Ikumasa Yoshida
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Ikumasa Yoshida has a total of 52 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Yosuke Tasaki
Faculty of Architecture and Urban Design, Department of Urban and Civil Engineering, Tokyo City University, Tokyo, Japan
5 shared publications- Jianye Ching
National Taiwan University
4 shared publications - Yu Otake
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
4 shared publications Yukihisa Tomizawa
4 shared publicationsHidehiko Sekiya
3 shared publications- Samim Mustafa
Indian Institute of Technology (BHU)
3 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 19 October 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Computers and Geotechnics
- Vol. 177
What defines a “site” in geotechnical engineering?: A comparative study between local and global big indirect databases
- 19 October 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Computers and Geotechnics
- Vol. 177
Open AccessWhat defines a “site” in geotechnical engineering?: A comparative study between local and global big indirect databases
- 27 May 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Computers and Geotechnics
- Vol. 160
Estimation of engineering bedrock layer utilizing ground surface elevation in Gaussian process regression
- 27 May 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Computers and Geotechnics
- Vol. 160
Estimation of engineering bedrock layer utilizing ground surface elevation in Gaussian process regression
- 26 April 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Structural Safety
- Vol. 103
Bridge weigh-in-motion considering dynamic response in observation noise with application to multiple driving conditions
- 26 April 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Structural Safety
- Vol. 103
Bridge weigh-in-motion considering dynamic response in observation noise with application to multiple driving conditions
- 1 March 2023
- Published by American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) in ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
- Vol. 9 (1) , 04022064
Data-Drive Site Characterization for Benchmark Examples: Sparse Bayesian Learning versus Gaussian Process Regression
In this paper, two data-drive site characterization methods, the sparse Bayesian learning (SBL) method and the Gaussian process regression (GPR) method, are benchmarked by a set of virtual ground examples and a real ground example of cone penetration test (CPT) data. The two methods both assume a zero-mean prior Gaussian random field model for the spatial trend, but the strategies of maintaining model simplicity are different. The SBL method produces a simple trend model by adopting sparse basis functions, whereas the GPR method produces a simple trend model by adopting a kernel function governed by few hyperparameters. The accuracy of the two methods in predicting the cone tip resistance ( ) of CPT was quantified by the root-mean square prediction error (RMSE), whereas the accuracy in identifying soil layers was quantified by the identification rate (IR). It was found that the GPR method in general outperforms the SBL method. Further accuracy improvement for the GPR method can be obtained if a clustering analysis based on the Robertson’s soil behavior index ( ) is conducted.- 1 March 2023
- Published by American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) in ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
- Vol. 9 (1) , 04022064
Data-Drive Site Characterization for Benchmark Examples: Sparse Bayesian Learning versus Gaussian Process Regression
In this paper, two data-drive site characterization methods, the sparse Bayesian learning (SBL) method and the Gaussian process regression (GPR) method, are benchmarked by a set of virtual ground examples and a real ground example of cone penetration test (CPT) data. The two methods both assume a zero-mean prior Gaussian random field model for the spatial trend, but the strategies of maintaining model simplicity are different. The SBL method produces a simple trend model by adopting sparse basis functions, whereas the GPR method produces a simple trend model by adopting a kernel function governed by few hyperparameters. The accuracy of the two methods in predicting the cone tip resistance ( ) of CPT was quantified by the root-mean square prediction error (RMSE), whereas the accuracy in identifying soil layers was quantified by the identification rate (IR). It was found that the GPR method in general outperforms the SBL method. Further accuracy improvement for the GPR method can be obtained if a clustering analysis based on the Robertson’s soil behavior index ( ) is conducted.- 9 February 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Structural Safety
- Vol. 102
Bayesian updating of model parameters using adaptive Gaussian process regression and particle filter
- 9 February 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Structural Safety
- Vol. 102
Bayesian updating of model parameters using adaptive Gaussian process regression and particle filter
- 2 January 2023
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards
- Vol. 17 (1) , 77-97
Data-driven approximation of geotechnical dynamics to an equivalent single-degree-of-freedom vibration system based on dynamic mode decomposition
The application of data science technologies in geotechnical and earthquake engineering is a hot topic. This study aimed to identify the macroscopic dynamic properties of the soil from the previous records of seismic motions observed at the ground surface utilizing the dynamic mode decomposition (DMD). The key to our ingenuity was to replace the soil layer composition and dynamic properties with a single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) vibration model based on the ground surface observation records. In the validation process, first, a comparison was made between the proposed method and the analytical solution for an SDOF vibration system; second, a comparison was made with a one-dimensional equivalent linear multiple reflection theory analysis considering the nonlinear soil profile. The proposed method effectively approximated complex ground profiles to an equivalent SDOF vibration system and constructed shear strain-dependent models of the macroscopic pseudo-shear modulus and damping constant from the observed ground surface seismic motions. This study was based on numerical experiments and limited conditions of small seismic amplitudes for which equivalent linear approximations could be made. Based on the results obtained in this paper, we aim to extend the model to wide-area forecasting by improving it to a practical model that covers strong nonlinearities.
