Dariusz Marczak

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a severe complication following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA), associated with significantly increased patient morbidity and mortality. PJI remains the leading cause of early revision surgery after total joint arthroplasty and imposes a substantial financial burden on the healthcare system. In the United States, the incidence of PJI is estimated at 1–2% for primary THA and TKA procedures. Infections can arise from local spread from the skin or air, or through hematogenous seeding of the affected joint. Reducing the bacterial load at the surgical site is critical for preventing postoperative infections, and this goal is achieved through rigorous maintenance of perioperative sterility and appropriate antibiotic administration. Antibiotic prophylaxis is a cornerstone of infection prevention in arthroplasty and has been conclusively shown to lower the incidence of PJI. However, considerable variability and ongoing debate exist regarding the optimal route of antibiotic administration for infection prevention in THA and TKA. This review summarizes the current evidence on antibiotic strategies during primary total hip and knee arthroplasty, with the aim of informing perioperative management decisions among arthroplasty specialists and other clinicians involved in the care of these patients. This review will help guide perioperative decisions for arthroplasty specialists and will also serve as a valuable resource for general practitioners and infectious disease specialists who are involved in the care of patients who are about to undergo or have previously undergone a total joint arthroplasty procedure. This article is well-suited for publication in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders because it addresses a major cause of morbidity and revision surgery in orthopaedic practice, aligning closely with the journal’s focus on musculoskeletal health and disease. By synthesizing current evidence on antibiotic prophylaxis in total joint arthroplasty, it offers practical guidance for clinicians, researchers, and policymakers seeking to improve surgical outcomes. The article’s multidisciplinary relevance, spanning orthopaedics, infectious disease, and perioperative care, fits the journal’s commitment to publishing research that bridges clinical practice and broader healthcare impacts.

Background. Recent studies have revealed the usefulness of synovial calprotectin (CLP) in diagnosing chronic periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs). However, there is still a lack of evidence to support the use of serum CLP in the diagnosis of early PJIs and surgical site infections (SSIs) after total joint arthroplasties (TJAs). Objectives. The primary aim of this study is to investigate the standard kinetics of CLP concentrations in the blood during the very early postoperative period after non-complicated total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The secondary aim was to perform a preliminary comparison of CLP concentrations between non-infected patients and patients with recognized SSIs. Materials and methods. A total of 64 consecutive patients who underwent primary THA and TKA were included in this prospective research. Sixty patients (30 THA and 30 TKA) were scheduled to determine the standard shape of the blood CLP curve and the expected concentrations during the first 5 postoperative days after non-complicated TJAs. In 4 additonal patients, early SSI was confirmed, and they were included in a separate SSI subgroup. Results. Calprotectin demonstrated a linear increase during the first 5 postoperative days. Statistically significant differences in CLP concentrations between non-infected cases and SSIs were not observed. The preoperative median results with interquartile range (Q1-Q3) were 0.52 (0.39-0.64) mg/dL and 0.5 (0.47-0.52) mg/dL (p = 0.77), while post operation they were as follows: on postoperative day 1: 0.88 (0.53-1.3) mg/dL and 0.86 (0.62-1.1) mg/dL (p = 0.84), on postoperative day 3: 1.77 (1.29-2.08) mg/dL and 1.85 (1.70-1.95) mg/dL (p = 0.72), and on postoperative day 5: 2.32 (1.79-2.67) mg/dL and 2.56 (2.25-2.83) mg/dL (p = 0.55), respectively. Conclusions. Serial CLP measurements during the early postoperative period revealed a linear (statistically significant) increase in concentration to postoperative day 5 without an evident point of decrease. A significant difference in median values and the course of curve patterns between the non-complicated and SSI groups was not observed.

Aims: Total knee arthroplasty in patients with fixed valgus deformity is a demanding procedure. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical results of using the lateral approach [LA] versus the medial approach [MA] in the treatment of fixed valgus knee deformities. Methods: This single-center study compared the results of 143 consecutive patients with fixed valgus deformity (mean 21.55° valgus, mean age 68.2 years) undergoing LA Total Knee Arthroplasty [TKA] to 50 patients (mean 16.58° valgus, mean age 67.2 years) undergoing MA TKA. The mean follow-up period was 5.1 years (2–10 years). Data was collected from operative notes, routine postoperative visits, and radiological findings. Apart from a radiological evaluation, patients were clinically assessed both pre- and postoperatively using the Knee Society Score [KSS]. Descriptive statistics together with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, the Student’s t-test for independent samples, and the Mann-Whitney U test were used. The level of significance in this study was α = 0.05. Results: In the LA group, the KSS Knee was significantly higher than in the MA group [85.31 vs. 77.42, respectively, p-value < 0.001]. The difference was also in the KSS total but with no statistical significance [155.17 vs. 149.22, p-value 0.087]. The surgery time in the LA group was shorter than in the MA group [81 vs. 91 min, respectively, p-value—0.002]. The complication rate after surgery was higher in the MA group than in the LA group (14% vs. 9%, respectively). Conclusions: The lateral approach is a good alternative to the standard medial parapatellar approach in the treatment of fixed valgus knee deformities. A higher postoperative KSS Knee, shorter surgery time, and similar complication rate make the lateral approach a valuable option for treating patients with osteoarthritis and fixed valgus knee deformity.

