Abraham George
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Abraham George has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Nikolaos Papakostas
Laboratory for Intelligent Manufacturing and Robotics, School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland
2 shared publications - Anthony Newell
Laboratory for Advanced Manufacturing Simulation and Robotics, School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin 4, Ireland
1 shared publication - Ciara O’callaghan
Laboratory for Advanced Manufacturing Simulation and Robotics, School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland
1 shared publication - Conor Maguire
Laboratory for Advanced Manufacturing Simulation and Robotics, School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland
1 shared publication - Kevin Roche
Laboratory for Advanced Manufacturing Simulation and Robotics, School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland
1 shared publication - Marco Trevisan Mota
Laboratory for Advanced Manufacturing Simulation and Robotics, School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 22 May 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Applied Sciences
- Vol. 14 (11) , 4367
Using Voxelisation-Based Data Analysis Techniques for Porosity Prediction in Metal Additive Manufacturing
Additive manufacturing workflows generate large amounts of data in each phase, which can be very useful for monitoring process performance and predicting the quality of the finished part if used correctly. In this paper, a framework is presented that utilises machine learning methods to predict porosity defects in printed parts. Data from process settings, in-process sensor readings, and post-process computed tomography scans are first aligned and discretised using a voxelisation approach to create a training dataset. A multi-step classification system is then proposed to classify the presence and type of porosity in a voxel, which can then be utilised to find the distribution of porosity within the build volume. Titanium parts were printed using a laser powder bed fusion system. Two discretisation techniques based on voxelisation were utilised: a defect-centric and a uniform discretisation method. Different machine learning models, feature sets, and other parameters were also tested. Promising results were achieved in identifying porous voxels; however, the accuracy of the classification requires improvement before being applied industrially. The potential of the voxelisation-based framework for this application and its ability to incorporate data from different stages of the additive manufacturing workflow as well as different machine learning models was clearly demonstrated.
- 22 May 2024
- Published by MDPI AG in Applied Sciences
- Vol. 14 (11) , 4367
Open AccessUsing Voxelisation-Based Data Analysis Techniques for Porosity Prediction in Metal Additive Manufacturing
Additive manufacturing workflows generate large amounts of data in each phase, which can be very useful for monitoring process performance and predicting the quality of the finished part if used correctly. In this paper, a framework is presented that utilises machine learning methods to predict porosity defects in printed parts. Data from process settings, in-process sensor readings, and post-process computed tomography scans are first aligned and discretised using a voxelisation approach to create a training dataset. A multi-step classification system is then proposed to classify the presence and type of porosity in a voxel, which can then be utilised to find the distribution of porosity within the build volume. Titanium parts were printed using a laser powder bed fusion system. Two discretisation techniques based on voxelisation were utilised: a defect-centric and a uniform discretisation method. Different machine learning models, feature sets, and other parameters were also tested. Promising results were achieved in identifying porous voxels; however, the accuracy of the classification requires improvement before being applied industrially. The potential of the voxelisation-based framework for this application and its ability to incorporate data from different stages of the additive manufacturing workflow as well as different machine learning models was clearly demonstrated.
- Open Access
- 18 July 2020
- Published by MDPI AG in Applied Sciences
- Vol. 10 (14) , 4953
An Agent-Based Decision Support Platform for Additive Manufacturing Applications
The effective estimation and consideration of process cost, time, and quality for additive manufacturing operations, when a series of suitable technologies and resources are available, is very important for making informed product design and development decisions. The main objective of this paper is to propose the design, deployment, and use of an agent-based decision support platform, which is capable of proposing alternative additive manufacturing resources and process configurations to design engineers while reducing the number of communication steps among engineering teams and organizations. Different computer-aided systems are utilised and interfaced for automating the information exchange as well as for accelerating the overall product development process.
- 18 July 2020
- Published by MDPI AG in Applied Sciences
- Vol. 10 (14) , 4953
Open AccessAn Agent-Based Decision Support Platform for Additive Manufacturing Applications
The effective estimation and consideration of process cost, time, and quality for additive manufacturing operations, when a series of suitable technologies and resources are available, is very important for making informed product design and development decisions. The main objective of this paper is to propose the design, deployment, and use of an agent-based decision support platform, which is capable of proposing alternative additive manufacturing resources and process configurations to design engineers while reducing the number of communication steps among engineering teams and organizations. Different computer-aided systems are utilised and interfaced for automating the information exchange as well as for accelerating the overall product development process.