Collin Gilbreath
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Collin Gilbreath has a total of 57 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Sihan Wu
Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA
36 shared publications - Jun Yi Stanley Lim
Children’s Medical Center Research Institute, Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
34 shared publications - Yoon Jung Kim
Children’s Medical Center Research Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
34 shared publications - Anna F. Farago
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Cambridge, Massachusetts
32 shared publications - Benjamin J. Drapkin
Hamon Center for Therapeutic Oncology Research, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
32 shared publications - Catherine B. Meador
Division of Hematology Oncology and Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Mass General Brigham Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
32 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 24 June 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Cell Biology
- Vol. 28 (7) , 1-11
Cis and trans regulatory mechanisms of extrachromosomal DNA segregation
Extrachromosomal DNAs (ecDNAs) attach to chromosomes during mitosis for random segregation and promote cancer heterogeneity. However, the mechanism governing ecDNA–chromosome mitotic interactions remains poorly understood. Here we show that ecDNAs tether to histone H3 lysine 27 acetylation (H3K27ac)-marked chromatin during mitosis. Depleting H3K27ac disrupts this interaction. Diverse bromodomain proteins, as H3K27ac readers, stabilize ecDNA–chromosome binding in a context-dependent and complementary manner. Although disrupting the Mediator complex in asynchronous cells detaches ecDNAs from mitotic chromosomes, Mediator and active Pol II are absent from ecDNAs during mitosis, suggesting that ecDNAs are transcriptionally silent during mitosis. Instead, inactive Pol II mediates ecDNA attachment. Furthermore, CRISPR interference targeting transcriptional regulatory elements on ecDNA impairs ecDNA segregation. Mis-segregated ecDNAs were expelled into the cytosol, leading to diminished oncogene expression and a reversal of therapy resistance. Our research provides universal cis and trans regulatory mechanisms of ecDNA segregation, offering deeper insight into ecDNA-driven oncogenesis.
- 24 June 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Cell Biology
- Vol. 28 (7) , 1-11
Open AccessCis and trans regulatory mechanisms of extrachromosomal DNA segregation
Extrachromosomal DNAs (ecDNAs) attach to chromosomes during mitosis for random segregation and promote cancer heterogeneity. However, the mechanism governing ecDNA–chromosome mitotic interactions remains poorly understood. Here we show that ecDNAs tether to histone H3 lysine 27 acetylation (H3K27ac)-marked chromatin during mitosis. Depleting H3K27ac disrupts this interaction. Diverse bromodomain proteins, as H3K27ac readers, stabilize ecDNA–chromosome binding in a context-dependent and complementary manner. Although disrupting the Mediator complex in asynchronous cells detaches ecDNAs from mitotic chromosomes, Mediator and active Pol II are absent from ecDNAs during mitosis, suggesting that ecDNAs are transcriptionally silent during mitosis. Instead, inactive Pol II mediates ecDNA attachment. Furthermore, CRISPR interference targeting transcriptional regulatory elements on ecDNA impairs ecDNA segregation. Mis-segregated ecDNAs were expelled into the cytosol, leading to diminished oncogene expression and a reversal of therapy resistance. Our research provides universal cis and trans regulatory mechanisms of ecDNA segregation, offering deeper insight into ecDNA-driven oncogenesis.
- Open Access
ecDNA-driven oncogene super-expressors shape immunoevasive tumor microenvironment
EcDNA contributes to cancer genetic heterogeneity through random segregation during mitosis. Emerging evidence links ecDNA to immune evasion, but the mechanism remains elusive. Using genetically engineered mouse models of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), we show that Kras and Myc oncogenes are amplified either on ecDNAs or as homogeneously staining regions (HSRs) on chromosomes. ecDNA-driven tumors are more aggressive in immunocompetent mice. Single-cell transcriptomic and histological analyses reveal that ecDNA-driven tumors rapidly establish an immunoevasive tumor microenvironment (TME), marked by increased myofibroblastic cancer-associated fibroblasts (myCAFs) and reduced T cell infiltration. Mechanistically, ecDNA heterogeneity generates a subset of cancer cells with extremely high Kras expression, termed super-expressors, which secrete amphiregulin to promote myCAF expansion and suppress T cell infiltration. Clonally organized super-expressors establish an immunoevasive niche in the TME from patients with PDAC. Our findings demonstrate a causal role of ecDNA in TME remodeling, offering insights into cancer heterogeneity and immune evasion.
