David Granatstein
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
David Granatstein has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Elizabeth M. Kirby
Center for Sustaining Agriculture and Natural Resources, Washington State University, Tree Fruit Research and Extension Center, 1100 North Western Avenue, Wenatchee, WA 98801
2 shared publicationsMichel R. Wiman
Center for Sustaining Agriculture and Natural Resources, Washington State University, Tree Fruit Research and Extension Center, 1100 North Western Avenue, Wenatchee, WA 98801
2 shared publicationsThomas P. Sullivan
Applied Mammal Research Institute, 11010 Mitchell Avenue, Summerland, British Columbia, V0H 1Z8, Canada
2 shared publicationsAlan Groff
Foreman Fruit and Land Co., LLC
1 shared publicationEnrique Sánchez
INTA EEA Alto Valle , General Roca, Patagonia, Argentina
1 shared publicationKent Mullinix
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 25 May 2014
- Published by Springer Nature in Organic Agriculture
- Vol. 4 (3) , 197-207
Productivity, economics, and fruit and soil quality of weed management systems in commercial organic orchards in Washington State, USA
- 25 May 2014
- Published by Springer Nature in Organic Agriculture
- Vol. 4 (3) , 197-207
Productivity, economics, and fruit and soil quality of weed management systems in commercial organic orchards in Washington State, USA
- 31 August 2009
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Fruit Science
- Vol. 9 (3) , 257-281
Research Knowledge and Needs for Orchard Floor Management in Organic Tree Fruit Systems
While pest management and tree horticulture dominate the research agenda for temperate tree fruits, organic production requires more attention to weed control and nutrient management because of the limited options growers have. Weed control and tree nutrition are interlinked and can have impacts on other parts of the system such as rodent pests, beneficial insect habitat, water use, and soil quality. Trade-offs commonly occur when trying to solve weed control and nutrient management in organic orchards. This article reviews numerous orchard-floor management studies relevant to finding solutions for organic systems and suggests areas for further research. Alternatives to soil tillage are needed, as it can degrade soil and tree performance. Conversely, mulching frequently leads to improved tree performance and increased soil quality but can be a costly practice relative to other options. Currently effective organic analogues to the herbicide strip-grass alley system are lacking. A plant-based solution would be ideal from a sustainability standpoint, but no satisfactory solution has been developed for widespread use.
- 31 August 2009
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Fruit Science
- Vol. 9 (3) , 257-281
Research Knowledge and Needs for Orchard Floor Management in Organic Tree Fruit Systems
While pest management and tree horticulture dominate the research agenda for temperate tree fruits, organic production requires more attention to weed control and nutrient management because of the limited options growers have. Weed control and tree nutrition are interlinked and can have impacts on other parts of the system such as rodent pests, beneficial insect habitat, water use, and soil quality. Trade-offs commonly occur when trying to solve weed control and nutrient management in organic orchards. This article reviews numerous orchard-floor management studies relevant to finding solutions for organic systems and suggests areas for further research. Alternatives to soil tillage are needed, as it can degrade soil and tree performance. Conversely, mulching frequently leads to improved tree performance and increased soil quality but can be a costly practice relative to other options. Currently effective organic analogues to the herbicide strip-grass alley system are lacking. A plant-based solution would be ideal from a sustainability standpoint, but no satisfactory solution has been developed for widespread use.
