Joshua H. Wolf
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Joshua H. Wolf has a total of 77 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Jessica Felton
6 shared publicationsArun Mavanur
Department of Surgery, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Lifebridge Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
5 shared publicationsChristopher R. D'ADamo
Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland
4 shared publicationsJoseph Wetherell
4 shared publicationsChristopher R. D’aDamo
Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Lifebridge Health, Baltimore, USA
3 shared publications- Christopher Richard D'ADamo
Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
3 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 7 April 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Surgical Oncology
- Vol. 66, 102427
Comparative outcomes of organ-preserving surgery vs. radical resection for clinical T2N0 rectal cancer: A retrospective analysis
- 7 April 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Surgical Oncology
- Vol. 66, 102427
Comparative outcomes of organ-preserving surgery vs. radical resection for clinical T2N0 rectal cancer: A retrospective analysis
- 22 April 2025
- Published by Wiley in Colorectal Disease
- Vol. 27 (4) , e70102
Combined single‐incision laparoscopic surgery/robotic approach for simultaneous transverse loop colostomy reversal and colorectal anastomosis – A video vignette
- 22 April 2025
- Published by Wiley in Colorectal Disease
- Vol. 27 (4) , e70102
Combined single‐incision laparoscopic surgery/robotic approach for simultaneous transverse loop colostomy reversal and colorectal anastomosis – A video vignette
- 14 October 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Robotic Surgery
- Vol. 18 (1) , 1-8
Association of robotic surgery with early discharge, readmission, and complications in elective colectomy: an analysis of NSQIP data from 2012 to 2021
Background Early discharge (ED) after colectomy has become a target outcome for multiple reasons, but the factors associated with ED are not well characterized. This study investigated the factors associated with ED and evaluated the impact of ED on overall outcome. Methods Data from ACS-NSQIP were used to identify patients who underwent non-emergent colectomy from 2012 to 2021. ED was defined as length of stay ≤ 2 days. Unpaired t-tests, chi-square tests and adjusted multivariate logistic regression modeling were used to estimate associated factors for ED. Bounceback readmission was defined as readmission within 7 days of discharge. Results In this cohort of 282,490 patients, 43,137 (15.3%) met the criteria for ED. Robotic colectomy (OR 14.35; 95% CI [13.63–15.12]) was more strongly associated with ED than any other patient characteristic, including laparoscopic colectomy (6.82 [6.51–7.14], ref open colectomy). ED vs. non-ED patients had lower rates of 30-day (5.84 vs. 10.37%, p < 0.01) and bounceback (3.56 vs. 5.75%, p < 0.01) readmissions, overall complications (5.65 vs. 18.63%, p < 0.01) and post-discharge complications (4.21 vs. 7.49%, p < 0.01). Conclusions Robotic surgery was the variable most strongly associated with ED, with greater odds of ED compared to both laparoscopic and open colectomy. Patients who had ED after robotic surgery had lower rates of complications and readmission compared to non-ED patients.
- 14 October 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Robotic Surgery
- Vol. 18 (1) , 1-8
Association of robotic surgery with early discharge, readmission, and complications in elective colectomy: an analysis of NSQIP data from 2012 to 2021
Background Early discharge (ED) after colectomy has become a target outcome for multiple reasons, but the factors associated with ED are not well characterized. This study investigated the factors associated with ED and evaluated the impact of ED on overall outcome. Methods Data from ACS-NSQIP were used to identify patients who underwent non-emergent colectomy from 2012 to 2021. ED was defined as length of stay ≤ 2 days. Unpaired t-tests, chi-square tests and adjusted multivariate logistic regression modeling were used to estimate associated factors for ED. Bounceback readmission was defined as readmission within 7 days of discharge. Results In this cohort of 282,490 patients, 43,137 (15.3%) met the criteria for ED. Robotic colectomy (OR 14.35; 95% CI [13.63–15.12]) was more strongly associated with ED than any other patient characteristic, including laparoscopic colectomy (6.82 [6.51–7.14], ref open colectomy). ED vs. non-ED patients had lower rates of 30-day (5.84 vs. 10.37%, p < 0.01) and bounceback (3.56 vs. 5.75%, p < 0.01) readmissions, overall complications (5.65 vs. 18.63%, p < 0.01) and post-discharge complications (4.21 vs. 7.49%, p < 0.01). Conclusions Robotic surgery was the variable most strongly associated with ED, with greater odds of ED compared to both laparoscopic and open colectomy. Patients who had ED after robotic surgery had lower rates of complications and readmission compared to non-ED patients.