Open AccessecDNA-driven oncogene super-expressors shape immunoevasive tumor microenvironment
EcDNA contributes to cancer genetic heterogeneity through random segregation during mitosis. Emerging evidence links ecDNA to immune evasion, but the mechanism remains elusive. Using genetically engineered mouse models of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), we show that Kras and Myc oncogenes are amplified either on ecDNAs or as homogeneously staining regions (HSRs) on chromosomes. ecDNA-driven tumors are more aggressive in immunocompetent mice. Single-cell transcriptomic and histological analyses reveal that ecDNA-driven tumors rapidly establish an immunoevasive tumor microenvironment (TME), marked by increased myofibroblastic cancer-associated fibroblasts (myCAFs) and reduced T cell infiltration. Mechanistically, ecDNA heterogeneity generates a subset of cancer cells with extremely high Kras expression, termed super-expressors, which secrete amphiregulin to promote myCAF expansion and suppress T cell infiltration. Clonally organized super-expressors establish an immunoevasive niche in the TME from patients with PDAC. Our findings demonstrate a causal role of ecDNA in TME remodeling, offering insights into cancer heterogeneity and immune evasion.
- Open Access
Cis and Trans Regulatory Mechanisms of ecDNA Segregation
Extrachromosomal DNAs (ecDNAs) attach to chromosomes during mitosis for random segregation and promote cancer heterogeneity. However, the mechanism governing ecDNA-chromosome mitotic interactions remains poorly understood. This study shows that ecDNAs tether to histone H3 lysine 27 acetylation (H3K27ac)-marked chromatin during mitosis. Depleting H3K27ac disrupts this interaction. Diverse bromodomain proteins, as H3K27ac readers, stabilise ecDNA-chromosome binding in a context-dependent and complementary manner. Although disrupting the Mediator complex in asynchronous cells detaches ecDNAs from mitotic chromosomes, Mediator and active Pol II are absent from ecDNAs during mitosis, suggesting that ecDNAs are transcriptionally silent during mitosis. Instead, inactive Pol II mediates ecDNA attachment. Furthermore, CRISPR interference targeting transcriptional regulatory elements on ecDNA impairs ecDNA segregation. Mis-segregated ecDNAs were expelled into the cytosol, leading to diminished oncogene expression and a reversal of therapy resistance. Our research provides universal cis and trans regulatory mechanisms of ecDNA segregation, offering deeper insight into ecDNA-driven oncogenesis.
Open AccessCis and Trans Regulatory Mechanisms of ecDNA Segregation
Extrachromosomal DNAs (ecDNAs) attach to chromosomes during mitosis for random segregation and promote cancer heterogeneity. However, the mechanism governing ecDNA-chromosome mitotic interactions remains poorly understood. This study shows that ecDNAs tether to histone H3 lysine 27 acetylation (H3K27ac)-marked chromatin during mitosis. Depleting H3K27ac disrupts this interaction. Diverse bromodomain proteins, as H3K27ac readers, stabilise ecDNA-chromosome binding in a context-dependent and complementary manner. Although disrupting the Mediator complex in asynchronous cells detaches ecDNAs from mitotic chromosomes, Mediator and active Pol II are absent from ecDNAs during mitosis, suggesting that ecDNAs are transcriptionally silent during mitosis. Instead, inactive Pol II mediates ecDNA attachment. Furthermore, CRISPR interference targeting transcriptional regulatory elements on ecDNA impairs ecDNA segregation. Mis-segregated ecDNAs were expelled into the cytosol, leading to diminished oncogene expression and a reversal of therapy resistance. Our research provides universal cis and trans regulatory mechanisms of ecDNA segregation, offering deeper insight into ecDNA-driven oncogenesis.
