Tyler J. Albert
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Tyler J. Albert has a total of 106 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Paul B. Cornia
VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA; Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
7 shared publications- Paul B. Cornia
University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Medicine Seattle Washington USA
5 shared publications Anand D. Jagannath
VA Portland Health Care System; Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University
3 shared publicationsHelene Starks
Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine; Dept of Bioethics and Humanities, University of Washington School of Medicine
3 shared publicationsAmanda Pensiero
Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, USA
2 shared publicationsBrian Kwan
San Diego VA Medical Center; Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego School of Medicine
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 8 October 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Advances in Simulation
Multiprofessional and interprofessional simulation training for advance care planning: a systematic review
Background: Recent international guidelines describe advance care planning (ACP) as evolving from isolated communication tasks toward an iterative, collaborative process integrating goals-of-care (GOC) discussions, documentation, clinical and ethical reasoning. Simulation is a promising approach to support this evolution, yet its design and impact on ACP interprofessional collaborative practice remain unclear. This systematic review synthesised and evaluated the literature on multiprofessional and interprofessional simulation (MP-Sim, IP-Sim) for training healthcare students and professionals in ACP. Methods: We addressed four questions on trainees, ACP tasks, simulation design, and outcomes. Six databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, ERIC, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science) were searched from January 2010 to June 2025. Eligible studies used simulation with trainees from at least two professions to address ACP. Findings were synthesised using a Presage–Process–Product framework, and outcomes were classified according to Kirkpatrick’s levels. Study quality was appraised using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument. Results: 28 studies (11 MP-Sim, 17 IP-Sim) included 4,081 participants (83% professionals, 17% students), predominantly physicians and nurses. Simulation programs predominantly targeted GOC conversations, with limited integration of documentation and clinical and ethical reasoning. Most simulations were conducted in hospital settings. Despite heterogeneous methods, studies reported positive outcomes on learner satisfaction, attitudes toward communication and teamwork, and, in some studies, GOC documentation. MP-Sim primarily supported rehearsal of profession-specific ACP tasks, whereas IP-Sim more often enabled collaboration in dyads and teams. Conclusion: Simulation-based ACP training can be conceptualized through a dual continuum comprising professional integration (from multiprofessional participation to interprofessional collaboration) and task integration (from communication-focused part-task rehearsal to whole-task ACP practice). This dual continuum provides a practical lens for guiding simulation design towards greater interprofessional collaboration and whole-task ACP practice. Designing simulations that integrate GOC communication, documentation, clinical and ethical reasoning with interprofessional collaboration within longitudinal, multi-stakeholder scenarios may better prepare students and professionals for contemporary ACP practice.
- 8 October 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Advances in Simulation
Open AccessMultiprofessional and interprofessional simulation training for advance care planning: a systematic review
Background: Recent international guidelines describe advance care planning (ACP) as evolving from isolated communication tasks toward an iterative, collaborative process integrating goals-of-care (GOC) discussions, documentation, clinical and ethical reasoning. Simulation is a promising approach to support this evolution, yet its design and impact on ACP interprofessional collaborative practice remain unclear. This systematic review synthesised and evaluated the literature on multiprofessional and interprofessional simulation (MP-Sim, IP-Sim) for training healthcare students and professionals in ACP. Methods: We addressed four questions on trainees, ACP tasks, simulation design, and outcomes. Six databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, ERIC, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science) were searched from January 2010 to June 2025. Eligible studies used simulation with trainees from at least two professions to address ACP. Findings were synthesised using a Presage–Process–Product framework, and outcomes were classified according to Kirkpatrick’s levels. Study quality was appraised using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument. Results: 28 studies (11 MP-Sim, 17 IP-Sim) included 4,081 participants (83% professionals, 17% students), predominantly physicians and nurses. Simulation programs predominantly targeted GOC conversations, with limited integration of documentation and clinical and ethical reasoning. Most simulations were conducted in hospital settings. Despite heterogeneous methods, studies reported positive outcomes on learner satisfaction, attitudes toward communication and teamwork, and, in some studies, GOC documentation. MP-Sim primarily supported rehearsal of profession-specific ACP tasks, whereas IP-Sim more often enabled collaboration in dyads and teams. Conclusion: Simulation-based ACP training can be conceptualized through a dual continuum comprising professional integration (from multiprofessional participation to interprofessional collaboration) and task integration (from communication-focused part-task rehearsal to whole-task ACP practice). This dual continuum provides a practical lens for guiding simulation design towards greater interprofessional collaboration and whole-task ACP practice. Designing simulations that integrate GOC communication, documentation, clinical and ethical reasoning with interprofessional collaboration within longitudinal, multi-stakeholder scenarios may better prepare students and professionals for contemporary ACP practice.
