Zhuqin Feng
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Zhuqin Feng has a total of 1 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Roger Patulny
Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 20 January 2025
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Asian Studies Review
- p. 1-21
Face and Favours: Network Norms among Chinese Migrants and Non-Migrants in Australia
- 20 January 2025
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Asian Studies Review
- p. 1-21
Open AccessFace and Favours: Network Norms among Chinese Migrants and Non-Migrants in Australia
- 7 May 2023
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Asian Studies Review
- Vol. 48 (4) , 896-897
The theory of guanxi and Chinese society
In The Theory of Guanxi and Chinese Society, Jack Barbalet explores the vital Chinese social concept of guanxi, a particular form of connection where participants voluntarily maintain an enduring r...
- 7 May 2023
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Asian Studies Review
- Vol. 48 (4) , 896-897
The theory of guanxi and Chinese society
In The Theory of Guanxi and Chinese Society, Jack Barbalet explores the vital Chinese social concept of guanxi, a particular form of connection where participants voluntarily maintain an enduring r...
- 7 June 2020
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Sociology
- Vol. 57 (2) , 464-482
Should I use my ‘weak’ social capital or ‘strong’ guanxi? Reviewing and critiquing two theories in the context of Western-Chinese migration
Social network dynamics are complex in the context of Chinese overseas migration because of the unique dynamics of guanxi, which are distinctly different from ‘Western’ social capital. The few migration studies comparing guanxi and social capital suggest that the former largely consists ‘strong ties’, while the latter is comprised of ‘weak ties’. However, most apply only a cursory comparison of one network facet. We review core literature in the two fields to contrast what each says about network norms, structures and practices. We find that: (i) guanxi is characterised by dynamics of ‘face’ and renqing; (ii) guanxi has core and peripheral aspects that grant it bonding and bridging qualities; (iii) weak ties in social capital networks are more beneficial for acquiring non-redundant resources, and for joining civic/voluntary associations; (iv) while strong, face-based guanxi ties better mobilise valuable resources, these ties are rarely transformed into social capital.
- 7 June 2020
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Sociology
- Vol. 57 (2) , 464-482
Should I use my ‘weak’ social capital or ‘strong’ guanxi? Reviewing and critiquing two theories in the context of Western-Chinese migration
Social network dynamics are complex in the context of Chinese overseas migration because of the unique dynamics of guanxi, which are distinctly different from ‘Western’ social capital. The few migration studies comparing guanxi and social capital suggest that the former largely consists ‘strong ties’, while the latter is comprised of ‘weak ties’. However, most apply only a cursory comparison of one network facet. We review core literature in the two fields to contrast what each says about network norms, structures and practices. We find that: (i) guanxi is characterised by dynamics of ‘face’ and renqing; (ii) guanxi has core and peripheral aspects that grant it bonding and bridging qualities; (iii) weak ties in social capital networks are more beneficial for acquiring non-redundant resources, and for joining civic/voluntary associations; (iv) while strong, face-based guanxi ties better mobilise valuable resources, these ties are rarely transformed into social capital.