BÇBenan Çağlayan

Benan Çağlayan

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Benan Çağlayan has a total of 94 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Association of Pulmonary Involvement at Baseline with Exercise Intolerance and Worse Physical Functioning 8 Months Following COVID-19 Pneumonia

    by Fatma Isil Uzel, Yüksel Peker, Zeynep Atceken, Ferhan Karatas, Cetin Atasoy, Benan Caglayan

    Objectives: We aimed to describe the cardiopulmonary function during exercise and the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with a history of COVID-19 pneumonia, stratified by chest computed tomography (CT) findings at baseline. Methods: Among 77 consecutive patients with COVID-19 who were discharged from the Pulmonology Ward between March 2020 and April 2021, 28 (mean age 54.3 ± 8.6 years, 8 females) agreed to participate to the current study. The participants were analyzed in two groups based on pulmonary involvement (PI) at baseline chest CT applying a threshold of 25%. A consequent artificial intelligence (AI)-guided total opacity score (TOS) was calculated in a subgroup of 22 patients. A cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) was conducted on average 8.4 (±1.9) months after discharge from the hospital. HRQoL was defined using the short-form (SF-36) questionnaire. The primary outcome was exercise intolerance that was defined as a peak oxygen uptake (V′O2peak) < 80% predicted. Secondary outcomes were ventilatory limitation, defined as breathing reserve < 15%, circulatory limitation, defined as oxygen pulse predicted below 80%, and deconditioning, defined as exercise intolerance in the absence of ventilatory and circulatory limitations. Other secondary outcomes included the SF-36 domains. Results: In all, 15 patients had at least 25% PI (53.6%) at baseline chest CT. Exercise intolerance was observed in ten patients (35.7%), six due to deconditioning and four due to circulatory limitation; none had ventilatory limitation. AI-guided TOS was 30.1 ± 24.4% vs. 6.1 ± 4.8% (p < 0.001) at baseline, and 1.7 ± 3.0% vs. 0.2 ± 0.7% (nonsignificant) at follow-up in high and low PI groups, respectively. The physical functioning (PF) domain score of the SF-36 questionnaire was 66.3 ± 19.4 vs. 85.0 ± 13.1 in high and low PI groups, respectively (p = 0.007). Other SF-36 domains did not differ significantly between the groups. A high PI at baseline was inversely correlated with V′O2peak (standardized β coefficient = −0.436; 95% CI −26.1; −0.7; p = 0.040) and with PF scores (standardized β coefficient −0.654; 95% CI −41.3; −7.6; p = 0.006) adjusted for age, sex, body mass index and lung diffusion capacity. Conclusions: One-third of participants experienced exercise intolerance eight months after COVID-19 pneumonia. A higher PI at baseline was significantly associated with exercise intolerance and PF. Notwithstanding, the radiological PI was resolved, and the exercise intolerance was mainly explained not by ventilatory limitation but by circulatory limitation and deconditioning.


  • Open Access

    Clinical Course of Coronavirus disease 2019 C-19 in Patients with Bronchiectasis

    by Ebru Çakır Edis, Aykut Çilli, Deniz Kızılırmak, Ayşın Şakar Coşkun, Abdullah Sayıner, Sedat Çiçek, İnCi Gülmez, Meltem Çoban Ağca, Benan Çağlayan, Neslihan Özçelik, et al.

    Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has affected the whole world and caused the death of more than 6 million people. The disease has been observed to have a more severe course in patients with chronic lung diseases. There are limited data regarding COVID-19 in patients with bronchiectasis. The aim of this article is to investigate the course of COVID-19 and factors affecting the clinical outcome in patients with bronchiectasis. This study was conducted using the Turkish Adult Bronchiectasis Database (TEBVEB) to which 25 centers in Türkiye contributed between March 2019 and January 2022. The database consisted of 1035 patients, and COVID-19-related data were recorded for 606 patients. One hundred nineteen (19.6%) of the bronchiectasis patients (64 female, mean age 57.3 ± 13.9) had COVID-19. Patients with bronchiectasis who developed COVID-19 more frequently had other comorbidities (P = .034). They also more frequently had cystic bronchiectasis (P = .009) and their Bronchiectasis Severity Index was significantly higher (P = .019). Eighty-two (68.9%) of the patients who had COVID-19 were followed up in the outpatient clinic, 27 (22.7%) in the inpatient ward and 10 (8.4%) patients in the intensive care unit. There tended to be a higher percentage of males among patients admitted to the hospital (P = .073); similarly, the mean age of the patients admitted to the hospital was also higher (60.8 vs 55.8 years for the outpatients), but these differences did not reach statistical significance (P = .071). In conclusion, this study showed that severe bronchiectasis, presence of cystic bronchiectasis and worse Bronchiectasis Severity Index are associated with the development of COVID-19, but not with the severity of infection.


