Rodrigo Sandoval Boburg

Background/Objectives: Impella support is increasingly utilized as a crucial bridge to durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock. However, the transvalvular path of the Impella catheter raises concerns regarding mechanical trauma, potentially precipitating or accelerating aortic regurgitation (AR). We aimed to characterize the complete longitudinal trajectory of AR following Impella bridge-to-LVAD and to determine its association with clinical and hemodynamic sequelae. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study including all patients bridged from Impella to durable LVAD between 2013 and 2024 (n = 19). At Impella initiation, all patients met the retrospective SCAI shock stage D or worse criteria. At LVAD implantation, all patients were classified as INTERMACS 1–2 (INTERMACS 2, n = 13). The Impella models were 5.0 in 11 (axillary access), 2.5 in 5 (femoral access), and CP in 3 (femoral access); no periprocedural Impella complications were recorded. The implanted LVAD systems were HeartMate II (n = 7), HVAD (n = 3), and HeartMate III (n = 9). Patients undergoing concomitant aortic valve intervention were excluded. Transthoracic/TEE echocardiography was performed at prespecified time points (pre-Impella, pre-LVAD, post-LVAD discharge, 12 months, and 24 months) with standardized aortic regurgitation (AR) grading. Right ventricular (RV) function was assessed qualitatively when quantitative indices (TAPSE) were unavailable. Primary endpoints were new or progressive AR and AR severity at LVAD implantation. Secondary endpoints included survival, renal dysfunction, biomarkers, and rehospitalization. Univariate analyses were used to compare outcomes according to AR severity. Results: Nineteen patients (68% male, median age 57 years, IQR 47–60) underwent Impella support for 13.3 ± 9.9 days before HeartMate 3 (84%) or HVAD (16%) implantation. All patients had competent aortic valves (grade 0 AR) at the time of LVAD implantation. AR ≥ mild developed in 9/18 (50%) at discharge, 12/15 (80%) at 12 months, and 13/15 (87%) at 24 months, and 8/15 (53%) progressed to ≥ moderate AR by 24 months. Patients with moderate-to-severe AR had higher NT-proBNP levels at 12 months (median 6318 vs. 2336 pg/mL, p = 0.137). Thirty-day and 24-month survival rates were 95% and 79%, respectively. Conclusions: Aortic regurgitation frequently develops or progresses from the pre-LVAD period to follow-up in patients bridged from Impella to durable LVAD. Although limited by a small sample size and incomplete quantitative RV metrics, these observations support structured echocardiographic surveillance after Impella use and management strategies—routine valve inspection at LVAD implantation and post-LVAD speed/blood pressure targets that encourage aortic valve opening—to mitigate the risk and clinical impact of aortic regurgitation.

Background: In advanced heart failure patients implanted with a fully magnetically levitated HeartMate 3 (HM3) Abbott left ventricular assist device (LVAD), it is unknown how the role of the LVAD outpatient clinic may affect the long-term survival after hospital discharge. Our objective is to share our standardized protocol for outpatient care, to describe the role of the LVAD outpatient clinic in postoperative long-term care after LVAD implantation, and to report survival. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients implanted with HM3 LVAD in our institute between September 2015 and January 2025. Patients who received HeartWare Ventricular Assist Device (HVAD) and HeartMate 2 LVAD devices were excluded from our study, to ensure a homogenous cohort focusing on the latest and the only currently used LVAD device generation. We included a total of 48 patients. After LVAD patients are discharged from our center, they are followed in our outpatient clinic in 3-month intervals. During visits, bloodwork, EKG, wound inspection, and echocardiography are performed in addition to LVAD analysis. The role of the outpatient clinic is to detect early signs of deterioration or problems and act accordingly to prevent serious complications. Results: Thirty-three patients (68.7%) are still alive in 2025; two patients (4.2%) had a successful heart transplantation; and thirty-one patients (64.5%) are still on LVAD support. There were 210 total patient years of support. The mean time on device is 4.4 years. During the follow-up period we noticed 15 deaths (31.3%). Notably, there was no technical device-related death. Kaplan–Meier analysis estimated an overall survival rate of 97.9%, 92.8%, 83.7%, and 51.1% at 1, 2, 4, and 8 years, respectively. Conclusion: Strict control of patients after discharge in an outpatient clinic is essential for the long-term survival of these patients. A well-structured outpatient program is of utter importance to avoid LVAD-related complications and should be a cornerstone for the treatment, especially in non-transplant centers.

