VRV. Ramesh

V. Ramesh

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


V. Ramesh has a total of 15 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Clinicopathological Concordance in 2216 Cases of Skin Biopsy over One Year: An Indian Experience

    by Akanksha Malik, Fouzia Siraj, Sharma Shruti, Pooja Gupta, Geeti Khullar, V Ramesh

    To determine the spectrum of diseases and the level of clinicopathological concordance in skin biopsies received over a period of one year. A total of 2216 skin biopsy cases received over a period of one year at a tertiary care center were retrospectively analyzed. The cases were further divided into further categories in levels of concordance based on the agreement between the clinical and histopathological diagnosis rendered. Of the cases, 61.01% showed clinicopathological concordance. Cases with a descriptive pathological diagnosis, not matching the clinical diagnosis, constituted 31.54%, whereas 4.02% of cases had a definitive pathological diagnosis, which was discordant with the clinical differentials; 3.29% biopsies were inadequate. This study highlights the clinicopathological concordance in all the biopsies received from dermatology. It emphasizes the importance of skin biopsies in arriving at the diagnosis. However, it is a tool that must be used judiciously. Skin biopsies are also pivotal in flagging malignancies that may mimic benign lesions.


  • Open Access

    Genital Ulcer Disease: How Worrisome Is It Today? A Status Report from New Delhi, India

    by Sumathi Muralidhar, Richa Talwar, Deepa Anil Kumar, Joginder Kumar, Manju Bala, Nilofar Khan, V. Ramesh

    Background and Objectives. Genital ulcer diseases represent a diagnostic dilemma, especially in India, where few STI clinics have access to reliable laboratory facility. The changing STI trends require that a correct diagnosis be made in order to institute appropriate treatment and formulate control policies. The objective of this study was to determine recent trends in aetiology of genital ulcers, by using accurate diagnostic tools. Methods. Specimens from 90 ulcer patients were processed for dark field microscopy, stained smears, culture for H. ducreyi, and real-time PCR. Blood samples were collected for serological tests. Results. Prevalence of GUD was 7.45 with mean age at initial sexual experience as 19.2 years. Use of condom with regular and nonregular partners was 19.5% and 42.1%, respectively. Sexual orientation was heterosexual (92.2%) or homosexual (2.2%). There were 8 cases positive for HIV (8.9%). Herpes simplex virus ulcers were the commonest, followed by syphilis and chancroid. There were no cases of donovanosis and LGV. Conclusions. A valuable contribution of this study was in validating clinical and syndromic diagnoses of genital ulcers with an accurate aetiological diagnosis. Such reliable data will aid treatment and better define control measures of common agents and help eliminate diseases amenable to elimination, like donovanosis.


  • Open Access

    Comparative assessment of CDS, CLSI disc diffusion and Etest techniques for antimicrobial susceptibility testing ofNeisseria gonorrhoeae: a 6-year study

    by Vikram Singh, Manju Bala, Monika Kakran, V Ramesh

    Background: A variety of techniques are available for antimicrobial susceptibility testing ofNeisseria gonorrhoeae.Objective: The aim of this study was to find a cost-effective, reliable and easily applicable microbiological method to detect antimicrobial susceptibilities ofN. gonorrhoeaein resource-poor countries.Design: Prospective study.Setting: Male and female STD clinic of Regional STD Teaching, Training and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.Participants: N. gonorrhoeaeisolates from all male and female patients presenting with acute gonococcal urethritis and cervical discharge.Material and methods: A total of 295 consecutiveN. gonorrhoeaeisolates during 2005–2010 was used to compare the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and CDS disc diffusion technique with Etest by performing antimicrobial susceptibility testing in parallel for penicillin, tetracycline, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin and spectinomycin. WHO reference strains were used as controls.Results: CDS disc diffusion zones of inhibition showed that complete percentage agreement for penicillin, ciprofloxacin and tetracycline was high with their analogous Etest minimal inhibitory concentrations in comparison to CLSI disc diffusion technique, that is, 91.5%, 92.9% and 99.3% versus 87.5%, 88.5% and 74.9%, respectively. CDS results had less number of major and minor category discrepancies in comparison to CLSI and CDS method showed excellent correlation coefficient (r=1) with Etest for all five antimicrobial agents tested in comparison to CLSI (r=0.92). It was very poor (r=0.61) by CLSI method for tetracycline. The correlation coefficients between the two methods and the Etest were identical if tetracycline was removed from the CLSI analysis.Conclusions: The CDS technique is an attractive alternative forN. gonorrhoeaesusceptibility testing and is recommended for monitoring the antimicrobial susceptibility in less developed and resource-poor settings to facilitate enhanced antimicrobial resistance surveillance when the WHO Gonococcal Antimicrobial Surveillance Programme is undergoing expansion to meet the ongoing challenges of surveillance and control of gonococcal antimicrobial resistance.


  • Open Access

    Dermatophagia Simulating Callosities

    by K. Al Hawsawi, K. Al Aboud, V. Ramesh