N. Regina Rabinovich

: Mozambique has stunting, wasting, and underweight rates of 37%, 15%, and 4%, respectively. In Zambézia Province, Mozambique, 44.6% of children younger than 5 years of age suffer from chronic malnutrition, which impairs physical and cognitive development and leads to long-term health and productivity issues. This study examines undernutrition, stunting, wasting, underweight, and their associations with socioeconomic status among children younger than 5 years old in Mopeia District, Zambézia Province (central Mozambique). We conducted a secondary analysis of data from the Broad One Health Endectocide-Based Malaria Intervention in Africa 2021 cluster randomized clinical trial, which included a cohort of 2,667 children younger than 5 years old. We calculated odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals to assess associations between risk factors and undernutrition. The prevalence rates of stunting, wasting, and underweight were 41.7%, 20.4%, and 24.3%, respectively; these numbers are among the highest globally. Lower wealth index showed an association with higher odds of stunting and underweight, whereas distance from tarmac roads showed a link to increased wasting. Key predictors of stunting included lack of electricity, long water-fetching times, and smaller household size; being underweight showed an association with the number of bed nets and housing type. These relationships reflect socioeconomic patterns rather than direct causality. Undernutrition among children younger than 5 years old in Mopeia District remains critically high and is strongly patterned by socioeconomic factors. Addressing structural determinants, such as household wealth, access to infrastructure, and living conditions, will be essential for reducing the burden of undernutrition in rural Mozambique.

: Mass drug administration (MDA) of ivermectin is currently being evaluated for malaria control. Uptake and adherence to MDA are shaped by various individual, social, and operational factors; however, the authors of most studies have focused on individual drivers of uptake. In the present paper, a longitudinal qualitative study undertaken alongside the Broad One Health Endectocide-Based Malaria Intervention in Africa (BOHEMIA) ivermectin MDA clinical trial is reported to examine community experiences and perceptions of the trial and the ivermectin MDA. Using purposive maximum variation sampling, researchers selected five villages involved in the BOHEMIA trial (two in the intervention arm and three in the control arm). Before the trial, researchers lived in each village for 1 month, making observations and conducting in-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs). They returned before the first MDA round and remained throughout all three rounds, gathering insights on trial implementation, community perceptions, and perceived effects of the MDA. During this period, a total of 22 IDIs were conducted, along with structured observation reports. Two months after the MDA, 15 FGDs were held in eight additional villages. The findings indicate that during the trial, addressing needs and confidence in the implementing institution fostered participation, whereas previous negative experiences with MDA interventions and perceived exclusion from community engagement activities reduced involvement. The MDA was widely perceived as effective in reducing mosquitoes and malaria in both arms of the trial. It was also seen as highly effective against bedbugs in the intervention arm. These insights highlight the importance of trust, engagement, and previous experiences in shaping community participation in MDA programs.

The country’s success is a call to action for other affected areas

: Scabies is endemic in many resource-poor tropical areas, causing significant morbidity. However, our understanding of the true burden of scabies in Africa is limited, partly owing to limited capacity and challenges accessing the currently recommended diagnostic tools. The primary objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of scabies assessments made by minimally trained field-workers. We trained field-workers with a minimum of secondary school education in the diagnosis of scabies. After the training, we assessed the diagnostic accuracy of assessments made by nine field-workers compared with the reference standard. In all, 193 individuals were assessed for scabies. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated, as well as agreement (κ coefficients) between medical doctors and between field-workers. Of the 193 participants, 26% had scabies according to the reference standard. The sensitivity of field-worker diagnosis compared with the reference standard was 94% (95% CI: 90–99%), and the specificity was 96% (95% CI: 90–97%). The determination of severity by field-workers was less accurate; the sensitivity for severe scabies was 61% (95% CI: 48–74%), and the mean specificity was 97% (95% CI: 93–100%). This study demonstrated that field-workers without medical qualifications were capable of diagnosing scabies to a similar level of accuracy as experienced medical doctors after a short period of focal training. This may facilitate rapid assessments of scabies prevalence for public health purposes and decisions about mass drug administration implementation in similar settings.

"Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses to Inform Recommendations for the Final Phase of Elimination and Prevention of Re-Establishment of Malaria" published on 02 Apr 2024 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.

