Marco Tuccori

This study aimed to identify and describe trajectories of adherence to biologics in patients with IBDs and to identify adherence determinants in the Italian real‐world setting. We conducted a retrospective cohort study across 12 Italian regions, including new users of biologics with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), between 2010 and 2019 and followed them for 3 years. We assessed adherence longitudinally, and we identified trajectories using nonparametric methods. To identify determinants of adherence, we used multinomial multivariate regression models. We included 20 150 subjects in the final cohort, mostly male (56%), < 65 years old (92%), and with Crohn's disease (58%). We identified three trajectories of adherence to biologics for IBDs: one group (19% of the cohort) maintained high adherence throughout the observation period, while the largest group (46%) initially reduced adherence, stabilizing around 70%. The remaining group (35%) gradually decreased adherence over the entire follow‐up, reaching 20%. Being female (odds ratio (OR) 1.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.40–1.65), older (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.21–1.70), and having adalimumab as index drug were each positively associated with low adherence compared to high adherence. In contrast, starting treatment with a biosimilar (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.42–0.52) was negatively associated with low adherence. Our findings highlight that one in three patients with IBDs gradually reduced adherence to biologics within the first 3 years of treatment. Differences were observed according to the initial biologic dispensed and patient characteristics such as sex and age, with females and older patients positively associated with low adherence.

Background In 2018, the European Medicines Agency issued some risk minimisation measures related to unresolved adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reported for fluoroquinolones, including sensory ADRs. Spontaneous reporting databases frequently report unresolved outcomes for gustatory, olfactory and auditory (GOA) ADRs. However, such a high volume of unresolved GOA ADRs could reflect an under-investigated clinical issue or an intrinsic difficulty in the outcome assessment. Objectives The objectives of the study were: (1) to investigate whether unresolved outcomes are reported more frequently for GOA ADRs than for other ADRs to systemic antibiotics and (2) to identify possible signals of unresolved GOA ADRs for systemic antibiotics. Methods We used the EudraVigilance database to extract the number of ADRs to systemic antibiotics of the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical class J01 up to February 2019. We classified ADRs in “non-GOA ADRs” and “GOA ADRs”. Adverse drug reactions were categorised in three groups according to the outcome: defined, persistent/permanent (unresolved) and undetermined ADRs. We performed disproportionality analyses with the case/non-case methodology, by calculating the crude reporting odds ratio (ROR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Cases were all persistent/permanent ADRs, and non-cases were defined and undetermined ADRs. For the first objective, index groups were gustatory or olfactory or auditory ADRs, while reference group included all non-GOA ADRs. For the second objective, we performed a disproportionality analysis by using the sub-set of GOA ADRs. Index and reference groups varied with subgroups of drugs and drug class, so that each drug and drug class was compared with the others. We conducted two sensitivity analyses for each analysis by varying the case definition. Results We extracted 748,798 ADRs, including 10,770 GOA ADRs. The first analysis showed that GOA ADRs were reported more frequently as unresolved events compared with all other ADRs (ROR: 2.68 95% CI 2.51–2.85; ROR: 5.20 95% CI 4.66–5.81; and ROR: 2.64 (95% CI 2.51–2.79, respectively). Gustatory ADRs were reported more frequently as unresolved for doxycycline (ROR: 1.69, 95% CI 1.18–2.41, p = 0.0038), azithromycin (ROR: 2.07, 95% CI 1.58–2.72, p < 0.0001) and levofloxacin (ROR: 1.59, 95% CI 1.22–2.07, p < 0.001) compared with GOA ADRs of all other antibiotics. Olfactory ADRs were reported more frequently as unresolved for doxycycline (ROR: 2.4, 95% CI 1.26–4.58, p = 0.0078) and levofloxacin (ROR: 1.92, 95% CI 1.28–2.86, p = 0.0014). Auditory ADRs were reported more frequently as unresolved for doxycycline (ROR: 1.52, 95% CI 1.09–2.12, p = 0.013) and clarithromycin (ROR: 1.31, 95% CI 1.09–1.59, p = 0.0049). Conclusions We tested and used an appropriate expected frequency standard, which allows us to identify possible signals of unresolved GOA ADRs to antibiotic drugs in the EudraVigilance database. This approach could be used to generate signals of persistent or even irreversible events for other drugs or adverse reactions. However, these signals must be confirmed with a thorough clinical assessment.