Background: The aim of this study was to analyze the treatment results of fungal periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) caused by Candida species from a single orthopedic center and to compare them with reports from other institutions. Methods: Eight patients operated on from January 2014 to December 2021 met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed in terms of clinical outcomes. A systematic review of the literature identified 153 patients with Candida PJIs extracted from 12 studies according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Results: The success rate of the treatment in the case series was 50%. The most frequent pathogens were Candida albicans (three cases; 37.5%) and Candida parapsilosis (three cases; 37.5%). In one patient (12.5%), bacterial co-infection was noted, and in five patients (62.5%) significant risk factors of PJI were confirmed. The overall success rate on the basis of data collected for systematic review was 65.5%. A sub-analysis of 127 patients revealed statistically significant differences (p = 0.02) with a higher success rate for the knees (77.6%) than for the hips (58%). In 10 studies the analysis of risk factors was performed and among 106 patients in 77 (72.6%) comorbidities predispose to fungal PJI were confirmed. Bacterial co-infection was noted in 84 patients (54.9%). In 93 patients (60.7%) Candida albicans was the culprit pathogen, and in 39 patients (25.5%) Candida parapsilosis was the culprit pathogen. Based on these two most frequent Candida species causing PJI, the success rate of the treatment was statistically different (p = 0.03), and was 60.3% and 83.3%, respectively. The two-stage strategy was more favorable for patients with Candida parapsilosis infections (94.4% success rate) than the one-stage protocol (50% success rate; p = 0.02); as well as in comparison to the two-stage treatment of Candida albicans (65% success rate; p = 0.04). Conclusions: The analysis of the literature showed no differences in the overall success rate between one- and two-stage surgical strategies for all Candida species, but differed significantly comparing the two most frequent strains and concerning PJI localization. The frequent presence of bacterial co-infections makes it necessary to consider the additional administration of antibiotics in the case of fungal PJI.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the bone union, complication rate, clinical and functional outcomes of long-stemmed total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients with periprosthetic femoral or tibial shaft fractures and in patients with femoral or tibial shaft fractures with coexisting advanced knee osteoarthritis (OA). This retrospective study comprised 25 patients who underwent surgery due to tibial or femoral shaft fractures: (1) with coexisting severe knee OA or (2) with a periprosthetic fracture requiring implant exchange. In all cases, fracture stabilization was performed intramedullary with the use of long-stemmed implants without the use of additional fixation material (plates, screws, or cerclage). Bone union was achieved in 22/25 patients (88%). One patient required revision with additional plate stabilization due to non-union, and asymptomatic partial bone union was observed in two cases. The group with periprosthetic fractures demonstrated good clinical (mean 73.1 ± 13.3) and moderate functional (mean 59.2 ± 18.8) outcomes in the Knee Society Scoring system (KSS). In the group with shaft fracture and coexisting OA significantly higher clinical (excellent results, mean 84.1 ± 11; p = 0.03) and functional (good results, mean 76.2 ± 20.6; p = 0.04) results were noted. There were no statistically significant differences in terms of range of motion (ROM) or complication rate between these two groups. One-stage TKA with a long-stemmed implant without the use of additional fixation material is an effective method for the treatment of femoral or tibial shaft fractures in patients who require joint replacement. Despite being technically demanding, the approach yields bone union and moderate to excellent clinical and functional outcomes with a relatively low complication rate.

Background: Hereditary multiple osteochondromas (hereditary multiple exostoses, HME) is a rare genetic disease characterized by the development of benign osteocartilaginous tumors that may cause severe limb deformities and early onset osteoarthritis. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the method of choice for the treatment of advanced gonarthrosis, however the surgical management with coexisting severe axial limb deformity remains unclear.Case presentation: 65-year-old man with HME and extra-articular multi-axial limb deformity was admitted to the orthopedic department due to chronic knee pain and limited range of motion caused by secondary osteoarthritis. Regarding to the clinical and radiological examinations, after preoperative planning he was qualified to a one-stage TKA combined with tibial shaft osteotomy (TSO). In a one year follow-up full bone union was confirmed with no signs of implant loosening or prosthesis displacement. Patient was very satisfied, did not report any joint pain and has sufficient range of motion without knee instability.Conclusion: The improvement of mechanical axis during TKA is a crucial factor for achieve operative success and long implant survival. Despite the higher risk of complication rate in comparison to two-stage treatment, one-stage TKA with simultaneous TSO should be a considerable method for patients with osteoarthritis and multiaxial limb deformities. This method can give a good clinical and functional outcomes, however should be performed subsequently to careful preoperative planning and proper patient qualification.