- 1 January 2009
- Published by American Society for Horticultural Science in HortTechnology
- Vol. 19 (3) , 558-562
Cover Crops Influence Meadow Vole Presence in Organic Orchards
Living mulch cover crops can improve soil health and build organic matter, yet their use in fruit orchards comes with a risk of encouraging meadow vole ( Microtus pennsylvanicus ), a rodent that can be destructive to fruit trees. Several living mulch cover crop species were assessed in an apple ( Malus × domestica ) orchard understory along with wood chip mulch and bare ground. Desired species characteristics were weed competitiveness, low growth habit, nitrogen fixation, and potential rodent repellency. Legume species included birdsfoot trefoil ( Lotus corniculatus ), medic ( Medicago spp.), and subterranean clover ( Trifolium subterraneum ), which were planted in solid stands as well as mixtures. Nonlegume species included sweet woodruff ( Galium odoratum ), sweet alyssum ( Lobularia maritima ), creeping thyme ( Thymus serpyllum ), and colonial bentgrass ( Agrostis tenuis ). Meadow vole presence was evaluated in fall and spring with point-intersect and run-length measurements. A legume mix (medic, birdsfoot trefoil, subterranean clover, and colonial bentgrass) had the highest meadow vole presence, with no reduction under the “sandwich” system of tilling either side of the tree trunks while leaving a cover crop in a narrow strip with the trunks. The nonlegume mix [colonial bentgrass, sweet alyssum, creeping thyme, and fivespot ( Neomophila maculata )] had similar results. However, the sweet woodruff (planted in the “sandwich” system) had significantly lower presence of meadow voles than the other living mulches. Wood chip mulch, cultivation, and bare ground control were all similar, with very low presence, indicating low risk of meadow vole damage. The results from the sweet woodruff suggest that we need more research on the potential to select living mulches that are nonattractive or repellent to meadow voles for use in orchards.
- 1 January 2009
- Published by American Society for Horticultural Science in HortTechnology
- Vol. 19 (3) , 558-562
Cover Crops Influence Meadow Vole Presence in Organic Orchards
Living mulch cover crops can improve soil health and build organic matter, yet their use in fruit orchards comes with a risk of encouraging meadow vole ( Microtus pennsylvanicus ), a rodent that can be destructive to fruit trees. Several living mulch cover crop species were assessed in an apple ( Malus × domestica ) orchard understory along with wood chip mulch and bare ground. Desired species characteristics were weed competitiveness, low growth habit, nitrogen fixation, and potential rodent repellency. Legume species included birdsfoot trefoil ( Lotus corniculatus ), medic ( Medicago spp.), and subterranean clover ( Trifolium subterraneum ), which were planted in solid stands as well as mixtures. Nonlegume species included sweet woodruff ( Galium odoratum ), sweet alyssum ( Lobularia maritima ), creeping thyme ( Thymus serpyllum ), and colonial bentgrass ( Agrostis tenuis ). Meadow vole presence was evaluated in fall and spring with point-intersect and run-length measurements. A legume mix (medic, birdsfoot trefoil, subterranean clover, and colonial bentgrass) had the highest meadow vole presence, with no reduction under the “sandwich” system of tilling either side of the tree trunks while leaving a cover crop in a narrow strip with the trunks. The nonlegume mix [colonial bentgrass, sweet alyssum, creeping thyme, and fivespot ( Neomophila maculata )] had similar results. However, the sweet woodruff (planted in the “sandwich” system) had significantly lower presence of meadow voles than the other living mulches. Wood chip mulch, cultivation, and bare ground control were all similar, with very low presence, indicating low risk of meadow vole damage. The results from the sweet woodruff suggest that we need more research on the potential to select living mulches that are nonattractive or repellent to meadow voles for use in orchards.
- 1 January 2009
- Published by American Society for Horticultural Science in HortTechnology
- Vol. 19 (3) , 558-562
Cover Crops Influence Meadow Vole Presence in Organic Orchards
Living mulch cover crops can improve soil health and build organic matter, yet their use in fruit orchards comes with a risk of encouraging meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus), a rodent that can be destructive to fruit trees. Several living mulch cover crop species were assessed in an apple (Malus ×domestica) orchard understory along with wood chip mulch and bare ground. Desired species characteristics were weed competitiveness, low growth habit, nitrogen fixation, and potential rodent repellency. Legume species included birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus), medic (Medicago spp.), and subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum), which were planted in solid stands as well as mixtures. Nonlegume species included sweet woodruff (Galium odoratum), sweet alyssum (Lobularia maritima), creeping thyme (Thymus serpyllum), and colonial bentgrass (Agrostis tenuis). Meadow vole presence was evaluated in fall and spring with point-intersect and run-length measurements. A legume mix (medic, birdsfoot trefoil, subterranean clover, and colonial bentgrass) had the highest meadow vole presence, with no reduction under the “sandwich” system of tilling either side of the tree trunks while leaving a cover crop in a narrow strip with the trunks. The nonlegume mix [colonial bentgrass, sweet alyssum, creeping thyme, and fivespot (Neomophila maculata)] had similar results. However, the sweet woodruff (planted in the “sandwich” system) had significantly lower presence of meadow voles than the other living mulches. Wood chip mulch, cultivation, and bare ground control were all similar, with very low presence, indicating low risk of meadow vole damage. The results from the sweet woodruff suggest that we need more research on the potential to select living mulches that are nonattractive or repellent to meadow voles for use in orchards.
