Cameron Hassani
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Cameron Hassani has a total of 29 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Arash Bedayat
Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, California
6 shared publications - Ashley Elizabeth Prosper
Medical & Imaging Informatics, Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
3 shared publications Farhood Saremi
From the Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, 757 Westwood Plaza, Suite 1621, Los Angeles, CA 90095 (C.H., F.U., A.B., A.E.P., J.P.F.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS (C.M.W.); and Department of Radiology, Keck Hospital of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif (F.S.).
3 shared publications- Amir Ali Rahsepar
Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
2 shared publications - Hamid Chalian
Department of Radiology, Cardiothoracic Imaging Section, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street Room RR215F, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
2 shared publications - John Paul Finn
Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, USA
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Top Cited PapersOpen Access
- 27 April 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging
- Vol. 105 (7-8) , 251-265
ChatGPT in radiology: A systematic review of performance, pitfalls, and future perspectives
- 27 April 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging
- Vol. 105 (7-8) , 251-265
Top Cited PapersOpen AccessChatGPT in radiology: A systematic review of performance, pitfalls, and future perspectives
- 1 April 2024
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology
- Vol. 311 (1) , e232257
Left Ventricular Rupture after Acute Myocardial Infarction
- 1 April 2024
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology
- Vol. 311 (1) , e232257
Left Ventricular Rupture after Acute Myocardial Infarction
- Top Cited Papers
- 1 June 2023
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology
- Vol. 307 (5) , e230922
How AI Responds to Common Lung Cancer Questions: ChatGPT versus Google Bard
Background The recent release of large language models (LLMs) for public use, such as ChatGPT and Google Bard, has opened up a multitude of potential benefits as well as challenges. Purpose To evaluate and compare the accuracy and consistency of responses generated by publicly available ChatGPT-3.5 and Google Bard to non-expert questions related to lung cancer prevention, screening, and terminology commonly used in radiology reports based on the recommendation of Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) v2022 from American College of Radiology and Fleischner society. Materials and Methods Forty of the exact same questions were created and presented to ChatGPT-3.5 and Google Bard experimental version as well as Bing and Google search engines by three different authors of this paper. Each answer was reviewed by two radiologists for accuracy. Responses were scored as correct, partially correct, incorrect, or unanswered. Consistency was also evaluated among the answers. Here, consistency was defined as the agreement between the three answers provided by ChatGPT-3.5, Google Bard experimental version, Bing, and Google search engines regardless of whether the concept conveyed was correct or incorrect. The accuracy among different tools were evaluated using Stata. Results ChatGPT-3.5 answered 120 questions with 85 (70.8%) correct, 14 (11.7%) partially correct, and 21 (17.5%) incorrect. Google Bard did not answer 23 (19.1%) questions. Among the 97 questions answered by Google Bard, 62 (51.7%) were correct, 11 (9.2%) were partially correct, and 24 (20%) were incorrect. Bing answered 120 questions with 74 (61.7%) correct, 13 (10.8%) partially correct, and 33 (27.5%) incorrect. Google search engine answered 120 questions with 66 (55%) correct, 27 (22.5%) partially correct, and 27 (22.5%) incorrect. The ChatGPT-3.5 is more likely to provide correct or partially answer than Google Bard, approximately by 1.5 folds (OR = 1.55, P = 0.004). ChatGPT-3.5 and Google search engine were more likely to be consistent than Google Bard by approximately 7 and 29 folds (OR = 6.65, P = 0.002 for ChatGPT and OR = 28.83, P = 0.002 for Google search engine, respectively). Conclusion Although ChatGPT-3.5 had a higher accuracy in comparison with the other tools, neither ChatGPT nor Google Bard, Bing and Google search engines answered all questions correctly and with 100% consistency.
- 1 June 2023
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology
- Vol. 307 (5) , e230922
Top Cited PapersHow AI Responds to Common Lung Cancer Questions: ChatGPT versus Google Bard
Background The recent release of large language models (LLMs) for public use, such as ChatGPT and Google Bard, has opened up a multitude of potential benefits as well as challenges. Purpose To evaluate and compare the accuracy and consistency of responses generated by publicly available ChatGPT-3.5 and Google Bard to non-expert questions related to lung cancer prevention, screening, and terminology commonly used in radiology reports based on the recommendation of Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) v2022 from American College of Radiology and Fleischner society. Materials and Methods Forty of the exact same questions were created and presented to ChatGPT-3.5 and Google Bard experimental version as well as Bing and Google search engines by three different authors of this paper. Each answer was reviewed by two radiologists for accuracy. Responses were scored as correct, partially correct, incorrect, or unanswered. Consistency was also evaluated among the answers. Here, consistency was defined as the agreement between the three answers provided by ChatGPT-3.5, Google Bard experimental version, Bing, and Google search engines regardless of whether the concept conveyed was correct or incorrect. The accuracy among different tools were evaluated using Stata. Results ChatGPT-3.5 answered 120 questions with 85 (70.8%) correct, 14 (11.7%) partially correct, and 21 (17.5%) incorrect. Google Bard did not answer 23 (19.1%) questions. Among the 97 questions answered by Google Bard, 62 (51.7%) were correct, 11 (9.2%) were partially correct, and 24 (20%) were incorrect. Bing answered 120 questions with 74 (61.7%) correct, 13 (10.8%) partially correct, and 33 (27.5%) incorrect. Google search engine answered 120 questions with 66 (55%) correct, 27 (22.5%) partially correct, and 27 (22.5%) incorrect. The ChatGPT-3.5 is more likely to provide correct or partially answer than Google Bard, approximately by 1.5 folds (OR = 1.55, P = 0.004). ChatGPT-3.5 and Google search engine were more likely to be consistent than Google Bard by approximately 7 and 29 folds (OR = 6.65, P = 0.002 for ChatGPT and OR = 28.83, P = 0.002 for Google search engine, respectively). Conclusion Although ChatGPT-3.5 had a higher accuracy in comparison with the other tools, neither ChatGPT nor Google Bard, Bing and Google search engines answered all questions correctly and with 100% consistency.
