Ya Li Liang

Background: The 99th-percentile upper reference limit (99% URL) is essential for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) assays to diagnose acute coronary syndromes. We derived the gender-specific 99% URLs for the new Snibe hs-cTnI assay and verified its high-sensitivity performance. Methods: The Snibe hs-cTnI assay has a claimed limit of blank/detection/quantitation of 0.5/1.0/2.0 ng/L, a precision of 5.67% (@ 9.83 ng/L), 4.65% (@ 21.0 ng/L) and 3.77% (@ 174 ng/L), an analytical measuring range of 1.00–500,000 ng/L, and a claimed 99% URL of 20.1/11.8/17.5 ng/L (males/females/overall). Assay precision was evaluated using kit control materials. A total of 846 (M 444, F 402) anonymized leftover samples from healthy individuals were assessed for the derivation of 99% URLs. Results: The inter-assay CV was 6.2/4.4% (@ 10.1/20.6 ng/L). The 10/20% CV corresponded to a concentration of 5.2/3.0 ng/L. The assay recorded detectable hs-cTnI values in 64% of women and 70% of men. Hs-cTnI values were significantly lower in females than males (females vs. males median 2.6 vs. 3.2 ng/L, Mann–Whitney p = 0.005). The derived 99% URL for the population was 7.7 ng/L (90% CI 6.93–22.8 ng/L) for women and 13.7 ng/L (90% CI 10.6–41.4 ng/L) for men. When confined to subjects ≥40 years old only, males had a 99% URL of 14.8 ng/L (n = 412, 90% CI 10.6–41.4 ng/L) and 8.1 ng/L (n = 377, 90% CI 6.95–22.8 ng/L) for females, respectively. Conclusions: The Snibe hs-cTnI assay fulfills the requirements of a hs-cTn assay. Gender-specific 99% URLs are derived for this assay and they increased with age.

Background: We evaluated the Sysmex Highly Integrated Single-Cartridge Luminescence Immunoassay System (HISCL) hs-cTnT assay, and compared its performance to the Roche assay, with derivation of 99th-percentile upper reference limits (99% URLs) for healthy subjects. We assessed the effect of increasing age/decreasing eGFR on the HISCL hs-cTnT. Methods: We verified assay limits of blank/detection, precision and the functional sensitivity. Samples were analyzed on both the Sysmex HISCL and Roche Elecsys analyzers for method comparison. Results: The HISCL assay limit of blank/detection was 1.3/1.9 ng/L, and concentrations corresponding to 20/10% CVs were 1.8/3.3 ng/L. Assay precision of kit controls at 3253 ng/L was 2.2% and at 106 ng/L was 2.5%. Linear regression analysis (n = 2151) showed good agreement (r = 0.95) with the Roche hs-cTnT. Bland–Altman (Roche/HISCL) analysis for samples with hs-cTnT ≤ 52 ng/L showed a mean absolute difference of 3.5 ng/L; for hs-cTnT > 52 ng/L, the mean difference was 2.8%. In a cardio-renal healthy population (n = 1004), the 99% URLs were 14.4/17.0/13.9 ng/L for overall/male/female, respectively; assay CV% was below 10% at these levels. More than 50% of the hs-cTnT in the healthy male and female subjects were measurable above the limit of detection. Hs-cTnT increased with increasing age and decreasing eGFR. Conclusions: In conclusion, the Sysmex HISCL hs-cTnT fulfils the criteria for a high-sensitivity assay, with specific 99th URLs for males and females. Expectedly, the baseline Sysmex hs-cTnT increases with age and decreasing eGFR.

Background: We evaluated the performance of the Abbott thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor antibody chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) on the Alinity i. Methods: Verification studies for precision, linearity, analytical measuring range, diagnostic cut offs for Graves’ disease were performed. We compared the Abbott CMIA to an established TRAb assay (Roche electrochemiluminescence immunoassay). Method comparison analysis was performed between serum and plasma samples on the Abbott CMIA. Results: Repeatability (CV%) for TRAb were 4.07, 1.56, 0.71 and within-laboratory imprecision (CV%) were 4.07, 1.90, 0.71 at 3.0, 10.0, 30.0 IU/L of TRAb, respectively. Linearity and analytical measuring range were verified from 1.07–47.9 IU/L. The limit of the blank was 0 IU/L, limit of detection was 0.15 IU/L, and limit of quantification was 0.5 IU/L. Passing-Bablok analysis showed agreement between the two assays; Y-intercept = 0.787, slope = 1.04. Passing-Bablok analysis also showed agreement between the plasma and serum samples run on the Abbott CMIA; Y-intercept −0.17, slope = 0.97. Conclusions: The Abbott TRAb CMIA on the Alinity i performs within the manufacturer claims for assay precision, linearity, analytical measuring range, limit of blank, limit of detection, limit of quantitation and diagnostic cut offs for Graves’ disease. Thus, the Abbott TRAb CMIA on the Alinity i is fit for clinical use.

