Ewa Pawłowicz-Szlarska
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Ewa Pawłowicz-Szlarska has a total of 39 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Michał Nowicki
Department of Nephrology, Hypertension, Transplantation and Internal Medicine, Central University Hospital, Medical University of Lodz, 90-419 Lodz, Poland
10 shared publications Joanna Forycka
Student Scientific Society affiliated with the Department of Nephrology, Hypertension and Kidney Transplantation, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
2 shared publicationsKarolina Harendarz
Student Scientific Society affiliated with the Department of Nephrology, Hypertension and Kidney Transplantation, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
2 shared publications- Agata Sarniak
Department of Clinical Physiology, Medical University of Lodz, Mazowiecka 6/8, 92-215 Lodz, Poland
1 shared publication - Agnieszka Makówka
Department of Nephrology, Hypertension, Transplantation, and Internal Medicine, Central University Hospital, Medical University of ?ód?, ?ód?, Poland
1 shared publication Aleksander Kowal
Student Scientific Society affiliated with the Department of Nephrology, Hypertension and Kidney Transplantation, Central University Hospital, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 1 November 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Advances in Kidney Disease and Health
- Vol. 32 (6) , 479-487
Overcoming Logistical Challenges in Kidney Disease Treatment and Workflow Management in Disasters
- 1 November 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Advances in Kidney Disease and Health
- Vol. 32 (6) , 479-487
Open AccessOvercoming Logistical Challenges in Kidney Disease Treatment and Workflow Management in Disasters
- Open Access
- 30 April 2025
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Clinical Kidney Journal
- Vol. 18 (5) , sfaf132
Ten tips on how to manage kidney health in migrants and refugees
The number of forcibly displaced people worldwide continues to rise each year due to armed conflicts, human rights violations and natural disasters. Many others migrate in search of better living conditions. People with chronic kidney disease, particularly those requiring kidney replacement therapy, are especially vulnerable during displacement. Preparedness is crucial to minimize risks for these patients. Education and training provided in the pre-disaster period may raise patients’ resilience and improve outcomes. Local or national kidney disaster relief task forces could help coordinate evacuation efforts and care for migrant patients, ensuring collaboration among stakeholders. While providing high-quality kidney care is essential, challenges such as healthcare costs, reimbursement issues, and social or cultural barriers may limit access in host countries. It is also critical to address the psychological needs of displaced people. Caring for displaced patients raises ethical concerns, leading to moral distress and burnout among healthcare providers. Collaborative efforts to address these challenges are essential to ensure the best outcomes for both displaced individuals and host countries.
- 30 April 2025
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Clinical Kidney Journal
- Vol. 18 (5) , sfaf132
Open AccessTen tips on how to manage kidney health in migrants and refugees
The number of forcibly displaced people worldwide continues to rise each year due to armed conflicts, human rights violations and natural disasters. Many others migrate in search of better living conditions. People with chronic kidney disease, particularly those requiring kidney replacement therapy, are especially vulnerable during displacement. Preparedness is crucial to minimize risks for these patients. Education and training provided in the pre-disaster period may raise patients’ resilience and improve outcomes. Local or national kidney disaster relief task forces could help coordinate evacuation efforts and care for migrant patients, ensuring collaboration among stakeholders. While providing high-quality kidney care is essential, challenges such as healthcare costs, reimbursement issues, and social or cultural barriers may limit access in host countries. It is also critical to address the psychological needs of displaced people. Caring for displaced patients raises ethical concerns, leading to moral distress and burnout among healthcare providers. Collaborative efforts to address these challenges are essential to ensure the best outcomes for both displaced individuals and host countries.
