Benjamin Baffour Gyau

The C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10 (CXCL10) is implicated in the progression of osteosarcoma (OS), the most aggressive pediatric bone malignancy. However, its role often presents a profound clinical paradox: although high circulating levels are strongly linked to poor prognosis, its canonical function is to recruit anti-tumor immune cells. This review unravels these contrasting roles by proposing a novel spatiotemporal model. We argue that in the early stages, immune-evading OS cells initiate the formation of a pre-metastatic niche (PMN) in the lungs, creating a localized inflammatory environment that becomes the primary source of elevated circulating CXCL10. As the disease progresses, elevated systemic levels of CXCL10 overwhelm the localized chemokine gradient at the primary tumor site, creating a potent immune decoy that diverts anti-tumor CXCR3+ T cells away from the tumor. The resulting immune desertification permits unchecked tumor growth and an increased metastatic burden. We also discuss the therapeutic implications of this model, proposing that disrupting the chemokine axis offers a roadmap for developing rational, stage-specific therapies to effectively combat metastatic OS.

Background: Osteosarcoma (OS) is a fast-growing malignant bone tumor that occurs most often in children and teenagers. Development of pulmonary metastasis is the primary cause of treatment failure and mortality. Our previous studies demonstrated that cytoplasmic p27 interacts with PAK1, enhancing PAK1 phosphorylation and promoting OS pulmonary metastasis. However, the cellular functions of p27 and PAK1 are primarily regulated by phosphorylation, and the roles of specific phosphorylation residues in modulating OS metastatic potential remain unclear. Methods: To study tumor invasiveness and lung metastasis, we employed a CRISPR-based knock-in method to introduce specific mutations—p27-T157A, p27-T157D, PAK1-T423E, and PAK1-K299R—into the 143B OS cell line, followed by in vitro invasion and orthotopic xenograft mouse experiments. These residues were selected for their therapeutic potential, as T157 regulates p27 nuclear–cytoplasmic shuttling, while T423 and K299 modulate PAK1 kinase activity. Results: No significant differences in pulmonary metastasis were observed across p27 mutants compared to parental controls. However, the p27-T157D mutant exhibited increased cytoplasmic mislocalization, elevated PAK1-S144 phosphorylation, and enhanced in vitro invasiveness compared to the p27-T157A mutant and parental 143B cells. The PAK1-K299R mutant, designed to be kinase-dead, showed negligible S144 phosphorylation, consistent with loss of kinase activity. Unexpectedly, this mutant displayed increased T423 phosphorylation and in vitro invasiveness, and significantly enhanced pulmonary metastasis in vivo compared to the PAK1-T423E mutant and parental controls. Conclusions: These findings highlight the complexity of targeting specific p27 and PAK1 phosphorylation sites as an anti-metastatic strategy for OS. While p27-T157 phosphorylation influences cytoplasmic localization and invasiveness, it does not significantly alter metastatic outcomes. Conversely, PAK1-T423 phosphorylation is critical in driving OS metastatic potential, and the kinase-dead K299R mutant’s unexpected pro-metastatic effect suggests that kinase-independent mechanisms or compensatory pathways may contribute to metastasis. Our findings suggest the necessity for a more comprehensive understanding of the phosphorylation dynamics of p27 and PAK1 in metastatic OS. They also indicate that conventional kinase inhibition may be insufficient and underscore the potential benefits of alternative or combinatorial therapeutic strategies, such as targeting kinase-independent functions or other upstream kinases involved in these regulatory pathways.

Background: Metastasis continues to be a leading cause of mortality in osteosarcoma (OS) among pediatric and young adult populations, with few effective therapeutic options available. Despite immunotherapy advancements, its efficacy in OS is hindered by an incomplete understanding of the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). Methods: We utilized multiplex imaging mass cytometry and phenoplexing to characterize immune and stromal cell populations within the TME of a tissue microarray comprising 51 primary OS tumors. The prognostic significance of TME cell abundance and spatial cell–cell distance was evaluated using Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses. To investigate macrophage functionality in vivo, we employed orthotopic xenograft mouse models by co-injecting THP-1-derived M0 or M2 macrophages with 143B OS cells to assess their impact on tumor growth and pulmonary metastasis. Mechanisms of macrophage-mediated metastasis were explored using Luminex, ELISA, and transwell migration assays. Results: Our results showed that macrophages dominated the TME, with M0 and M2 subtypes significantly outnumbering M1 macrophages (M1) and other myeloid cells. T cells and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) were the second and third most abundant immune populations, respectively. Among stromal cells, endothelial cells predominated over fibroblasts. While individual immunosuppressive cell populations (M2, MDSC, and Treg) showed no direct correlation with clinical outcomes, the collective abundance of M2 and MDSC was significantly associated with reduced metastasis-free survival (MFS, p = 0.0244) and recurrence-free survival (RFS, p = 0.0040). Notably, closer spatial proximity between M2 macrophages and immunosuppressive cells (p = 0.0248) or Ki-67⁺ cells (p = 0.0321) correlated with decreased MFS, suggesting the formation of an M2-centric immunosuppressive and pro-tumor hub. In vivo, co-injection of M2 macrophages with 143B cells significantly enhanced pulmonary metastasis (p = 0.0140). Luminex analysis identified M2-derived MIP-1α (CCL3) as a candidate chemokine driving OS cell metastatic potential. Conclusions: This study provides a high-resolution map of the OS TME, highlighting the prognostic significance of M2 and immunosuppressive cell interactions in driving metastasis, potentially through MIP-1α signaling. These findings establish a foundation for developing targeted immunotherapies to improve outcomes in metastatic OS.