- 1 May 2023
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in RadioGraphics
- Vol. 43 (5) , e220063
Cardiac Outpouchings: Practical Approach to Normal Variants and Pathologic Conditions at CT and MRI
Numerous entities, both structural and pathologic, can manifest as a contrast material- or blood-filled cardiac outpouching at imaging. These outpouchings often resemble one another and are frequently unfamiliar to imagers and clinicians, creating uncertainty when detected. Furthermore, the diagnostic criteria for conditions such as hernia, aneurysm, pseudoaneurysm, and diverticulum have not been consistently applied in studies and reports cited in the literature describing these outpouchings, adding to the confusion among general and cardiothoracic imagers. Pouches and outpouchings are commonly found incidentally on thoracic and abdominal CT scans obtained for other reasons. Many pouches and outpouchings can be confidently diagnosed or ignored at routine imaging, whereas others may require further evaluation with electrocardiographically gated CT, cardiac MRI, or echocardiography for a more definitive diagnosis. It is easiest to group and diagnose these entities on the basis of their cardiac chamber location or their involvement with the interatrial and interventricular septa. Ancillary features, such as motion, morphology, neck and body size, presence or absence of thrombus, and late gadolinium enhancement characteristics, are important in reaching a correct diagnosis. The aim of this article is to provide a practical guide to pouches and outpouchings of the heart. Each entity is defined according to its cause, imaging characteristics, clinical significance, and relevant associated findings. Mimics of cardiac pouches and outpouchings such as the Bachmann bundle, atrial veins, and thebesian vessels also are briefly discussed. Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material. ©RSNA, 2023.
- 1 May 2023
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in RadioGraphics
- Vol. 43 (5) , e220063
Cardiac Outpouchings: Practical Approach to Normal Variants and Pathologic Conditions at CT and MRI
Numerous entities, both structural and pathologic, can manifest as a contrast material- or blood-filled cardiac outpouching at imaging. These outpouchings often resemble one another and are frequently unfamiliar to imagers and clinicians, creating uncertainty when detected. Furthermore, the diagnostic criteria for conditions such as hernia, aneurysm, pseudoaneurysm, and diverticulum have not been consistently applied in studies and reports cited in the literature describing these outpouchings, adding to the confusion among general and cardiothoracic imagers. Pouches and outpouchings are commonly found incidentally on thoracic and abdominal CT scans obtained for other reasons. Many pouches and outpouchings can be confidently diagnosed or ignored at routine imaging, whereas others may require further evaluation with electrocardiographically gated CT, cardiac MRI, or echocardiography for a more definitive diagnosis. It is easiest to group and diagnose these entities on the basis of their cardiac chamber location or their involvement with the interatrial and interventricular septa. Ancillary features, such as motion, morphology, neck and body size, presence or absence of thrombus, and late gadolinium enhancement characteristics, are important in reaching a correct diagnosis. The aim of this article is to provide a practical guide to pouches and outpouchings of the heart. Each entity is defined according to its cause, imaging characteristics, clinical significance, and relevant associated findings. Mimics of cardiac pouches and outpouchings such as the Bachmann bundle, atrial veins, and thebesian vessels also are briefly discussed. Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material. ©RSNA, 2023.
- 4 August 2022
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging
- Vol. 4 (4) , e210323
Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography without Gadolinium-based Contrast Material: Clinical Applications Using Ferumoxytol
Ferumoxytol, a high-relaxivity, iron-based contrast agent for vascular MRI, yields high-quality thoracoabdominal images without the need for bolus timing, and its stable concentration in the blood ... Vascular imaging can be challenging because of the wide variability of contrast dynamics in different vascular territories and potential safety concerns in patients with renal insufficiency or alle...