Border malaria is frequently cited as an obstacle to malaria elimination and sometimes used as a justification for the failure of elimination. Numerous border or cross-border meetings and elimination initiatives have been convened to address this bottleneck to elimination. In this Perspective, border malaria is defined as malaria transmission, or the potential for transmission, across or along shared land borders between countries where at least one of them has ongoing malaria transmission. Border malaria is distinct from malaria importation, which can occur anywhere and in any country. The authors’ analysis shows that the remaining transmission foci of malaria-eliminating countries tend to occur in the vicinity of international land borders that they share with neighbouring endemic countries. The reasons why international land borders often represent the last mile in malaria elimination are complex. The authors argue that the often higher intrinsic transmission potential, the neglect of investment and development, the constant risk of malaria importation due to cross-border movement, the challenges of implementing interventions in complex environments and uncoordinated action in a cross-border shared transmission focus all contribute to the difficulties of malaria elimination in border areas. Border malaria reflects the limitations of the current tools and interventions for malaria elimination and implies the need for social cohesion, basic health services, community economic conditions, and policy dialogue and coordination to achieve the expected impact of malaria interventions. Given the uniqueness of each border and the complex and multifaceted nature of border malaria, a situation analysis to define and characterize the determinants of transmission is essential to inform a problem-solving mindset and develop appropriate strategies to eliminate malaria in these areas.

The Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) was launched in 1988 with the aim of completely clearing wild polio viruses by 2000. More than three decades later, the goal has not been achieved, although spectacular advances have been made, with wild polio virus reported in only 2 countries in 2019. In spite of such progress, novel challenges have been added to the equation, most importantly outbreaks of vaccine-derived polio cases resulting from reversion to neurovirulence of attenuated vaccine virus, and insufficient coverage of vaccination. In the context of the latest discussions on malaria eradication, the GPEI experience provides more than a few lessons to the malaria field when considering a coordinated eradication campaign. The WHO Strategic Advisory Committee on Malaria Eradication (SAGme) stated in 2020 that in the context of more than 200 million malaria cases reported, eradication was far from reach in the near future and, therefore, efforts should remain focused on getting back on track to achieve the objectives set by the Global Technical Strategy against Malaria (2016–2030). Acknowledging the deep differences between both diseases and the stages they are in their path towards eradication, this paper draws from the history of GPEI and highlights relevant insights into what it takes to eradicate a pathogen in fields as varied as priority setting, global governance, strategy, community engagement, surveillance systems, and research. Above all, it shows the critical need for openness to change and adaptation as the biological, social and political contexts vary throughout the time an eradication campaign is ongoing.

Achieving a malaria-free world presents exciting scientific challenges as well as overwhelming health, equity, and economic benefits. WHO and countries are setting ambitious goals for reducing the burden and eliminating malaria through the “Global Technical Strategy” and 21 countries are aiming to eliminate malaria by 2020. The commitment to achieve these targets should be celebrated. However, the need for innovation to achieve these goals, sustain elimination, and free the world of malaria is greater than ever. Over 180 experts across multiple disciplines are engaged in the Malaria Eradication Research Agenda (malERA) Refresh process to address problems that need to be solved. The result is a research and development agenda to accelerate malaria elimination and, in the longer term, transform the malaria community’s ability to eradicate it globally.

Malaria programmes use Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein-2 (PfHRP2) based rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for malaria diagnosis. The deletion of this target antigen could potentially lead to misdiagnosis, delayed treatment and continuation of active transmission. Plasmodium falciparum isolates (n = 1162) collected in Southern Mozambique were assessed by RDTs, microscopy and/or 18SrRNA qPCR. pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 deletions were investigated in isolates from individuals who were negative by RDT but positive by microscopy and/or qPCR (n = 69) using gene-specific PCRs, with kelch13 PCR as the parasite DNA control. Lack of pfhrp2 PCR amplification was observed in one of the 69 isolates subjected to molecular analysis [1.45% (95% CI 0.3–7.8%)]. The low prevalence of pfhrp2 deletions suggests that RDTs will detect the vast majority of the P. falciparum infections. Nevertheless, active surveillance for changing deletion frequencies is required.