- 1 May 2026
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 209-213
How to Teach Virtually
- 21 August 2025
- Published by Wiley in Medical Education
- Vol. 60 (2) , 181-182
A Fellow‐Led Orientation to Mitigate Microaggressions in the Intensive Care Unit
- 21 August 2025
- Published by Wiley in Medical Education
- Vol. 60 (2) , 181-182
A Fellow‐Led Orientation to Mitigate Microaggressions in the Intensive Care Unit
- 10 February 2025
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 138 (2) , e22
The Reply
- 10 February 2025
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 138 (2) , e22
The Reply
- Open Access
- 14 January 2025
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in ATS Scholar
- Vol. 6 (1) , 8-12
Failing Safely: Autonomy and Identity Formation in Medical Training
- 14 January 2025
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in ATS Scholar
- Vol. 6 (1) , 8-12
Open AccessFailing Safely: Autonomy and Identity Formation in Medical Training
- 6 June 2024
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 137 (9) , 900-907
The Evolution of Internal Medicine Chief Residents: A 20-Year Multicenter Study
- 6 June 2024
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 137 (9) , 900-907
The Evolution of Internal Medicine Chief Residents: A 20-Year Multicenter Study
- 1 September 2023
- Published by Southern Medical Association in Southern Medical Journal
- Vol. 116 (9) , 745-749
A Multicenter Observational Study Comparing Virtual with In-Person Morning Reports during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Objectives: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic disrupted how educational conferences were delivered, leaving programs to choose between in-person and virtual morning report formats. The objective of our study was to describe morning reports during the COVID-19 pandemic, including the use of virtual formats, attendance, leadership, and content. Methods: A prospective observational...
- 1 September 2023
- Published by Southern Medical Association in Southern Medical Journal
- Vol. 116 (9) , 745-749
A Multicenter Observational Study Comparing Virtual with In-Person Morning Reports during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Objectives: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic disrupted how educational conferences were delivered, leaving programs to choose between in-person and virtual morning report formats. The objective of our study was to describe morning reports during the COVID-19 pandemic, including the use of virtual formats, attendance, leadership, and content. Methods: A prospective observational...
- Open Access
- 10 January 2023
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in ATS Scholar
- Vol. 4 (1) , 33-38
Responsibilities of Internal Medicine Chief Residents in the Modern Era: A National Survey
- 10 January 2023
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in ATS Scholar
- Vol. 4 (1) , 33-38
Open AccessResponsibilities of Internal Medicine Chief Residents in the Modern Era: A National Survey
- 1 July 2022
- Published by Southern Medical Association in Southern Medical Journal
- Vol. 115 (7) , 400-403
A Comparative Study of Scripted versus Unscripted Morning Reports: Results from a Prospective Multicenter Study
Objectives: Morning report is one of the central activities of internal medicine residency education. The two most common morning report formats are scripted reports, which use preselected cases with prepared didactics, and unscripted reports in which a case is discussed without preparation. No previous study has compared these two formats. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational...
- 1 July 2022
- Published by Southern Medical Association in Southern Medical Journal
- Vol. 115 (7) , 400-403
A Comparative Study of Scripted versus Unscripted Morning Reports: Results from a Prospective Multicenter Study
Objectives: Morning report is one of the central activities of internal medicine residency education. The two most common morning report formats are scripted reports, which use preselected cases with prepared didactics, and unscripted reports in which a case is discussed without preparation. No previous study has compared these two formats. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational...
- 1 November 2021
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
- Vol. 22 (11) , 2344-2349
A Cross-Sectional Survey of Internal Medicine Residents’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Current Practices Regarding Patient Transitions to Post-Acute Care
- 1 November 2021
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
- Vol. 22 (11) , 2344-2349
A Cross-Sectional Survey of Internal Medicine Residents’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Current Practices Regarding Patient Transitions to Post-Acute Care