Background: The yearly number of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantations is approximately twice the number of heart transplantations (HTX) in Germany. As the number of patients with an LVAD installed grows, so does the likelihood of their presentation to the emergency room (ER). Due to uneasiness in identifying their primary complaint, ER personnel are often likely to overlook important clues in the treatment of patients with an LVAD. Methods: To assess the urgency of patients’ conditions and their relationship with LVADs, we retrospectively examined the ER admissions of patients with HeartMate 3^TM (HM 3) LVADs installed between 2014 and 2024 at our university medical center. We counted referrals to the peripheral ward (minor) and to the intensive care unit (ICU, major). Relation to LVAD relation was also recorded. The survival was analyzed with respect to the severity of the cause of admission (minor/major) and the relationship to the LVAD therapy. Results: We observed 100 presentations to the emergency department. Of these, 77 were minor and 23 were major. The majority (92) was not related to the LVAD. Of the eight admissions related to the LVAD, two were major adverse events, accounting only for 2% of the total cases. Conclusions: An ER presentation of a patient with an HM 3 is very likely to have a medical cause not related to the LVAD. LVAD-related causes were mostly minor and could be treated on the ward.

Objectives: Perfusion strategy is crucial for the outcome of neonatal aortic arch surgery. This study investigates Whole-Body Perfusion to potentially improve postoperative outcomes for neonates, addressing a significant gap in current research. Methods: Retrospective analysis was conducted for neonates receiving aortic arch reconstruction in our institution: 33 patients were treated with Antegrade Cerebral Perfusion (ACP, 2014–2017) and 61 patients with Whole-Body Perfusion (WBP, 2017–2022). After strict Propensity Score Matching, 20 patients were analyzed in each group. WBP consists of ACP and Lower Body Perfusion (LBP), achieved through a femoral arterial sheath. Results: Patients with WBP had a shorter time on Cardiopulmonary Bypass (86.65 ± 25.47 vs. 172.95 ± 60.12 min) and Cross-Clamp time (46.70 ± 18.48 vs. 91.30 ± 40.10 min) (p ≤ 0.001). Lactate at the time of reperfusion and after 24 h was lower in the WBP group (1.73 ± 0.63 vs. 4.29 ± 1.61, p < 0.001; 1.45 ± 0.57 vs. 2.09 ± 0.96 mmol/L, p = 0.026). Patients with WBP needed significantly fewer intraoperative transfusions of Red Blood Cells, Fresh Frozen Plasma and Platelets (p ≤ 0.001). WBP patients had a shorter time on ventilator (5.15 ± 4.05 vs. 10.00 ± 8.72 days, p = 0.01) and a higher urine output after 24 h (200.85 ± 100.87 vs. 118.10 ± 82.33 mL, p = 0.002). Conclusions: Patients treated with WBP received significantly fewer intraoperative transfusions and had a shorter time on extracorporeal circulation and ventilator. Furthermore, there was a trend for reduced multiorgan dysfunction.