- 2 January 2023
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards
- Vol. 17 (1) , 77-97
Data-driven approximation of geotechnical dynamics to an equivalent single-degree-of-freedom vibration system based on dynamic mode decomposition
The application of data science technologies in geotechnical and earthquake engineering is a hot topic. This study aimed to identify the macroscopic dynamic properties of the soil from the previous records of seismic motions observed at the ground surface utilizing the dynamic mode decomposition (DMD). The key to our ingenuity was to replace the soil layer composition and dynamic properties with a single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) vibration model based on the ground surface observation records. In the validation process, first, a comparison was made between the proposed method and the analytical solution for an SDOF vibration system; second, a comparison was made with a one-dimensional equivalent linear multiple reflection theory analysis considering the nonlinear soil profile. The proposed method effectively approximated complex ground profiles to an equivalent SDOF vibration system and constructed shear strain-dependent models of the macroscopic pseudo-shear modulus and damping constant from the observed ground surface seismic motions. This study was based on numerical experiments and limited conditions of small seismic amplitudes for which equivalent linear approximations could be made. Based on the results obtained in this paper, we aim to extend the model to wide-area forecasting by improving it to a practical model that covers strong nonlinearities.
- Open Access
- 1 January 2023
- Published by Japan Society of Civil Engineers in Japanese Journal of JSCE
- Vol. 79 (15) , 22-15013
REAL-TIME RECONSTRUCTION SIMULATION BASED ON AUTONOMOUS BASIS FUNCTION SELECTION
近年,大規模災害に対するインフラ施設のレジリエンス性向上の重要性が指摘されている.本研究は,構造物設計側からレジリエンス性能向上へ貢献するためのモニタリング設計法の構築を試みている.液状化懸念層上の盛土の地震時挙動評価を例題として,観測点最適化法および適応型即時予測法の基本的な枠組みを提案している.数値解析結果から対象施設の空間モード関数群を導き,空間モード関数群の特性を有効活用した簡易法を提案している.観測点最適化では,QR-pivoting による貪欲法が工学的に有用な情報を提供することを確認した.適応型即時予測では,周辺尤度を用いて予測に用いる空間モード関数の数を即時に選択(モデル選択)した上で,カルマンフィルタにより構成係数を予測する方法を提案した.最後に,検証用入力地震動の数値解析結果と提案手法による適応型予測を比較した.提案手法は,入力地震動の特性に応じて,リアルタイムに適切なモデル選択を行い予測精度を向上させることを確認した.
