Nehal Almurbati
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Nehal Almurbati has a total of 4 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Zainab Abdulmohsen Eid
University of Salford
3 shared publications - Arnold Jonathan Wilkins
Department of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK
1 shared publication - Fay Abdulla Al Khalifa
University of Bahrain
1 shared publication - João Pinelo
Atlantic International Research Centre (AIR Centre), Azores, Portugal
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 31 July 2025
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 159-168
Applications of 3D Printing Buildings Using Construction and Demolition Waste: Techniques and Considerations
- 31 July 2025
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 159-168
Applications of 3D Printing Buildings Using Construction and Demolition Waste: Techniques and Considerations
- 30 July 2025
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 306-314
3D Printed Buildings Environmental Assessment: A Critical Review
- 30 July 2025
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 306-314
3D Printed Buildings Environmental Assessment: A Critical Review
- 27 October 2024
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 345-352
Methodologies to Assess the Environmental Impact of 3D Printed Buildings Using Construction Waste
- 27 October 2024
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 345-352
Methodologies to Assess the Environmental Impact of 3D Printed Buildings Using Construction Waste
- Open Access
- 11 February 2020
- Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University in JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURE AND URBANISM
- Vol. 44 (1) , 44-51
EXAMINING THE VISUAL EFFECT OF TRYPOPHOBIC REPETITIVE PATTERN IN CONTEMPORARY URBAN ENVIRONMENTS: BAHRAIN AS A CASE FOR MIDDLE EAST COUNTRIES
New building materials and design technologies such as design parameterisation allow for the creation of unusual architectural elements composed of spatially repetitive patterns. Images with specific spatial properties, as from repetitive patterns, may cause psychological and physiological reactions, in some cases leading to severe discomfort, headaches or seizures. Clusters of roughly circular shapes, often hollow, are also known to create reactions such as sickness and vomiting in certain individuals. The phenomenon is known as trypophobia. Because trypophobia has only recently been described and is not widely recognised, we undertook a survey of the public reaction to trypophobic images, as well as to patterns that are known to have a neurological effect, viz. patterns of stripes. The study investigates whether the two types of pattern are similarly aversive and examines the extent of the aversion to find out whether trypophobia needs to be considered when designing buildings. We showed a variety of images to 405 members of the public to gauge their reaction. In some instances, the reaction was profound: one person vomited. The findings suggest that reactions to stimuli in the built environment are significant enough to provoke a debate on the role of visual discomfort in architecture and sustainable urbanism. It seems important to further investigate the properties of architectural shapes that induce discomfort so as to avoid a public health concern in contemporary urban environments.
- 11 February 2020
- Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical University in JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURE AND URBANISM
- Vol. 44 (1) , 44-51
Open AccessEXAMINING THE VISUAL EFFECT OF TRYPOPHOBIC REPETITIVE PATTERN IN CONTEMPORARY URBAN ENVIRONMENTS: BAHRAIN AS A CASE FOR MIDDLE EAST COUNTRIES
New building materials and design technologies such as design parameterisation allow for the creation of unusual architectural elements composed of spatially repetitive patterns. Images with specific spatial properties, as from repetitive patterns, may cause psychological and physiological reactions, in some cases leading to severe discomfort, headaches or seizures. Clusters of roughly circular shapes, often hollow, are also known to create reactions such as sickness and vomiting in certain individuals. The phenomenon is known as trypophobia. Because trypophobia has only recently been described and is not widely recognised, we undertook a survey of the public reaction to trypophobic images, as well as to patterns that are known to have a neurological effect, viz. patterns of stripes. The study investigates whether the two types of pattern are similarly aversive and examines the extent of the aversion to find out whether trypophobia needs to be considered when designing buildings. We showed a variety of images to 405 members of the public to gauge their reaction. In some instances, the reaction was profound: one person vomited. The findings suggest that reactions to stimuli in the built environment are significant enough to provoke a debate on the role of visual discomfort in architecture and sustainable urbanism. It seems important to further investigate the properties of architectural shapes that induce discomfort so as to avoid a public health concern in contemporary urban environments.