Underreporting is the main limitation of spontaneous reporting systems. This cohort-event monitoring study aims to examine the potential of short message service (SMS)-based surveillance compared to traditional surveillance systems. Using VigiVax software, parents of vaccinated children aged two years or younger, in the period March 2021–May 2022, received a single SMS inquiry about adverse events following immunization (AEFI). Responses were collected, validated by health operators and integrated with the information on electronic immunization registries. AEFI reports were automatically submitted to the Italian Pharmacovigilance system. Among 254,160 SMS messages sent, corresponding to 451,656 administered doses (AD), 71,643 responses were collected (28.2% response rate), and 21,231 of them (8.3%) reported AEFI. After a seriousness assessment based on clinical criteria, 50 reports (0.24%) were classified as serious. Among these, a causality assessment identified 31 reports at least potentially related to the vaccination (RR: 6.86/100,000 AD). Febrile seizures following MMRV (measles, mumps, rubella, varicella) vaccination accounted for 11 of these 31 cases, with an incidence of 32 per 100,000 AD. No fatal outcomes were reported. Our findings support the highly favorable risk profile of pediatric vaccinations and the possibility to improve spontaneous reporting through the integration of digital technologies.

Underreporting is the main limitation of the spontaneous reporting systems. This study aims to reduce underreporting enhancing public participation in vaccinovigilance through an SMS-based reporting system integrated with electronic immunization registries (IRs). Using the VigiVax software, parents of vaccinated children aged 2 years or younger received a single SMS inquiry about adverse events following immunization (AEFI). Responses were collected, validated by health operators and integrated with the information on IRs. AEFI reports were automatically submitted to the Italian Pharmacovigilance system. Among 254,160 SMS messages sent, corre-sponding to 451,656 administered doses (AD), 71,643 responses were collected (28.2% response rate), 21,231of them (8.3%) reporting an AEFI. After seriousness assessment based on clinical criteria, 50 reports (0,24%) were classified as serious. Among these, causality assessment identi-fied 31 reports at least potentially related to the vaccination (RR: 6.86/100,000 AD). Febrile seizures following MMRV vaccination accounted for 11 of these 31 cases, with an incidence of 32 per 100,000 AD. No fatal outcomes were reported. Our findings support the highly favorable risk profile of pediatric vaccinations and the possibility to improve spontaneous reporting through the integration of digital technologies.

Background: In the context of a comparative study of efficacy and safety of drugs used in rare neuromuscular and neurodegenerative diseases (CAESAR—call AIFA_FV_2012-13-14), we assessed the use patterns of drugs indicated for myasthenia gravis (MG). Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted based on administrative healthcare data. For a cohort of MG patients, prevalent and incident use of pyridostigmine (Py) and other indicated drugs in the first year after case identification was evaluated. Prevalent combined use of major therapies (azathioprine (Az), prednisone (Pr), vitamin D (Vd)) stratified by Py use was assessed, and a comparison between therapies at the time of MG identification and during the first year of follow-up was performed. Results: We included 2369 MG patients between 2013 and 2019. Among them, prevalent and incident Py users were 38.4% and 22.0%, respectively. In the first year of follow-up, the use of Pr was observed in 74.5% of Py prevalent users and in 82.0% of Py incident users, respectively; the use of Az was observed in 24.9% and 23.0%, respectively; and the use of Vd was observed in 53.3% and 48.2%, respectively. Among 910 Py prevalent users, 13.1% also used Az, Pr, and Vd, while 15.3% used none of these. Among 938 non-Py users, 2.7% used Az, Pr, and Vd, while 53.8% used none of these. During the first year, an increase in combined therapies was evident in incident Py users. Conclusions: Our results suggest that, for some MG patients, there may be a need for treatments that combine a rapid onset of benefit with long-term and consistent disease control. These issues may be addressed by the new treatments currently being developed. To date, more studies are needed to address the heterogeneity, quality, and generalizability of the existing data and to evaluate patterns of use, efficacy, and safety of new or emerging therapies for MG.

Editorial: Traditional and innovative approaches for signal detection

Spontaneous reporting systems remain pivotal for post-marketing surveillance and disproportionality analysis (DA) represents a recognized approach for early signal detection. Although DAs cannot be used per se as a standalone approach to assess a drug-related risk and cannot replace clinical judgment in the individual patient, their role remain irreplaceable for rapid detection of rare and unpredictable adverse drug reactions with strong drug-attributable component (e.g., designated medical events), especially when developed by a multidisciplinary team and combined with a careful case-by-case analysis (individual inspection of reports for causality assessment or to uncover reporting patterns and clinical features). In the recent past, a remarkable increase in publications of pharmacovigilance studies using DAs was observed, albeit the quality was debated: several publications contained “spin”, namely, misinterpretation of results to infer causality, calculate incidence, or provide risk stratification, which may ultimately result in unjustified alarm. The development of dedicated Guidelines by the international READUS-PV project (https://readus-statement.org/) will allow reproducible and transparent publication of accurate DAs, thus supporting their real transferability and exploitation by regulators and clinicians. This review offered a perspective on methodological aspects (and understanding) of DAs, their rationale, design, reporting, and interpretation.