AJAli Judd

Ali Judd

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Ali Judd has a total of 680 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Standards adoption as a bottleneck for pandemic preparedness: empirical evidence and funder recommendations from a cross-sectional survey of European emerging infectious disease consortia (Preprint)

    by Lauren Maxwell, Priya Shreedhar, Victoria Charlotte Simensen, Lennie Derde, Ali Judd, Heather Hufstedler, Thomas Jaenisch, Marco Hirsch, Anita Müller, Alessandro Visentin, et al.

    BACKGROUND Rapid research responses to emerging infectious disease (EID) outbreaks depend not only on how quickly studies are launched, but also on whether their data can be combined, compared, and reused across studies. Health data standards, including shared vocabularies, terminology, and information models, are the structural prerequisite for interoperable, findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable (FAIR) data. Despite European Commission (EC) investments exceeding €130 million across the EID cohort and clinical trial consortia coordinated through the Cohort Coordination Board (CCB) and Trial Coordination Board (TCB), little empirical evidence exists on the extent to which these consortia adopt standards, the barriers they face, or what funders could do to improve implementation. OBJECTIVE To characterise health data standards adoption across EC-funded EID consortia, identify the barriers that prevent uptake, and generate evidence-based recommendations for funders to strengthen standards implementation for the rapid reuse of interoperable participant-level data in epidemic detection and response. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional online survey May 2023-Feb 2024, developed through a literature review and stakeholder consultation, with CCB and TCB-affiliated EC-funded EID consortia. Research networks and consortia outside these boards could participate if forwarded the survey. We collected information on consortium characteristics, standards use, barriers to adoption, awareness of EC-supported standardisation initiatives, and recommendations for improving uptake. Responses were analysed descriptively; open-text responses were categorised thematically. RESULTS Thirty-three responses, representing 15 consortia or research networks spanning over 40 countries were collected. Most responses came from cohort consortia. Adoption of data standards was limited. The most frequently used standards were ICD codes (n=10) and the Systematised Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (n=9); 7 respondents reported not using standards. The main barriers were insufficient experience applying standards (n=17), lack of budget (n=12), uncertainty about which standard to use (n=12), uncertainty about which standards related studies used (n=9), and inadequate tools (n=9). Awareness of EC initiatives designed to support standards adoption was strikingly low, suggesting that EC investment in standards support is not reaching its intended audience. Respondents recommended dedicated budgets, clearer guidance on preferred standards by data type, better communication of the benefits of standards adoption, stronger tooling, and funder mandates. CONCLUSIONS Health data standards are underused across European EID consortia, representing a preventable bottleneck for pandemic preparedness despite substantial public investment. European funders can address this through the following actions recommended by major EC-funded EID Consortia: mandating dedicated standards budgets at the grant submission stage, issuing formal guidance on preferred standards by data type, investing in open-source tooling that delivers value to data generators, requiring machine-actionable data management plans, and establishing a public registry of standards adopted by funded consortia. Strengthening coordinated standards adoption is a necessary and achievable step toward the FAIR, interoperable research data infrastructure that effective pandemic response demands. CLINICALTRIAL Not applicable.

  • Open Access

    Effectiveness and safety of darunavir and lopinavir for treating children and adolescents living with HIV: a systematic review

    by John O’ROurke, Claire L. Townsend, Edith Milanzi, Hannah Castro, Intira Jeannie Collins, Ali Judd, Julie Jesson, Valériane Leroy, Martina Penazzato, Marissa Vicari, et al.

    Darunavir and lopinavir solid formulations are recommended protease inhibitors for treating HIV. An evidence review of their effectiveness/efficacy and saf

  • Open Access

    Effectiveness and Safety of Direct-acting Antivirals for Treatment of Adolescents With HCV/HIV Coinfection: Real-world Data From Europe

    by Farihah Malik, Siobhan Crichton, Yulia Plotnikova, Inga Latysheva, Anna Samarina, Maria Pokorska-Śpiewak, Marisa Navarro Gomez, Heather Bailey, Claire Thorne, Ali Judd, et al.

