Chance M. Carbaugh

Plerixafor is a CXCR4 antagonist approved in 2008 by the FDA for hematopoietic stem cell collection. Subsequently, plerixafor has shown promise as a potential pathogen‐agnostic immunomodulator in a variety of preclinical animal models. Additionally, investigator‐led studies demonstrated plerixafor prevents viral and bacterial infections in patients with WHIM syndrome, a rare immunodeficiency with aberrant CXCR4 signaling. Here, we investigated whether plerixafor could be repurposed to treat sepsis or severe wound infections, either alone or as an adjunct therapy. In a Pseudomonas aeruginosa lipopolysaccharide (LPS)‐induced zebrafish sepsis model, plerixafor reduced sepsis mortality and morbidity assessed by tail edema. There was a U‐shaped response curve with the greatest effect seen at 0.1 μM concentration. We used Acinetobacter baumannii infection in a neutropenic murine thigh infection model. Plerixafor did not show reduced bacterial growth at 24 h in the mouse thigh model, nor did it amplify the effects of a rifampin antibiotic therapy, in varying regimens. While plerixafor did not mitigate or treat bacterial wound infections in mice, it did reduce sepsis mortality in zebra fish. The observed mortality reduction in our LPS model of zebrafish was consistent with prior research demonstrating a mortality benefit in a murine model of sepsis. However, based on our results, plerixafor is unlikely to be successful as an adjunct therapy for wound infections. Further research is needed to better define the scope of plerixafor as a pathogen‐agnostic therapy. Future directions may include the use of longer acting CXCR4 antagonists, biased CXCR4 signaling, and optimization of animal models.

Engineered nanomaterials pose occupational health and environmental concerns as they possess unique physical and chemical properties that can contribute to toxicity. High throughput toxicity screening methods are needed to address the increasing number of nanomaterials in production. Here we used a zebrafish photomotor response (PMR) test to evaluate a set of fifteen nanomaterials with military relevance. Automated dechorionation of zebrafish embryos was used to enhance nanomaterials bioavailability. Optimal PMR activity in zebrafish embryos was found at 30–31 hours post-fertilization (hpf). Behavioral and toxicological responses were measured at 30 and 120 hpf; behavioral responses were found for thirteen of the fifteen nanomaterials and acute toxicity (LC50) levels for nine of the fifteen nanomaterials below the maximum test concentration of 500 μg/ml. Physico-chemical characterization of the nanomaterials detected endotoxin and bacterial contamination in two of the tested samples, which may have contributed to observed toxicity and reinforces the need for physical and chemical characterization of nanomaterials use in toxicity testing. The zebrafish PMR test, together with automated dechorionation, provides an initial rapid assessment of the behavioral effects and toxicity of engineered nanomaterials that can be followed up by physico-chemical characterization if toxicity is detected, reducing the amount of time and monetary constraints of physico-chemical testing.

Zebrafish are an attractive model for chemical screening due to their adaptability to high‐throughput platforms and ability to display complex phenotypes in response to chemical exposure. The photomotor response (PMR) is an established and reproducible phenotype of the zebrafish embryo, observed 24 h post‐fertilization in response to a predefined sequence of light stimuli. In an effort to evaluate the sensitivity and effectiveness of the zebrafish embryo PMR assay for toxicity screening, we analyzed chemicals known to cause both neurological effects and developmental abnormalities, following both short (1 h) and long (16 h+) duration exposures. These include chemicals that inhibit aerobic respiration (eg, cyanide), acetyl cholinesterase inhibitors (organophosphates pesticides) and several chemical weapon precursor compounds with variable toxicity profiles and poorly understood mechanisms of toxicity. We observed notable concentration‐responsive, phase‐specific effects in the PMR after exposure to chemicals with a known mechanism of action. Chemicals with a more general toxicity profile (toxic chemical weapon precursors) appeared to reduce all phases of the PMR without a notable phase‐specific effect. Overall, 10 of 20 chemicals evaluated elicited an effect on the PMR response and eight of those 10 chemicals were picked up in both the short‐ and long‐duration assays. In addition, the patterns of response uniquely differentiated chemical weapon precursor effects from those elicited by inhibitors of aerobic respiration and organophosphates. By providing a rapid screening test for neurobehavioral effects, the zebrafish PMR test could help identify potential mechanisms of action and target compounds for more detailed follow‐on toxicological evaluations.Approved for public release: distribution unlimited.