Josef Martin Tatschl

Background: Heart rate variability (HRV) indicates brain-body interaction and has been associated with a variety of mental and physical health indicators. Transient reductions in HRV, independent of bodily movement (so-called additional HRV reduction [AddHRVr]), may reflect moments of psychophysiological vulnerability. This metric is quantified by regressing bodily movement on the root mean square of successive differences and identifying reductions <0.5 SD of the predicted value in real time in everyday life. Objective: We aimed to apply this measure using wearables in everyday life to trigger low-threshold, 1-minute just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) to stabilize autonomic function and relieve perceived stress and ruminative thoughts. Thus, we compared moments of AddHRVr with random points in time with respect to the effects of brief JITAIs. Methods: In 2 preregistered microrandomized trials, participants underwent a 1-day calibration period to derive individualized trigger settings and then received AddHRVr-triggered and random prompts throughout the following 3 days, asking for perceived stress and rumination. In study 1, participants (N=60) underwent a slow breathing intervention (0.1 Hz slow-paced breathing) following each prompt, and in study 2, participants (N=50) were microrandomized to both an external attention (ie, focusing attention on a nonliving object) and a mindful breathing intervention. HRV was assessed before, during, and following each intervention by means of the root mean squares of successive differences, SD of normal-to-normal beats, and high- and low-frequency HRV. Participants also reported on perceived stress and ruminative thoughts before and after the interventions. Results: Following interventions in both studies, perceived stress and ruminative thoughts significantly declined irrespective of the kind of prompt and intervention (study 1—perceived stress: b=–0.12; P<.001 and ruminative thoughts: b=–0.11; P<.001 and study 2—perceived stress: b=–0.07; P=.01 and ruminative thoughts: b=–0.10; P=.002). AddHRVr-triggered prompts resulted in a stronger increase in HRV during the slow-paced breathing (b=0.08; P=.02) and mindful breathing interventions (b=0.10; P=.03), and elevated HRV metrics in a time frame of 10 minutes following the interventions in contrast to random prompts (study 1: b=0.12; P<.001 and study 2: b=0.10; P=.03). Conclusions: Both studies show, for the first time, that transient, nonmetabolic reductions in HRV (AddHRVr) can be used to trigger brief JITAIs in real time by wearables to stabilize autonomic function, thus potentially promoting cardiac health. The findings suggest that although psychological benefits emerged independent of the cardiac autonomic state, slow-paced breathing or directing attention for 1 minute to either the own body or nonliving objects seemed to boost autonomic flexibility when HRV was compromised. Trial Registration: German Clinical Trial Register DRKS00035684; https://www.drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00035684 and DRKS00035685; https://www.drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00035685

Objective: Feeling comfortable and safe has been discussed to foster health and well-being. However, the pathways to better health are complex, involving both behavioral and physiological routes. Methods: In this study, we examined the role of safety perception for cardiac health by (1) examining associations with baseline heart rate variability (HRV; Study 1) and (2) evaluating a novel measure of autonomic cardiac flexibility in daily life, namely increases in HRV independent of metabolic demands (ImdHRVi; Study 2). Results: Study 1 (N = 76) found evidence for a positive association between vagally mediated HRV and the Neuroception of Psychological Safety scale (Morton L, Cogan N, Kolacz J, et al. “A new measure of feeling safe: developing psychometric properties of the Neuroception of Psychological Safety Scale (NPSS)”: Correction. Psychol Trauma. 2022; https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001374), thus suggesting a link between safety and cardiac vagal regulation. In Study 2, a sample of N = 245 adult volunteers participated in a four-day-ambulatory assessment measuring HRV and bodily movement. A regression was calculated between HRV and bodily movement for 12 h of the first recording day, which was then used to calculate minute-by-minute ImdHRVi (beyond those predicted by bodily movement) in the following days. It turned out that safety perception predicted more episodes of ImdHRVi in everyday life, even after controlling for several confounds. Conclusions: Findings suggest that feeling safe and everyday life cardiac autonomic regulation are interrelated, thus possibly contributing to adaptive adjustment and health.

