Daniel L. Herr

Background: Critical illness in coronavirus disease 2019 may require extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. We quantified immunothrombotic markers in patients with COVID-19 receiving ECMO and evaluated their predictive capacity for death. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 74 consecutive patients with COVID-19 on ECMO at a single academic medical center between March 2020 and February 2021. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 nucleocapsid RNA and 16 immunothrombotic biomarkers were longitudinally quantified and their trajectories were used to predict death and decannulation across multiple models. Results: Male sex, smoking, serum bilirubin levels, and low partial arterial oxygen pressure–fraction of inspired oxygen ratio were associated with increased risk of death. Plasma levels of 10 immunothrombotic markers were significantly elevated in fatal cases and some were associated with an increased hazard of death (eg, interleukin 8, von Willebrand factor) or decreased hazard for decannulation (eg, angiopoietin 2, interleukin 1β) when adjusting for sex, smoking status, and time to cannulation. Predictive models incorporating biomarkers were superior to demographics alone and equivalent to models including clinical information. Conclusions: We found that male sex, smoking, and select clinical variables and immunothrombotic markers were risk factors for death in patients with COVID-19 on ECMO informing pathogenesis and prognostication of severe COVID-19.

Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been increasingly used for postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock, but without a concomitant reduction in observed in‐hospital mortality. Long‐term outcomes are unknown. This study describes patients’ characteristics, in‐hospital outcome, and 10‐year survival after postcardiotomy ECMO. Variables associated with in‐hospital and postdischarge mortality are investigated and reported. Methods and Results: The retrospective international multicenter observational PELS‐1 (Postcardiotomy Extracorporeal Life Support) study includes data on adults requiring ECMO for postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock between 2000 and 2020 from 34 centers. Variables associated with mortality were estimated preoperatively, intraoperatively, during ECMO, and after the occurrence of any complications, and then analyzed at different time points during a patient's clinical course, through mixed Cox proportional hazards models containing fixed and random effects. Follow‐up was established by institutional chart review or contacting patients. This analysis included 2058 patients (59% were men; median [interquartile range] age, 65.0 [55.0–72.0] years). In‐hospital mortality was 60.5%. Independent variables associated with in‐hospital mortality were age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.02 [95% CI, 1.01–1.02]) and preoperative cardiac arrest (HR, 1.41 [95% CI, 1.15–1.73]). In the subgroup of hospital survivors, the overall 1‐, 2‐, 5‐, and 10‐year survival rates were 89.5% (95% CI, 87.0%–92.0%), 85.4% (95% CI, 82.5%–88.3%), 76.4% (95% CI, 72.5%–80.5%), and 65.9% (95% CI, 60.3%–72.0%), respectively. Variables associated with postdischarge mortality included older age, atrial fibrillation, emergency surgery, type of surgery, postoperative acute kidney injury, and postoperative septic shock. Conclusions: In adults, in‐hospital mortality after postcardiotomy ECMO remains high; however, two‐thirds of those who are discharged from hospital survive up to 10 years. Patient selection, intraoperative decisions, and ECMO management remain key variables associated with survival in this cohort. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03857217.

Bleeding remains a major source of morbidity associated with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO). Moreover, there remains significant controversy, and a paucity of data regarding the ideal anticoagulation strategy for VV-ECMO patients. All patients undergoing isolated, peripheral VV-ECMO between January 2009 and December 2014 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Patients (n = 123) were stratified into one of three sequential eras of anticoagulation strategies: activated clotting time (ACT: 160–180 seconds, n = 53), high-partial thromboplastin time (H-PTT: 60–80 seconds, n = 25), and low-PTT (L-PTT: 45–55 seconds, n = 25) with high-flow (>4 L/min). Pre-ECMO APACHE II scores, SOFA scores, and Murray scores were not significantly different between the groups. Patients in the L-PTT group required less red blood cell units on ECMO than the ACT or H-PTT group (2.1 vs. 1.3 vs. 0.9; p < 0.001) and patients in the H-PTT and L-PTT group required less fresh frozen plasma than the ACT group (0.33 vs. 0 vs. 0; p = 0.006). Overall, major bleeding events were significantly lower in the L-PTT group than in the ACT and H-PTT groups. There was no difference in thrombotic events. In this single-institution experience, a L-PTT, high-flow strategy on VV-ECMO was associated with fewer bleeding and no difference in thrombotic events than an ACT or H-PTT strategy.

