Sarah Gonzales

Background: Pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing could identify actionable drug–gene interactions, reducing the risks of inappropriate prescribing of certain medications in some patients. An area of growing public health concern is rising global rates of depression and antidepressant use over the last two decades. Prior research has elucidated perspectives of healthcare providers who prescribe antidepressants regarding the clinical utility of genetic information, including PGx testing, but there is a gap in understanding how individual perspectives and systemic contextual factors may combine to influence PGx testing adoption. Objective: The objective of this study was to elucidate combinations of individual and contextual conditions associated with willingness to adopt PGx testing for Cytochrome P450 Subfamily IID, Polypeptide 6 (CYP2D6) and Subfamily IIC, Polypeptide 19 (CYP2C19) among antidepressant prescribers. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional, mixed-methods study using structured questionnaires and semi-structured interviews with healthcare providers who prescribe antidepressants within their scope of practice across four healthcare systems in the United States. We collected data on implementation science concepts from the Theoretical Domains Framework, the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), and the Implementation Outcomes Framework. Coincidence analysis (CNA), a case-based, Boolean logic-based method that identifies minimally sufficient combinations of conditions that lead to a particular outcome, was used to identify combinations of conditions for PGx test adoption among antidepressant prescribers. Interviews were also conducted with 10 patients who received pharmacogenetic testing within these healthcare systems to contextualize findings with patient perspectives. Results: Prescribers adopted PGx testing when they believed it would be beneficial to patients and were not deterred by cost-related concerns; the combination of these conditions led to PGx adoption in the most highly supported CNA model. Patient perspectives were also consistent with the selected model, with data suggesting they may have greater willingness to tolerate costs when they perceived or experienced benefits from testing. Conclusions: Insights from this study may be used by health system administrators and public health policymakers to inform future PGx implementation strategies that enhance uptake and awareness of existing evidence for clinical benefits of PGx testing and mitigate cost-related barriers to adoption.

People with HIV from historically underrepresented racial and ethnic minority (URM) groups are at increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Guided by the health belief model, we conducted in-depth interviews with URM with HIV, established CVD, and CVD risk factors at three academic medical centers in the Southern United States between November 2019 and March 2020. We analyzed the data using applied thematic analysis. A total of 27 participants were interviewed, and most were African American. Participants described their HIV status as a contributing factor to perceived severity of CVD. Barriers, such as a lack of access to specialists and affordability found in our study, highlight both individual challenges and systemic issues affecting this population. To ensure equitable CVD care, interventions should address both individual beliefs and systemic barriers. Integrating these findings into new or existing intervention strategies has the potential to enhance preventive efforts and improve cardiovascular health outcomes in this population.

Background: Electronic health record (EHR)–integrated digital personal health records (PHRs) via Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) are promising digital health tools to support care coordination (CC) for children and youth with special health care needs but remain widely unadopted; as their adoption grows, mixed methods and implementation research could guide real-world implementation and evaluation. Objective: This study (1) evaluates the feasibility of an FHIR-enabled digital PHR app for CC for children and youth with special health care needs, (2) characterizes determinants of implementation, and (3) explores associations between adoption and patient- or family-reported outcomes. Methods: This nonrandomized, single-arm, prospective feasibility trial will test an FHIR-enabled digital PHR app’s use among families of children and youth with special health care needs in primary care settings. Key app features are FHIR-enabled access to structured data from the child’s medical record, families’ abilities to longitudinally track patient- or family-centered care goals, and sharing progress toward care goals with the child’s primary care provider via a clinician dashboard. We shall enroll 40 parents or caregivers of children and youth with special health care needs to use the app for 6 months. Inclusion criteria for children and youth with special health care needs are age 0-16 years; primary care at a participating site; complex needs benefiting from CC; high hospitalization risk in the next 6 months; English speaking; having requisite technology at home (internet access, Apple iOS mobile device); and an active web-based EHR patient portal account to which a parent or caregiver has full proxy access. Digital prescriptions will be used to disseminate study recruitment materials directly to eligible participants via their existing EHR patient portal accounts. We will apply an intervention mixed methods design to link quantitative and qualitative (semistructured interviews and family engagement panels with parents of children and youth with special health care needs) data and characterize implementation determinants. Two CC frameworks (Pediatric Care Coordination Framework; Patient-Centered Medical Home) and 2 evaluation frameworks (Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research; Technology Acceptance Model) provide theoretical foundations for this study. Results: Participant recruitment began in fall 2022, before which we identified >300 potentially eligible patients in EHR data. A family engagement panel in fall 2021 generated formative feedback from family partners. Integrated analysis of pretrial quantitative and qualitative data informed family-centered enhancements to study procedures. Conclusions: Our findings will inform how to integrate an FHIR-enabled digital PHR app for children and youth with special health care needs into clinical care. Mixed methods and implementation research will help strengthen implementation in diverse clinical settings. The study is positioned to advance knowledge of how to use digital health innovations for improving care and outcomes for children and youth with special health care needs and their families. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05513235; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05513235 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/46847