- Open Access
- 7 November 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 12 (22) , 6964
Kidney Transplant Recipients Show Limited Lung Diffusion Capacity but Similar Hydrogen Peroxide Exhalation as Healthy Matched Volunteers: A Pilot Study
Patients with end-stage chronic kidney disease show higher systemic oxidative stress and exhale more hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) than healthy controls. Kidney transplantation reduces oxidative stress and H2O2 production by blood polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs). Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) may be predisposed to an impairment of lung diffusing capacity due to chronic inflammation. Lung function and H2O2 concentration in the exhaled breath condensate (EBC) were compared in 20 KTRs with stable allograft function to 20 healthy matched controls. Serum interleukin eight (IL-8) and C-reactive protein (CRP), blood cell counts, and spirometry parameters did not differ between groups. However, KTRs showed lower total lung diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide, corrected for hemoglobin concentration (TLCOc), in comparison to healthy controls (92.1 ± 11.5% vs. 102.3 ± 11.9% of predicted, p = 0.009), but similar EBC H2O2 concentration (1.63 ± 0.52 vs. 1.77 ± 0.50 µmol/L, p = 0.30). The modality of pre-transplant renal replacement therapy had no effect on TLCOc and EBC H2O2. TLCOc did not correlate with time after transplantation. In this study, TLCOc was less reduced in KTRs in comparison to previous reports. We suggest this fact and the non-elevated H2O2 exhalation exhibited by KTRs, may result perhaps from the evolution of the immunosuppressive therapy.
- 7 November 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 12 (22) , 6964
Open AccessKidney Transplant Recipients Show Limited Lung Diffusion Capacity but Similar Hydrogen Peroxide Exhalation as Healthy Matched Volunteers: A Pilot Study
Patients with end-stage chronic kidney disease show higher systemic oxidative stress and exhale more hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) than healthy controls. Kidney transplantation reduces oxidative stress and H2O2 production by blood polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs). Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) may be predisposed to an impairment of lung diffusing capacity due to chronic inflammation. Lung function and H2O2 concentration in the exhaled breath condensate (EBC) were compared in 20 KTRs with stable allograft function to 20 healthy matched controls. Serum interleukin eight (IL-8) and C-reactive protein (CRP), blood cell counts, and spirometry parameters did not differ between groups. However, KTRs showed lower total lung diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide, corrected for hemoglobin concentration (TLCOc), in comparison to healthy controls (92.1 ± 11.5% vs. 102.3 ± 11.9% of predicted, p = 0.009), but similar EBC H2O2 concentration (1.63 ± 0.52 vs. 1.77 ± 0.50 µmol/L, p = 0.30). The modality of pre-transplant renal replacement therapy had no effect on TLCOc and EBC H2O2. TLCOc did not correlate with time after transplantation. In this study, TLCOc was less reduced in KTRs in comparison to previous reports. We suggest this fact and the non-elevated H2O2 exhalation exhibited by KTRs, may result perhaps from the evolution of the immunosuppressive therapy.
- 13 February 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Renal Nutrition
- Vol. 33 (4) , 592-600
Activity and Profile of the Users of a Novel Mobile Application Supporting Proper Diet Among Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients
- 13 February 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Renal Nutrition
- Vol. 33 (4) , 592-600
Activity and Profile of the Users of a Novel Mobile Application Supporting Proper Diet Among Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients
- Open Access
- 23 January 2023
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Renal Failure
- Vol. 45 (1) , 2164305
Effect of intravenous iron on endogenous erythropoietin and FGF-23 secretion in patients with chronic kidney disease
It has been observed that intravenous iron administration may suppress endogenous production of erythropoietin (EPO). We postulate that this effect may be mediated by increased FGF-23 secretion.To ...
- 23 January 2023
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Renal Failure
- Vol. 45 (1) , 2164305
Open AccessEffect of intravenous iron on endogenous erythropoietin and FGF-23 secretion in patients with chronic kidney disease
It has been observed that intravenous iron administration may suppress endogenous production of erythropoietin (EPO). We postulate that this effect may be mediated by increased FGF-23 secretion.To ...
- Open Access
- 28 October 2022
- Published by International Scientific Information, Inc. in American Journal of Case Reports
- Vol. 23, e936565-1-e936565-7
Novel Complement Factor B Gene Mutation Identified in a Kidney Transplant Recipient with a Shiga Toxin-Triggered Episode of Thrombotic Microangiopathy
Objective: Rare diseaseBackground: Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is an ultra-rare disorder characterized by over-activation and dysregulation of the alternative complement pathway. The clinical presentation of the disease comprises thrombocytopenia, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, and acute kidney injury. In most cases, aHUS is caused by genetic mutations in components of the alternative complement pathway. The risk of graft loss in patients after kidney transplantation with aHUS is dependent on the type of genetic mutation.Case Report: We present a case of a 32-year-old patient after a second kidney transplantation with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome, whose clinical manifestation was triggered by the Shiga toxin-producing E. coli infection. Genetic testing revealed a new mutation (p.I342T) in the gene encoding complement factor B (CFB). Since 2 causative variants for aHUS have been described in the same exon of CFB gene, it might be supposed that the p.I342T variant has similar deleterious effects on CFB function. Despite the implemented treatment, graft function deteriorated and the patient had to return to a hemodialysis program and is currently on a waiting list for a third kidney transplant. The presence of the gene variant with increased susceptibility for aHUS and its recurrence after kidney transplantation makes the patient a good candidate for therapy with complement factor C5 inhibitors during and after the planned kidney transplantation.Conclusions: Our case confirms the importance of genetic testing in patients with any sign of thrombotic microangiopathy. The finding of Shiga toxin-induced HUS with typical clinical course should not limit our vigilance of complement-mediated HUS with high risk of renal failure.