- 4 August 2022
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging
- Vol. 4 (4) , e210323
Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography without Gadolinium-based Contrast Material: Clinical Applications Using Ferumoxytol
Ferumoxytol, a high-relaxivity, iron-based contrast agent for vascular MRI, yields high-quality thoracoabdominal images without the need for bolus timing, and its stable concentration in the blood ... Vascular imaging can be challenging because of the wide variability of contrast dynamics in different vascular territories and potential safety concerns in patients with renal insufficiency or alle...
- 1 April 2021
- Published by Elsevier in Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging
- Vol. 102 (4) , 213-224
CT evaluation of unrepaired/incidental congenital cardiovascular diseases in adults
- 1 April 2021
- Published by Elsevier in Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging
- Vol. 102 (4) , 213-224
CT evaluation of unrepaired/incidental congenital cardiovascular diseases in adults
- 1 July 2020
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in RadioGraphics
- Vol. 40 (4) , 1073-1089
Vascularized Lymph Node Transfer: A Primer for the Radiologist
Vascularized lymph node transfer preoperative imaging for lymphedema requires an understanding of imaging acquisition techniques and reconstruction parameters that differ from those used in routine... Lymphedema, the accumulation of lymphatic fluid in the tissues, is a chronic disease and a major cause of long-term morbidity and disability. Lymphedema is usually a secondary condition, often caus...
- 1 July 2020
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in RadioGraphics
- Vol. 40 (4) , 1073-1089
Vascularized Lymph Node Transfer: A Primer for the Radiologist
Vascularized lymph node transfer preoperative imaging for lymphedema requires an understanding of imaging acquisition techniques and reconstruction parameters that differ from those used in routine... Lymphedema, the accumulation of lymphatic fluid in the tissues, is a chronic disease and a major cause of long-term morbidity and disability. Lymphedema is usually a secondary condition, often caus...
- 1 July 2020
- Published by Elsevier in Radiologic Clinics of North America
- Vol. 58 (4) , 781-796
Recent Innovations in Renal Vascular Imaging
- 1 July 2020
- Published by Elsevier in Radiologic Clinics of North America
- Vol. 58 (4) , 781-796
Recent Innovations in Renal Vascular Imaging
- 1 March 2020
- Published by American Roentgen Ray Society in American Journal of Roentgenology
- Vol. 214 (3) , 536-545
Myocardial Radiomics in Cardiac MRI
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to review the nascent field of radiomics in cardiac MRI. CONCLUSION. Cardiac MRI produces a large number of images in a fairly inefficient manner with some...
- 1 March 2020
- Published by American Roentgen Ray Society in American Journal of Roentgenology
- Vol. 214 (3) , 536-545
Myocardial Radiomics in Cardiac MRI
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to review the nascent field of radiomics in cardiac MRI. CONCLUSION. Cardiac MRI produces a large number of images in a fairly inefficient manner with some...
- 1 November 2017
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in RadioGraphics
- Vol. 37 (7) , 1928-1954
Comprehensive Cross-sectional Imaging of the Pulmonary Veins
This article describes imaging findings related to the pulmonary veins: normal and anomalous anatomy, pathologic conditions, postoperative imaging appearances, and postoperative complications. The pulmonary veins carry oxygenated blood from the lungs to the heart, but their importance to the radiologist extends far beyond this seemingly straightforward function. The anatomy of the pulmonary veins is variable among patients, with several noteworthy variant and anomalous patterns, including supernumerary pulmonary veins, a common ostium, anomalous pulmonary venous return, and levoatriocardinal veins. Differences in pulmonary vein anatomy and the presence of variant or anomalous anatomy can be of critical importance, especially for preoperative planning of pulmonary and cardiac surgery. The enhancement or lack of enhancement of the pulmonary veins can be a clue to clinically important disease, and the relationship of masses to the pulmonary veins can herald cardiac invasion. The pulmonary veins are also an integral part of thoracic interventions, including lung transplantation, pneumonectomy, and radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation. This fact creates a requirement for radiologists to h...
- 1 November 2017
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in RadioGraphics
- Vol. 37 (7) , 1928-1954
Comprehensive Cross-sectional Imaging of the Pulmonary Veins
This article describes imaging findings related to the pulmonary veins: normal and anomalous anatomy, pathologic conditions, postoperative imaging appearances, and postoperative complications. The pulmonary veins carry oxygenated blood from the lungs to the heart, but their importance to the radiologist extends far beyond this seemingly straightforward function. The anatomy of the pulmonary veins is variable among patients, with several noteworthy variant and anomalous patterns, including supernumerary pulmonary veins, a common ostium, anomalous pulmonary venous return, and levoatriocardinal veins. Differences in pulmonary vein anatomy and the presence of variant or anomalous anatomy can be of critical importance, especially for preoperative planning of pulmonary and cardiac surgery. The enhancement or lack of enhancement of the pulmonary veins can be a clue to clinically important disease, and the relationship of masses to the pulmonary veins can herald cardiac invasion. The pulmonary veins are also an integral part of thoracic interventions, including lung transplantation, pneumonectomy, and radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation. This fact creates a requirement for radiologists to h...