SMSarah Miller

Sarah Miller

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Sarah Miller has a total of 67 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Incivility Experienced by Males in Nursing Education: An Exploratory Study

    by Scott Hale, Benjamin Smallheer, Sarah Miller, Martina Mueller, Diana Layne

    Background: Males remain underrepresented in nursing education and may experience incivility differently in academic settings. Purpose: This exploratory study examined the frequency and perceived severity of uncivil behaviors reported by male nursing students and educators in prelicensure programs. Methods: A cross-sectional survey using the Incivility in Nursing Education-Revised instrument was completed by 96 participants from accredited US associate and baccalaureate programs. Results: Threats involving a weapon, defined as any object or instrument used or intended to cause harm, were rated highly uncivil. The most frequent behavior was using electronic devices for unrelated purposes. Regression findings showed limited associations between demographic or institutional variables and incivility perceptions, but overall models were not statistically significant. Conclusions: Incivility remains a concern for males in nursing education, supporting further research and targeted interventions to promote inclusive, respectful learning environments.

  • Open Access

    Clinical Provider Perspectives on Remote Spirometry and mHealth for COPD

    by Susan McCabe, Jessica Madiraca, Lianne Cole, Emily Morgan, Terri Fowler, Whitney Smith, Catherine O’connor Durham, Kathleen Lindell, Sarah Miller

    Background/Objectives: COPD is a leading cause of death in the US, with higher morbidity and mortality in rural areas that lack specialized pulmonary care. Mobile health (mHealth) tools, including remote spirometry, may fill this gap, yet healthcare provider (HCP) perspectives on utility and implementation of remote spirometry and mHealth for COPD management in these settings remain unexplored. This study aimed to examine HCPs’ perspectives of mHealth with remote spirometry to inform future implementation in rural and low medical access settings. Methods: Five HCPs working in rural or medically limited settings in South Carolina participated in a deliberative discussion focus group. A semi-structured interview guide was used to explore insights into feasibility, clinical utility, and implementation needs. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify facilitators, barriers, and implementation considerations. Results: Participants reported that remote spirometry and mHealth had potential to support COPD treatment, increase healthcare access, and support self-management. Key facilitators identified were access to smartphones, potential for individualized COPD care, and visual tools for patient engagement. Barriers included risk of time and workload burden, data information overload, and technological limitations. Participants emphasized the need for team training, thoughtful integration into existing workflows, customizable data displays, and robust support for patient onboarding. Conclusions: Providers viewed mHealth applications with remote spirometry as a valuable tool with potential to improve COPD care but identified critical implementation needs. Participants emphasized that successful integration would require structured support, user-centered design, and attention to reimbursement and workflow alignment to enhance sustainability and patient/provider engagement.


  • Open Access

    Transforming Palliative Care for Rural Patients with COPD Through Nurse-Led Models

    by Kristen Poston, Alexa Nasti, Carrie Cormack, Sarah N. Miller, Kathleen Oare Lindell

    Background/Objectives: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, with rural populations experiencing higher prevalence and worse outcomes. This paper explores the transformative potential of nurse-led palliative care models in addressing the unique challenges faced by rural patients with COPD and their informal caregivers and synthesizes current evidence on nurse-led palliative care interventions, highlighting their impact on symptom management, advance care planning, and psychosocial support. Methods: This is a comprehensive synthesis of nurse-led palliative care programs, focusing on home-based care, telehealth, community outreach, and primary care integration. Results: Nurse-led interventions significantly improve patient satisfaction, reduce symptom burden, and enhance the likelihood of advance care planning discussions. Home-based care models and telehealth are particularly effective in rural settings, offering accessible and continuous support. Conclusions: Nurses have a critical role in bridging the palliative care gap for rural patients with COPD and their informal caregivers. Expanding nurse-led palliative care services can improve quality of life, reduce healthcare utilization, and promote health equity. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and strategies for scaling nurse-led palliative care programs in rural contexts.