    We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of direct-acting antivirals in adolescents with hepatitis C (HCV)/HIV coinfection using pooled individual patient-level data from 5 European cohorts. Of 122 participants in follow-up from November 2013 to August 2021, 19 were treated <18 years of age; of 15 with HCV RNA available at/after 12 weeks post-treatment, all had sustained virologic response with acceptable safety. This evidence addresses an important gap in knowledge of treatment outcomes in adolescents with HCV/HIV coinfection in real-life settings.


  • Open Access

    Beliefs about antiretroviral therapy and their association with adherence in young people living with perinatal HIV in England: a cross-sectional analysis

    by Iona White, Ali Judd, Hannah Castro, Elizabeth Chappell, on behalf of the Adolescents and Adults Living with Perinatal HIV (AALPHI) Steering Committee

    This cross-sectional analysis aimed to describe beliefs about antiretroviral therapy (ART) in young people living with perinatal HIV (PHIV) in England, and the association between these beliefs and adherence to ART. The Beliefs About Medicine Questionnaire (Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy version), was used to measure participants' beliefs in the necessity of ("Necessity score") and concerns regarding ("Concerns score") ART. Participants were classified as having high/low total scores using midpoints of the score scales. Associations between beliefs and being Last Month Adherent (LMA; self-reported not missing more than 2 consecutive ART doses in the month prior to the interview) were analysed using logistic regression, adjusting for sociodemographic, clinical, and psychosocial variables. Of 247 PHIV (median age = 18.6 years), 158 (64%) were LMA. 224 (91%) had a high Necessity score and 54 (22%) a high Concerns score. There was no association between high Necessity score and LMA in multivariable analysis (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.34-5.28, p = 0.679); however, high Concerns score was independently associated with a reduced odds of being LMA (aOR = 0.19, CI = 0.07-0.47, p < 0.001). Interventions to address the concerns young people living with PHIV have about ART should be explored as a strategy to improve their adherence.


  • Acceptability of hepatitis C screening and treatment during pregnancy in pregnant women in Egypt, Pakistan, and Ukraine: A cross-sectional survey

    by Karen Scott, Elizabeth Chappell, Aya Mostafa, Alla Volokha, Nida Najmi, Fatma Ebeid, Svitlana Posokhova, Raheel Sikandar, Marta Vasylyev, Saima Zulfiqar, et al.

    Chronic hepatitis C (HCV) in women of childbearing age is a major public health concern with ∼15 million women aged 15–49 years living with HCV globally in 2019. Evidence suggests HCV in pregnancy is associated with adverse pregnancy and infant outcomes. This includes ∼6% risk of infants acquiring HCV vertically, and this is the leading cause of HCV in children globally. However, few countries offer routine universal antenatal HCV screening, and direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are not approved for pregnant or breastfeeding women although small clinical trials are ongoing. We conducted a survey of pregnant and postpartum women in 3 high HCV burden lower-middle-income countries to assess the acceptability of universal antenatal HCV screening and DAA treatment in the scenario that DAAs are approved for use in pregnancy. Pregnant and postpartum women attending antenatal clinics in Egypt, Pakistan, and Ukraine were invited to complete a survey and provide demographic and clinical data on their HCV status. Among the 630 women included (n=210 per country), 73% were pregnant and 27% postpartum, 27% were ever HCV antibody or PCR positive. Overall, 586 (93%) reported acceptability of universal antenatal HCV screening and 544 (88%) would take DAAs in pregnancy (92%, 98%, and 73% in Egypt, Pakistan, and Ukraine, respectively). Most said they would take DAAs in pregnancy to prevent vertical acquisition and other risks for the baby, and a smaller proportion would take DAAs for maternal cure. Our findings suggest that should DAAs be approved for use in pregnancy, the uptake of both HCV screening and DAA treatment may be high in women living in lower-middle–income countries. Export {"href":"Single Video Player","role":"media-player-id","content-type":"play-in-place","position":"float","orientation":"portrait","label":"","caption":"","object-id":[{"pub-id-type":"doi","id":""},{"pub-id-type":"other","content-type":"media-stream-id","id":"1_wb6lzldz"},{"pub-id-type":"other","content-type":"media-source","id":"Kaltura"}]}


  • Open Access

    Effectiveness and safety of tenofovir alafenamide in children and adolescents living with HIV: a systematic review

    by John O'ROurke, Claire L. Townsend, Edith Milanzi, Intira Jeannie Collins, Hannah Castro, Ali Judd, Marissa Vicari, Julie Jesson, Valériane Leroy, Martina Penazzato, et al.