- Open Access
- 1 May 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure S2 from Acquired Cross-Resistance in Small Cell Lung Cancer due to Extrachromosomal DNA Amplification of MYC Paralogs
Comparison gene expression and H3K27ac between MGH1518 serial models
- 1 May 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure S2 from Acquired Cross-Resistance in Small Cell Lung Cancer due to Extrachromosomal DNA Amplification of MYC Paralogs
Comparison gene expression and H3K27ac between MGH1518 serial models
- Open Access
- 1 May 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure S11 from Acquired Cross-Resistance in Small Cell Lung Cancer due to Extrachromosomal DNA Amplification of MYC Paralogs
Frequency of amplified oncogenes across PDX panel, similarity of ecMYC/L/N structures, and regression analysis of average drug response versus MYC paralog copy number, expression and amplicon type.
- 1 May 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure S11 from Acquired Cross-Resistance in Small Cell Lung Cancer due to Extrachromosomal DNA Amplification of MYC Paralogs
Frequency of amplified oncogenes across PDX panel, similarity of ecMYC/L/N structures, and regression analysis of average drug response versus MYC paralog copy number, expression and amplicon type.
- Open Access
- 1 May 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure S12 from Acquired Cross-Resistance in Small Cell Lung Cancer due to Extrachromosomal DNA Amplification of MYC Paralogs
Acquired ecMYCN amplification in MGH1578 serial models and lineage oncogene expression compared with ecDNA status across the PDX panel.
- 1 May 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure S12 from Acquired Cross-Resistance in Small Cell Lung Cancer due to Extrachromosomal DNA Amplification of MYC Paralogs
Acquired ecMYCN amplification in MGH1578 serial models and lineage oncogene expression compared with ecDNA status across the PDX panel.
- Open Access
- 1 May 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure S1 from Acquired Cross-Resistance in Small Cell Lung Cancer due to Extrachromosomal DNA Amplification of MYC Paralogs
Calculation of delta-AUC and comparison of EC with EP in PDX models.
- 1 May 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure S1 from Acquired Cross-Resistance in Small Cell Lung Cancer due to Extrachromosomal DNA Amplification of MYC Paralogs
Calculation of delta-AUC and comparison of EC with EP in PDX models.
- Open Access
- 1 May 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure S11 from Acquired Cross-Resistance in Small Cell Lung Cancer due to Extrachromosomal DNA Amplification of MYC Paralogs
Frequency of amplified oncogenes across PDX panel, similarity of ecMYC/L/N structures, and regression analysis of average drug response versus MYC paralog copy number, expression and amplicon type.
- 1 May 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure S11 from Acquired Cross-Resistance in Small Cell Lung Cancer due to Extrachromosomal DNA Amplification of MYC Paralogs
Frequency of amplified oncogenes across PDX panel, similarity of ecMYC/L/N structures, and regression analysis of average drug response versus MYC paralog copy number, expression and amplicon type.
- Open Access
- 1 May 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure S9 from Acquired Cross-Resistance in Small Cell Lung Cancer due to Extrachromosomal DNA Amplification of MYC Paralogs
Reconstruction of ecDNAs containing MYC paralogs and MYCL FISH in MGH1501-1A metaphase chromosomes.
- 1 May 2024
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure S9 from Acquired Cross-Resistance in Small Cell Lung Cancer due to Extrachromosomal DNA Amplification of MYC Paralogs
Reconstruction of ecDNAs containing MYC paralogs and MYCL FISH in MGH1501-1A metaphase chromosomes.