- 28 October 2022
- Published by International Scientific Information, Inc. in American Journal of Case Reports
- Vol. 23, e936565-1-e936565-7
Open AccessNovel Complement Factor B Gene Mutation Identified in a Kidney Transplant Recipient with a Shiga Toxin-Triggered Episode of Thrombotic Microangiopathy
Objective: Rare diseaseBackground: Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is an ultra-rare disorder characterized by over-activation and dysregulation of the alternative complement pathway. The clinical presentation of the disease comprises thrombocytopenia, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, and acute kidney injury. In most cases, aHUS is caused by genetic mutations in components of the alternative complement pathway. The risk of graft loss in patients after kidney transplantation with aHUS is dependent on the type of genetic mutation.Case Report: We present a case of a 32-year-old patient after a second kidney transplantation with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome, whose clinical manifestation was triggered by the Shiga toxin-producing E. coli infection. Genetic testing revealed a new mutation (p.I342T) in the gene encoding complement factor B (CFB). Since 2 causative variants for aHUS have been described in the same exon of CFB gene, it might be supposed that the p.I342T variant has similar deleterious effects on CFB function. Despite the implemented treatment, graft function deteriorated and the patient had to return to a hemodialysis program and is currently on a waiting list for a third kidney transplant. The presence of the gene variant with increased susceptibility for aHUS and its recurrence after kidney transplantation makes the patient a good candidate for therapy with complement factor C5 inhibitors during and after the planned kidney transplantation.Conclusions: Our case confirms the importance of genetic testing in patients with any sign of thrombotic microangiopathy. The finding of Shiga toxin-induced HUS with typical clinical course should not limit our vigilance of complement-mediated HUS with high risk of renal failure.
- Open Access
- 30 August 2022
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal Of Nephrology
- Vol. 35 (8) , 2077-2086
Organizational support, training and equipment are key determinants of burnout among dialysis healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic
Introduction: Burnout was already found to be an important factor in the professional landscape of nephrology prior to the COVID-19 outbreak and is expected to worsen during the pandemic. Objectives: The aim of our study was to assess pandemic experiences, perceptions, and burnout among Polish dialysis unit professionals in the COVID-19 period. Participants and methods: A survey, which consisted of a Pandemic Experiences and Perceptions Survey (PEPS) and a Maslach Burnout Inventory was distributed online to Polish dialysis units. The study group comprised 379 participants (215 nurses, 148 physicians, and 16 respondents of other professions). Results: The pandemic largely affected or completely dominated the work of dialysis units according to 53.4% and 25.5% of nurses responding to the PEPS, respectively. Among physicians, the prevalence was 55.5% and 15.4% of participants, respectively. Serious or life-threatening risk was perceived by 72.1% and 11.9% of dialysis healthcare professionals, respectively. Furthermore, 74.6% of the study participants stated that their work in a dialysis setting amidst the pandemic was felt to be associated with serious risk for their relatives. Adequate personal protective equipment and information from management decreased burnout among dialysis staff. Burnout was lower in all dimensions among those participants who felt more in control of their exposure to infection, provided by proper training, equipment, and support ( p = 0.0004 for emotional exhaustion, p = 0.0007 for depersonalization, and p < 0.0001 for feelings of personal accomplishment). Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic has largely affected the work in dialysis units. Providing proper training, equipment, and support may decrease burnout among dialysis staff. Graphical
- 30 August 2022
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal Of Nephrology
- Vol. 35 (8) , 2077-2086