    Introduction: Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) is approved for paediatric use in fixed‐dose combination tablets, but efficacy and safety data in children are limited. We conducted a systematic review on the efficacy/effectiveness and safety of TAF in infants, children and adolescents living with HIV.Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, clinical trial registries, reference lists and relevant conferences to identify literature published January 2009–March 2021. We included clinical trials and observational studies assessing the efficacy/effectiveness or safety of TAF through ≥6 months of treatment in participants aged 0–19 years.Results and discussion: Overall 3626 abstracts and 371 full papers were screened. Four single‐arm, innovator‐funded trials (341 participants) and a pooled analysis of those trials were identified. All four trials included treatment‐experienced and virally suppressed children or adolescents. One trial also included treatment‐naïve adolescents with baseline viral load >1000 copies/ml. The risk of bias was rated as low in one study and unclear in the other three owing to missing data on study design (all conference presentations). At 48 weeks, 92% (46/50) of treatment‐naïve participants were virally suppressed (one trial). Among treatment‐experienced participants with viral load at 48 weeks, 214 of 224 participants were virally suppressed. Across the studies, one grade 3/4 adverse event was considered drug‐related (intermediate uveitis). There were three discontinuations for adverse events (grade 2 anxiety and insomnia, grade 1 iridocyclitis [drug‐related] and grade 1 pulmonary tuberculosis [unrelated to treatment]). One accidental death occurred across the four studies. In the pooled analysis of 223 participants, the median change in bone mineral density z‐score (height‐ and age‐adjusted) from baseline to 48 weeks was −0.12 (interquartile range [IQR] −0.46, 0.17) to 0.05 (IQR not reported) for spine, and −0.09 (IQR −0.33, 0.07) to 0.09 (IQR not reported) for total body less head. Weight‐for‐age z‐scores increased by 0.25 from baseline to 48 weeks.Conclusions: Four single‐arm trials were identified in this systematic review, with initial evidence suggesting good viral suppression and no obvious safety concerns in children and adolescents on TAF‐containing regimens over 24–48 weeks. However, further comparative and longer‐term safety data are needed in children and adolescents, including on weight and metabolic changes.


  • Open Access

    Effectiveness and safety of dolutegravir and raltegravir for treating children and adolescents living with HIV: a systematic review

    by Claire L. Townsend, John O'ROurke, Edith Milanzi, Intira Jeannie Collins, Ali Judd, Hannah Castro, Marissa Vicari, Julie Jesson, Valériane Leroy, Françoise Renaud, et al.

    Introduction: Globally about 1.7 million children were living with HIV in 2020. Two integrase strand transfer inhibitors, dolutegravir and raltegravir, are increasingly used in children. We conducted a systematic review to assess the effectiveness and safety of dolutegravir and raltegravir in children and adolescents living with HIV, aged 0–19 years.Methods: Sources included MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, clinical trial registries, abstracts from key conferences and reference list searching. Observational studies and clinical trials published January 2009–March 2021 were eligible. Outcomes included efficacy/effectiveness (CD4 counts and viral load) and/or safety outcomes (mortality, grade 3/4 adverse events and treatment discontinuation) through 6 months or more post‐treatment initiation. Risk of bias was assessed using previously published tools appropriate for the study design. Narrative syntheses were conducted.Results and discussion: In total, 3626 abstracts and 371 papers were screened. Eleven studies, including 2330 children/adolescents, reported data on dolutegravir: one randomized controlled trial (RCT; low risk of bias), one single‐arm trial (unclear risk of bias) and nine cohort studies (three low risk of bias, two unclear risk and four high risk). Ten studies, including 649 children/adolescents receiving raltegravir, were identified: one RCT (low risk of bias), one single‐arm trial (low risk of bias) and eight cohort studies (four low risk of bias, three unclear risk and one high risk). Viral suppression levels in children/adolescents at 12 months were high (>70%) in most studies assessing dolutegravir (mostly second‐ or subsequent‐line, or mixed treatment lines), and varied from 42% (5/12) to 83% (44/53) at 12 months in studies assessing raltegravir (mostly second‐ or subsequent‐line). Across all studies assessing dolutegravir or raltegravir, grade 3/4 adverse events (clinical and/or laboratory) were reported in 0–50% of subjects, few resulted in discontinuation, few were drug related and no deaths were attributed to either drug.Conclusions: These reassuring findings suggest that dolutegravir and raltegravir are effective and safe as preferred regimens in children and adolescents living with HIV. With the rollout of dolutegravir in paediatric populations already underway, it is critical that data are collected on safety and effectiveness in infants, children and adolescents, including on longer‐term outcomes, such as weight and metabolic changes.