The CXCL10-CXCR3 axis is known to promote tumor growth and metastasis via autocrine signaling, while it can also elicit anti-tumor responses by paracrine signaling. However, its roles are still elusive in osteosarcoma (OS), the most common malignant bone tumor in children. In this study, we utilized in vitro assays, mouse models, and gene expression analysis to characterize the roles of the CXCL10-CXCR3 axis in OS. To understand the autocrine signaling, we performed in vitro phenotypic assays on three OS cell lines with and without CXCL10. The results showed that the chemokine increased AKT phosphorylation and tumor cell migration. Using a CRISPR-based CXCR3 deletion mutant, we demonstrated that the lack of the receptor inhibited OS tumor growth and pulmonary metastasis in an orthotopic xenograft mouse model. The results indicate that the CXCL10-CXCR3 axis is sufficient and necessary to promote aggressive phenotypes in OS via autocrine signaling. Next, using gene expression datasets from two cohorts of OS patients, we showed that high expression of CXCL10 or its cognate receptor CXCR3 was associated with a better prognosis. Since CXCL10 is known to recruit CXCR3+ immune cells to fight against cancer, we further found that the expression of the T cell marker CD3D was associated with a better prognosis. These results suggest that the chemokine may also play a protective role in osteosarcoma by recruiting anti-tumor immune cells via paracrine signaling. Lastly, we have previously reported that a high circulating level of CXCL10 correlates with a poor prognosis in osteosarcoma patients. In this study, we demonstrated that increasing the circulating CXCL10 level in immunodeficient orthotopic xenograft mouse models of OS did not significantly promote the development of pulmonary metastases, suggesting circulating CXCL10 may exert its chemotactic effect mainly on immune cells, not on tumor cells. Taken together, we propose a model that tumor expression of CXCL10 promotes osteosarcoma growth and metastasis development via autocrine signaling. The increase of the local level of CXCL10 attracts CXCR3+ immune cells to the tumor site and promotes anti-tumor function via paracrine signaling. Metastatic cells colonize the lungs and cause tissue damage and inflammation, which increases the production of CXCL10 in the circulation. The higher circulating CXCL10 recruits T cells away from the primary tumor site and indicates the occurrence of metastasis and, hence, correlates with a worse outcome in patients. Our research highlights the importance of understanding the opposite effects of CXCL10 on tumor and immune cells as well as in the tumor microenvironment and circulation. Identification of the mechanistic differences in the CXCL10-CXCR3 signaling between tumor and immune cells will provide a novel therapeutic approach against tumor cells while promoting anti-tumor immune response in OS.Citation Format: Benjamin B. Gyau, Xiang Chen, Junyan Wang, Margaret A. Clement, Angela M. Major, Jun Xu, M. John Hicks, Tsz-Kwong Man. The CXCL10-CXCR3 axis as Jekyll and Hyde: A regulator of metastasis and immune response in osteosarcoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 1394. The CXCL10-CXCR3 axis is known to promote tumor growth and metastasis via autocrine signaling, while it can also elicit anti-tumor responses by paracrine signaling. However, its roles are still elusive in osteosarcoma (OS), the most common malignant bone tumor in children. In this study, we utilized in vitro assays, mouse models, and gene expression analysis to characterize the roles of the CXCL10-CXCR3 axis in OS. To understand the autocrine signaling, we performed in vitro phenotypic assays on three OS cell lines with and without CXCL10. The results showed that the chemokine increased AKT phosphorylation and tumor cell migration. Using a CRISPR-based CXCR3 deletion mutant, we demonstrated that the lack of the receptor inhibited OS tumor growth and pulmonary metastasis in an orthotopic xenograft mouse model. The results indicate that the CXCL10-CXCR3 axis is sufficient and necessary to promote aggressive phenotypes in OS via autocrine signaling. Next, using gene expression datasets from two cohorts of OS patients, we showed that high expression of CXCL10 or its cognate receptor CXCR3 was associated with a better prognosis. Since CXCL10 is known to recruit CXCR3+ immune cells to fight against cancer, we further found that the expression of the T cell marker CD3D was associated with a better prognosis. These results suggest that the chemokine may also play a protective role in osteosarcoma by recruiting anti-tumor immune cells via paracrine signaling. Lastly, we have previously reported that a high circulating level of CXCL10 correlates with a poor prognosis in osteosarcoma patients. In this study, we demonstrated that increasing the circulating CXCL10 level in immunodeficient orthotopic xenograft mouse models of OS did not significantly promote the development of pulmonary metastases, suggesting circulating CXCL10 may exert its chemotactic effect mainly on immune cells, not on tumor cells. Taken together, we propose a model that tumor expression of CXCL10 promotes osteosarcoma growth and metastasis development via autocrine signaling. The increase of the local level of CXCL10 attracts CXCR3+ immune cells to the tumor site and promotes anti-tumor function via paracrine signaling. Metastatic cells colonize the lungs and cause tissue damage and inflammation, which increases the production of CXCL10 in the circulation. The higher circulating CXCL10 recruits T cells away from the primary tumor site and indicates the occurrence of metastasis and, hence, correlates with a worse outcome in patients. Our research highlights the importance of understanding the...

