Rebecca Shaw
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Rebecca Shaw has a total of 3 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Celia Kitzinger
Department of Sociology, University of York, York, UK
1 shared publication Paul Dolan
Sheffield Health Economics Group, University of Sheffield, S1 4DA Sheffield, UK
1 shared publicationRebecca Shaw
Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 1 December 2005
- Published by Elsevier in Social Science & Medicine
- Vol. 61 (11) , 2374-2383
Calls to a home birth helpline: Empowerment in childbirth
- 1 December 2005
- Published by Elsevier in Social Science & Medicine
- Vol. 61 (11) , 2374-2383
Calls to a home birth helpline: Empowerment in childbirth
- 30 April 2004
- Published by Elsevier in Health Policy
- Vol. 68 (1) , 31-36
A note on a discussion group study of public preferences regarding priorities in the allocation of donor kidneys
- 30 April 2004
- Published by Elsevier in Health Policy
- Vol. 68 (1) , 31-36
A note on a discussion group study of public preferences regarding priorities in the allocation of donor kidneys
- 21 February 2003
- Published by Wiley in Health Expectations
- Vol. 6 (1) , 53-59
A note on the relative importance that people attach to different factors when setting priorities in health care
Objective To explore whether and to what extent people wish to give differential priority when asked to choose between providing health care treatment for different individuals or groups, on the basis of a range of factors, ranging from health gain to the number of dependants a person has.Design A sample of people resident in York self‐completed a questionnaire.Setting The City of York.Participants Twenty‐three members of the general public and 29 undergraduate students.Main outcome measures The relative importance of factors that people think should be taken into account when choosing between providing health care treatment for individuals or groups.Results The results suggest that health gain and the consequences for health without treatment are two of the most important considerations.Conclusions A sample of the general public and undergraduate students wish to take account of a number of personal characteristics when setting priorities in health care.
- 21 February 2003
- Published by Wiley in Health Expectations
- Vol. 6 (1) , 53-59
A note on the relative importance that people attach to different factors when setting priorities in health care
Objective To explore whether and to what extent people wish to give differential priority when asked to choose between providing health care treatment for different individuals or groups, on the basis of a range of factors, ranging from health gain to the number of dependants a person has.Design A sample of people resident in York self‐completed a questionnaire.Setting The City of York.Participants Twenty‐three members of the general public and 29 undergraduate students.Main outcome measures The relative importance of factors that people think should be taken into account when choosing between providing health care treatment for individuals or groups.Results The results suggest that health gain and the consequences for health without treatment are two of the most important considerations.Conclusions A sample of the general public and undergraduate students wish to take account of a number of personal characteristics when setting priorities in health care.