Open AccessOrganizational support, training and equipment are key determinants of burnout among dialysis healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic
Introduction: Burnout was already found to be an important factor in the professional landscape of nephrology prior to the COVID-19 outbreak and is expected to worsen during the pandemic. Objectives: The aim of our study was to assess pandemic experiences, perceptions, and burnout among Polish dialysis unit professionals in the COVID-19 period. Participants and methods: A survey, which consisted of a Pandemic Experiences and Perceptions Survey (PEPS) and a Maslach Burnout Inventory was distributed online to Polish dialysis units. The study group comprised 379 participants (215 nurses, 148 physicians, and 16 respondents of other professions). Results: The pandemic largely affected or completely dominated the work of dialysis units according to 53.4% and 25.5% of nurses responding to the PEPS, respectively. Among physicians, the prevalence was 55.5% and 15.4% of participants, respectively. Serious or life-threatening risk was perceived by 72.1% and 11.9% of dialysis healthcare professionals, respectively. Furthermore, 74.6% of the study participants stated that their work in a dialysis setting amidst the pandemic was felt to be associated with serious risk for their relatives. Adequate personal protective equipment and information from management decreased burnout among dialysis staff. Burnout was lower in all dimensions among those participants who felt more in control of their exposure to infection, provided by proper training, equipment, and support ( p = 0.0004 for emotional exhaustion, p = 0.0007 for depersonalization, and p < 0.0001 for feelings of personal accomplishment). Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic has largely affected the work in dialysis units. Providing proper training, equipment, and support may decrease burnout among dialysis staff. Graphical
- Open Access
- 29 March 2022
- Published by Wroclaw Medical University in Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine
- Vol. 31 (7) , 749-755
Interprofessional collaboration in the renal care settings: Experiences in the COVID-19 era
Background. The role of interprofessional collaboration (IPC) in healthcare is increasingly emphasized. Due to significant comorbidity in renal patients who require highly specialized procedures, proper IPC is an essential component in renal care. During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the existing and proven collaboration mechanisms were put to the test. Objectives. To assess IPC in the renal care settings in the era of COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and methods. The survey consisted of the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale II (AITCS-II) (3 subscales - partnership, cooperation and coordination, maximum of 5 points), questions about work conditions and factors influencing work during the pandemic, as well as demographic data. The survey was distributed in 8 renal care settings (4 hospital wards with dialysis units and 4 individual dialysis units); 127 participants filled out the survey; 26.8% of participants were physicians, 68.5% nurses and 4.7% other staff members, i.e., administrative assistants. Mean work experience in their current team was 16.8 +/- 11.7 years among nurses and 11.6 +/- 9.7 years among physicians. Results. Interprofessional collaboration was assessed by physicians and nurses, respectively, as follows: partnership 4.03 +/- 0.79 compared to 3.58 +/- 0.73 (p = 0.003), cooperation 4.28 +/- 0.59 compared to 3.71 +/- 0.72 (p = 0.0002), and coordination 3.83 +/- 0.87 compared to 3.48 +/- 0.82 (p = 0.04). The specific workplace did not influence the IPC rates; 49.9% of physicians and 40.1% of nurses agreed or strongly agreed that the collaboration worsened during the pandemic; 47% of physicians and 42.4% of nurses admitted that the communication has significantly deteriorated. An increased level of stress, new procedures and fear of getting infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) were, according to the participants, the most significant factors for the worsening of IPC. Conclusions. The exceptional circumstances faced during the pandemic have a significant impact on IPC, which may influence patients' satisfaction and safety. An active support for healthcare teams in the field of IPC is especially important in this challenging reality.