  • Open Access

    Learning and memory function in young people with and without perinatal HIV in England

    by Alejandro Arenas-Pinto, Ali Judd, Diane Melvin, Marthe Le Prevost, Caroline Foster, Kate Sturgeon, Alan Winston, Lindsay C. Thompson, Diana M. Gibb, Hannah Castro, et al.

    Learning and memory are important for successful education and career progression. We assess these functions in young people (YP) with perinatal HIV (PHIV) (with or without a previous AIDS-defining illness) and a comparable group of HIV-negative YP. 234 PHIV and 68 HIV-negative YP completed 9 tests; 5 National Institutes of Health (NIH) Toolbox tests (2 executive function, 1 speed of information processing, 2 memory); 2 Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Revised (HVLT-R) (learning (L), delayed recall (R)), and 2 verbal application measures. Z-scores for each test were calculated using normative data and averaged by domain where appropriate. The effect of predictors on test scores in the three domains with the lowest z-scores were analysed using linear regression. 139(59%) and 48(71%) PHIV and HIV-negative YP were female, 202(86%) and 52(76%) Black, and median age was 19 [17, 21] and 18 [16, 21] years respectively. 55(24%) PHIV had a previous Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) class C AIDS-defining diagnosis (PHIV/C). For HVLT-R, there was a trend towards PHIV/C YP having the lowest mean z-scores (L -1.5 (95% CI -1.8,-1.2), R -1.7 (-2.0,-1.4)) followed by PHIV without a CDC C diagnosis (L -1.3 (-1.4,-1.1), R -1.4 (-1.5,-1.2)) and then the HIV-negative group (L -1.0 (-1.3,-0.7), R -1.1 (-1.3,-0.8)); all were greater than 1 SD below the reference mean. The same trend was seen for verbal application measures; however, z-scores were within 1 SD below the reference mean. NIH Toolbox tests were similar for all groups. In multivariable analyses PHIV/C and Black ethnicity predicted lower HVLT-R scores. Black ethnicity also predicted lower executive function scores, however each year increase in age predicted higher scores. In conclusion, cognitive performance in verbal learning and recall fell below population normative scores, and was more pronounced in PHIV/C, supporting wider findings that earlier antiretroviral therapy initiation, before the occurrence of AIDS-defining conditions, may protect aspects of cognitive development.


  • Open Access

    Growth and CD4 patterns of adolescents living with perinatally acquired HIV worldwide, a CIPHER cohort collaboration analysis

    by The Collaborative Initiative for Paediatric HIV Education and Research (CIPHER) Global Cohort Collaboration, Julie Jesson, Siobhan Crichton, Matteo Quartagno, Marcel Yotebieng, Elaine J. Abrams, Kulkanya Chokephaibulkit, Sophie Le Coeur, Marie‐Hélène Aké‐Assi, Kunjal Patel, et al.

