Chia-Hui Tai

Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is one of the common complications of diabetes. DFU can cause a huge medical and financial burden due to infections, compromise the quality of life, and increase the mortality rate in patients. However, the consumption of medical resources for DFU is rarely mentioned. A retrospective cohort study was performed. Data were obtained from the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan, and the prevalence and medical utilization data for DFU in 2001–2015 were extracted, followed by the analysis for high-risk populations. Between 2001 and 2015, there were 7511 new DFU patients. A higher proportion in these patients was male, elderly with a low education level, and low income. Between 2001 and 2015, the prevalence of DFU was 0.5–0.8%, and the number of DFU patients showed stable growth. Every year, 12.6–19.3% and 1.2–7.0% of patients underwent debridement and amputation, respectively. The hospitalization fees increased year on year. Our study showed that the DFU prevalence increased year on year, and the DFU medical expenditure increased. DFU tends to occur in males, patients with low socioeconomic status, low education level, those with multiple comorbidities, and old age. Therefore, DFU care and prevention require the entire healthcare system to jointly formulate a prevention plan.

By promoting personal hygiene and improving comfort, bed baths can decrease the risk of infection and help maintain skin integrity in critically ill patients. Current bed-bathing practices commonly involve the use of either soap and water (SAW) or disposable wipes (DWs). Previous research has shown both bed-bathing methods are equally effective in removing dirt, oil, and microorganisms. This experimental study compared the cost, staff satisfaction, and effects of two bed-bathing practices on critically ill patients’ vital signs. We randomly assigned 138 participants into 2 groups: an experimental group that received bed baths using DWs and a control group that received bed baths using SAW. We compared the bath duration, cost, vital sign trends, and nursing staff satisfaction between the two groups. We used the chi-square test and t-test for the statistical analysis, and we expressed the quantitative data as mean and standard deviation. Our results showed the bed baths using DWs had a shorter duration and lower cost than those using SAW. There were no significant differences in the vital sign trends between the two groups. The nursing staff preferred to use DWs over SAW. This study can help clinical nursing staff decide which method to use when assisting patients with bed baths.