Harold L. Dauerman

BACKGROUND: Undertreatment and delayed treatment of aortic stenosis (AS) are common, both of which are associated with increased mortality. Historically, assessment of quality for AS care has focused on peri- and postprocedural outcomes. The American Heart Association Target: AS registry is the first national registry to provide data and evaluate quality for upstream processes of care for patients with AS. METHODS: Randomly selected patients from 2023 and 2024 with moderate or severe AS from 58 sites in the Target: AS registry were included. The 2 primary quality measures were (1) timely diagnosis (percentage of patients with an echocardiogram consistent with possible severe AS who had all assessments to clarify AS severity and symptoms within 30 days) and (2) timely treatment (percentage of patients with a Class I indication for aortic valve replacement treated within 90 days). Secondary measures included documentation of key echocardiographic parameters in the report, clinical recommendations in the echocardiogram report summary, multidisciplinary heart valve team evaluation, guideline-based performance of multimodality testing, and timely surveillance echocardiograms. RESULTS: Among 8097 patients, 47% were women, 7% Black, 6% Hispanic, and 3% Asian. Timely diagnosis occurred in 54% in 2023, improving to 61% in 2024 ( P =0.027) with gaps caused by lack of timely symptom assessment (23% [2023]; 16% [2024]), lack of stroke volume index (35% [2023]; 18% [2024]), or lack of timely multimodality testing (87% [2023]; 75% [2024]). Among those with a Class I indication for aortic valve replacement, timely treatment occurred in 82% (2023) versus 85% (2024) ( P =NS). Multidisciplinary heart valve team evaluation occurred in 78% (2023) versus 84% (2024) ( P =0.008). Key findings in the echocardiography report were documented in 83% (2023) and 85% (2024) ( P =NS), but a clinical recommendation was included in <10% of the time. Timely surveillance echocardiograms for moderate (2 years) and severe AS (1 year) were not performed in ~40% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The national American Heart Association Target: AS registry demonstrates opportunities for improvement in timely diagnosis, surveillance, and treatment for patients with AS at participating centers. By providing an infrastructure to measure performance and identify best practices, the Target: AS registry has the potential to elevate and optimize care and patient outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Coronary accessibility following redo–transcatheter aortic valve replacement (redo-TAVR) is increasingly important, particularly in younger low-risk patients. This study aimed to predict coronary accessibility after simulated Sapien-3 balloon-expandable valve implantation within an Evolut supra-annular, self-expanding valve using pre-TAVR computed tomography (CT) imaging. METHODS: A total of 219 pre-TAVR CT scans from the Evolut Low-Risk CT substudy were analyzed. Virtual Evolut and Sapien-3 valves were sized using CT-based diameters. Two initial Evolut implant depths were analyzed, 3 and 5 mm. Coronary accessibility was evaluated for 2 Sapien-3 in Evolut implant positions: Sapien-3 outflow at Evolut node 4 and Evolut node 5. RESULTS: With a 3-mm initial Evolut implant depth, suitable coronary access was predicted in 84% of patients with the Sapien-3 outflow at Evolut node 4, and in 31% of cases with the Sapien-3 outflow at Evolut node 5 ( P P P P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Coronary accessibility after Sapien-3 in Evolut redo-TAVR relates to the initial Evolut implant depth, the Sapien-3 outflow position within the Evolut, and the native annular anatomy. This CT-based quantitative analysis may provide useful information to inform and refine individualized preprocedural CT planning of the initial TAVR and guide lifetime management for future coronary access after redo-TAVR. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02701283.

Objectives: Prolonged wait times for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The incidence and predictors of short TAVR wait times (STWT: defined as ≤ 30 days from referral to TAVR procedure) have not been defined. This study examined the impact of clinical characteristics, demographics, and pre-TAVR cardiac catheterization on wait times for TAVR. Methods: This was a retrospective observational analysis of 831 patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR from 2019 to mid-2022 at the University of Vermont Medical Center. Demographics, timing of treatment [stratified by COVID-19 onset (1 March 2020)], TAVR center travel distance, baseline clinical factors, and process-related variables were analyzed to determine univariate STWT predictors (P < 0.10). Multivariable analysis was performed to determine independent STWT predictors. Results: Approximately 50% of TAVR patients in this study achieved a STWT. The proportion of patients with STWT was higher (54.7% vs. 45.2%; P = 0.008) after the onset of COVID-19 pandemic. STWT was not related to travel distance (P = 0.61). Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) > 60% were less likely to achieve STWT compared to patients with LVEF < 40% (OR 0.45, P = 0.003). Patients who required catheterization or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) before TAVR were significantly less likely to achieve STWT (OR 0.65, P = 0.01). Conclusion: TAVR wait times were not affected by the COVID-19 pandemic or single rural TAVR center travel distance. Sicker patients were more likely to achieve STWT while catheterization/PCI before TAVR was associated with longer wait times.

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)