  • Open Access

    Bronchiectasis in Türkiye: Data from a Multicenter Registry (Turkish Adult Bronchiectasis Database)

    by Ebru Çakır Edis, Aykut Çilli, Deniz Kızılırmak, Ayşın Şakar Coşkun, Nurcan Güler, Sedat Çiçek, Can Sevinç, Meltem Çoban Ağca, İnci Gülmez, Benan Çağlayan, et al.

    Background: Bronchiectasis is a chronic lung disease characterized by permanent bronchial wall dilatation. Although it has been known as an orphan disease, it has recently gained attention because of registry -based studies and drug research. Aims: We aimed to use a multicenter database to analyze and compare data regarding the etiology, associated comorbidities, microbiological characteristics, and preventive strategies of bronchiectasis in T & uuml;rkiye to those of other countries. Study Design: A multicenter prospective cohort study. Methods: The multicenter, prospective cohort study was conducted between March 2019 and January 2022 using the Turkish Adult Bronchiectasis Database, in which 25 centers in T & uuml;rkiye participated. Patients aged > 18 years who presented with respiratory symptoms such as cough, sputum, and dyspnea and were diagnosed with non -cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis using computed tomography were included in the study. Demographic information, etiologies, comorbidities, pulmonary functions, and microbiological, radiological, and clinical data were collected from the patients. Results: Of the 1,035 study participants, 518 (50%) were females. The mean age of the patients was 56.1 +/- 16.1 years. The underlying etiology was detected in 565 (54.6%) patients. While postinfectious origin was the most common cause of bronchiectasis (39.5%), tuberculosis was identified in 11.3% of the patients. An additional comorbidity was detected in 688 (66.5%) patients. The most common comorbidity was cardiovascular disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and bronchiectasis was identified in 19.5% of the patients. The most commonly detected microbiological agent was Pseudomonas aeruginosa (29.4%). Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) were used in 70.1% of the patients, and the frequency of exacerbations in the last year was significantly higher in patients using ICS than in nonusers (p < 0.0001). Age [odds ratio (OR): 1.028; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.005-1.051], cachexia (OR: 4.774; 95% CI: 2,054-11,097), high modified medical research council dyspnea scale score (OR: 1,952; 95% CI: 1,459-2,611), presence of chronic renal failure (OR: 4,172; 95% CI: 1,249-13,938) and use of inhaled steroids (OR: 2,587; 95% CI: 1,098-6,098) were significant risk factors for mortality. Mortality rates were higher in patients with COPD than in those with no COPD (21.7-9.1%, p = 0.016). Patients with bronchiectasis and COPD exhibited more frequent exacerbations, exacerbation -related hospitalizations, and hospitalization in the intensive care unit in the previous year than patients without COPD. Conclusion: This is the first multicenter study of bronchiectasis in T & uuml;rkiye. The study results will provide important data that can guide the development of health policies in T & uuml;rkiye on issues such as infection control, vaccination, and the unnecessary use of antibiotics and steroids.


  • How Can Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Affect The Diaphragm and Respiratory Functions of The Patients