Background: Neonatal aortic arch surgery remains one of the most challenging procedures in congenital cardiac surgery. In recent years, there has been a trend away from selective cerebral perfusion (SCP) and arrest of body circulation towards whole-body perfusion (WBP), a combination of SCP and lower-body perfusion (LBP), to facilitate arch surgery and preserve organ function. Methods: Retrospective, single-centre analysis was conducted of patients under one year of age undergoing aortic arch surgery from January 2014 until December 2022. SCP was used from January 2014—December 2017; WBP was implemented from January 2017—December 2022. Patients were separated according to the type of perfusion used during surgery, SCP or WBP. The cohort consisted of a total of 95 patients, 34 in the SCP group and 61 in the WBP group. Results: Patients in the WBP group showed significantly lower rates of intraoperative transfusions, namely red blood cells, fresh-frozen plasma and thrombocytes (p-value < 0.01, p-value = 0.02, p-value 0.01). Binary logistic regression analyses showed favourable outcomes for the WBP group regarding 30-day mortality (OR = 0.03, CI = 0.003–0.391, p-value = p-value = 0.01), neurological complications (OR = 0.994, CI = 0.998–1, p-value = 0.06) and postoperative renal replacement therapy (RRT) (OR = 0.989, CI = 0.983–0.995, p-value = <0.01). Conclusions: Patients with WBP received fewer intraoperative transfusions, showed improved postoperative renal function and suffered significantly fewer neurological complications.

Background: End-stage heart failure is associated with high mortality. Recent developments such as the left ventricular assist device (LVAD) have improved patient outcomes. The HeartMate 3 LVAD is a novel centrifugal pump that was developed to provide hemodynamic support in heart failure patients, either as a bridge-to-transplant (BTT), myocardial recovery, or destination therapy (DT). Our objective was to evaluate the survival rates and LVAD-related complications of the HeartMate 3 LVAD before and after hospital discharge in our center. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients implanted with the HeartMate 3 LVAD in our institute between September 2015 and June 2024. Patients who received a Heart Ware Ventricular Assist Device (HVAD) and HeartMate 2 LVAD devices were excluded. The primary endpoint was survival before and after hospital discharge. The secondary endpoints included an incidence of serious LVAD adverse events (bleeding, major infection, hemolysis, device thrombosis and malfunction, and neurological dysfunction) and the causes of re-admission along the follow-up period. Results: A total of 48 consecutive HeartMate 3 LVAD patients were enrolled in this study. The mean age was 56.1 ± 10.6 years. A total of 72.9% of patients received LVAD therapy as a BTT, 14.6% as DT, 10.4% as a bridge-to-decision, and 2.1% as a bridge-to-recovery. A total of 85.4% of patients were discharged after implantation. The main cause for in-hospital mortality was right ventricular failure (8.3%), followed by stroke, abdominal bleeding, and multi-organ failure (2.1% each). One patient (2.1%) had successful heart transplantation, 26 patients (63.4%) are still on LVAD support, and 11 (26.8%) patients have died during follow-up. The main cause of mortality after hospital discharge was sepsis, which occurred in 9.8% of patients, followed by right ventricular failure, non-LVAD-related causes, unknown causes with two (4.9%) cases each, and one case of fatal stroke (2.4%). During the follow-up, there was no need for LVAD replacement. Conclusions: HeartMate 3 LVAD is associated with excellent in-hospital survival rates in patients with end-stage heart failure. Right ventricular failure was the main cause of death before hospital discharge, whereas sepsis was the main cause of death after hospital discharge.

Background/Objectives: The demographic shift towards an aging population necessitates a reevaluation of surgical interventions like coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in octogenarians. This study aims to elucidate the outcomes of CABG in octogenarians with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), a group traditionally considered at high risk for such procedures. Methods: Conducted across four academic hospitals in Germany from 2017 to 2023, this retrospective multicenter study assessed 100 patients (50 octogenarians ≥80 years and 50 non-octogenarians p = 0.759). Mortality rates were similar across groups (7% each, p = 1.000), as were occurrences of postoperative myocardial infarction (2% each, p = 1.000) and stroke (3% total). Secondary outcomes like delirium (17% total, no significant age group difference, p = 0.755), acute kidney injury (18% total, p = 0.664), and the need for dialysis (14% total, p = 1.000) also showed no differences between age groups. Interestingly, non-octogenarians required more packed red blood cells during their stay (p = 0.008), while other postoperative care metrics, such as hospital and ICU length of stay and ventilation hours, were comparable across groups. Conclusion: This multicenter study highlights that CABG is a viable and safe surgical option for octogenarians with HFrEF, challenging prior assumptions about the elevated risks associated with performing this procedure in older patients. The absence of significant differences in the incidence of MACCEs and other postoperative complications across age groups emphasizes the importance of careful patient selection and perioperative management. These findings advocate for a more inclusive approach to surgical treatment for octogenarians with HFrEF, suggesting that age alone should not be a determinant for CABG eligibility. This study contributes critical insights into optimizing care for a high-risk demographic, indicating a need for tailored guidelines that accommodate the aging population with complex cardiac conditions.

