Laura Giurato

Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), the most advanced form of peripheral arterial disease (PAD), is the comorbidity primarily responsible for major lower-limb amputations, particularly for diabetic patients. Autologous cell therapy has been the focus of efforts over the past 20 years to create non-interventional therapeutic options for no-option CLTI to improve limb perfusion and wound healing. Among the different available techniques, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNC) appear to be the most promising autologous cell therapy due to physio-pathological considerations and clinical evidence, which will be discussed in this review. A meta-analysis of six clinical studies, including 256 diabetic patients treated with naive, fresh PBMNC produced via a selective filtration point-of-care device, was conducted. PBMNC was associated with a mean yearly amputation rate of 15.7%, a mean healing rate of 62%, and a time to healing of 208.6 ± 136.5 days. Moreover, an increase in TcPO2 and a reduction in pain were observed. All-cause mortality, with a mean rate of 22.2% and a yearly mortality rate of 18.8%, was reported. No serious adverse events were reported. Finally, some practical and financial considerations are provided, which point to the therapy’s recommendation as the first line of treatment for this particular and crucial patient group.

The current study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PB-MNC) therapy as adjuvant treatment for patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) and no-option critical limb ischaemia (NO-CLI). The study is a prospective, noncontrolled, observational study including patients with neuro-ischaemic DFUs and NO-CLI who had unsuccessful revascularization below the ankle (BTA) and persistence of foot ischaemia defined by TcPO2 values less than 30 mmHg. All patients received three cycles of PB-MNC therapy administered through a “below-the-ankle approach” in the affected foot along the wound-related artery according to the angiosome theory. The primary outcome measures were healing, major amputation, and survival after 1 year of follow-up. The secondary outcome measures were the evaluation of tissue perfusion by TcPO2 and foot pain defined by the numerical rating scale (NRS). Fifty-five patients were included. They were aged >70 years old and the majority were male and affected by type 2 diabetes with a long diabetes duration (>20 years); the majority of DFUs were infected and nearly 90% were assessed as gangrene. Overall, 69.1% of patients healed and survived, 3.6% healed and deceased, 10.9% did not heal and deceased, and 16.4% had a major amputation. At baseline and after PB-MNC therapy, the TcPO2 values were 17 ± 11 and 41 ± 12 mmHg, respectively (p < 0.0001), while the pain values (NRS) were 6.8 ± 1.7 vs. 2.8 ± 1.7, respectively (p < 0.0001). Any adverse event was recorded during the PB-MNC therapy. Adjuvant PB-MNC therapy seems to promote good outcomes in patients with NO-CLI and neuro-ischaemic DFUs.

The study aimed to evaluate the prevalence, characteristics and outcomes of patients affected by Charcot neuro-arthropathy (CN) and peripheral arterial disease (PAD) compared to CN without PAD. Consecutive patients presenting with an acute CN were included. The sample size was calculated by the power analysis by adopting the two-tailed tests of the null hypothesis with alfa = 0.05 and a value of beta = 0.10 as the second type error and, therefore, a test power equal to 90%. Seventy-six patients were identified. Twenty-four patients (31.6%) had neuro-ischaemic CN; they were older (66 vs. 57yrs), p = 0.03, had a longer diabetes duration (19 vs. 14yrs), p < 0.001, and more cases of end-stage-renal-disease (12.5 vs. 0%), p = 0.04 and ischaemic heart disease (58.3 vs. 15.4%), p < 0.0001 than neuropathic CN. Fifty patients (65.8%) had concomitant foot ulcers, 62.5% and 67.3% (p = 0.3), respectively, in CN with and without PAD. Neuro-ischaemic CN show arterial lesions of 2.9 vessels, and PAD was located predominantly below-the-knee (75%) but not below-the-ankle (16.7%). The outcomes for neuro-ischaemic and neuropathic CN patients were, respectively: wound healing (86.7 vs. 94.3%), p = 0.08; minor amputation (25 vs. 7.7%), p = 0.003; major amputation (8.3 vs. 1.9%), p = 0.001; hospitalization (75 vs. 23%), p = 0.0001. The study showed a frequent association between CN and PAD, leading to a neuro-ischaemic Charcot foot type. Neuro-ischaemic CN leaded to an increased risk of minor and major amputation and hospitalization, compared to neuropathic CN.

