Tatiana Petrova

Among the many accumulated challenges, radon mitigation measures for existing buildings are not still carried out in Russia that, combined with the use of an inadequate method for indoor radon measurements, has led to stagnation and crisis of the radon regulation system. To overcome the crisis, a ranking of buildings and responsibility distribution in radon control, including theses on updating the national norms and regulations for ensuring radiation safety, as well as nine priority activities of the radon action plan are proposed in accordance with IAEA requirements.

Recent years have seen increased attention given to radon from two scientific directions. After neglecting radon as an earthquake precursor in the 1990s, it has become the subject of discussions in earthquake-forecast papers due to growing networks of radon monitoring in different countries, particularly the technologies of real-time radon measurements where gamma spectrometers are of great interest as sources of ²²²Rn identification. The second fast-developing direction involves radon in Lithosphere–Atmosphere–Ionosphere Coupling (LAIC) models as a source of boundary layer ionization. Here we address the second topic, which is not connected with the earthquake forecast problems, namely, the role of air ionization by radon as a source of the Global Electric Circuit (GEC) modification. In this publication, we try to unite all of these problems to present a more complex view of radon as an important element in our environment. Special attention is paid to the dependence of radon variability on environmental conditions.

Recent years demonstrate the increased attention to radon from two scientific directions. After neglecting radon as earthquake precursors in 1990-th it becomes again the subject of earthquake-forecast papers discussions due to growing networks of the radon monitoring in different countries, especially, the technologies of real-time radon measurements where the gamma-spectrometers become the leader of interest as the sources of 222Rn identification. The second fast developing direction is including the radon in the Lithosphere-Atmosphere-Ionosphere Coupling (LAIC) models as a source of the boundary layer ionization. And here we encounter with second direction which is not connected with the earthquake forecast problems. It is the role of air ionization by radon as a source of the Global Electric Circuit (GEC) modification. In this publication we try to unite all these problems to present more complex view on radon as important element of our environment.

This article delves into the factors that may influence radon flux, such as soil properties and weather conditions, on the example of two experimental locations with different soil compositions, composed primarily of clay and sand, respectively. The experimental location with sandy soil was previously observed to have anomalously high radon flux levels. Radon monitoring was performed routinely, approximately at the same time of day and in parallel on both of these locations to exclude the influence of diurnal variations. The results show that radon transport in these locations differs in mechanism: Location with clay soil has diffusive radon transport, with an average radon flux density of 37.4 ± 24.9 mBq m⁻² s⁻¹ and a range of 0.3–167.8 mBq m⁻² s⁻¹, while the location with sandy soil has convective radon transport with an average radon flux density of 93.6 ± 51.2 mBq m⁻² s⁻¹ and a range of 9.8–302.2 mBq m⁻² s⁻¹. This corresponds to about 8.3% of RFD measurements on site with clay soils exceeding the national reference level of 80 mBq m⁻² s⁻¹ and 45.6% exceeding them on the site with sandy soils. Average radon flux density values were then compared to meteorological variables using Pearson correlation analysis with Student’s t-test. It was observed that radon flux density correlates the most with ambient air temperature both for diffusive and convective radon transport mechanisms, while a weaker inverse correlation is observed with atmospheric precipitation and wind speed for the diffusive mode of radon transport, but not for the convective. Radon activity concentration in soil air correlates with the radon flux density and air temperature in the case of convective radon transport, but does not correlate in the case of diffusive transport.

Strong seasonal variations in the radon exhalation rate from the soil surface were revealed during a two-year monitoring cycle in a fault zone on a slope of Mount Beshtau in the Caucasus Mineral Water Resort area, Russia. The variations are characterized by very high radon levels in summer and low levels in winter. In the warm season (from late April to early October), the radon exhalation rate values ranged from 4.5 to 23.8 Bq m^–2 s^–1. During the cold period (from November to March), the radon levels decreased to 0.04–0.17 Bq m^–2 s^–1. A strong correlation was found between the radon exhalation and atmospheric air temperature (the Pearson correlation coefficient is 0.8). The simulation results show that seasonal fluctuations in the radon exhalation rate are caused by an inversion of the convective radon transport direction in the fractured zones of the rock massif. In summer, the convective flow of radon is directed from the rock massif to atmosphere, whereas this flow in winter comes from the atmosphere to rock massif. The rate of convective transport varies from 5 to 28 m day^–1 during the warm season and from –2 to –4 m day^–1 during the cold one. Seasonal radon anomalies in fault zones are most probably caused by thermally induced convective air flows in the highly permeable rock zone due to the temperature difference between the rock air and atmospheric air. Seasonal radon anomalies should be taken into account both when mapping radon risk and when using radon as a tracer of gas transport in geochemical and geophysical research.

Radon poses significant health risk due to inhalation and subsequent α-decay of its progeny and is the second biggest cause of lung cancer worldwide. In Russian Federation, radon flux density (RFD) measurements are performed routinely to assess radon safety of land lots before construction takes place. This study aims to show possible ‘weather’-influenced variations in RFD and radon activity concentration (RAC) that can occur during winter and spring periods in climatic conditions typical for territories with severe snowy winters. Results show that RFD correlates with weather, having a significant correlation with ambient air temperature in winter as well as spring periods and a weak inverse correlation with wind speed. In spring, RFD also responds to an increase in soil moisture, dropping severely because of rainfall. RAC, however, correlates very little with weather but has a weak inverse correlation with RFD.

Continuous indoor radon measurements were carried out in two traditional Russian rural houses located in different villages of the Moscow region in summer of 2017 and 2018. In additional, in the summer of 2017, continuous measurements of soil gas radon activity concentration at depth 0.8 m and radon exhalation rate from the ground surface near the house were performed simultaneously. It was found that the indoor radon concentration in rural houses is subject to strong daily variations, which are characterized by highs at night and lows during the day. Indoor radon concentration is directly proportional to indoor and outdoor temperature difference and inversely proportional to wind speed. While the radon exhalation rate from the ground surface, as well as the ventilation of premises (opening doors and windows) practically do not affect the concentration of radon in Russian rural wooden houses.