Marco Tescione

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a ubiquitous opportunistic pathogen and a leading cause of severe healthcare-associated infections, particularly ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and bloodstream infections (BSIs) in critically ill patients. Its remarkable capacity for both intrinsic and acquired resistance leads to complex phenotypic profiles, culminating in difficult-to-treat resistant P. aeruginosa (DTR-PA). Managing DTR-PA presents a daunting clinical challenge characterised by a narrow therapeutic armamentarium, treatment delays, and high attributable mortality. To bridge the gap between complex molecular microbiology and bedside decision-making, this narrative review employs a pragmatic, clinical vignette-based approach. Through six representative fictional scenarios of pneumonia and BSI, we systematically dissect the underlying mechanisms of resistance and their direct therapeutic implications. The vignettes explore combinations of intrinsic adaptations—such as Pseudomonas-derived cephalosporinase (PDC/AmpC) hyperexpression, OprD porin loss, and efflux pump upregulation—as well as the acquisition of serine- (e.g., GES) and metallo-β-lactamases (e.g., VIM, NDM, IMP). Grounded in the updated 2026 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines, we evaluate the optimal deployment of newer β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. We highlight the specific preference for ceftolozane–tazobactam in pneumonia, the roles of ceftazidime–avibactam and imipenem–relebactam, and the critical use of cefiderocol for metallo-β-lactamase producers and highly resistant phenotypes. Furthermore, the review addresses pressing clinical controversies: the superiority of targeted monotherapy over historical, toxic combination regimens; the risks of unconditionally applying “shorter-is-better” duration paradigms to DTR-PA; and the alarming frequency of treatment-emergent cross-resistance among novel agents. We also clarify common clinical misconceptions, such as the limited utility of meropenem–vaborbactam and aztreonam–avibactam against specific pseudomonal mechanisms. Ultimately, effective DTR-PA management precludes class-based empirical assumptions. By providing a phenotype-driven bedside aide-mémoire, this review reinforces that rapid recognition, direct agent-specific antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD)-optimised dosing, and prompt source control remain the absolute cornerstones of survival for patients afflicted by these formidable infections.

Surgery for hip fractures should be performed within 48 h from patient's admission. However, several factors including chronic antiplatelet therapy could delay operation. Among the totality of patients taking clopidogrel, up to 30% are resistant to the drug and have a normal platelets reactivity. We propose thromboelastography (TEG) with an ADP Platelet Mapping assay kit to assess platelet aggregation, a safe tool that could help to avoid surgery delay in those patients treated with antiplatelet therapy. A patient's blood sample was collected for aggregometry. If MA-ADP and platelets aggregation (%) were within normal values, the patient was fit for immediate surgery with neuraxial anesthesia and ultrasound-guided nerve block. If one of the two parameters or both were deranged, a mortality risk assessment was estimated. In the low risk category, the patients waited till normalization of the parameters, whereas in the high-risk group a general anesthesia and peripheral antalgic block was carried out. Nine patients were enrolled. Four of them showed normal aggregometry and surgery was performed within 24 h from admission. Two patients were classified as high mortality risk and surgery was carried out under general anesthesia. Three patients awaited operation till normalization of parameters. No peri or post-operative complications were reported. An aggregometry-guided protocol can safely expedite hip fracture surgery in patients taking clopidogrel. Nonetheless, in presence of a normal platelets function, clinician can opt for a neuraxial instead of general anesthesia reducing the incidence of postoperative delirium and cognitive dysfunction. Trial registration: prospectively registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04642209; date of registration: 23rd November 2020)