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR)—veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for refractory cardiac arrest—has grown rapidly, but its widespread adoption has been limited by frequent neurologic complications. With individual centers developing best practices, utilization may be increasing with an uncertain effect on outcomes. This study describes the recent ECPR experience at the University of Maryland Medical Center from 2016 through 2018, with attention to neurologic outcomes and predictors thereof. The primary outcome was dichotomized Cerebral Performance Category (≤2) at hospital discharge; secondary outcomes included rates of specific neurologic complications. From 429 ECMO runs over 3 years, 57 ECPR patients were identified, representing an increase in ECPR utilization compared with 41 cases over the previous 6 years. Fifty-two (91%) suffered in-hospital cardiac arrest, and 36 (63%) had an initial nonshockable rhythm. Median low-flow time was 31 minutes. Overall, 26 (46%) survived hospitalization and 23 (88% of survivors, 40% overall) had a favorable discharge outcome. Factors independently associated with good neurologic outcome included lower peak lactate, initial shockable rhythm, and higher initial ECMO mean arterial pressure. Neurologic complications occurred in 18 patients (32%), including brain death in 6 (11%), hypoxic-ischemic brain injury in 11 (19%), ischemic stroke in 6 (11%), intracerebral hemorrhage in 1 (2%), and seizure in 4 (7%). We conclude that good neurologic outcomes are possible for well-selected ECPR patients in a high-volume program with increasing utilization and evolving practices. Markers of adequate peri-resuscitation tissue perfusion were associated with better outcomes, suggesting their importance in neuroprognostication.

(1) Background: COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS) has several distinctions from traditional acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS); however, patients with refractory respiratory failure may still benefit from veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) support. We report our challenges caring for CARDS patients on VV-ECMO and alterations to traditional management strategies. (2) Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of our institutional strategies for managing patients with COVID-19 who required VV-ECMO in a dedicated airlock biocontainment unit (BCU), from March to June 2020. The data collected included the time course of admission, VV-ECMO run, ventilator length, hospital length of stay, and major events related to bleeding, such as pneumothorax and tracheostomy. The dispensation of sedation agents and trial therapies were obtained from institutional pharmacy tracking. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed. (3) Results: Forty COVID-19 patients on VV-ECMO were managed in the BCU during this period, from which 21 survived to discharge and 19 died. The criteria for ECMO initiation was altered for age, body mass index, and neurologic status/cardiac arrest. All cannulations were performed with a bedside ultrasound-guided percutaneous technique. Ventilator and ECMO management were routed in an ultra-lung protective approach, though varied based on clinical setting and provider experience. There was a high incidence of pneumothorax (n = 19). Thirty patients had bedside percutaneous tracheostomy, with more procedural-related bleeding complications than expected. A higher use of sedation was noted. The timing of decannulation was also altered, given the system constraints. A variety of trial therapies were utilized, and their effectiveness is yet to be determined. (4) Conclusions: Even in a high-volume ECMO center, there are challenges in caring for an expanded capacity of patients during a viral respiratory pandemic. Though institutional resources and expertise may vary, it is paramount to proceed with insightful planning, the recognition of challenges, and the dynamic application of lessons learned when facing a surge of critically ill patients.