    Introduction: Adolescents living with HIV are subject to multiple co‐morbidities, including growth retardation and immunodeficiency. We describe growth and CD4 evolution during adolescence using data from the Collaborative Initiative for Paediatric HIV Education and Research (CIPHER) global project.Methods: Data were collected between 1994 and 2015 from 11 CIPHER networks worldwide. Adolescents with perinatally acquired HIV infection (APH) who initiated antiretroviral therapy (ART) before age 10 years, with at least one height or CD4 count measurement while aged 10–17 years, were included. Growth was measured using height‐for‐age Z‐scores (HAZ, stunting if <‐2 SD, WHO growth charts). Linear mixed‐effects models were used to study the evolution of each outcome between ages 10 and 17. For growth, sex‐specific models with fractional polynomials were used to model non‐linear relationships for age at ART initiation, HAZ at age 10 and time, defined as current age from 10 to 17 years of age.Results: A total of 20,939 and 19,557 APH were included for the growth and CD4 analyses, respectively. Half were females, two‐thirds lived in East and Southern Africa, and median age at ART initiation ranged from 7 years in sub‐Saharan African regions. At age 10, stunting ranged from 6% in North America and Europe to 39% in the Asia‐Pacific; 19% overall had CD4 counts 3. Across adolescence, higher HAZ was observed in females and among those in high‐income countries. APH with stunting at age 10 and those with late ART initiation (after age 5) had the largest HAZ gains during adolescence, but these gains were insufficient to catch‐up with non‐stunted, early ART‐treated adolescents. From age 10 to 16 years, mean CD4 counts declined from 768 to 607 cells/mm3. This decline was observed across all regions, in males and females.Conclusions: Growth patterns during adolescence differed substantially by sex and region, while CD4 patterns were similar, with an observed CD4 decline that needs further investigation. Early diagnosis and timely initiation of treatment in early childhood to prevent growth retardation and immunodeficiency are critical to improving APH growth and CD4 outcomes by the time they reach adulthood.


  • Open Access

    Arterial Stiffness in a Cohort of Young People Living With Perinatal HIV and HIV Negative Young People in England

    by J. Mellin, M. Le Prevost, J. Kenny, K. Sturgeon, L. C. Thompson, C. Foster, H. H. Kessler, Nandu Goswami, N. Klein, A. Judd, et al.

    Background: Antiretroviral therapy (ART) has increased life expectancy and consequently the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in adults living with HIV. We investigated the levels and predictors of arterial stiffness in young people (YP) living with perinatal HIV (PHIV) and HIV negative YP in the Adolescents and Adults Living with Perinatal HIV (AALPHI) study.Methods: AALPHI was a prospective study evaluating the impact of HIV infection and exposure to ART on YP living with PHIV (aged 13–21 years) who had known their HIV status for at least 6 months, and HIV negative YP (aged 13–23 years) who either had a sibling, friend or parent living with HIV. Participants were enrolled from HIV clinics and community services in England. Two hundred and thirteen PHIV and 65 HIV negative YP (42% siblings of PHIV) had pulse wave velocity (PWV) measurements taken (Vicorder software) from the supra-sternal notch to the middle of the thigh cuff, at their second interview in the study between 2015 and 2017. Average PWV was calculated from the three closest readings (≥3 and ≤ 12 m/s) within 0.6 m/s of each other. Linear regression examined predictors of higher (worse) PWV, including age, sex, HIV status and height as a priori, ethnicity, born outside UK/Ireland, alcohol/nicotine/drug use, weight, waist-to-hip-ratio, mean arterial pressure (MAP), caffeine 2 h before PWV and nicotine on day of PWV. A separate PHIV model included CD4, viral load, years taking ART and ART regimen.Findings: One hundred and twenty eight (60%) PHIV and 45 (69%) HIV negative YP were female (p = 0.18), with median (IQR) age 18 (16, 20) and 18 (16, 21) years (p = 0.48) respectively. Most PHIV were taking a combination of three ART drugs from two classes. There was a trend toward higher (worse) mean PWV in the PHIV group than the HIV negative group [unvariable analysis 6.15 (SD 0.83) m/s vs. 5.93 (0.70) m/s, respectively, unadjusted p = 0.058], which was statistically significant in the multivariable analysis [adjusted p (ap) = 0.020]. In multivariable analysis being male (ap = 0.002), older age (ap < 0.001), higher MAP (ap < 0.001) and nicotine use on day of measurement (ap = 0.001) were also predictors of higher PWV. The predictors were the same in the PHIV model.Interpretation: By late adolescence PHIV had worse PWV in comparison to HIV negative peers, and traditional risk factors for CVD (higher arterial pressure, being male and older age) were associated with higher PWV values. Regular detailed monitoring of cardiovascular risk factors should become standard of care for every young person with PHIV worldwide.