    by Selin Gamze Sumen, Sevda Sener Comert, Benan Caglayan

    Amaç: Bu retrospektif çalışmada, hiperbarik oksijen tedavisinin ardışık uygulamalarda hastaların solunum fonksiyonları ve diyafragma hareketleri üzerindeki etkilerini değerlendirmeyi amaçladık. Hastalar ve Yöntem: Çalışma grubu, Haziran 2019-Aralık 20219 tarihleri arasında hiperbarik oksijen tedavisi uygulanan çeşitli hastalık tanısı alan 22 hastadan oluşuyordu. Dinamik ve statik akciğer hacimleri, difüzyon kapasitesi, maksimum inspiratuar ve ekspiratuar basınçlar gibi solunum fonksiyonları tedavi seanslarının başlamasından ve bitiminden önce değerlendirildi. Ayrıca torasik ultrasonografi ile diyafram kalınlığı, gelgit volümü ve derin inspirasyon sırasındaki diyafram hareketleri ölçüldü. Bulgular: Çalışmaya yaş ortalaması 53.3±10.0 yıl olan yirmi iki hasta (16 erkek;6 kadın) dahil edildi. Hastaların hiperbarik oksijen tedavilerinin sonunda yapılan ölçümlerde total akciğer kapasitesi, vital kapasite ve rezidüel volüm de artış görüldü (p<0.05). Diğer statik akciğer hacimleri, maksimum inspiratuar ve ekspiratuar basınçlar, akciğer karbon monoksit difüzyon kapasitesinde değişiklik gözlenmedi. Tidal volümü hareketi ve vital kapasite sırasında diyafram kalınlığı ve diyafram hareketi artmıştır (p<0.05). Sonuç: Çalışmamızda hiperbarik oksijen tedavisinin diyafram ve solunum fonksiyonları üzerindeki etkisini, spirometri, diyafram görüntüleme teknikleri ve difüzyon kapasitesi yöntemleri ile değerlendirdik. Sonuç olarak, hiperbarik oksijen tedavisi pulmoner ve diyafram kası fonksiyonlarında anlamlı bir değişikliğe yol açmıştır.

  • Open Access

    Effect of High-Risk Obstructive Sleep Apnea on Clinical Outcomes in Adults with Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Clinical Trial

    by Yüksel Peker, Yeliz Celik, Semih Arbatli, Sacide Rana Isik, Baran Balcan, Ferhan Karataş, Fatma Işıl Uzel, Levent Tabak, Betül Çetin, Arzu Baygül, et al.

    Rationale: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is an ongoing pandemic, in which obesity, hypertension, and diabetes have been linked to poor outcomes. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with these conditions and may influence the prognosis of adults with COVID-19. Objectives: To determine the effect of OSA on clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19. Methods: The current prospective observational study was conducted in three hospitals in Istanbul, Turkey from March 10 to June 22, 2020. The participants were categorized as high-risk or low-risk OSA according to the Berlin questionnaire that was administered in the out-patient clinic, in hospital, or shortly after discharge from hospital blinded to the clinical outcomes. A modified high-risk (mHR)–OSA score based on the snoring patterns (intensity and/or frequency), breathing pauses, and morning/daytime sleepiness, without taking obesity and hypertension into account, were used in the regression models. Results: The primary outcome was the clinical improvement defined as a decline of two categories from admission on a 7-category ordinal scale that ranges from 1 (discharged with normal activity) to 7 (death) on Days 7, 14, 21, and 28, respectively. Secondary outcomes included clinical worsening (an increase of 1 category), need for hospitalization, supplemental oxygen, and intensive care. In total, 320 eligible patients (median [interquartile range] age, 53.2 [41.3–63.0] yr; 45.9% female) were enrolled. In all, 121 (37.8%) were categorized as known (n = 3) or high-risk OSA (n = 118). According to the modified scoring, 70 (21.9%) had mHR-OSA. Among 242 patients requiring hospitalization, clinical improvement within 2 weeks occurred in 75.4% of the mHR-OSA group compared with 88.4% of the modified low-risk–OSA group (P = 0.014). In multivariate regression analyses, mHR-OSA (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19–0.92) and male sex (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.17–0.86) predicted the delayed clinical improvement. In the entire study population (n = 320), including the nonhospitalized patients, mHR-OSA was associated with clinical worsening (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.00–2.39) and with the need for supplemental oxygen (OR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.06–3.59). Snoring patterns, especially louder snoring, significantly predicted delayed clinical improvement, worsening, need for hospitalization, supplemental oxygen, and intensive care. Conclusions: Adults with mHR-OSA in our COVID-19 cohort had poorer clinical outcomes than those with modified low-risk OSA independent of age, sex, and comorbidities. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04363333).