In COVID‐19 patients receiving enoxaparin and antiplatelets therapy, aggregometry and thromboelastography might be considered an adjunctive tool to identify the time to perform procedures at risk of bleeding, such as tracheostomy.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients can develop interstitial pneumonia, which, in turn, can evolve into acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This is accompanied by an inflammatory cytokine storm. severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has proteins capable of promoting the cytokine storm, especially in patients with comorbidities, including obesity. Since currently no resolutive therapy for ARDS has been found and given the scientific literature regarding the use of adenosine, its application has been hypothesized. Through its receptors, adenosine is able to inhibit the acute inflammatory process, increase the protection capacity of the epithelial barrier, and reduce the damage due to an overactivation of the immune system, such as that occurring in cytokine storms. These features are known in ischemia/reperfusion models and could also be exploited in acute lung injury with hypoxia. Considering these hypotheses, a COVID-19 patient with unresponsive respiratory failure was treated with adenosine for compassionate use. The results showed a rapid improvement of clinical conditions, with negativity of SARS-CoV2 detection.

Background: Obesity and steatosis are associated with COVID-19 severe pneumonia. Elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and reduced immune response are typical of these patients. In particular, adipose tissue is the organ playing the crucial role. So, it is necessary to evaluate fat mass and not simpler body mass index (BMI), because BMI leaves a portion of the obese population unrecognized. The aim is to evaluate the relationship between Percentage of Fat Mass (FM%) and immune-inflammatory response, after 10 days in Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Methods: Prospective observational study of 22 adult patients, affected by COVID-19 pneumonia and admitted to the ICU and classified in two sets: (10) lean and (12) obese, according to FM% and age (De Lorenzo classification). Patients were analyzed at admission in ICU and at 10th day. Results: Obese have steatosis, impaired hepatic function, compromise immune response and higher inflammation. In addition, they have a reduced prognostic nutritional index (PNI), nutritional survival index for ICU patients. Conclusion: This is the first study evaluating FM% in COVID-19 patient. We underlined obese characteristic with likely poorly prognosis and an important misclassification of obesity. A not negligible number of patients with normal BMI could actually have an excess of adipose tissue and therefore have an unfavorable outcome such as an obese. Is fundamental personalized patients nutrition basing on disease phases.

Some COVID-19 patients develop interstitial pneumonia that can evolve into Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). This is accompanied by an inflammatory cytokine storm. SarS-CoV has proteins capable of promoting cytokine storm, especially in patients with comorbidities, including obesity. Since there is currently no resolutive therapy for ARDS and given the scientific literature regarding the use of adenosine, its application has been hypothesized. Adenosine through its receptors is able to inhibit the acute inflammatory process, increase the protection capacity of the epithelial barrier and reduce the damage due to an overactivation of the immune system, such as in cytokine storms. These features are known in ischemia / reperfusion models and could also be exploited in acute lung injury, with hypoxia. In light of these hypotheses, for compassionate use, a COVID-19 patient, with unresponsive respiratory failure, was treated with adenosine. The results showed a rapid and clear improvement in clinical conditions, with the negative effect of detection of SarS-CoV2.

Background: Obesity and steatosis are associated with COVID-19 severe pneumonia. Elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and reduced immune response are typical of these patients. In particular, adipose tissue is the organ playing the crucial role. So, it is necessary to evaluate fat mass and not simpler body mass index (BMI), because BMI leaves a portion of the obese population unrecognized. The aim is to evaluate the relationship between FM% and immune-inflammatory response, after 10th days in ICU.Methods: Prospective observational study in single cohort of 22 adult patients, affected by COVID-19 pneumonia and admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and classified (10) lean and (12) obese, according to Percentage of Fat Mass (FM%) and age (De Lorenzo classification). Patients were analyzed at admission in ICU and at 10th day.Results: Obese have steatosis, impaired hepatic function, compromise immune response and higher inflammation. In addition, they have a reduced prognostic nutritional index (PNI), nutritional survival index for ICU patients.Conclusion: This is the first study evaluating FM% in COVID-19 patient. We underlined obese characteristic with likely poorly prognosis and an important misclassification of obesity. A not negligible number of patients with normal BMI could actually have an excess of adipose tissue and therefore have an unfavorable outcome such as an obese. Is fundamental personalized patients nutrition basing on disease phases.