Timo Breuer
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Timo Breuer has a total of 57 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Philipp Schaer
TH Köln - University of Applied Sciences, Cologne, Germany
26 shared publications - Norbert Fuhr
University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany
7 shared publications - Andreas Konstantin Kruff
TH Köln - University of Applied Sciences
6 shared publications - Jüri Keller
TH Köln - University of Applied Sciences
6 shared publications - Björn Engelmann
TH Köln, Cologne, Germany
5 shared publications - Christin Katharina Kreutz
TH Mittelhessen, Giessen, Germany
5 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 6 November 2026
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 1222-1233
Beyond States: Investigating the Effects of Context on User Modeling with Feature-Conditioned Markov Models
- 6 November 2026
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 1222-1233
Open AccessBeyond States: Investigating the Effects of Context on User Modeling with Feature-Conditioned Markov Models
- 21 September 2026
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 548-573
Overview of the CLEF 2026 LongEval Lab on Longitudinal Evaluation of Model Performance
- 21 September 2026
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 548-573
Overview of the CLEF 2026 LongEval Lab on Longitudinal Evaluation of Model Performance
- Open Access
- 19 July 2026
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 778-789
Formalized Information Needs Improve Large-Language-Model Relevance Judgments
- 19 July 2026
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 778-789
Open AccessFormalized Information Needs Improve Large-Language-Model Relevance Judgments
- Open Access
- 11 June 2026
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) in ACM Transactions on Information Systems
- Vol. 44 (5) , 1-41
Now That Your System Has Been Reproduced, What Does This Mean for the Users?
Reproducibility lies at the basis of the empirical method: a novel approach will be widely adopted if its experimental results can be validated and reproduced by the community. Previous work on reproducibility in Information Retrieval (IR) has mainly addressed the reproducibility and replicability of offline experiments, with a few exceptions that replicate user studies. To the best of our knowledge, no previous work has investigated how reproducibility affects real users. In this paper, we do that by evaluating and comparing the reproducibility of an IR system both offline and online. We consider a reference system and generate a constellation of reproduced systems with varying parameters. We select 6 systems with different degrees of offline reproducibility. We then run a between-subjects online experiment with 280 participants and collect clicks to evaluate online reproducibility. Results show that real users do not perceive moderate variations of the reproducibility degree of systems, while they become relevant when the difference with the original system increases. Furthermore, we trained a click model to evaluate online reproducibility with simulated clicks. Results are not consistent with those from the user study, suggesting that better click models are needed to evaluate online reproducibility. Our data and source code are publicly available: https://github.com/angelogeninatti/reproducibilityLogs .
- 11 June 2026
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) in ACM Transactions on Information Systems
- Vol. 44 (5) , 1-41
Open AccessNow That Your System Has Been Reproduced, What Does This Mean for the Users?
Reproducibility lies at the basis of the empirical method: a novel approach will be widely adopted if its experimental results can be validated and reproduced by the community. Previous work on reproducibility in Information Retrieval (IR) has mainly addressed the reproducibility and replicability of offline experiments, with a few exceptions that replicate user studies. To the best of our knowledge, no previous work has investigated how reproducibility affects real users. In this paper, we do that by evaluating and comparing the reproducibility of an IR system both offline and online. We consider a reference system and generate a constellation of reproduced systems with varying parameters. We select 6 systems with different degrees of offline reproducibility. We then run a between-subjects online experiment with 280 participants and collect clicks to evaluate online reproducibility. Results show that real users do not perceive moderate variations of the reproducibility degree of systems, while they become relevant when the difference with the original system increases. Furthermore, we trained a click model to evaluate online reproducibility with simulated clicks. Results are not consistent with those from the user study, suggesting that better click models are needed to evaluate online reproducibility. Our data and source code are publicly available: https://github.com/angelogeninatti/reproducibilityLogs .
- 24 March 2026
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 594-609
Sim4IA-Bench: A User Simulation Benchmark Suite for Next Query and Utterance Prediction
- 24 March 2026
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 594-609
Sim4IA-Bench: A User Simulation Benchmark Suite for Next Query and Utterance Prediction
- 24 March 2026
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 345-353
Evaluating Information Retrieval Models Along Time: The LongEval Lab at CLEF 2026
- 24 March 2026
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 345-353
Evaluating Information Retrieval Models Along Time: The LongEval Lab at CLEF 2026
- Open Access
- 22 September 2025
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 884-893
“We Share Our Code Online”: Why This Is Not Enough to Ensure Reproducibility and Progress in Recommender Systems Research
- 22 September 2025
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 884-893
Open Access“We Share Our Code Online”: Why This Is Not Enough to Ensure Reproducibility and Progress in Recommender Systems Research
- Open Access
- 13 July 2025
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 2931-2935
Evaluating Contrastive Feedback for Effective User Simulations
- 13 July 2025
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 2931-2935
Open AccessEvaluating Contrastive Feedback for Effective User Simulations
- Open Access
- 13 July 2025
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 4172-4175
Second SIGIR Workshop on Simulations for Information Access (Sim4IA 2025)
- 13 July 2025
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
- p. 4172-4175
Open AccessSecond SIGIR Workshop on Simulations for Information Access (Sim4IA 2025)
- Open Access
- 1 July 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Datenbank-Spektrum
- Vol. 25 (2) , 71-81
Large Language Models for Information Retrieval: Challenges and Chances
The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has introduced a paradigm shift in Information Retrieval (IR), moving beyond conventional keyword queries and ranked result lists. LLMs now play a critical role in the evolution of IR technologies and introduce new interaction forms like Retrieval-Augmented Generation, which is a more dynamic and interactive retrieval process that integrates various aspects of Information Access, like Question Answering, into the dialog between a searcher and the search engine. We explore the multi-faceted impact of LLMs on IR, particularly in three distinct layers where they have become an integral part of the retrieval process, namely the retrieval system and processing pipeline that can make use of a richer semantic representation using advanced language models, the interaction layer, and the broader IR ecosystem. For the latter, we focus on evaluation issues as well as bias, fairness, and ethical concerns. We also highlight some recent cases of using LLMs in the medical domain to demonstrate the impact on one specific domain.
- 1 July 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Datenbank-Spektrum
- Vol. 25 (2) , 71-81
Open AccessLarge Language Models for Information Retrieval: Challenges and Chances
The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has introduced a paradigm shift in Information Retrieval (IR), moving beyond conventional keyword queries and ranked result lists. LLMs now play a critical role in the evolution of IR technologies and introduce new interaction forms like Retrieval-Augmented Generation, which is a more dynamic and interactive retrieval process that integrates various aspects of Information Access, like Question Answering, into the dialog between a searcher and the search engine. We explore the multi-faceted impact of LLMs on IR, particularly in three distinct layers where they have become an integral part of the retrieval process, namely the retrieval system and processing pipeline that can make use of a richer semantic representation using advanced language models, the interaction layer, and the broader IR ecosystem. For the latter, we focus on evaluation issues as well as bias, fairness, and ethical concerns. We also highlight some recent cases of using LLMs in the medical domain to demonstrate the impact on one specific domain.