Monocytes and lymphocytes play a key role in physiologic wound healing and might be involved in the impaired mechanisms observed in diabetes. Skin wound macrophages are represented by tissue resident macrophages and infiltrating peripheral blood recruited monocytes which play a leading role during the inflammatory phase of wound repair. The impaired transition of diabetic wound macrophages from pro-inflammatory M1 phenotypes to anti-inflammatory pro-regenerative M2 phenotypes might represent a key issue for impaired diabetic wound healing. This review will focus on the role of immune system cells in normal skin and diabetic wound repair. Furthermore, it will give an insight into therapy able to immuno-modulate wound healing processes toward to a regenerative anti-inflammatory fashion. Different approaches, such as cell therapy, exosome, and dermal substitute able to promote the M1 to M2 switch and able to positively influence healing processes in chronic wounds will be discussed.

The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of foot revascularization in persons with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) and below-the-ankle (BTA) arterial disease. Consecutive patients referred for a new active ischaemic DFU requiring lower limb revascularization were considered. Among those, only patients with a BTA arterial disease were included. Revascularization procedures were retrospectively analysed: in the case of successful foot revascularization (recanalization of pedal artery, or plantar arteries or both) or not, patients were respectively divided in two groups, successful foot perfusion (SFP) and failed foot perfusion (FFP). Healing, minor and major amputation at 12 months of follow-up were evaluated and compared. Eighty patients (80) were included. The mean age was 70.5 ± 10.9 years, 55 (68.7%) were male, 72 (90%) were affected by type 2 diabetes with a mean duration of 22.7 ± 11.3 years. Overall 45 (56.2%) patients healed, 47 (58.7%) had minor amputation and 13 (16.2%) major amputation. Outcomes for SFP and FFP were respectively: healing (89.3 vs. 9.1%, p < 0.0001), minor amputation (44.7 vs. 78.8%, p = 0.0001), major amputation (2.1 vs. 36.3%, p < 0.0001). Failed foot revascularization resulted an independent predictor of non-healing, minor amputation, and major amputation. Foot revascularization is mandatory to achieve healing and avoid major amputation in persons with ischaemic DFU and BTA arterial disease.

The study aimed to evaluate clinical and vascular characteristics, as well as outcomes, for diabetic persons with foot ulceration and no-option critical limb ischemia (CLI). The study group included a sample of patients admitted to our diabetic foot unit because of a new diabetic foot ulcer and CLI. All subjects were managed using a limb salvage protocol which includes lower-limb revascularization. According to whether or not the revascularization procedure was a success, patients were respectively divided into two groups: successfully treated CLI patients (ST-CLI) and no-option CLI patients (NO-CLI). Failed revascularization was considered in the case of technical recanalization failure of occluded vessels (inability to overcome the obstruction) and/or absence of arterial flow to the foot. Limb salvage, major amputation, and death after 1 year of follow-up were evaluated and compared between the two groups. Overall, 239 patients were included, 74.9% belonging to ST-CLI and 25.1% to NO-CLI. NO-CLI patients reported more cases of ischemic heart disease (80 vs. 62.1, p = 0.008), heart failure (63.3 vs. 32.4%, p < 0.0001), and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (60 vs. 25.7%) than ST-CLI patients. In addition, more vessels were affected in the NO-CLI group (5.2 ± 1.6 vs. 4 ± 1.5, p < 0.0001), and there was more involvement of tibio-peroneal trunk (50 vs. 30.2%, p = 0.006), anterior tibial (93.3 vs. 82.7, p = 0.03), posterior tibial (93.3 vs. 73.7%, p = 0.0005), peroneal (70 vs. 48%, p = 0.002), and below-the-ankle arteries (73.3 vs. 39.1%, p < 0.0001) than ST-CLI. The 1 year outcomes for the whole population were 69.9% limb salvage, 10.9% major amputation, and 19.2% death. The outcomes for NO-CLI and ST-CLI were, respectively, as follows: limb salvage (13.8 vs. 73.4%, p < 0.0001), amputation (30 vs. 4.5%, p = 0.0001), and mortality (50 vs. 8.9%, p < 0.0001). NO-CLI patients showed a more severe pattern of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) with distal arterial lesions and worse outcomes than ST-CLI.