  • Dyspnea and Palliative Care in Advanced Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

    by Sarah N. Miller, Elizabeth Higgins, Joan Fnp-Bc Cain, Patrick Msn Coyne, Robert Bs Peacock, Ayaba Mph Logan, Tracy PhD Fasolino, Kathleen Oare PhD Lindell

    Dyspnea is the most common and activity-limiting symptom for those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Treatment is complex, palliative care (PC) dyspnea relief interventions are poorly understood, and PC remains underutilized in COPD despite national guidelines and recommendations. The purpose of this rapid review was to explore the concept of dyspnea and role of PC through the lens of providers, caregivers, and patients with COPD. A systematic approach for synthesis was used to identify 13 articles published between January 2018 and October 2023. Team members compared data via visualization and theme clustering to identify key conclusions describing operationalization of dyspnea, management, and PC implications. Dyspnea operationalization was challenging, with inconsistent measurement and terminology. Dyspnea was a significant burden in COPD and contributed to complexity of treatment. Opioids were used most often to treat dyspnea, but provider perspectives and biases can influence treatment decisions and perceptions of opioid therapy by the patient and caregiver. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines and policies are needed to clarify the use of opioid therapy for dyspnea management to reduce stigmatization and barriers to treatment. Provider education should emphasize a multipronged approach to treatment of dyspnea in COPD with integration of PC early in the care continuum.


  • Open Access

    Use of Ecological Momentary Assessment to Measure Dyspnea in COPD

    by Sarah N Miller, Michelle Nichols, Ronald J Teufel Ii, Erin P Silverman, Marta Walentynowicz

    Dyspnea is an unpredictable and distressing symptom of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Dyspnea is challenging to measure due to the heterogeneity of COPD and recall bias associated with retrospective reports. Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) is a technique used to collect symptoms in real-time within a natural environment, useful for monitoring symptom trends and risks of exacerbation in COPD. EMA can be integrated into mobile health (mHealth) platforms for repeated data collection and used alongside physiological measures and behavioral activity monitors. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the use of mHealth and EMA for dyspnea measurement, consider clinical implications of EMA in COPD management, and identify needs for future research in this area.


  • RESP-FIT: A Technology-Enhanced Combined Inspiratory and Expiratory Muscle Strength Training Intervention for Adults With COPD

    by Sarah N. Miller, Martina Mueller, Michelle Nichols, Ronald J. Teufel Ii, Diana M. Layne, Charlie Strange, Mohan Madisetti, MaryChris Pittman, Teresa J. Kelechi, Paul W. Davenport

    Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressive respiratory disease associated with respiratory muscle weakness and activity- limiting symptoms such as dyspnea. Respiratory muscle strength training (RMST) is an empirically validated therapy to increase respiratory muscle strength. The theoretically- informed, technology- enhanced RESPiratory FITness (RESP-FIT) intervention for COPD is a 6- week combined inspiratory and expiratory muscle strength training program with symptom measurement in real time via ecological momentary assessment (EMA). Objective: In addition to hypothesis- generating purposes, the purpose of this randomized control pilot study was to explore whether observed effects (on symptoms, patient- reported outcomes, and respiratory muscle strength) support carrying out a future large-scale trial of RESP-FIT. Methods: A total of 30 adults with COPD were randomized to intervention (n=15) or control groups, with the intervention group undergoing 6 weeks of mHealth-enhanced RMST. Daily symptom data were collected in real time over the 6- week intervention period using EMA. Results: Compared to the control group, participants in the intervention group reported decreased dyspnea and anxiety, increased happiness, and improved respiratory muscle strength. However, reports of fatigue and sleep disturbance increased in the intervention group compared to the control group. Conclusion: Results support the hypothesis that the 6- week RESP-FIT program will improve respiratory muscle strength, emotional state (anxiety and happiness), and breathlessness in COPD but may contribute to fatigue, at least in the short term. Future work is needed to determine the efficacy of RESP-FIT, determine mechanisms of action on dyspnea and fatigue, and conduct within- participant comparisons of EMA data to explore individual or environmental fluctuations in COPD symptoms.


  • Open Access

    Proactive Electronic Visits for Smoking Cessation and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Screening in Primary Care: Randomized Controlled Trial of Feasibility, Acceptability, and Efficacy

    by Jennifer Dahne, Marty S Player, Charlie Strange, Matthew J Carpenter, Dee W Ford, Kathryn King, Sarah Miller, Ryan Kruis, Elizabeth Hawes, Johanna E Hidalgo, et al.

