Sabrina Chelli

Purpose: To identify gender differences in (1) the coronal alignment of functional knee phenotypes and (2) the JLCA (joint line convergence angle) in relation to the phenotype classification.Methods: This study is a retrospective data analysis, including 12,099 osteoarthritic knee computed tomography (5025 male, 7074 female) analysed by Medacta software for hip‐knee‐ankle angle (HKA), femoral mechanical angle (FMA), tibial mechanical angle (TMA) and JLCA. The data were grouped into genders and combined according to the Functional Knee Phenotypes Classification.Results: Out of 127 phenotypes for males and 131 for females, 17 common phenotypes were reported. The commonest four were similar for both genders with VARHKA177° NEUFMA93° NEUTMA87° (9.8% males, 9.50% females), followed by VARHKA174° NEUFMA93°VARTMA84° (7.1%) and VARHKA174°VARFMA90° NEUTMA87° (7.0%) for males and VARHKA174° NEUFMA93° NEUTMA87° (6.1%), VARHKA174° NEUFMA93°VARTMA84° (5.1%) for females. The commonest FMA and TMA (91.5° to 94.5° and 85.5° to 88.5°, respectively) were the same for both genders, however, the rest of the male population observed greater femoral varus than the female population (p < 0.001). JLCA values ranged from −28.4° to 8.2° in the overall study population. Males and females had a mean JLCA of −2.96° (±2.6° SD) and −2.66° (±2.8°7 SD), respectively, p < 0.001.Conclusions: Gender differences exist within the osteoarthritic knee phenotype. The male varus phenotype is influenced by FMA, while TMA values are similar across genders. JLCA variations show similarities to both TMA and FMA, suggesting JLCA is influenced by bone morphology more than by gender. These differences inform surgical decision‐making for the personalised approach to the primary TKA.Level of Evidence: Level III.

Percutaneous sacroiliac fixation is an effective minimally invasive method for posterior pelvic ring stabilization. Screw misplacement, and subsequent neurologic injury are two well described complications. Managing those complications however is under-reported. A young female, sustained an unstable pelvic ring injury as a victim of motor vehicle collision. Following percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation, she complained of L5 nerve root radiculopathy, and muscle weakness. Percutaneous removal of the screw after a wait period for fracture union resulted in immediate symptoms relief. Safe sacroiliac screw placement is technically demanding requiring good understanding of sacral complex morphology and its anatomic variants. Risk of screw misplacement, and potential neurologic injury increases in dysmorphic sacra, or with inaccurate fracture reduction. Advances in intraoperative imaging modalities have been introduced in an attempt to improve accurate screw insertion. Literature is scarce with reports discussing removal of sacroiliac screw. Technique of screw retrieval is also controversial. This case addresses management of an iatrogenic neurologic complication following percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation. Our experience showed that, percutaneous retrieval of an intact misplaced sacroiliac screw is achievable, resulting in complete resolution of neurologic symptoms.