Anton Nahman
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Anton Nahman has a total of 8 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Willem J. de Lange
Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)
3 shared publications Brian K. Mahumani
Junior Researcher, Sustainability Science and Resource Economics Research Group, Natural Resources and the Environment, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Stellenbosch, South Africa
1 shared publication- Dan Rigby
Economics, School of Social Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
1 shared publication Linda Godfrey
1 shared publication- Lorren Kirsty Haywood
Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)
1 shared publication - Sumaiya Arabi
Council for Scientific and Industrial Research
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 27 December 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Marine Pollution Bulletin
- Vol. 212, 117461
The economic impacts of marine plastic debris in South Africa: A preliminary estimate
- 27 December 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Marine Pollution Bulletin
- Vol. 212, 117461
Open AccessThe economic impacts of marine plastic debris in South Africa: A preliminary estimate
- Open Access
- 27 May 2020
- Published by Academy of Science of South Africa in South African Journal of Science
- Vol. 116 (5/6) , 51-57
Impacts of marine plastic on ecosystem services and economy: State of South African research
In addition to its direct impacts on marine ecology and biota, marine plastic debris can affect the delivery of ecosystem services, with resulting impacts on human well-being, society and the economy. It is important to quantify these impacts in economic terms, so as to be able to provide evidence-based support for an appropriate policy response. We review the South African literature on the impacts of marine plastic debris on ecosystem services and on the economy, in order to identify relevant knowledge gaps. The gaps are found to be significant. Some research has been conducted in terms of impacts relating to recreation, aesthetics and tourism and the costs of beach and harbour clean-ups. However, there is a significant lack of research regarding impacts on ecosystem services relating to fisheries and aquaculture, heritage, habitat provision, biodiversity, and nutrient cycles. There is also a significant lack of research regarding direct economic impacts on the transport/shipping and fisheries industries, indirect economic impacts (such as costs associated with health-related impacts), and non-market costs (e.g. impacts on scenic, cultural and spiritual values). More research is needed in South Africa to address these gaps, in order to inform policy aimed at addressing plastic waste and marine plastic debris. Significance: This review highlights the knowledge gaps in terms of the impacts of marine plastics on ecosystem services and on the economy in South Africa, which are important to understand in order to be able to direct funding for future research in this domain. Without better knowledge of the economic impacts of marine plastic debris, it is difficult to assess the costs of inaction, and therefore to inform an appropriate policy response for tackling the problem of marine plastic debris.
- 27 May 2020
- Published by Academy of Science of South Africa in South African Journal of Science
- Vol. 116 (5/6) , 51-57
Open AccessImpacts of marine plastic on ecosystem services and economy: State of South African research
In addition to its direct impacts on marine ecology and biota, marine plastic debris can affect the delivery of ecosystem services, with resulting impacts on human well-being, society and the economy. It is important to quantify these impacts in economic terms, so as to be able to provide evidence-based support for an appropriate policy response. We review the South African literature on the impacts of marine plastic debris on ecosystem services and on the economy, in order to identify relevant knowledge gaps. The gaps are found to be significant. Some research has been conducted in terms of impacts relating to recreation, aesthetics and tourism and the costs of beach and harbour clean-ups. However, there is a significant lack of research regarding impacts on ecosystem services relating to fisheries and aquaculture, heritage, habitat provision, biodiversity, and nutrient cycles. There is also a significant lack of research regarding direct economic impacts on the transport/shipping and fisheries industries, indirect economic impacts (such as costs associated with health-related impacts), and non-market costs (e.g. impacts on scenic, cultural and spiritual values). More research is needed in South Africa to address these gaps, in order to inform policy aimed at addressing plastic waste and marine plastic debris. Significance: This review highlights the knowledge gaps in terms of the impacts of marine plastics on ecosystem services and on the economy in South Africa, which are important to understand in order to be able to direct funding for future research in this domain. Without better knowledge of the economic impacts of marine plastic debris, it is difficult to assess the costs of inaction, and therefore to inform an appropriate policy response for tackling the problem of marine plastic debris.
- 8 February 2016
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Development Southern Africa
- Vol. 33 (2) , 215-233
Beyond GDP: Towards a Green Economy Index
Given the broad (economic, social and environmental) objectives of a green economy, and the limitations associated with mainstream measures of economic performance (such as gross domestic product), an alternative or expanded set of indicators is required for measuring progress toward a green economy. This article develops a composite index for measuring green economic performance, based on 26 indicators across the economic, social and environmental dimensions. The index will enable comparison of a country's green economic performance both over time and relative to other countries. Furthermore, the index is constructed in such a way as to allow for disaggregation (i.e. for scores on individual components to be seen at a glance), such that areas of specific concern can be easily identified and addressed, and progress in each area monitored over time. The index was tested on data from 193 countries, and the resulting country rankings were assessed.
- 8 February 2016
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Development Southern Africa
- Vol. 33 (2) , 215-233
Beyond GDP: Towards a Green Economy Index
Given the broad (economic, social and environmental) objectives of a green economy, and the limitations associated with mainstream measures of economic performance (such as gross domestic product), an alternative or expanded set of indicators is required for measuring progress toward a green economy. This article develops a composite index for measuring green economic performance, based on 26 indicators across the economic, social and environmental dimensions. The index will enable comparison of a country's green economic performance both over time and relative to other countries. Furthermore, the index is constructed in such a way as to allow for disaggregation (i.e. for scores on individual components to be seen at a glance), such that areas of specific concern can be easily identified and addressed, and progress in each area monitored over time. The index was tested on data from 193 countries, and the resulting country rankings were assessed.
- 1 November 2013
- Published by Elsevier in Waste Management
- Vol. 33 (11) , 2493-2500
Costs of food waste along the value chain: Evidence from South Africa
- 1 November 2013
- Published by Elsevier in Waste Management
- Vol. 33 (11) , 2493-2500
Costs of food waste along the value chain: Evidence from South Africa
- 1 November 2012
- Published by Elsevier in Waste Management
- Vol. 32 (11) , 2147-2153
The costs of household food waste in South Africa
- 1 November 2012
- Published by Elsevier in Waste Management
- Vol. 32 (11) , 2147-2153
The costs of household food waste in South Africa
- 1 September 2011
- Published by Elsevier in Waste Management
- Vol. 31 (9-10) , 2046-2056
Pricing landfill externalities: Emissions and disamenity costs in Cape Town, South Africa
- 1 September 2011
- Published by Elsevier in Waste Management
- Vol. 31 (9-10) , 2046-2056
Pricing landfill externalities: Emissions and disamenity costs in Cape Town, South Africa
- 1 December 2008
- Published by Wiley in South African Journal of Economics
- Vol. 76 (4) , 721-737
VALUING BLUE FLAG STATUS AND ESTUARINE WATER QUALITY IN MARGATE, SOUTH AFRICA1
- 1 December 2008
- Published by Wiley in South African Journal of Economics
- Vol. 76 (4) , 721-737
VALUING BLUE FLAG STATUS AND ESTUARINE WATER QUALITY IN MARGATE, SOUTH AFRICA1