SMSusan Morgan

Susan Morgan

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Susan Morgan has a total of 35 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Impact of Tumour Epstein–Barr Virus Status on Clinical Outcome in Patients with Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL): A Review of the Literature and Analysis of a Clinical Trial Cohort of Children with cHL

    by Mahdi Nohtani, Katerina Vrzalikova, Maha Ibrahim, Judith E. Powell, Éanna Fennell, Susan Morgan, Richard Grundy, Keith McCarthy, Sarah Dewberry, Jan Bouchal, et al.

    In this study, we have re-evaluated how EBV status influences clinical outcome. To accomplish this, we performed a literature review of all studies that have reported the effect of EBV status on patient outcome and also explored the effect of EBV positivity on outcome in a clinical trial of children with cHL from the UK. Our literature review revealed that almost all studies of older adults/elderly patients have reported an adverse effect of an EBV-positive status on outcome. In younger adults with cHL, EBV-positive status was either associated with a moderate beneficial effect or no effect, and the results in children and adolescents were conflicting. Our own analysis of a series of 166 children with cHL revealed no difference in overall survival between EBV-positive and EBV-negative groups (p = 0.942, log rank test). However, EBV-positive subjects had significantly longer event-free survival (p = 0.0026). Positive latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1) status was associated with a significantly lower risk of treatment failure in a Cox regression model (HR = 0.21, p = 0.005). In models that controlled for age, gender, and stage, EBV status had a similar effect size and statistical significance. This study highlights the age-related impact of EBV status on outcome in cHL patients and suggests different pathogenic effects of EBV at different stages of life.


  • Open Access

    Safety and exceptional immunogenicity of novel 5T4 viral vectored vaccination regimes in early stage prostate cancer: a phase I clinical trial

    by Federica Cappuccinin, Richard Bryant, Emily Pollock, Lucy Carter, Clare Verrill, Julianne Hollidge, Ian Poulton, Megan Baker, Celia Mitton, Andrea Baines, et al.

    Prostate cancer (PCa) has been under investigation as a target for antigen-specific immunotherapies in metastatic disease settings for a decade. However, neither of the two clinically most developed prostate cancer vaccines, Sipuleucel-T and ProstVac, induce strong T cell immunity. In this first-in-man study, VANCE, we evaluated a novel vaccination platform based on two replication-deficient viruses, chimpanzee adenovirus (ChAd) and MVA (Modified Vaccinia Ankara), targeting the oncofetal self-antigen 5T4 in early stage PCa. Forty patients, either newly diagnosed with early stage prostate cancer and scheduled for radical prostatectomy or patients with stable disease on an active surveillance protocol, were recruited to the study to assess the vaccine safety and T cell immunogenicity. Secondary and exploratory endpoints included immune infiltration into the prostate, prostate specific antigen (PSA) change and assessment of phenotype and functionality of antigen-specific T cells. The vaccine had an excellent safety profile. Vaccination-induced 5T4-specific T cell responses were measured in blood by ex vivo IFN-γ ELISpot and were detected in the majority of patients with a mean level in responders of 198 spot-forming cells (SFC) per million peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Flow cytometry analysis demonstrated the presence of both CD8+ and CD4+ polyfunctional 5T4-specific T cells in the circulation. 5T4-reactive tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were isolated from post-treatment prostate tissue. Some of the patients had a transient PSA rise 2-8 weeks following vaccination, possibly indicating an inflammatory response in the target organ. The potent T cell responses elicited support the evaluation of these vectored vaccine in efficacy trials.