Wenjun Zhong

Introduction: Hypoxia‐inducible factor‐2α (HIF‐2α) modulates the hypoxic response pathway in tumors; however, mutations in pathways (including SDHA, SDHB, SDHC, SDHD, FH, and VHL genes) that are suspected to activate HIF‐2α are poorly understood, with limited understanding of the prevalence and clinical prognosis.Methods: This retrospective observational study used a de‐identified nationwide (US‐based) clinico‐genomic database (CGDB) across 15 available tumor types.Results: Among the 9467 adult patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors included in the analysis, any mutation at the above‐mentioned six genes was observed in 1.8% (95% CI: 1.5–2.1) of patients. The mutation prevalence ranged from 0.05% of SDHD to 0.93% of VHL. When further stratified by tumor type, the prevalence of gene mutation in each tumor type was well below 1%, except for VHL with 44% in renal cell carcinomas (RCC). Excluding RCC, the prevalence of any HIF‐2α gene mutations in the study population was 0.9% (95% CI: 0.8–1.2). The median overall survival (OS) from 1 and 2 L therapy among patients with any HIF‐2α gene mutation was 14.5 (95% CI: 11.5–24.2) and 9.3 (95% CI: 6.0–18.1) months, respectively, compared with 13.4 (95% CI: 12.9–13.9) and 9.8 (95% CI: 9.3–10.4) months among patients without HIF‐2α gene mutations.Discussion and Conclusions: The prevalence of HIF‐2α related gene mutations was generally low (<1%) across the 15 solid tumor types, except for VHL in RCC. No significant association between HIF‐2α gene mutation status and OS was identified among patients evaluated in this study.

The classification of undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) has been evolving with advances in immunohistochemistry and genomic profiling over the past 20 years. There is a lack of current information on UPS incidence. Due to the lack of designated histology codes for UPS in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEERs) program, we estimated UPS incidence by three different definitions based on clinical opinions using the 2000–2020 data from 22 registries of the SEER program. The incidence varied widely across the three definitions with 0.06 per 100,000 persons for the least inclusive definition and 0.67 per 100,000 persons for the most inclusive definition in 2016–2020, making it challenging to estimate the exact incidence of UPS. Regardless, all the incidences decreased between 2000 and 2020. Guidelines in UPS diagnosis and classification need to be better implemented in the US.

Insomnia is a common sleep disorder characterized as dissatisfaction with sleep quantity or quality resulting in distress or impairment of social, occupational, or other daily functioning. It is unknown if there are medical conditions that have strong associations with insomnia but are unrecognized in previous literature. In this cross-sectional study based on IBM Marketscan Research Databases, we measured insomnia and 78 medical conditions in patients with 2-year continuous enrollment during 2018–2019. We selected important comorbidities associated with insomnia for eight age-sex groups and built logistic regression models to measure the associations. The prevalence of diagnosed insomnia increased with age, from <0.4% in the age group 0–17 to 4%–5% in the age group ≥65. Females had a higher prevalence of insomnia than males. Anxiety and depression were two important comorbidities across all age-sex subgroups. Most odds ratios of comorbidities remained significant after adjusting for other comorbidities in regression models. We did not find any new medical conditions that had strong associations with insomnia but were unrecognized in previous literature. The findings can help physicians use comorbidities to identify patients with high risk of insomnia.

This study used 2 insurance databases to estimate the prevalence of treatment-resistant depression among US patients with pharmaceutically treated depression.