BACKGROUND Heart rate variability (HRV) indicates brain-body interaction and has been associated with a variety of mental and physical health indicators. Transient reductions in HRV, independent of bodily movement (so-called additional HRV reduction [AddHRVr]), may reflect moments of psychophysiological vulnerability. This metric is quantified by regressing bodily movement on the root mean square of successive differences and identifying reductions <0.5 SD of the predicted value in real time in everyday life. OBJECTIVE We aimed to apply this measure using wearables in everyday life to trigger low-threshold, 1-minute just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) to stabilize autonomic function and relieve perceived stress and ruminative thoughts. Thus, we compared moments of AddHRVr with random points in time with respect to the effects of brief JITAIs. METHODS In 2 preregistered microrandomized trials, participants underwent a 1-day calibration period to derive individualized trigger settings and then received AddHRVr-triggered and random prompts throughout the following 3 days, asking for perceived stress and rumination. In study 1, participants (N=60) underwent a slow breathing intervention (0.1 Hz slow-paced breathing) following each prompt, and in study 2, participants (N=50) were microrandomized to both an external attention (ie, focusing attention on a nonliving object) and a mindful breathing intervention. HRV was assessed before, during, and following each intervention by means of the root mean squares of successive differences, SD of normal-to-normal beats, and high- and low-frequency HRV. Participants also reported on perceived stress and ruminative thoughts before and after the interventions. RESULTS Following interventions in both studies, perceived stress and ruminative thoughts significantly declined irrespective of the kind of prompt and intervention (study 1—perceived stress: b=–0.12; P<.001 and ruminative thoughts: b=–0.11; P<.001 and study 2—perceived stress: b=–0.07; P=.01 and ruminative thoughts: b=–0.10; P=.002). AddHRVr-triggered prompts resulted in a stronger increase in HRV during the slow-paced breathing (b=0.08; P=.02) and mindful breathing interventions (b=0.10; P=.03), and elevated HRV metrics in a time frame of 10 minutes following the interventions in contrast to random prompts (study 1: b=0.12; P<.001 and study 2: b=0.10; P=.03). CONCLUSIONS Both studies show, for the first time, that transient, nonmetabolic reductions in HRV (AddHRVr) can be used to trigger brief JITAIs in real time by wearables to stabilize autonomic function, thus potentially promoting cardiac health. The findings suggest that although psychological benefits emerged independent of the cardiac autonomic state, slow-paced breathing or directing attention for 1 minute to either the own body or nonliving objects seemed to boost autonomic flexibility when HRV was compromised. CLINICALTRIAL German Clinical Trial Register DRKS00035684; https://www.drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00035684 and DRKS00035685; https://www.drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00035685

A functional reciprocity between the gut microbiome and vagal nerve activity has been suggested, however, human studies addressing this phenomenon are limited.Twenty-four-hour cardiac vagal activit...

Resonance breathing (RB) has been shown to benefit health and performance within clinical and non‐clinical populations. This is attributed to its baroreflex stimulating effect and the concomitant increase in cardiac vagal activity (CVA). Hence, developing methods that strengthen the CVA boosting effect of RB could improve its clinical effectiveness. Therefore, we assessed whether supplementing RB with coherent pelvic floor activation (PRB), which has been shown to entrain the baroreflex, yields stronger CVA than standard RB. N = 32 participants performed 5‐min of RB and PRB, which requires to recruit the pelvic floor during the complete inspiratory phase and release it at the initiation of the expiration. CVA was indexed via heart rate variability using RMSSD and LF‐HRV. PRB induced significantly larger RMSSD (d = 1.04) and LF‐HRV (d = 0.75, ps < .001) as compared to RB. Results indicate that PRB induced an additional boost in CVA relative to RB in healthy individuals. However, subsequent studies are warranted to evaluate whether these first findings can be replicated in individuals with compromised health, including a more comprehensive psychophysiological assessment to potentially elucidate the origin of the observed effects. Importantly, longitudinal studies need to address whether PRB translates to better treatment outcomes.

Nutritional interventions have beneficial effects on certain psychiatric disorder symptomatology and common physical health comorbidities. However, studies evaluating nutritional literacy in mental health professionals (MHP) are scarce. This study aimed to assess the across 52 countries. Surveys were distributed via colleagues and professional societies. Data were collected regarding self-reported general nutrition knowledge, nutrition education, learning opportunities, and the tendency to recommend food supplements or prescribe specific diets in clinical practice. In total, 1056 subjects participated in the study: 354 psychiatrists, 511 psychologists, 44 psychotherapists, and 147 MHPs in-training. All participants believed the diet quality of individuals with mental disorders was poorer compared to the general population (p < 0.001). The majority of the psychiatrists (74.2%) and psychologists (66.3%) reported having no training in nutrition. Nevertheless, many of them used nutrition approaches, with 58.6% recommending supplements and 43.8% recommending specific diet strategies to their patients. Only 0.8% of participants rated their education regarding nutrition as ‘very good.’ Almost all (92.9%) stated they would like to expand their knowledge regarding ‘Nutritional Psychiatry.’ There is an urgent need to integrate nutrition education into MHP training, ideally in collaboration with nutrition experts to achieve best practice care.