BACKGROUND Electronic health record (EHR)–integrated digital personal health records (PHRs) via Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) are promising digital health tools to support care coordination (CC) for children and youth with special health care needs but remain widely unadopted; as their adoption grows, mixed methods and implementation research could guide real-world implementation and evaluation. OBJECTIVE This study (1) evaluates the feasibility of an FHIR-enabled digital PHR app for CC for children and youth with special health care needs, (2) characterizes determinants of implementation, and (3) explores associations between adoption and patient- or family-reported outcomes. METHODS This nonrandomized, single-arm, prospective feasibility trial will test an FHIR-enabled digital PHR app’s use among families of children and youth with special health care needs in primary care settings. Key app features are FHIR-enabled access to structured data from the child’s medical record, families’ abilities to longitudinally track patient- or family-centered care goals, and sharing progress toward care goals with the child’s primary care provider via a clinician dashboard. We shall enroll 40 parents or caregivers of children and youth with special health care needs to use the app for 6 months. Inclusion criteria for children and youth with special health care needs are age 0-16 years; primary care at a participating site; complex needs benefiting from CC; high hospitalization risk in the next 6 months; English speaking; having requisite technology at home (internet access, Apple iOS mobile device); and an active web-based EHR patient portal account to which a parent or caregiver has full proxy access. Digital prescriptions will be used to disseminate study recruitment materials directly to eligible participants via their existing EHR patient portal accounts. We will apply an intervention mixed methods design to link quantitative and qualitative (semistructured interviews and family engagement panels with parents of children and youth with special health care needs) data and characterize implementation determinants. Two CC frameworks (Pediatric Care Coordination Framework; Patient-Centered Medical Home) and 2 evaluation frameworks (Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research; Technology Acceptance Model) provide theoretical foundations for this study. RESULTS Participant recruitment began in fall 2022, before which we identified >300 potentially eligible patients in EHR data. A family engagement panel in fall 2021 generated formative feedback from family partners. Integrated analysis of pretrial quantitative and qualitative data informed family-centered enhancements to study procedures. CONCLUSIONS Our findings will inform how to integrate an FHIR-enabled digital PHR app for children and youth with special health care needs into clinical care. Mixed methods and implementation research will help strengthen implementation in diverse clinical settings. The study is positioned to advance knowledge of how to use digital health innovations for improving care and outcomes for children and youth with special health care needs and their families. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05513235; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05513235 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT DERR1-10.2196/46847

Background: Suboptimal medication adherence is a significant problem for patients with serious mental illness. Measuring medication adherence through subjective and objective measures can be challenging, time-consuming, and inaccurate. Objective: The primary purpose of this feasibility and acceptability study was to evaluate the impact of a digital medicine system (DMS) among Veterans (patients) with serious mental illness as compared with treatment as usual (TAU) on medication adherence. Methods: This open-label, 2-site, provider-randomized trial assessed aripiprazole refill adherence in Veterans with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, or major depressive disorder. We randomized 26 providers such that their patients either received TAU or DMS for a period of 90 days. Semistructured interviews with patients and providers were used to examine the feasibility and acceptability of using the DMS. Results: We enrolled 46 patients across 2 Veterans Health Administration sites: 21 (46%) in DMS and 25 (54%) in TAU. There was no difference in the proportion of days covered by medication refill over 3 and 6 months (0.82, SD 0.24 and 0.75, SD 0.26 in DMS vs 0.86, SD 0.19 and 0.82, SD 0.21 in TAU, respectively). The DMS arm had 0.85 (SD 0.20) proportion of days covered during the period they were engaged with the DMS (mean 144, SD 100 days). Interviews with patients (n=14) and providers (n=5) elicited themes salient to using the DMS. Patient findings described the positive impact of the DMS on medication adherence, challenges with the DMS patch connectivity and skin irritation, and challenges with the DMS app that affected overall use. Providers described an overall interest in using a DMS as an objective measure to support medication adherence in their patients. However, providers described challenges with the DMS dashboard and integrating DMS data into their workflow, which decreased the usability of the DMS for providers. Conclusions: There was no observed difference in refill rates. Among those who engaged in the DMS arm, the proportion of days covered by refills were relatively high (mean 0.85, SD 0.20). The qualitative analyses highlighted areas for further refinement of the DMS. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03881449; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03881449