- 1 January 2023
- Published by Japan Society of Civil Engineers in Japanese Journal of JSCE
- Vol. 79 (15) , 22-15013
Open AccessREAL-TIME RECONSTRUCTION SIMULATION BASED ON AUTONOMOUS BASIS FUNCTION SELECTION
近年,大規模災害に対するインフラ施設のレジリエンス性向上の重要性が指摘されている.本研究は,構造物設計側からレジリエンス性能向上へ貢献するためのモニタリング設計法の構築を試みている.液状化懸念層上の盛土の地震時挙動評価を例題として,観測点最適化法および適応型即時予測法の基本的な枠組みを提案している.数値解析結果から対象施設の空間モード関数群を導き,空間モード関数群の特性を有効活用した簡易法を提案している.観測点最適化では,QR-pivoting による貪欲法が工学的に有用な情報を提供することを確認した.適応型即時予測では,周辺尤度を用いて予測に用いる空間モード関数の数を即時に選択(モデル選択)した上で,カルマンフィルタにより構成係数を予測する方法を提案した.最後に,検証用入力地震動の数値解析結果と提案手法による適応型予測を比較した.提案手法は,入力地震動の特性に応じて,リアルタイムに適切なモデル選択を行い予測精度を向上させることを確認した.
- 5 December 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Computers and Geotechnics
- Vol. 154
Dealing with nonlattice spatially variable data contaminated by white noise using Kronecker-product formulation
- 5 December 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Computers and Geotechnics
- Vol. 154
Dealing with nonlattice spatially variable data contaminated by white noise using Kronecker-product formulation
- 1 December 2022
- Published by American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) in ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
- Vol. 8 (4) , 04022052
Benchmarking of Gaussian Process Regression with Multiple Random Fields for Spatial Variability Estimation
Benchmarking is very valuable for evaluating and comparing methodologies. Here, Gaussian process regression using multiple Gaussian random fields (GPR-MR) is applied to benchmarking data for spatial variability problems. The benchmarking data used were from the literature and included four types of virtual ground models (VG1 to VG4) and one real ground measurement data set. The spatial variability of geological properties is often divided into a trend component and a random component. In GPR-MR, the trend component is expressed by a random field with a large scale of fluctuation (SOF), leading to a smooth (slow) variability, whereas the random component is expressed by one with a small SOF, leading to a rapidly changing variability. The SOF and the standard deviation of random fields were estimated using the maximum likelihood method based on the measured data provided in the benchmarking data. GPR-MR was used to estimate the spatial variabilities of all cases, and its performance was evaluated. For the real ground measured data, model selection was also performed with respect to the autocorrelation function of the random component in terms of information criteria, whereas the Markovian autocorrelation function was used for the virtual ground data without the model selection. Based on the results, the Whittle-Matérn (WM) model was selected for the random component. GPR-MR was used to estimate the spatial variability, and its performance with the WM model was evaluated.
- 1 December 2022
- Published by American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) in ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering
- Vol. 8 (4) , 04022052
Benchmarking of Gaussian Process Regression with Multiple Random Fields for Spatial Variability Estimation
Benchmarking is very valuable for evaluating and comparing methodologies. Here, Gaussian process regression using multiple Gaussian random fields (GPR-MR) is applied to benchmarking data for spatial variability problems. The benchmarking data used were from the literature and included four types of virtual ground models (VG1 to VG4) and one real ground measurement data set. The spatial variability of geological properties is often divided into a trend component and a random component. In GPR-MR, the trend component is expressed by a random field with a large scale of fluctuation (SOF), leading to a smooth (slow) variability, whereas the random component is expressed by one with a small SOF, leading to a rapidly changing variability. The SOF and the standard deviation of random fields were estimated using the maximum likelihood method based on the measured data provided in the benchmarking data. GPR-MR was used to estimate the spatial variabilities of all cases, and its performance was evaluated. For the real ground measured data, model selection was also performed with respect to the autocorrelation function of the random component in terms of information criteria, whereas the Markovian autocorrelation function was used for the virtual ground data without the model selection. Based on the results, the Whittle-Matérn (WM) model was selected for the random component. GPR-MR was used to estimate the spatial variability, and its performance with the WM model was evaluated.