Samuli Rahkonen
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Samuli Rahkonen has a total of 12 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Ilkka Pölönen
Spectral Imaging Laboratory, Faculty of Information Technology, University of Jyväskylä, Finland
4 shared publications - Matti Aleksanteri Eskelinen
University of Jyväskylä, Faculty of Information Technology, Jyväskylä, Finland
2 shared publications - Sami Äyrämö
Faculty of Information Technology, University of Jyväskylä, Finland. Address: Mattilanniemi 2, 40100 Jyväskylä, Finland; Wellbeing Services County of Central Finland, Jyväskylä, Finland
2 shared publications - Anna-Maria Raita-Hakola
Spectral Imaging Laboratory, Faculty of Information Technology, University of Jyväskylä, Finland
1 shared publication Emilia Koskinen
Tampere University, Finnish Centre for Alternative Methods, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere, Finland
1 shared publication- Emilia Koskinen
Tampere University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Finnish Centre for Alternative Method
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 8 July 2023
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 315-325
Method for Radiance Approximation of Hyperspectral Data Using Deep Neural Network
- 8 July 2023
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 315-325
Method for Radiance Approximation of Hyperspectral Data Using Deep Neural Network
- Open Access
Reflectance Measurement Method Based on Sensor Fusion of Frame-Based Hyperspectral Imager and Time-of-Flight Depth Camera
Hyperspectral imaging and distance data have previously been used in aerial, forestry, agricultural, and medical imaging applications. Extracting meaningful information from a combination of different imaging modalities is difficult, as the image sensor fusion requires knowing the optical properties of the sensors, selecting the right optics and finding the sensors’ mutual reference frame through calibration. In this research we demonstrate a method for fusing data from Fabry–Perot interferometer hyperspectral camera and a Kinect V2 time-of-flight depth sensing camera. We created an experimental application to demonstrate utilizing the depth augmented hyperspectral data to measure emission angle dependent reflectance from a multi-view inferred point cloud. We determined the intrinsic and extrinsic camera parameters through calibration, used global and local registration algorithms to combine point clouds from different viewpoints, created a dense point cloud and determined the angle dependent reflectances from it. The method could successfully combine the 3D point cloud data and hyperspectral data from different viewpoints of a reference colorchecker board. The point cloud registrations gained – fitness for inlier point correspondences and RMSE was approx. 2, which refers a quite reliable registration result. The RMSE of the measured reflectances between the front view and side views of the targets varied between and on average and the spectral angle between and degrees. The results suggest that changing emission angle has very small effect on the surface reflectance intensity and spectrum shapes, which was expected with the used colorchecker.Open AccessReflectance Measurement Method Based on Sensor Fusion of Frame-Based Hyperspectral Imager and Time-of-Flight Depth Camera
Hyperspectral imaging and distance data have previously been used in aerial, forestry, agricultural, and medical imaging applications. Extracting meaningful information from a combination of different imaging modalities is difficult, as the image sensor fusion requires knowing the optical properties of the sensors, selecting the right optics and finding the sensors’ mutual reference frame through calibration. In this research we demonstrate a method for fusing data from Fabry–Perot interferometer hyperspectral camera and a Kinect V2 time-of-flight depth sensing camera. We created an experimental application to demonstrate utilizing the depth augmented hyperspectral data to measure emission angle dependent reflectance from a multi-view inferred point cloud. We determined the intrinsic and extrinsic camera parameters through calibration, used global and local registration algorithms to combine point clouds from different viewpoints, created a dense point cloud and determined the angle dependent reflectances from it. The method could successfully combine the 3D point cloud data and hyperspectral data from different viewpoints of a reference colorchecker board. The point cloud registrations gained – fitness for inlier point correspondences and RMSE was approx. 2, which refers a quite reliable registration result. The RMSE of the measured reflectances between the front view and side views of the targets varied between and on average and the spectral angle between and degrees. The results suggest that changing emission angle has very small effect on the surface reflectance intensity and spectrum shapes, which was expected with the used colorchecker. - Open Access
- 1 March 2020
- Published by SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng in Journal of Medical Imaging
- Vol. 7 (02) , 029801-1
Multilabel segmentation of cancer cell culture on vascular structures with deep neural networks (Erratum)
Corrections to the article, “Multilabel segmentation of cancer cell culture on vascular structures with deep neural networks,” by S. Rahkonen et al. This article [J. Med. Imag. 7(2), 024001 (2020) doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.7.2.024001] was originally published online on 7 April 2020 with errors in the panel labels for Fig. 6. The following corrections were made to the originally published version: 1. in Fig 6(h), “Prediction (O)” was corrected to read “Prediction (S)”; 2. in Fig 6(i), “Prediction (I)” was corrected to read “Prediction (IP)”; 3. in Fig 6(j), “Errors (R)” was corrected to read “Errors (P)”; 4. in Fig 6(k), “Errors (O)” was corrected to read “Errors (S)”; 5. in Fig 6(l), “Errors (I)” was corrected to read “Errors (IP)”; 6. in Fig 6(m), “Abs. errors (R)” was corrected to read “Abs. errors (P)”; 7. in Fig 6(n), “Abs. errors (O)” was corrected to read “Abs. errors (S)”; and 8. in Fig 6(o), “Abs. errors (I)” was corrected to read “Abs. errors (IP).” This article was corrected on 13 April 2020.
- 1 March 2020
- Published by SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng in Journal of Medical Imaging
- Vol. 7 (02) , 029801-1
Open AccessMultilabel segmentation of cancer cell culture on vascular structures with deep neural networks (Erratum)
Corrections to the article, “Multilabel segmentation of cancer cell culture on vascular structures with deep neural networks,” by S. Rahkonen et al. This article [J. Med. Imag. 7(2), 024001 (2020) doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.7.2.024001] was originally published online on 7 April 2020 with errors in the panel labels for Fig. 6. The following corrections were made to the originally published version: 1. in Fig 6(h), “Prediction (O)” was corrected to read “Prediction (S)”; 2. in Fig 6(i), “Prediction (I)” was corrected to read “Prediction (IP)”; 3. in Fig 6(j), “Errors (R)” was corrected to read “Errors (P)”; 4. in Fig 6(k), “Errors (O)” was corrected to read “Errors (S)”; 5. in Fig 6(l), “Errors (I)” was corrected to read “Errors (IP)”; 6. in Fig 6(m), “Abs. errors (R)” was corrected to read “Abs. errors (P)”; 7. in Fig 6(n), “Abs. errors (O)” was corrected to read “Abs. errors (S)”; and 8. in Fig 6(o), “Abs. errors (I)” was corrected to read “Abs. errors (IP).” This article was corrected on 13 April 2020.
- Open Access
- 1 March 2020
- Published by SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng in Journal of Medical Imaging
- Vol. 7 (02) , 024001-16
Multilabel segmentation of cancer cell culture on vascular structures with deep neural networks
In many cases, chemotherapeutic anticancer therapies’ contribution to life extension is low, and serious adverse effects are common.1,2 Also the cost of cancer treatments is extremely high and is increasing constantly.2
- 1 March 2020
- Published by SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng in Journal of Medical Imaging
- Vol. 7 (02) , 024001-16
Open AccessMultilabel segmentation of cancer cell culture on vascular structures with deep neural networks
In many cases, chemotherapeutic anticancer therapies’ contribution to life extension is low, and serious adverse effects are common.1,2 Also the cost of cancer treatments is extremely high and is increasing constantly.2