- 29 March 2022
- Published by Wroclaw Medical University in Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine
- Vol. 31 (7) , 749-755
Open AccessInterprofessional collaboration in the renal care settings: Experiences in the COVID-19 era
Background. The role of interprofessional collaboration (IPC) in healthcare is increasingly emphasized. Due to significant comorbidity in renal patients who require highly specialized procedures, proper IPC is an essential component in renal care. During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the existing and proven collaboration mechanisms were put to the test. Objectives. To assess IPC in the renal care settings in the era of COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and methods. The survey consisted of the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale II (AITCS-II) (3 subscales - partnership, cooperation and coordination, maximum of 5 points), questions about work conditions and factors influencing work during the pandemic, as well as demographic data. The survey was distributed in 8 renal care settings (4 hospital wards with dialysis units and 4 individual dialysis units); 127 participants filled out the survey; 26.8% of participants were physicians, 68.5% nurses and 4.7% other staff members, i.e., administrative assistants. Mean work experience in their current team was 16.8 +/- 11.7 years among nurses and 11.6 +/- 9.7 years among physicians. Results. Interprofessional collaboration was assessed by physicians and nurses, respectively, as follows: partnership 4.03 +/- 0.79 compared to 3.58 +/- 0.73 (p = 0.003), cooperation 4.28 +/- 0.59 compared to 3.71 +/- 0.72 (p = 0.0002), and coordination 3.83 +/- 0.87 compared to 3.48 +/- 0.82 (p = 0.04). The specific workplace did not influence the IPC rates; 49.9% of physicians and 40.1% of nurses agreed or strongly agreed that the collaboration worsened during the pandemic; 47% of physicians and 42.4% of nurses admitted that the communication has significantly deteriorated. An increased level of stress, new procedures and fear of getting infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) were, according to the participants, the most significant factors for the worsening of IPC. Conclusions. The exceptional circumstances faced during the pandemic have a significant impact on IPC, which may influence patients' satisfaction and safety. An active support for healthcare teams in the field of IPC is especially important in this challenging reality.
- Open Access
Burnout Syndrome among Pediatric Nephrologists—Report on Its Prevalence, Severity, and Predisposing Factors
Background and Objectives: Burnout is an occupation-related syndrome comprising emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced feelings of work-related personal accomplishments. There are reports on burnout among adult nephrologists and general pediatricians, but little is known about burnout among pediatric nephrologists. The aim of our study was to assess the prevalence and severity of burnout syndrome among Polish pediatric nephrologists. Materials and Methods: A 25-item study survey consisting of abbreviated Maslach Burnout Inventory and additional self-created questions about work-related factors was completed by 97 physicians affiliated with the Polish Society of Pediatric Nephrology. Women comprised 75.3%, with median time of professional experience in the study group was 15 years. Results: A high level of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced feeling of personal accomplishments were observed in 39.2%, 38.1%, and 21.6% of the participants, respectively. At least a medium level of burnout in all three dimensions were observed in 26.8% of the participants and 8.2% of them presented high three-dimensional burnout. About 41.2% of the participants stated that they would like to take part in burnout prevention and support programs. According to the study participants, excessive bureaucracy in healthcare systems, rush at work, and overtime work were the main job-related problems that could influence burnout intensity. Conclusions: Burnout is an important factor in the professional landscape of pediatric nephrology. Actions aimed at reducing the risk of occupational burnout among pediatric nephrologists should be applied, both at the personal and institutional levels.
Open AccessBurnout Syndrome among Pediatric Nephrologists—Report on Its Prevalence, Severity, and Predisposing Factors
Background and Objectives: Burnout is an occupation-related syndrome comprising emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced feelings of work-related personal accomplishments. There are reports on burnout among adult nephrologists and general pediatricians, but little is known about burnout among pediatric nephrologists. The aim of our study was to assess the prevalence and severity of burnout syndrome among Polish pediatric nephrologists. Materials and Methods: A 25-item study survey consisting of abbreviated Maslach Burnout Inventory and additional self-created questions about work-related factors was completed by 97 physicians affiliated with the Polish Society of Pediatric Nephrology. Women comprised 75.3%, with median time of professional experience in the study group was 15 years. Results: A high level of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced feeling of personal accomplishments were observed in 39.2%, 38.1%, and 21.6% of the participants, respectively. At least a medium level of burnout in all three dimensions were observed in 26.8% of the participants and 8.2% of them presented high three-dimensional burnout. About 41.2% of the participants stated that they would like to take part in burnout prevention and support programs. According to the study participants, excessive bureaucracy in healthcare systems, rush at work, and overtime work were the main job-related problems that could influence burnout intensity. Conclusions: Burnout is an important factor in the professional landscape of pediatric nephrology. Actions aimed at reducing the risk of occupational burnout among pediatric nephrologists should be applied, both at the personal and institutional levels.