- 23 August 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
- Vol. 28 (11) , 1917-1918
Prophylactic ureteral catheterization performed by the colorectal surgeon: a retrospective analysis
- 23 August 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
- Vol. 28 (11) , 1917-1918
Prophylactic ureteral catheterization performed by the colorectal surgeon: a retrospective analysis
- 25 July 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Surgical Research
- Vol. 301, 572-577
Comparison of Post-Hemorrhoid Surgery Pain Profiles in Older and Younger Adults
- 25 July 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Surgical Research
- Vol. 301, 572-577
Comparison of Post-Hemorrhoid Surgery Pain Profiles in Older and Younger Adults
- 15 April 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Surgical Oncology
- Vol. 54, 102075
Adjuvant chemotherapy in stage 1 colon cancer: Patient characteristics and survival analysis from the national cancer database
- 15 April 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Surgical Oncology
- Vol. 54, 102075
Adjuvant chemotherapy in stage 1 colon cancer: Patient characteristics and survival analysis from the national cancer database
- 21 September 2023
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 236, 115450
The modified frailty index predicts postoperative venous thromboembolism incidence better than older age in colorectal surgery patients
- 21 September 2023
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 236, 115450
The modified frailty index predicts postoperative venous thromboembolism incidence better than older age in colorectal surgery patients
- 5 June 2023
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Robotic Surgery
- Vol. 17 (5) , 2205-2209
A retrospective comparison of 90-day outcomes, length of stay, and readmissions between robotic-assisted and laparoscopic colectomy
Investigations generally assess 30 days of perioperative outcomes with robotic-assisted and laparoscopic colectomy. Outcomes beyond 30 days serve as a quality metric of surgical services and an assessment of 90 days of outcomes may have greater clinical utility. The purpose of this study was to assess 90 days of outcomes, length of stay (LOS), and readmissions among patients who underwent a robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic colectomy using a national database. Patients undergoing either robotic-assisted or laparoscopic colectomy were identified using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes within PearlDiver, a national, inpatient records database from 2010 to 2019. Outcomes were defined using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) risk calculator and identified using International Classification of Disease (ICD) diagnosis codes. Categorical variables were compared using chi-square tests, and continuous variables were compared using paired t tests. Covariate-adjusted regression models were also constructed to evaluate these associations while accounting for potential confounders. A total of 82,495 patients were assessed in this study. At 90 days, patients of the laparoscopic colectomy cohort experienced a higher rate of complications than patients who underwent robotic-assisted colectomy (9.5 vs. 6.6%, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in LOS (6 vs. 6.5 days, p = 0.08) and readmissions (6.1 vs. 6.7%, p = 0.851) at 90 days. Patients undergoing robotic-assisted colectomy have a lower risk for morbidity at 90 days. Neither approach is superior for LOS nor 90 days of readmissions. Both techniques are effective minimally invasive procedures, yet patients may gain a greater risk benefit from robotic colectomy.
- 5 June 2023
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Robotic Surgery
- Vol. 17 (5) , 2205-2209
A retrospective comparison of 90-day outcomes, length of stay, and readmissions between robotic-assisted and laparoscopic colectomy
Investigations generally assess 30 days of perioperative outcomes with robotic-assisted and laparoscopic colectomy. Outcomes beyond 30 days serve as a quality metric of surgical services and an assessment of 90 days of outcomes may have greater clinical utility. The purpose of this study was to assess 90 days of outcomes, length of stay (LOS), and readmissions among patients who underwent a robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic colectomy using a national database. Patients undergoing either robotic-assisted or laparoscopic colectomy were identified using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes within PearlDiver, a national, inpatient records database from 2010 to 2019. Outcomes were defined using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) risk calculator and identified using International Classification of Disease (ICD) diagnosis codes. Categorical variables were compared using chi-square tests, and continuous variables were compared using paired t tests. Covariate-adjusted regression models were also constructed to evaluate these associations while accounting for potential confounders. A total of 82,495 patients were assessed in this study. At 90 days, patients of the laparoscopic colectomy cohort experienced a higher rate of complications than patients who underwent robotic-assisted colectomy (9.5 vs. 6.6%, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in LOS (6 vs. 6.5 days, p = 0.08) and readmissions (6.1 vs. 6.7%, p = 0.851) at 90 days. Patients undergoing robotic-assisted colectomy have a lower risk for morbidity at 90 days. Neither approach is superior for LOS nor 90 days of readmissions. Both techniques are effective minimally invasive procedures, yet patients may gain a greater risk benefit from robotic colectomy.