Paweł Bąkowski

Background: Chronic Achilles tendon ruptures present a major surgical challenge due to tendon retraction, degeneration, and large defects. Autologous hamstring tendon grafts have emerged as a reliable reconstructive option, yet their biomechanical consequences remain poorly understood. This study investigated whether Achilles tendon reconstruction with semitendinosus and gracilis autografts alters the plantar flexor moment arm and whether such changes affect muscle strength. Methods: A cohort of 25 patients (mean age: 44.5 years) underwent minimally invasive endoscopic reconstruction using hamstring autografts. This secondary salvage procedure was performed in patients with neglected ruptures or failed primary treatment. Five patients were excluded from the original intervention group due to inadequate radiographic quality. Radiographic measurements of the Achilles tendon moment arm and isometric plantar flexor strength assessments were performed at 12 and 24 months postoperatively. Statistical analyses included paired t-tests, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and correlation analyses. Results: Results showed a significant shortening of the Achilles tendon moment arm after reconstruction compared with the preoperative imaging length (mean reduction: 6.6 mm; p < 0.0001). Despite this, plantar flexor strength in the operated limb improved significantly over time at 12 and 24 months (+388.6 N at 24 months; p = 0.0067) and did not correlate with the degree of moment arm shortening (p > 0.3). By 24 months, the operated limb demonstrated comparable or greater strength than the contralateral side, with nearly half of the patients achieving substantial clinically meaningful improvements. Conclusions: In conclusion, Achilles tendon reconstruction with hamstring autografts leads to consistent moment arm shortening, yet this does not impair long-term restoration of plantar flexor strength. A progressive rehabilitation program extending up to two years appears essential to optimize recovery and compensate for biomechanical alterations.

Introduction: Knee arthroscopy is a minimally invasive method of treatment of large joint disorders that allows to increase accuracy of the surgical procedure and diminish the chances of complications. Nevertheless, after the procedure some patients still experience pain or limited manoeuvrability for which several causes (e.g. inadequate rehabilitation, infection, arthrofibrosis or neuroma) have been identified. Aim: In this review, we focused on the symptoms associated with IBSN neuroma that arise during arthroscopic surgery, and described how to prevent, diagnose, and treat them. Materials and methods: The analysis was done based on literature review. A review of the literature was conducted in December 2022, through a search of the PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases, with no date limits. Results: Neuroma of the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve (IBSN), mainly caused by physical damage to the nerve bundle during arthroscopy, has been recognized as an often underdiagnosed cause of prolonged pain in the postoperative knee joint. Conclusions: Several actions can be implemented to prevent the formation of IBSN neuromas, like proper position of the limb during the surgery, proper arthroscopic portal placement, incision in the hamstring harvest during ACL reconstruction, proceeding with IBSN stump, use of ultrasound during the procedure. The treatment of IBSN neuromas covers surgical and non-surgical methods.

(1) Background: The autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) is a bio-orthopedic treatment for articular cartilage damage. It combines microfracture surgery with the application of a collagen membrane. The aim of the present study was to report a medium-term follow-up of patients treated with AMIC for focal chondral lesions. (2) Methods: Fourty-eight patients treated surgically and 21 control participants were enrolled in the study. To evaluate the functional outcomes, the proprioceptive (postural stability, postural priority) and isokinetic (peak value of maximum knee extensor and flexor torque in relation to body mass and the total work) measurements were performed. To evaluate the clinical outcomes, the Lysholm score and the IKDC score were imposed. (3) Results: Compared to the preoperative values, there was significant improvement in the first 2 years after intervention in the functional as well as subjective outcome measures. (4) Conclusions: AMIC showed durable results in aligned knees.

Background and objectives: The Achilles tendon, the largest tendon in the body, is vulnerable to injury because of its limited blood supply and the combination of forces to which it is subjected. Given the relevance of the Achilles tendon in the proper function of the foot and ankle, the primary goal of the present study was to use a holistic approach for a comprehensive evaluation of Achilles tendon reconstruction results on multiple levels. Materials and Methods: The study was designed in the following way: 30 patients with partial or total Achilles tendon tears were subjected to the minimally invasive Achilles tendon reconstruction. Patients were then subjected to the clinical, functional and isokinetic tests 12 and 24 months after the treatment. The clinical evaluation included calf circumference measurements and subjective patient-reported tests: ATRS, EQ-5D-5L and VAS scales. The functional evaluation was based on three tests: the weight-bearing lunge test, the heel rise test and single leg hop. Isometric and isokinetic evaluation was performed using a Biodex 3 dynamometer. Results: The calf circumference of the operated limbs was significantly lower than the non-operated limb 12 months after the surgical procedure, however this improved at the second evaluation. All subjective outcomes improved significantly 24 months after the surgery. Significantly better results in the function of the operated limbs were also obtained 24 months after the surgery. However, most of the muscle strength parameters of the operated limbs were already comparable to non-operated ones 12 months after the surgery and were comparable between two evaluation times. Conclusions: The overall results of this extensive evaluation are highly satisfactory and patients returned to their normal physical activity. From a medical point of view, it is assumed that the healing process is completed 12 months after the surgery, however, importantly, our results indicate that we should consider the healing process and the rehabilitation process separately.