Background: The most critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may require advanced support modalities, such as veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO). A systematic, methodical approach to a respiratory pandemic on a state and institutional level is critical. Methods: We conducted retrospective review of our institutional response to the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on the creation of a dedicated airlock biocontainment unit (BCU) to treat patients with refractory COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS). Data were collected through conversations with staff on varying levels in the BCU, those leading the effort to make the BCU and hospital incident command system, email communications regarding logistic changes being implemented, and a review of COVID-19 patient census at our institution from March through June 2020. Results: Over 2100 patients were successfully admitted to system hospitals; 29% of these patients required critical care. The response to this respiratory pandemic augmented intensive care physician staffing, created a 70-member nursing team, and increased the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) capability by nearly 200%. During this time period, 40 COVID-19 patients on VV-ECMO were managed in the BCU. Challenges in an airlock unit included communication, scarcity of resources, double-bunking, and maintaining routine care. Conclusions: Preparing for a surge of critically ill patients during a pandemic can be a daunting task. The implementation of a coordinated, system-level approach can help with the allocation of resources as needed. Focusing on established strengths of hospitals within the system can guide triage based on individual patient needs. The management of ECMO patients is still a specialty care, and a systematic and hospital based approach requiring an ECMO team composed of multiple experienced individuals is paramount during a respiratory viral pandemic.

Tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) has multiple anticoagulant properties. To our knowledge, no studies have measured TFPI levels in adult veno-arterial (VA) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients. We hypothesized that adult VA ECMO patients would have increased TFPI levels and slowed tissue factor triggered thrombin generation. Twenty VA ECMO patients had TFPI levels and thrombin generation lag time measured on ECMO day 1 or 2, day 3, and day 5. TFPI levels and thrombin generation lag time were compared against healthy control plasma samples. Mean TFPI levels were significantly higher in ECMO patients on ECMO day 1 or 2 = 81,877 ± 19,481 pg/mL, day 3 = 73,907 ± 26,690 pg/mL, and day 5 = 77,812 ± 23,484 pg/mL compared with control plasma = 38,958 ± 9,225 pg/mL (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). Median thrombin generation lag time was significantly longer in ECMO patients on ECMO day 1 or 2 = 10.0 minutes [7.5, 13.8], day 3 = 9.0 minutes [6.8, 12.1], and day 5 = 10.7 minutes [8.3, 15.2] compared with control plasma = 3.6 minutes [2.9, 4.2] (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). TFPI is increased in VA ECMO patients and tissue factor triggered thrombin generation is slowed. Increased TFPI levels could contribute to the multifactorial coagulopathy that occurs during ECMO.

Objective To test the hypothesis that brain injury is more common and varied in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) than radiographically observed, we described neuropathology findings of ECMO decedents and associated clinical factors from 3 institutions. Methods We conducted a retrospective multicenter observational study of brain autopsies from adult ECMO recipients. Pathology findings were examined for correlation with demographics, clinical data, ECMO characteristics, and outcomes. Results Forty-three decedents (n = 13 female, median age 47 years) received autopsies after undergoing ECMO for acute respiratory distress syndrome (n = 14), cardiogenic shock (n = 14), and cardiac arrest (n = 15). Median duration of ECMO was 140 hours, most decedents (n = 40) received anticoagulants; 60% (n = 26) underwent venoarterial ECMO, and 40% (n = 17) underwent venovenous ECMO. Neuropathology was found in 35 decedents (81%), including microhemorrhages (37%), macrohemorrhages (35%), infarctions (47%), and hypoxic-ischemic brain injury (n = 17, 40%). Most pathology occurred in frontal neocortices (n = 43 occurrences), basal ganglia (n = 33), and cerebellum (n = 26). Decedents with hemorrhage were older (median age 57 vs 38 years, p = 0.01); those with hypoxic brain injury had higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores (8.0 vs 2.0, p = 0.04); and those with infarction had lower peak Paco₂ (53 vs 61 mm Hg, p = 0.04). Six of 9 patients with normal neuroimaging results were found to have pathology on autopsy. The majority underwent withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy (n = 32, 74%), and 2 of 8 patients with normal brain autopsy underwent withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy for suspected neurologic injury. Conclusion Neuropathological findings after ECMO are common, varied, and associated with various clinical factors. Further study on underlying mechanisms is warranted and may guide ECMO management.