  • Open Access

    Bronchoscopy during the COVID-19 pandemic: A survey study

    by Benan Çağlayan, Ferhan Karataş, Sinem İlIaz, Işıl Uzel, Ayşe Bilge Öztürk, Tuane Demir

    Background: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the attitudes and behaviors of physicians performing bronchoscopy during the COVID-19 outbreak. Methods: Between March 2020 and May 2020, a total of 153 physicians were included in the study. An invitation letter for the participation in the study with a structured questionnaire of 18 questions were sent to the mail groups twice with five-day intervals. Participation in the study was allowed, until the third day after the second mail was sent. Results: All participants completed the questionnaire. According to the results, 33% of the physicians did not perform bronchoscopy and the majority of the physicians performed very few procedures during the outbreak, although the participants mostly worked at the tertiary hospitals (mean: 7.2±9.3). A total of 20% of the physicians performed bronchoscopy in potential or proven COVID-19 patients. Almost all of the physicians who participated in the survey reported the use of personal protective equipment such as masks and goggles during the procedure. During the pandemic, 9.7% of the physicians who performed bronchoscopy to potential or proven COVID-19 patients and 4.1% of the participants who did not perform bronchoscopy to any potential or proven COVID-19 patients were found to be infected with the virus (p>0.05). Conclusion: Physicians who perform bronchoscopy during pandemic act in accordance with the recommendations of guidelines. Although there was no statistically significant difference between the SARS-CoV-2 transmission rates of the teams who performed and did not perform bronchoscopy in potential or proven COVID-19 patients in our study, the high rate of personal protective equipment utilization might have played a role in this result.


  • COVID-19 Pneumonia and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Novel Combination

    by Fatma Isil Uzel, Sinem Iliaz, Ferhan Karatas, Benan Caglayan

    COVID-19,idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis,exacerbation


  • Open Access

    Antibiotic Allergy from the Perspective of Infectious Disease Physicians

    by Ayşe Bilge ÖZTÜRK, Nur Adalier, Sadi Can Sönmez, Leyla Pur Özyiğit, Süda Tekin, Benan Çağlayan, Önder Ergönül

    Antibiotic Allergy from the Perspective of Infectious Disease Physicians

  • Open Access

    Can PET-CT predict diagnostic success in ultrasonography-guided transthoracic fine needle aspiration biopsies in lung cancers?

    by C. Doğan, A. Fidan, S.ş. Cömert, N. Kıral, B. Salepçi, E.T. Parmaksıza, B. Çağlayan

    To examine any correlations between tumor maximum standard uptake values (SUVmax) in positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) and homogeneous/heterogeneous tumor FDG uptake in PET-CT, and the diagnostic success of the procedure in thoracic ultrasonography (US)-guided transthoracic fine needle aspiration biopsy (TFNAB). The files of patients who underwent thoracic US-guided TFNAB between 2013 and 2018 were examined. Patients who underwent thoracic US-guided TFNAB and were diagnosed as having primary lung cancer were considered as the US-TFNAB diagnostic group. Patients whose disease was diagnosed as primary lung cancer using a different diagnostic method (e.g. CT-guided biopsies, fiberoptic bronchoscopy) due to a lack of diagnosis despite undergoing thoracic US-guided TFNAB were allocated to the US-TFNAB non-diagnostic group. The clinical and radiologic characteristics and PET-CT parameters of the two groups were compared. A total of 104 patients were included in the study; 79 (76%) patients whose disease was diagnosed using US-guided TFNAB, and 25 (24%) patients whose primary lung cancer could not be diagnosed with US-guided TFNAB. The mean SUVmax value of the US-TFNAB diagnostic group was 19.5 ± 10.1, whereas it was 15.1 ± 8.9 in the US-TFNAB non-diagnostic group (p = 0.016). Whether a lesion showed homogeneous or heterogeneous FDG uptake did not effect diagnostic success (p = 0.289). SUVmax value was the only effective independent factor in the diagnostic success of the procedure (p = 0.035). High SUVmax values in PET-CT in lung cancers may increase the diagnostic success of US guided-TFNAB procedures.


  • The role of endobronchial ultrasonography elastography for predicting malignancy

    by Benan Çağlayan, Sinem İliaz, Pınar Bulutay, Ayşe Armutlu, Işıl Uzel, Ayşe Bilge Öztürk

    Background: This study aims to investigate the role of endobronchial ultrasonography elastography in predicting malignancy. Methods: Between January 2016 and December 2016, a total of 221 lymph nodes were biopsied using the endobronchial ultrasonography-guided transbronchial needle aspiration from 119 consecutive patients (69 males, 50 females; mean age 63.2±12.4 years; range, 16 to 86 years) were included. Lymph nodes were scored by elastography according to their colors in four categories before the procedure. The strain ratio was calculated based on the region of interest after three measurements. Results: Of the patients, 93 were diagnosed with a malignancy through endobronchial ultrasonography-guided transbronchial needle aspiration biopsy. The mean lymph node score of benign versus malignant lesions was 2.2±1.0 and 3.2±1, respectively (p