Using a patient’s genetic information to inform medication prescriptions can be clinically effective; however, the practice has not been widely implemented. Health systems need guidance on how to engage with providers to improve pharmacogenetic test utilization. Approaches from the field of implementation science may shed light on the complex factors affecting pharmacogenetic test use in real-world settings and areas to target to improve utilization. This paper presents an approach to studying the application of precision medicine that utilizes mixed qualitative and quantitative methods and implementation science frameworks to understand which factors or combinations consistently account for high versus low utilization of pharmocogenetic testing. This approach involves two phases: (1) collection of qualitative and quantitative data from providers—the cases—at four clinical institutions about their experiences with, and utilization of, pharmacogenetic testing to identify salient factors; and (2) analysis using a Configurational Comparative Method (CCM), using a mathematical algorithm to identify the minimally necessary and sufficient factors that distinguish providers who have higher utilization from those with low utilization. Advantages of this approach are that it can be used for small to moderate sample sizes, and it accounts for conditions found in real-world settings by demonstrating how they coincide to affect utilization.

BACKGROUND Suboptimal medication adherence is a significant problem for patients with serious mental illness (SMI). Measuring medication adherence through subjective and objective measures can be challenging, time consuming and inaccurate. OBJECTIVE We evaluated a digital medicine system (DMS) compared to treatment as usual (TAU) on adherence to oral aripiprazole and patient and provider perspectives on the feasibility and acceptability of a DMS. METHODS This open-label, 2-site, provider-randomized trial assessed aripiprazole refill adherence in Veterans with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, or major depressive disorder. We randomized 26 providers such that their patients either received TAU or DMS for a period of 90 days. Semi-structured interviews with patients and providers were used to examine feasibility and acceptability of using the DMS. RESULTS We enrolled 46 patients across 2 Veterans Affairs (VA) sites: (21 in DMS and 25 in TAU). There was no difference in medication refill over 3 and 6 months, respectively (82% and 75% DMS vs. 86% and 82% TAU). The DMS arm had 85% days covered during the period they were engaged with the DMS (144 days on average). Interviews with patients (n=14) and providers (n=5) elicited themes salient to using the DMS. Patient themes included: pre-enrollment adherence strategies and interest in the DMS, positive impact on medication adherence, system usability challenges, support needs, and suggested design/functionality improvements. Provider themes included: concerns for patient medication adherence and interest in the DMS, concerns with the DMS, DMS dashboard usability, challenges of the DMS, and suggestions to increase provider use. CONCLUSIONS There was no observed difference in refill rates. Among those who engaged in the DMS arm, refill rates were relatively high (85%). The qualitative analyses highlighted areas for further refinement of the DMS. CLINICALTRIAL NCT03881449

Background: After achieving viral suppression, it is critical for persons living with HIV (PLWH) to focus on prevention of non-AIDS comorbidities such as cardiovascular disease (CVD) in order to enhance their quality of life and longevity of life. Despite PLWH elevated risk of developing CVD compared to individuals without HIV, PLWH do not often meet evidence-based treatment goals for CVD prevention; the reasons for PLWH not meeting guideline recommendations are poorly understood. The objective of this study was to identify the factors associated with adherence to CVD medications for PLWH who have achieved viral suppression. Methods: Qualitative data were obtained from formative research conducted to inform the adaptation of a nurse-led intervention trial to improve cardiovascular health at three large academic medical centers in the United States. Transcripts were analyzed using content analysis guided by principles drawn from grounded theory. Results: Fifty-one individuals who had achieved viral suppression (< 200 copies/mL) participated: 37 in 6 focus groups and 14 in individual semi-structured interviews. Mean age was 57 years (SD: 7.8); most were African Americans (n=31) and majority were male (n=34). Three main themes were observed. First, participants reported discordance between their healthcare providers’ recommendations and their own preferred strategies to reduce CVD risk. Second, participants intentionally modified frequency of CVD medication taking which appeared to be related to low CVD risk perception and perceived or experienced side effects with treatment. Finally, participants discussed the impact of long-term experience with HIV care on adherence to CVD medication and motivational factors that enhanced adherence to heart healthy behaviors. Conclusion: Findings suggest that future research should focus on developing interventions to enhance patient–provider communication in order to elicit beliefs, concerns and preferences for CVD prevention strategies. Future research should seek to leverage and adapt established evidence-based practices in HIV care to support CVD medication adherence.