Daniel Kronenfeld
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Daniel Kronenfeld has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Amir Shahien
Boston Medical Center, Department of Orthopedics, Boston, MA 02118, USA
1 shared publication - David M. Freccero
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
1 shared publication - Eric L. Smith
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
1 shared publication - Jordan Etscheidt
New England Baptist Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics, Boston, MA 02120, USA
1 shared publication - Monique Gainey
Affiliation Department of Emergency Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America
1 shared publication - Ruijia Niu
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Boston Medical Center, One Boston Medical Center Pl, Boston, MA 02118, USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 18 March 2020
- Published by MDPI AG in Geriatrics
- Vol. 5 (1) , 18
Review of Therapeutic Options for the Prevention of VTE in Total Joint Arthroplasty
Hip and knee arthroplasty patients are at high risk of perioperative venous thromboembolic events (VTE). VTE has been well studied in this population and it is recommended that total joint arthroplasty recipients receive chemoprophylactic anticoagulation due to risk factors inherent to the surgical intervention. There are few concise resources for the orthopedic surgeon that summarize data regarding post-operative anticoagulation in the context of currently available therapeutic options and perioperative standards of practice. The periodic reexamination of literature is essential as conclusions drawn from studies predating perioperative protocols that include early mobilization and sequential compression devices as standards of practice in total joint arthroplasty are no longer generalizable to modern-day practice. We reviewed a large number of recently published research studies related to post-operative anticoagulation in total joint arthroplasty populations that received a high Level of Evidence grade. Current literature supports the use of oral aspirin regimens in place of more aggressive anticoagulants, particularly among low risk patients. Oral aspirin regimens appear to have the additional benefit of lower rates of bleeding and wound complications. Less consensus exists among high risk patients and more potent anticoagulants may be indicated. However, available evidence does not demonstrate clear superiority among current options, all of which may place patients at a higher risk of bleeding and wound complications. In this situation, chemoprophylactic selection should reflect specific patient needs and characteristics.
- 18 March 2020
- Published by MDPI AG in Geriatrics
- Vol. 5 (1) , 18
Open AccessReview of Therapeutic Options for the Prevention of VTE in Total Joint Arthroplasty
Hip and knee arthroplasty patients are at high risk of perioperative venous thromboembolic events (VTE). VTE has been well studied in this population and it is recommended that total joint arthroplasty recipients receive chemoprophylactic anticoagulation due to risk factors inherent to the surgical intervention. There are few concise resources for the orthopedic surgeon that summarize data regarding post-operative anticoagulation in the context of currently available therapeutic options and perioperative standards of practice. The periodic reexamination of literature is essential as conclusions drawn from studies predating perioperative protocols that include early mobilization and sequential compression devices as standards of practice in total joint arthroplasty are no longer generalizable to modern-day practice. We reviewed a large number of recently published research studies related to post-operative anticoagulation in total joint arthroplasty populations that received a high Level of Evidence grade. Current literature supports the use of oral aspirin regimens in place of more aggressive anticoagulants, particularly among low risk patients. Oral aspirin regimens appear to have the additional benefit of lower rates of bleeding and wound complications. Less consensus exists among high risk patients and more potent anticoagulants may be indicated. However, available evidence does not demonstrate clear superiority among current options, all of which may place patients at a higher risk of bleeding and wound complications. In this situation, chemoprophylactic selection should reflect specific patient needs and characteristics.