- 1 January 2009
- Published by American Society for Horticultural Science in HortTechnology
- Vol. 19 (3) , 558-562
Cover Crops Influence Meadow Vole Presence in Organic Orchards
Living mulch cover crops can improve soil health and build organic matter, yet their use in fruit orchards comes with a risk of encouraging meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus), a rodent that can be destructive to fruit trees. Several living mulch cover crop species were assessed in an apple (Malus ×domestica) orchard understory along with wood chip mulch and bare ground. Desired species characteristics were weed competitiveness, low growth habit, nitrogen fixation, and potential rodent repellency. Legume species included birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus), medic (Medicago spp.), and subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum), which were planted in solid stands as well as mixtures. Nonlegume species included sweet woodruff (Galium odoratum), sweet alyssum (Lobularia maritima), creeping thyme (Thymus serpyllum), and colonial bentgrass (Agrostis tenuis). Meadow vole presence was evaluated in fall and spring with point-intersect and run-length measurements. A legume mix (medic, birdsfoot trefoil, subterranean clover, and colonial bentgrass) had the highest meadow vole presence, with no reduction under the “sandwich” system of tilling either side of the tree trunks while leaving a cover crop in a narrow strip with the trunks. The nonlegume mix [colonial bentgrass, sweet alyssum, creeping thyme, and fivespot (Neomophila maculata)] had similar results. However, the sweet woodruff (planted in the “sandwich” system) had significantly lower presence of meadow voles than the other living mulches. Wood chip mulch, cultivation, and bare ground control were all similar, with very low presence, indicating low risk of meadow vole damage. The results from the sweet woodruff suggest that we need more research on the potential to select living mulches that are nonattractive or repellent to meadow voles for use in orchards.
- 1 February 2008
- Published by American Society for Horticultural Science in HortScience
- Vol. 43 (1) , 45-50
Mulching Options for Northwest Organic and Conventional Orchards
The semiarid climate of the Pacific Northwest allows for the production of organic, temperate tree fruit relatively free of disease and with fewer key insect pests compared with other regions of the United States. Weed control and soil fertility are two of the higher cost areas for organic tree fruit where alternatives are being sought through research and on-farm innovation. Mulches, both living [e.g., white clover [( Trifolium repens )] and inert (e.g., wood chips) show promise for controlling weeds, conserving water, providing nitrogen (N), or improving tree growth, but potentially have system trade-offs such as increased rodent pests and unwanted late-season N. Growers need orchard floor management practices that help them maintain or improve soil quality per the requirements of the National Organic Standards.
- 1 February 2008
- Published by American Society for Horticultural Science in HortScience
- Vol. 43 (1) , 45-50
Mulching Options for Northwest Organic and Conventional Orchards
The semiarid climate of the Pacific Northwest allows for the production of organic, temperate tree fruit relatively free of disease and with fewer key insect pests compared with other regions of the United States. Weed control and soil fertility are two of the higher cost areas for organic tree fruit where alternatives are being sought through research and on-farm innovation. Mulches, both living [e.g., white clover [( Trifolium repens )] and inert (e.g., wood chips) show promise for controlling weeds, conserving water, providing nitrogen (N), or improving tree growth, but potentially have system trade-offs such as increased rodent pests and unwanted late-season N. Growers need orchard floor management practices that help them maintain or improve soil quality per the requirements of the National Organic Standards.