Daniel Jin
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Daniel Jin has a total of 9 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Allan R. Martin
Spine Program; Krembil Brain Institute; University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
1 shared publication - Anna Rienmüller
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
1 shared publication - Colin Chan
Spine Program; Krembil Brain Institute; University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
1 shared publication - Eric M. Massicotte
Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
1 shared publication - Jetan H. Badhiwala
Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
1 shared publication - Lauren Riehm
Spine Program; Krembil Brain Institute; University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 10 March 2020
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 9 (3) , 752
Quantitative Assessment of Gait Characteristics in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Prospective Clinical Study
It is challenging to discriminate the early presentation of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy (DCM) as well as sensitively and accurately distinguishing between mild, moderate, and severe levels of impairment. As gait dysfunction is one of the cardinal symptoms of DCM, we hypothesized that spatiotemporal gait parameters, including the enhanced gait variability index (eGVI), could be used to sensitively discriminate between different severities of DCM. A total of 153 patients recently diagnosed with DCM were recruited and stratified on the basis of DCM severity grades, as measured using the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) scale. Demographic information and neurological status were collected. Gait assessments were performed using an 8 m walkway. Spearman rank correlation was used to identify relationships between gait parameters and mJOA values as well as the mJOA lower extremity (LE) subscore. Kruskal–Wallis H test was performed to evaluate differences between severity groups, as defined by mJOA classification. A significant and relatively strong correlation was found between the mJOA score and eGVI, as well as between the LE subscore of the mJOA and eGVI. Significant differences in the eGVI (X2(2, N = 153) = 55.04, p < 0.0001, ε2 = 0.36) were found between all groups of DCM severity, with a significant increase in the eGVI as DCM progressed from mild to moderate. The eGVI was the most discriminative gait parameter, which facilitated objective differentiation between varying severities of DCM. Quantitative gait assessments show promise as an accurate and objective tool to diagnose and classify DCM, as well as to potentially evaluate the impact of therapeutic interventions.
- 10 March 2020
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 9 (3) , 752
Open AccessQuantitative Assessment of Gait Characteristics in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Prospective Clinical Study
It is challenging to discriminate the early presentation of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy (DCM) as well as sensitively and accurately distinguishing between mild, moderate, and severe levels of impairment. As gait dysfunction is one of the cardinal symptoms of DCM, we hypothesized that spatiotemporal gait parameters, including the enhanced gait variability index (eGVI), could be used to sensitively discriminate between different severities of DCM. A total of 153 patients recently diagnosed with DCM were recruited and stratified on the basis of DCM severity grades, as measured using the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) scale. Demographic information and neurological status were collected. Gait assessments were performed using an 8 m walkway. Spearman rank correlation was used to identify relationships between gait parameters and mJOA values as well as the mJOA lower extremity (LE) subscore. Kruskal–Wallis H test was performed to evaluate differences between severity groups, as defined by mJOA classification. A significant and relatively strong correlation was found between the mJOA score and eGVI, as well as between the LE subscore of the mJOA and eGVI. Significant differences in the eGVI (X2(2, N = 153) = 55.04, p < 0.0001, ε2 = 0.36) were found between all groups of DCM severity, with a significant increase in the eGVI as DCM progressed from mild to moderate. The eGVI was the most discriminative gait parameter, which facilitated objective differentiation between varying severities of DCM. Quantitative gait assessments show promise as an accurate and objective tool to diagnose and classify DCM, as well as to potentially evaluate the impact of therapeutic interventions.