Background: Behavioral disturbance (BD) is common in dementia patients, with no FDA approved medications for this condition. Little data exists on the real-world medication use in this population. Objective: To describe real-world medications use in this population. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using the MarketScan database for outpatient medications and the Cerner database for inpatient medications. The study period was Oct 2015–Jun 2018. Patients with dementia and BD were identified through ICD-10-CM. We examined outpatient medications prescribed during 6-month before or after BD event date, and inpatient medications during inpatient visits, especially on central nervous systems (CNS) drugs including antidementia drugs, antidepressants, antipsychotics, anxiolytics, and anticonvulsants. Results: A total of 56,544 outpatients and 34,245 patient hospitalizations were assessed separately. Among outpatients, patients filled more medications after a BD event. The use of the five CNS drug classes generally increased after a BD event, and the largest increase was seen in antipsychotics (23%to 33%). Among inpatients, the median number of medications used in each hospitalization was 14. The use of antipsychotics was particularly high (64%), followed by anxiolytics (51%). A list of 60 unique medications were suggested to be the commonly used drugs in dementia patients with BD. Conclusion: In dementia patients with BD, anti-dementia medications, antidepressants, anticonvulsants, hypnotics and antipsychotics were the most used drug classes. Antidepressants and antipsychotics use were more frequent after a BD event, which suggests a need for safe drugs targeting BD in dementia patients.

Background BRIDION^® (sugammadex sodium) is an agent for the reversal of neuromuscular blockade (NMB) induced by rocuronium and vecuronium in general anesthesia. Following the approval of sugammadex in Canada (February 2016), Health Canada required a survey to assess the knowledge and understanding of the safety and efficacy aspects of sugammadex among anesthesiologists in Canada. Objective Our objective was to evaluate how well the anesthesiologists in Canada understood the safety and efficacy aspects of sugammadex. Methods A survey was implemented among anesthesiologists in Canada via internet/phone. The survey was organized to test the knowledge of anesthesiologists by utilizing 11 key questions regarding the safety and efficacy of sugammadex. Five additional safety questions that were not considered part of the key messages but were important concepts for anesthesiologists to know when administering sugammadex were also included. Results A total of 202 completed surveys were collected. Based on an a priori threshold of understanding of 75%, 9 out of 11 key messages scored at or above this threshold. The two messages that scored below this threshold involved (1) knowledge that sugammadex is not indicated for use in children aged < 18 years (71.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 65.0–77.9) and (2) that monitoring is required for recurrence of NMB after reversal with sugammadex (73.3%; 95% CI 66.6–79.2). Of the five additional safety questions, four had an understanding rate of ≥ 88.1%. One question scored 60.4%; this question covered the concept that sugammadex is not recommended for use in patients with severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min), including those requiring dialysis. Conclusion In general, the survey results suggested that anesthesiologists understood the use, safety, and efficacy of sugammadex for the reversal of moderate to deep NMB induced by rocuronium or vecuronium in adults undergoing surgery.

Background: Sugammadex (Bridion) was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in December 2015 for the reversal of neuromuscular block (NMB) induced by rocuronium and vecuronium bromide in adults undergoing surgery and approved for use in both adults and children in the European Union in 2008. Sugammadex use in children has been reported in the United States, but to what extent is not clear. Aims: The aim was to describe the utilization pattern of NMB agents and factors associated with the use of reversal agents (neostigmine and sugammadex) in US children. Methods: Cross-sectional study of children with exposure to NMB agents between 2015 and 2017 in the Cerner Health Facts^® database, which is an electronic health record (EHR) database across 600 facilities in the United States. Logistic regression estimated factors associated with the use of sugammadex vs neostigmine. Results: A total of 27 094 pediatric clinical encounters were exposed to neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs), in which 21 845 were exposed to rocuronium (76%), vecuronium (18%), or both (6%). Among children with exposure to rocuronium and vecuronium, the use of sugammadex was 1.7% in 2016 and 7.6% in 2017. The multivariable logistic model suggested that children who were older (age 12-17 years vs 0-1 year; odds ratio [OR] 1.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36-2.83), Hispanic or Latino ethnicity and other ethnicities (vs non-Hispanic or Latino; OR 2.03 and 1.56; 95% CI, 1.55-2.67 and 1.15-2.13, respectively), in teaching facilities (OR 1.26; 95% CI, 1.00-1.59), or admitted through emergency departments (OR 1.65; 95% CI, 1.06-2.58) were independently more likely to receive sugammadex than neostigmine after controlling for other covariates. Conclusions: In Cerner Health Facts database 2015 to 2017, among children, rocuronium was more commonly used than vecuronium, and sugammadex use was observed since 2016. Sugammadex and neostigmine users varied by demographic, clinical, and site-level characteristics.