Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Hoofar Hemmatabady has a total of 15 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Co-simulation of district heating systems and borehole heat exchanger arrays using 3D finite element method subsurface models

    by Julian Formhals, Bastian Welsch, Hoofar Hemmatabady, Daniel O. Schulte, Lukas Seib, Ingo Sass

    Integration of borehole heat exchangers (BHE) into district heating (DH) should be supported by numerical simulations to ensure efficient operation. Co-simulation allows for the use of dedicated software for above and below ground sub-models, facilitating the use of detailed 3D geological models. This paper presents a methodology for coupling DH models in Modelica to 3D FEM subsurface models. An interface which implements BHE models in Modelica and one with BHE models in the FEM model are compared to a benchmark model. Furthermore, an adaptive control of the communication steps reduces communication error and computational times simultaneously. A fictional solar DH system with underground thermal energy storage is co-simulated to demonstrate potential advantages of the proposed method. Overall, co-simulation of DH systems and BHE arrays facilitates accurate performance assessment of systems for which this would not be possible otherwise, but should be applied carefully, due to the increased computational effort.


  • Open Access

    Optimized Layouts of Borehole Thermal Energy Storage Systems in 4th Generation Grids

    by Hoofar Hemmatabady, Julian Formhals, Bastian Welsch, Daniel Otto Schulte, Ingo Sass

    Borehole thermal energy storage (BTES) systems are a viable option to meet the increasing cooling demand and to increase the sustainability of low-temperature district heating and cooling (DHC) grids. They are able to store the rejected heat of cooling cycles on a seasonal basis and deliver this heat during the heating season. However, their efficient practical implementation requires a thorough analysis from technical, economic and environmental points of view. In this comparative study, a dynamic exergoeconomic assessment is adopted to evaluate various options for integrating such a storage system into 4th generation DHC grids in heating dominated regions. For this purpose, different layouts are modeled and parameterized. Multi-objective optimization is conducted, varying the most important design variables in order to maximize exergetic efficiency and to minimize levelized cost of energy (LCOE). A comparison of the optimal designs of the different layouts reveals that passive cooling together with maximizing the heating temperature shift, accomplished by a heat pump, lead to optimal designs. Component-wise exergy and cost analysis of the most efficient designs highlights that heat pumps are responsible for the highest share in inefficiency while the installation of BTES has a high impact in the LCOE. BTES and buffer storage tanks have the lowest exergy destruction for all layouts and increasing the BTES volume results in more efficient DHC grids.


  • Open Access

    A Modelica Toolbox for the Simulation of Borehole Thermal Energy Storage Systems

    by Julian Formhals, Hoofar Hemmatabady, Bastian Welsch, Daniel Otto Schulte, Ingo Sass

    Borehole thermal energy storage (BTES) systems facilitate the subsurface seasonal storage of thermal energy on district heating scales. These systems’ performances are strongly dependent on operational conditions like temperature levels or hydraulic circuitry. Preliminary numerical system simulations improve comprehension of the storage performance and its interdependencies with other system components, but require both accurate and computationally efficient models. This study presents a toolbox for the simulation of borehole thermal energy storage systems in Modelica. The storage model is divided into a borehole heat exchanger (BHE), a local, and a global sub-model. For each sub-model, different modeling approaches can be deployed. To assess the overall performance of the model, two studies are carried out: One compares the model results to those of 3D finite element method (FEM) models to investigate the model’s validity over a large range of parameters. In a second study, the accuracies of the implemented model variants are assessed by comparing their results to monitoring data from an existing BTES system. Both studies prove the validity of the modeling approaches under investigation. Although the differences in accuracy for the compared variants are small, the proper model choice can significantly reduce the computational effort.


  • Hybrid thermal seasonal storage and solar assisted geothermal heat pump systems for greenhouses

    by Abtin Ataei, Hoofar Hemmatabady, Seyed Yahya Nobakht

    Hybrid thermal seasonal storage and solar assisted geothermal heat pump systems for greenhouses heating COP;cooling COP;thermal storage;TRNSYS;heat pump;control strategies;parallel;series; In this research, optimum design of the combined solar collector, geothermal heat pump and thermal seasonal storage system for heating and cooling a sample greenhouse is studied. In order to optimize the system from technical point of view some new control strategies and functions resulting from important TRNSYS output diagrams are presented. Temperatures of ground, rock bed storage, outlet ground heat exchanger fluid and entering fluid to the evaporator specify our strategies. Optimal heat storage is done with maximum efficiency and minimum loss. Mean seasonal heating and cooling COPs of 4.92 and 7.14 are achieved in series mode as there is no need to start the heat pump sometimes. Furthermore, optimal parallel operation of the storage and the heat pump is studied by applying the same control strategies. Although the aforementioned system has higher mean seasonal heating and cooling COPs (4.96 and 7.18 respectively) and lower initial cost, it requires higher amounts of auxiliary energy either. Soil temperature around ground heat exchanger will also increase up to $1.5^{\circ}C$ after 2 years of operation as a result of seasonal storage. At the end, the optimum combined system is chosen by trade-off between technical and economic issues.