AccScience Publishing is a publishing company based in Singapore. We have in our portfolio a range of high-quality, open-access, peer-reviewed journals and books from a broad spectrum of science, technology, biomedicine, engineering, education, social sciences and many more.

Tumor immunosuppression is a major cause for treatment failure and disease relapse, both in solid tumors and leukemia. Local hypoxia is among the conditions that cause immunosuppression, acting at least in part through the upregulation of extracellular adenosine levels, which potently suppress T cell responses and skew macrophages towards an M2 phenotype. Hence, there is intense investigation to identify drugs that target this axis. By using the TCL1 adoptive transfer CLL mouse model, we show that adenosine production and signaling are upregulated in the hypoxic lymphoid niches, where intense colonization of leukemic cells occurs. This leads to a progressive remodeling of the immune system towards tolerance, with expansion of T regulatory cells (Tregs), loss of CD8+ T cell cytotoxicity and differentiation of murine macrophages towards the patrolling (M2-like) subset. In vivo administration of SCH58261, an inhibitor the A2A adenosine receptor, re-awakens T cell responses, while limiting Tregs expansion, and re-polarizes monocytes towards the inflammatory (M1-like) phenotype. These results show for the first time the in vivo contribution of adenosine signaling to immune tolerance in CLL, and the translational implication of drugs interrupting this pathway. Although the effects of SCH58261 on leukemic cells are limited, interfering with adenosine signaling may represent an appealing strategy for combination-based therapeutic approaches.

Representing the major cause of morbidity and mortality for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients, immunosuppression is a common feature of the disease. Effectors of the innate and the adaptive immune response show marked dysfunction and skewing towards the generation of a tolerant environment that favors disease expansion. Major deregulations are found in the T lymphocyte compartment, with inhibition of CD8⁺ cytotoxic and CD4⁺ activated effector T cells, replaced by exhausted and more tolerogenic subsets. Likewise, differentiation of monocytes towards a suppressive M2-like phenotype is induced at the expense of pro-inflammatory sub-populations. Thanks to their B-regulatory phenotype, leukemic cells play a central role in driving immunosuppression, progressively inhibiting immune responses. A number of signaling cascades triggered by soluble mediators and cell–cell contacts contribute to immunomodulation in CLL, fostered also by local environmental conditions, such as hypoxia and derived metabolic acidosis. Specifically, molecular pathways modulating T-cell activity in CLL, spanning from the best known cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) to the emerging T cell immunoreceptor with immunoglobulin and immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibition motif domains (TIGIT)/CD155 axes, are attracting increasing research interest and therapeutic relevance also in the CLL field. On the other hand, in the microenvironment, the B cell receptor (BCR), which is undoubtedly the master regulator of leukemic cell behavior, plays an important role in orchestrating immune responses, as well. Lastly, local conditions of hypoxia, typical of the lymphoid niche, have major effects both on CLL cells and on non-leukemic immune cells, partly mediated through adenosine signaling, for which novel specific inhibitors are currently under development. In summary, this review will provide an overview of the molecular and microenvironmental mechanisms that modify innate and adaptive immune responses of CLL patients, focusing attention on those that may have therapeutic implications.

Introduction: Malaria is one of the most prevalent human infections worldwide with over 40% of the world’s population living in malaria-endemic areas. In the absence of an effective vaccine, emergence of drug-resistant strains requires urgent drug development. Current methods applied to drug target validation, a crucial step in drug discovery, possess limitations in malaria. These constraints require the development of techniques capable of simplifying the validation of Plasmodial targets. Areas covered: The authors review the current state of the art in techniques used to validate drug targets in malaria, including our contribution – the protein interference assay (PIA) – as an additional tool in rapid in vivo target validation. Expert opinion: Each technique in this review has advantages and disadvantages, implying that future validation efforts should not focus on a single approach, but integrate multiple approaches. PIA is a significant addition to the current toolset of antimalarial validation. Validation of aspartate metabolism as a druggable pathway provided proof of concept of how oligomeric interfaces can be exploited to control specific activity in vivo. PIA has the potential to be applied not only to other enzymes/pathways of the malaria parasite but could, in principle, be extrapolated to other infectious diseases.