Fang Xu
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Fang Xu has a total of 19 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Blaise Debonneval Frederick
Department of Psychiatry, Harvard University Medical School, Boston, USA
1 shared publication - Dawei Shan
Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing China
1 shared publication - Dongshan Wan
Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, National Center for Neurological Disorders, Beijing 100053, China
1 shared publication - Gang Liu
Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, National Center for Neurological Disorders, Beijing 100053, China
1 shared publication - Guoliang Chai
Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, National Center for Neurological Disorders, Beijing 100053, China
1 shared publication - Huimin Zhang
Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, National Center for Neurological Disorders, Beijing 100053, China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 24 August 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Molecular Sciences
- Vol. 27 (17) , 7577
Protein Profiling Identifies Biomarkers for Predicting Disease Severity in Anti-NMDAR Encephalitis
Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis is a severe autoimmune neurological disorder characterized by pathogenic antibodies against the NMDAR. A systematic protein profiling approach is warranted to identify biomarkers capable of predicting disease status. An Olink proximity extension assay (PEA) profiled 91 inflammation-related proteins from anti-NMDAR encephalitis patients. Disease severity or prognosis were assessed by CASE score or mRS score at 6-month follow-up. Patients were stratified into distinct molecular clusters using unsupervised clustering. Logistic regression models incorporating selected biomarkers were developed to predict disease severity and prognosis, followed by absolute quantification using ELISA. Patients were classified into four consensus clusters. Clusters 1 and 2 corresponded to the mild group, while Cluster 3 represented the severe group, consistent with CASE score above 6. Cluster 4 showed heterogeneous clinical features. Elevated serum levels of IL-10, IL-6, and SIRT2, as well as increased CSF levels of CXCL10, CXCL11, and MMP10, were positively associated with severe disease. Conversely, several proteins including LTA and CCL11, CCL8, TGFB1, CXCL6 were associated with severe disease or unfavorable 6-month outcomes. A logistic regression model combining serum CXCL6 and CCL11 with CSF MMP10 achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.95 for predicting disease severity. Serum CCL11 alone showed predictive value for 6-month prognosis, with an AUC of 0.79. These findings delineate distinct protein signatures associated with clinical heterogeneity of anti-NMDAR encephalitis. Prediction models incorporating multiple biomarkers may provide an approach for disease severity stratification and prognosis forecast.
- 24 August 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Molecular Sciences
- Vol. 27 (17) , 7577
Open AccessProtein Profiling Identifies Biomarkers for Predicting Disease Severity in Anti-NMDAR Encephalitis
Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis is a severe autoimmune neurological disorder characterized by pathogenic antibodies against the NMDAR. A systematic protein profiling approach is warranted to identify biomarkers capable of predicting disease status. An Olink proximity extension assay (PEA) profiled 91 inflammation-related proteins from anti-NMDAR encephalitis patients. Disease severity or prognosis were assessed by CASE score or mRS score at 6-month follow-up. Patients were stratified into distinct molecular clusters using unsupervised clustering. Logistic regression models incorporating selected biomarkers were developed to predict disease severity and prognosis, followed by absolute quantification using ELISA. Patients were classified into four consensus clusters. Clusters 1 and 2 corresponded to the mild group, while Cluster 3 represented the severe group, consistent with CASE score above 6. Cluster 4 showed heterogeneous clinical features. Elevated serum levels of IL-10, IL-6, and SIRT2, as well as increased CSF levels of CXCL10, CXCL11, and MMP10, were positively associated with severe disease. Conversely, several proteins including LTA and CCL11, CCL8, TGFB1, CXCL6 were associated with severe disease or unfavorable 6-month outcomes. A logistic regression model combining serum CXCL6 and CCL11 with CSF MMP10 achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.95 for predicting disease severity. Serum CCL11 alone showed predictive value for 6-month prognosis, with an AUC of 0.79. These findings delineate distinct protein signatures associated with clinical heterogeneity of anti-NMDAR encephalitis. Prediction models incorporating multiple biomarkers may provide an approach for disease severity stratification and prognosis forecast.
- Open Access
- 19 June 2020
- Published by SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng in Journal of Biomedical Optics
- Vol. 25 (06) , 065001-16
Asymmetry of peripheral vascular biomarkers in ischemic stroke patients, assessed using NIRS
Ischemic stroke is induced by a blockage in a cerebral vessel. Approximately 795,000 people suffer ischemic strokes every year in the United States.1 Emergency reperfusion therapy can restore perfusion and mitigate cognitive dysfunction.2 However, this treatment leads to increased risk of cerebral hemorrhage and cerebral hernia.3 Therefore, there is an urgent need for effective vascular perfusion biomarkers that can identify patients most likely to benefit from reperfusion therapy.
- 19 June 2020
- Published by SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng in Journal of Biomedical Optics
- Vol. 25 (06) , 065001-16
Open AccessAsymmetry of peripheral vascular biomarkers in ischemic stroke patients, assessed using NIRS
Ischemic stroke is induced by a blockage in a cerebral vessel. Approximately 795,000 people suffer ischemic strokes every year in the United States.1 Emergency reperfusion therapy can restore perfusion and mitigate cognitive dysfunction.2 However, this treatment leads to increased risk of cerebral hemorrhage and cerebral hernia.3 Therefore, there is an urgent need for effective vascular perfusion biomarkers that can identify patients most likely to benefit from reperfusion therapy.