    Background: Most smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have not yet been diagnosed, a statistic that has remained unchanged for over two decades. A dual-focused telehealth intervention that promotes smoking cessation, while also facilitating COPD screening, could help address national priorities to improve the diagnosis, prevention, treatment, and management of COPD. The purpose of this study was to preliminarily evaluate an integrated asynchronous smoking cessation and COPD screening e-visit (electronic visit) that could be delivered proactively to adult smokers at risk for COPD, who are treated within primary care. Objective: The aims of this study were (1) to examine e-visit feasibility and acceptability, particularly as compared to in-lab diagnostic pulmonary function testing (PFT), and (2) to examine the efficacy of smoking cessation e-visits relative to treatment as usual (TAU), all within primary care. Methods: In a randomized clinical trial, 125 primary care patients who smoke were randomized 2:1 to receive either proactive e-visits or TAU. Participants randomized to the e-visit condition were screened for COPD symptoms via the COPD Assessment in Primary Care to Identify Undiagnosed Respiratory Disease and Exacerbation Risk (CAPTURE). Those with scores ≥2 were invited to complete both home spirometry and in-lab PFTs, in addition to two smoking cessation e-visits. Smoking cessation e-visits assessed smoking history and motivation to quit and included completion of an algorithm to determine the best Food and Drug Administration–approved cessation medication to prescribe. Primary outcomes included measures related to (1) e-visit acceptability, feasibility, and treatment metrics; (2) smoking cessation outcomes (cessation medication use, 24-hour quit attempts, smoking reduction ≥50%, self-reported abstinence, and biochemically confirmed abstinence); and (3) COPD screening outcomes. Results: Of 85 participants assigned to the e-visits, 64 (75.3%) were invited to complete home spirometry and in-lab PFTs based on CAPTURE. Among those eligible for spirometry, 76.6% (49/64) completed home spirometry, and 35.9% (23/64) completed in-lab PFTs. At 1 month, all cessation outcomes favored the e-visit, with a significant effect for cessation medication use (odds ratio [OR]=3.22). At 3 months, all cessation outcomes except for 24-hour quit attempts favored the e-visit, with significant effects for cessation medication use (OR=3.96) and smoking reduction (OR=3.09). Conclusions: A proactive, asynchronous e-visit for smoking cessation and COPD screening may offer a feasible, efficacious approach for broad interventions within primary care. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04155073; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04155073


  • Open Access

    Feasibility of RESP-FIT: Technology-Enhanced Self-Management Intervention for Adults with COPD

    by Sarah Miller, Ronald Teufel, Michelle Nichols, Paul Davenport, Martina Mueller, Erin Silverman, Mohan Madisetti, MaryChris Pittman, Teresa Kelechi, Charlie Strange

    Introduction: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with substantial functional morbidity, including activity-limiting symptoms such as dyspnea and fatigue. Self-management interventions aid in symptomatic management of COPD and have been shown to produce positive outcomes on quality of life (QOL) and reduce hospital admissions. Purpose: The purpose of this randomized controlled longitudinal pilot study was to assess feasibility of the combined Respiratory Fitness (RESP-FIT) + Smartphone Airway Management System (SAMS) program, a 6-week, self-management, technology-enhanced respiratory muscle strength training (RMST) mHealth intervention. Patients and Methods: Feasibility was assessed by evaluating recruitment, retention, acceptability, adherence, and safety data. Data were collected from 30 participants (15 in intervention group, 15 in control) at 3 time points (baseline, 6 weeks, and 14 weeks). The intervention group was requested to perform RMST at regular intervals during the week (5 breaths, 5 times a day, 5 days a week). Bluetooth enabled tracking was used to track training sessions. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: Recruitment was staggered for device usage and was completed in 57 weeks, with near 90% retention from baseline to end-of-intervention. Mobile application rating scale scores and interview data indicated moderate satisfaction. Participants completed 14,388 actions in the app. The most commonly used features were recording of daily symptoms via ecological momentary assessment (EMA) and tracking RMST if assigned to training sessions. Training days were successfully captured using EMA, but Bluetooth enabled training tracking was found to be not feasible. Overall, participants reported satisfaction with the RESP-FIT + SAMS mHealth intervention and found it acceptable. Conclusion: RESP-FIT is feasible and enables real-time COPD symptom assessment in the home environment, but additional work is needed to integrate Bluetooth technology into the platform. Ongoing investigations focus on the accuracy of symptom perception, self-efficacy, and momentary factors that impact adherence behaviors.