Given the relevance of the Achilles tendon in proper function of the foot and ankle, the primary goal of the present study was to use a holistic approach for a comprehensive evaluation of Achilles tendon reconstruction results on multiple levels. 30 patients with partial or total Achilles tendon tears were subjected to the minimally invasive Achilles tendon reconstruction. Patients were then subjected to the clinical, functional and isokinetic tests 12 and 24 months after the treatment. The overall results of this extensive evaluation are highly satisfactory and patients returned to their normal physical activity.

The use of biologic therapies for the management of knee osteoarthritis (OA) has largely increased in recent years. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficiency and the therapeutic potential of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and autologous adipose tissue (AAT) injections as a treatment for knee OA. Sixty participants were enrolled in the study: 20 healthy ones and 40 with minimal to moderate knee OA (KL I-III). The OA patients were randomly assigned either to the PRP or to the AAT group. The PRP samples showed a low expression level of NF-κB-responsive gene CCL5 and high expression levels of classic inflammatory and TNF-l INF responses. The AAT injection product was prepared using a Lipogems device, and its regenerative potential as well as the ability for expansion of mesenchymal stem cells were tested in the cell culture conditions. The patient assessments were carried out five times. Significant improvement was observed regardless of the treatment method in the VAS, KOOS, WOMAC and IKDC 2000 subjective evaluations as well as in the functional parameters. Intra-articular injections of AAT or PRP improved pain, symptoms, quality of life and functional capacity with a comparable effectiveness in the patients with mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis.

Background: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a common, chronic, progressive and degenerative disease which affects patients’ quality of life and may cause disability and social isolation. OA is a huge economic burden for the patient and a large strain for the whole healthcare system. Articular cartilage has a small potential to repair, with progressively more clinicians emphasizing cellular therapy. Subcutaneous fat tissue in human body is a large reservoir of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and is been harvested in minimally invasive, simple procedure. The purpose of this study was to define a specific group of patients with knee osteoarthritis, who are the most likely to benefit from the treatment with intra-articular injection of an autologous adipose tissue (AAT). Methods: From 2016 to 2018, 59 symptomatic bilateral and unilateral knee OA patients were treated with a single intra-articular (IA) injection of an autologous adipose tissue (AAT). Before the treatment and at the follow-up, the participant was asked to fulfill the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the International Knee Documentation Committee 2000 (IKDC 2000), The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), the Health Questionnaire EQ-5D-5L and to quantify the pain in the affected joint with a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Moreover, the patients were asked to: (i) assess their satisfaction with the effects of the conducted treatment: from 0 (unsatisfied) to 10 (very satisfied), (ii) describe the rehabilitation, if it was performed (supervised or individual and duration in weeks) and (iii) indicate any additional treatment applied, like IA injections of hyaluronic acid (HA) or platelet-rich plasma (PRP), knee arthroscopy, partial or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at the follow-up. Results: The mean age of 37 participants (16 males and 21 females) included into statistical analysis was 57.78 ± 7.39 years, the mean BMI was 31.30 ± 7.51. The questionnaires were fulfilled after the average follow-up time of 27 ± 6.5 months. A significant difference (p < 0.05) compared with the baseline, was observed in pain [NRS], WOMAC, KOOS index, pain, symptoms, ADL, Sport and Rec, QoL, EQ-5D-5L index. The satisfaction in the whole group was 6.16 ± 3.07. There was no significant difference between satisfied and unsatisfied patients in BMI and pain [NRS] at the baseline. 6 out of 7 patients with stage IV in K-L were unsatisfied with the effects of the treatment with AAT. Discussion: The main conclusion of this study is that the patients with stage II of the knee OA with normal BMI are were most likely to benefit from IA injection of AAT, in contrast to the patients with stage IV, who will not beware not satisfied with the effectiveness of this kind of treatment. There were no adverse events reported at the donor site as well as in the treated knee joints.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the current status of education of polish surgeons in the subject of meniscus repair possibilities. The analysis of the possible correlations between the number of knee arthroscopy procedures performed by polish surgeons and their decision whether to remove or to repair the damaged meniscus has been performed.Methods: Two‐hundred and five registered orthopedic surgeons took part in surveys. The questionnaire contained the description of 20 patients with different types of meniscus damage and three questions concerning the experience in knee arthroscopy (two questions) and a choice of the treatment method (one question). Comparisons were made between knee arthroscopy experts (> 100 arthroscopies performed per year) and non‐experts (≤ 100 cases).Results: The questionnaire was completed by 194 knee surgeons from Poland with different levels in knee arthroscopy experience. For most cases, experts and non‐experts agreed on the meniscus treatment method. Statistically significant differences in the recommended treatment between experts and non‐experts were observed in 4 cases, where experts decided to repair the damage rather than to perform the meniscectomy.Conclusions: Meniscectomy remains a frequent orthopedic procedure, despite meniscal sparing having been advocated for several decades now and despite the existence of meniscus repair technique which gives good clinical outcomes—augmentation of the damaged meniscus with a collagen membrane. Polish surgeons still need education on the meniscus treatment possibilities.Level of evidence: V.