- Open Access
- 24 January 2022
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 17 (1) , e0261652
Polish medical students facing the pandemic—Assessment of resilience, well-being and burnout in the COVID-19 era
Introduction: Recent reports indicate that COVID-19 pandemic has significant influence on medical professionals’ mental health. Strict limitations in clinical practice and social interactions within academic community, which had to be introduced, could lead to significant psychological distress in medical students. The aim of the study was to assess resilience, well-being and burnout among Polish medical students in the COVID-19 era. Methods: The online survey consisting of validated questionnaires assessing resilience (Resilience Scale 14; RS-14), well-being (Medical Student Well-Being Index) and burnout (Maslach Burnout Inventory) as well as self-created survey concerning mental health problems, use of stimulants, SARS-CoV-2 infection, work in COVID-19 units, medical education and social attitude towards health care professionals in the pandemic era was distributed via Facebook and other online students’ platforms. 1858 MSs from all polish medical schools agreed to fill in the survey. Results: ‘Very low’, ‘low’ and ‘on the low end’ levels of resilience were found in 26%, 19.1% and 26.9% of the study group, respectively. Students with higher resilience level presented better attitude towards online and hybrid classes. 16.8% of respondents stated that they worked, currently work or plan to work voluntarily at the pandemic frontline. In terms of burnout, these respondents presented lower exhaustion (p = 0.003) and cynicism (p = 0.02), and higher academic efficacy (p = 0.002). That group also showed greater resilience (p = 0.046). The SARS-CoV-2 infection among respondents, their relatives and friends did not influence the results. 39.1% of respondents declared the need of the psychological or psychiatric consultation in relation to pandemic challenges. 231 (26.4%) participants previously diagnosed with mental health disorders noticed worsening of their symptoms. Increased intake of alcohol, cigarettes or other stimulants was noticed by 340 (28.6%) respondents. 80.2% of respondents thought that social aversion and mistrust towards doctors increased during the pandemic and part of them claimed it affected their enthusiasm toward medical career. Conclusions: The majority of medical students presented low levels of resilience and high burnout at the time of pandemic. Providing necessary support especially in terms of mental health and building up the resilience of this vulnerable group seems crucial to minimize harm of current pandemic and similar future challenges.
- 24 January 2022
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 17 (1) , e0261652
Open AccessPolish medical students facing the pandemic—Assessment of resilience, well-being and burnout in the COVID-19 era
Introduction: Recent reports indicate that COVID-19 pandemic has significant influence on medical professionals’ mental health. Strict limitations in clinical practice and social interactions within academic community, which had to be introduced, could lead to significant psychological distress in medical students. The aim of the study was to assess resilience, well-being and burnout among Polish medical students in the COVID-19 era. Methods: The online survey consisting of validated questionnaires assessing resilience (Resilience Scale 14; RS-14), well-being (Medical Student Well-Being Index) and burnout (Maslach Burnout Inventory) as well as self-created survey concerning mental health problems, use of stimulants, SARS-CoV-2 infection, work in COVID-19 units, medical education and social attitude towards health care professionals in the pandemic era was distributed via Facebook and other online students’ platforms. 1858 MSs from all polish medical schools agreed to fill in the survey. Results: ‘Very low’, ‘low’ and ‘on the low end’ levels of resilience were found in 26%, 19.1% and 26.9% of the study group, respectively. Students with higher resilience level presented better attitude towards online and hybrid classes. 16.8% of respondents stated that they worked, currently work or plan to work voluntarily at the pandemic frontline. In terms of burnout, these respondents presented lower exhaustion (p = 0.003) and cynicism (p = 0.02), and higher academic efficacy (p = 0.002). That group also showed greater resilience (p = 0.046). The SARS-CoV-2 infection among respondents, their relatives and friends did not influence the results. 39.1% of respondents declared the need of the psychological or psychiatric consultation in relation to pandemic challenges. 231 (26.4%) participants previously diagnosed with mental health disorders noticed worsening of their symptoms. Increased intake of alcohol, cigarettes or other stimulants was noticed by 340 (28.6%) respondents. 80.2% of respondents thought that social aversion and mistrust towards doctors increased during the pandemic and part of them claimed it affected their enthusiasm toward medical career. Conclusions: The majority of medical students presented low levels of resilience and high burnout at the time of pandemic. Providing necessary support especially in terms of mental health and building up the resilience of this vulnerable group seems crucial to minimize harm of current pandemic and similar future challenges.