Peter Larsson

Computational pharmacogenomics can potentially identify new indications for already approved drugs and pinpoint compounds with similar mechanism-of-action. Here, we used an integrated drug repositioning approach based on transcriptomics data and structure-based virtual screening to identify compounds with gene signatures similar to three known proteasome inhibitors (PIs; bortezomib, MG-132, and MLN-2238). In vitro validation of candidate compounds was then performed to assess proteasomal proteolytic activity, accumulation of ubiquitinated proteins, cell viability, and drug-induced expression in A375 melanoma and MCF7 breast cancer cells. Using this approach, we identified six compounds with PI properties ((-)-kinetin-riboside, manumycin-A, puromycin dihydrochloride, resistomycin, tegaserod maleate, and thapsigargin). Although the docking scores pinpointed their ability to bind to the β5 subunit, our in vitro study revealed that these compounds inhibited the β1, β2, and β5 catalytic sites to some extent. As shown with bortezomib, only manumycin-A, puromycin dihydrochloride, and tegaserod maleate resulted in excessive accumulation of ubiquitinated proteins and elevated HMOX1 expression. Taken together, our integrated drug repositioning approach and subsequent in vitro validation studies identified six compounds demonstrating properties similar to proteasome inhibitors.

Repurposing of FDA-approved drugs is a quick and cost-effective alternative to de novo drug development. Here, we identify genes involved in bortezomib sensitivity, predict cancer types that may benefit from treatment with bortezomib, and evaluate the mechanism-of-action of bortezomib in breast cancer (BT-474 and ZR-75–30), melanoma (A-375), and glioblastoma (A-172) cells in vitro. Cancer cell lines derived from cancers of the blood, kidney, nervous system, and skin were found to be significantly more sensitive to bortezomib than other organ systems. The in vitro studies confirmed that although bortezomib effectively inhibited the β5 catalytic site in all four cell lines, cell cycle arrest was only induced in G2/M phase and apoptosis in A-375 and A-172 after 24h. The genomic and transcriptomic analyses identified 33 genes (e.g. ALDH18A1, ATAD2) associated with bortezomib resistance. Taken together, we identified biomarkers predictive of bortezomib sensitivity and cancer types that might benefit from treatment with bortezomib.

During the preclinical stages of the drug discovery process, cell viability assays are fundamental tools for studying the phenotypic properties and overall health of cells following in vitro drug sensitivity screens. Therefore, it is important to optimize your viability assay of choice to obtain reproducible and replicable results, as well as use relevant drug response metrics (e.g., IC50, AUC, GR50, and GRmax) to identify candidate drugs for further evaluation in vivo. Herein, we used the resazurin reduction assay which is a quick, cost-effective, simple-to-use, and sensitive method for examining the phenotypic properties of cells. Using the MCF7 breast cancer cell line, we provide a detailed step-by-step protocol for optimizing drug sensitivity screens using the resazurin assay. Key words High-throughput screen Optimal cell number Doubling time Resazurin reduction assay Colorimetric assay Protocol Phenotypic screen Drug discovery MCF7 cell line

Background: The human proteasome gene family (PSM) consists of 49 genes that play a crucial role in cancer proteostasis. However, little is known about the effect of PSM gene expression and genetic alterations on clinical outcome in different cancer forms. Methods: Here, we performed a comprehensive pan-cancer analysis of genetic alterations in PSM genes and the subsequent prognostic value of PSM expression using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) containing over 10,000 samples representing up to 33 different cancer types. External validation was performed using a breast cancer cohort and KM plotter with four cancer types. Results: The PSM genetic alteration frequency was high in certain cancer types (e.g. 67%; esophageal adenocarcinoma), with DNA amplification being most common. Compared with normal tissue, most PSM genes were predominantly overexpressed in cancer. Survival analysis also established a relationship with PSM gene expression and adverse clinical outcome, where PSMA1 and PSMD11 expression were linked to more unfavorable prognosis in ≥ 30% of cancer types for both overall survival (OS) and relapse-free interval (PFI). Interestingly, PSMB5 gene expression was associated with OS (36%) and PFI (27%), and OS for PSMD2 (42%), especially when overexpressed. Conclusion: These findings indicate that several PSM genes may potentially be prognostic biomarkers and novel therapeutic targets for different cancer forms.

Cancer drug development has been riddled with high attrition rates, in part, due to poor reproducibility of preclinical models for drug discovery. Poor experimental design and lack of scientific transparency may cause experimental biases that in turn affect data quality, robustness and reproducibility. Here, we pinpoint sources of experimental variability in conventional 2D cell-based cancer drug screens to determine the effect of confounders on cell viability for MCF7 and HCC38 breast cancer cell lines treated with platinum agents (cisplatin and carboplatin) and a proteasome inhibitor (bortezomib). Variance component analysis demonstrated that variations in cell viability were primarily associated with the choice of pharmaceutical drug and cell line, and less likely to be due to the type of growth medium or assay incubation time. Furthermore, careful consideration should be given to different methods of storing diluted pharmaceutical drugs and use of DMSO controls due to the potential risk of evaporation and the subsequent effect on dose-response curves. Optimization of experimental parameters not only improved data quality substantially but also resulted in reproducible results for bortezomib- and cisplatin-treated HCC38, MCF7, MCF-10A, and MDA-MB-436 cells. Taken together, these findings indicate that replicability (the same analyst re-performs the same experiment multiple times) and reproducibility (different analysts perform the same experiment using different experimental conditions) for cell-based drug screens can be improved by identifying potential confounders and subsequent optimization of experimental parameters for each cell line.