This study aims to evaluate clinical and ulcer characteristics as well the outcomes of patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). The study group was composed of DFUs patients managed by a limb salvage protocol according to guidance. Clinical and ulcers findings were described, and 1-year outcomes defined as limb salvage, healing, healing time, major amputation and death were compared between neuropathic and ischemic DFUs. One thousand, one hundred and ninety-eight subjects were included; 386 (32.2%) neuropathic and 812 (67.8%) ischemic DFUs. Neuropathic patients were younger (69.5 ± 11.5 vs. 74.5 ± 11.5, p < 0.0001) and reported less cases of nephropathy (22.8 vs. 39.6%, p < 0.0001), ischemic heart disease (22.8 vs. 36.9, p = 0.0004), cerebrovascular disease (8.3 vs. 17.2%, p = 0.002), heart failure (10.1 vs. 24.7%, p = 0.0002) and end-stage-renal-disease (ESRD) (5.4 vs. 27%, p = 0.0001) than ischemic patients; they also showed less cases of large (>5 cm²) (10.3 vs. 22.9%, p = 0.0007), infected (40.4 vs. 55.7%, p = 0.0005) and deep to the bone (22.3 vs. 39.2, p = 0.0002) ulcers, as well less multiple ulcerations (21.8 vs. 32.8%, p = 0.006) than patients with ischemic DFUs. The outcomes for neuropathic and ischemic DFUs were limb salvage (98.4 vs. 82.3%, p < 0.0001), healing (97.3 vs. 79.6%, p < 0.0001), healing time (34.9 vs. 35.6 weeks, p = 0.8), major amputation (0.5 vs. 6.6%, p = 0.0001), death (1.1 vs. 11%, p < 0.0001) respectively. Revascularization failure and ESRD were independent predictors of major amputation, while heart failure and number of co-morbidities (≥5) were independent predictors of death. Ischemic DFUs patients showed more severe clinical and ulcers features as well worse outcomes than neuropathic DFUs patients.

Diabetic foot infections (DFIs) are severe complications of long-standing diabetes, and they represent a diagnostic challenge, since the differentiation between osteomyelitis (OM), soft tissue infection (STI), and Charcot’s osteoarthropathy is very difficult to achieve. Nevertheless, such differential diagnosis is mandatory in order to plan the most appropriate treatment for the patient. The isolation of the pathogen from bone or soft tissues is still the gold standard for diagnosis; however, it would be desirable to have a non-invasive test that is able to detect, localize, and evaluate the extent of the infection with high accuracy. A multidisciplinary approach is the key for the correct management of diabetic patients dealing with infective complications, but at the moment, no definite diagnostic flow charts still exist. This review aims at providing an overview on multimodality imaging for the diagnosis of DFI and to address evidence-based answers to the clinicians when they appeal to radiologists or nuclear medicine (NM) physicians for studying their patients.

Purpose To demonstrate the usefulness of rearfoot transcutaneous oximetry to assess the peripheral arterial disease in diabetic patients with heel ulcer. Methods From our database of 550 critical limb ischemia diabetic patients followed after a percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, we have selected patients with below the knee arterial disease. Patients were grouped according to the dorsal transcutaneous oximetry value (Group A < 30 mmHg; Group B ≥ 30 mmHg). Patients of Group B had a second oximetry performed at the rearfoot, close to the lesion localized in all cases at the heel. Finally, the analysis of the arterial pattern disease has been done. Results We selected 191 patients: Group A (151 patients), dorsal transcutaneous oximetry of 11.8 ± 0.7 mmHg; Group B (40 patients), dorsal transcutaneous oximetry of 44.2 ± 10.1 mmHg. In Group B, rearfoot oximetry was 20.5 ± 5 mmHg, significantly lower than dorsal oximetry (p = 0.0179). The anterior tibial artery was involved in all patients of Group A. In Group B, the anterior tibial artery was involved in 15 subjects and never alone; the posterior tibial artery was involved in 20 subjects and in 11 cases alone. The peroneal artery was affected in 20 subjects and in 14 patients alone. Conclusion When a heel lesion is present and the transcutaneous oximetry recorded on the dorsum of the foot does not confirm the presence of critical limb ischemia (not ≤30 mmHg), a second oximetry recorded on the rearfoot is useful to point out ischemia of the peroneal artery and/or of the posterior tibial artery.