Objective: This study assesses predictors for postoperative delirium (POD) and ICU stay durations in HFrEF patients undergoing CABG, focusing on ONCAB versus OPCAB surgical methods. Summary Background Data: In cardiac surgery, especially CABG, POD significantly impacts patient recovery and healthcare resource utilization. With varying incidences based on surgical techniques, this study provides an in-depth analysis of POD in the context of HFrEF patients, a group particularly susceptible to this complication. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 572 patients who underwent isolated CABG surgery with a preoperative ejection fraction under 40% was conducted at four German university hospitals. Patients were categorized into ONCAB and OPCAB groups for comparative analysis. Results: Age and Euro Score II were significant predictors of POD. The ONCAB group showed higher incidences of re-sternotomy (OR: 3.37), ECLS requirement (OR: 2.29), and AKI (OR: 1.49), whereas OPCAB was associated with a lower incidence of delirium. Statistical analysis indicated a significant difference in ICU stay durations between the two groups, influenced by surgical complexity and postoperative complications. Conclusions: This study underscores the importance of surgical technique in determining postoperative outcomes in HFrEF patients undergoing CABG. OPCAB may offer advantages in reducing POD incidence. These findings suggest the need for tailored surgical decisions and comprehensive care strategies to enhance patient recovery and optimize healthcare resources.

Background: This retrospective multicenter study investigates the impact of obesity on short-term surgical outcomes in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Given the rising global prevalence of obesity and its known cardiovascular implications, understanding its specific effects in high-risk groups like HFrEF patients is crucial. Methods: The study analyzed data from 574 patients undergoing CABG across four German university hospitals from 2017 to 2023. Patients were stratified into ‘normal weight’ (n = 163) and ‘obese’ (n = 158) categories based on BMI (WHO classification). Data on demographics, clinical measurements, health status, cardiac history, intraoperative management, postoperative outcomes, and laboratory insights were collected and analyzed using Chi-square, ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis, and binary logistic regression. Results: Key findings are a significant higher mortality rate (6.96% vs. 3.68%, p = 0.049) and younger age in obese patients (mean age 65.84 vs. 69.15 years, p = 0.003). Gender distribution showed no significant difference. Clinical assessment scores like EuroScore II and STS Score indicated no differences. Paradoxically, the preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was higher in the obese group (32.04% vs. 30.34%, p = 0.026). The prevalence of hypertension, COPD, hyperlipidemia, and other comorbidities did not significantly differ. Intraoperatively, obese patients required more packed red blood cells (p = 0.026), indicating a greater need for transfusion. Postoperatively, the obese group experienced longer hospital stays (median 14 vs. 13 days, p = 0.041) and higher ventilation times (median 16 vs. 13 h, p = 0.049). The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) (17.72% vs. 9.20%, p = 0.048) and delirium (p = 0.016) was significantly higher, while, for diabetes prevalence, there was an indicating a trend towards significance (p = 0.051) in the obesity group, while other complications like sepsis, and the need for ECLS were similar across groups. Conclusions: The study reveals that obesity significantly worsens short-term outcomes in HFrEF patients undergoing CABG, increasing risks like mortality, kidney insufficiency, and postoperative delirium. These findings highlight the urgent need for personalized care, from surgical planning to postoperative strategies, to improve outcomes for this high-risk group, urging further tailored research.