Introduction: We documented the total spike antibody (S-Ab), IgG S-Ab and neutralizing antibody (N-Ab) responses of BNT162b2/CoronaVac vaccinees up to 90 days post-booster dose. Methods: We included 32 homologous regimen CoronaVac vaccinees and 136 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccinees. We tested their total S-Ab (Roche), IgG (Abbott) and N-Ab (Snibe) levels at set time points from January 2021 to April 2022. All subjects were deemed to be COVID-19-naïve either via clinical history (CoronaVac vaccinees) or nucleocapsid antibody testing (BNT162b2 vaccinees). Results: All antibodies peaked 20–30 days post-inoculation. In BNT162b2 vaccinees, all post-booster antibodies were significantly higher than second-dose peaks. In CoronaVac vaccinees, IgG showed no significant differences between peak third-/second-dose titers (difference of 56.0 BAU/mL, 95% CI of −17.1 to 129, p = 0.0894). The post-vaccination titers of all antibodies in BNT162b2 vaccinees were significantly higher than those in CoronaVac vaccinees at all time points. Post-booster, all antibodies declined in 90 days; the final total/IgG/N-Ab titers were 7536 BAU/mL, 1276 BAU/mL and 12.5 μg/mL in BNT162b2 vaccinees and 646 BAU/mL, 62.4 BAU/mL and 0.44 μg/mL in CoronaVac vaccinees. Conclusion: The mRNA vaccine generated more robust total S-Ab, IgG and N-Ab responses after the second and third vaccinations.

Introduction: We tested the total spike antibody (S-Ab), IgG/IgM S-Ab, and neutralizing antibody (N-Ab) responses of COVID-19-naïve subjects from before their first BNT162b2 vaccination up to 210 days after boosting. Methods: We studied 136 COVID-19-naïve subjects who received three doses of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine (39 males, 97 females, mean age 43.8 ± 13.5 years) from January 2021 to May 2022. Serum was assessed for total S-Ab (Roche), IgG/M (Abbott), and N-Ab (Snibe). Results: Peak antibody levels were measured 20-30 days after each dose, with booster dosing eliciting significantly higher peak antibodies than the second dose: total S-Ab 2219 vs. 19,551 BAU/mL (difference 16,667 BAU/mL, p < 0.0001); IgG 2270 vs. 2932 BAU/mL (difference 660 BAU/mL, p = 0.04); and N-Ab 3.52 vs. 26.4 µg/mL (difference 21.4 µg/mL, p < 0.0001). Only IgM showed a lower peak post-booster antibody titer (COI 2.11 vs. 0.23, difference 1.63, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.38, p < 0.0001). By 180–210 days after the second or third vaccination, total S-Ab/IgG/N-Ab had decreased by 68.7/93.8/73.6% vs. 82.8/86.3/79.5%. The half-lives of IgG and N-Ab antibodies were longer after the third vaccination (IgG: 65 vs. 34 days, N-Ab: 99 vs. 78 days). Conclusion: Total S-Ab/IgG/N-Ab showed a greater increase post-booster, with IgG/N-Ab having a longer half-life.

Introduction: We compared the early total spike antibody (S-Ab) and neutralizing antibody (N-Ab) responses to two vaccines. Methods: We studied 96 Pfizer and 34 Sinovac vaccinees over a 14-month period from January 2021 to February 2022. All vaccinees received three doses of one type of vaccine. Antibody levels (Roche Elecsys total S-Ab and the Snibe N-Ab) were tested 10 days after the first dose, 20 days after the second dose, and 20 days after the booster dose. Results: At all time points, the mRNA vaccine generated higher S-Ab and N-Ab responses than the inactivated virus vaccine (S-Ab: first dose 2.48 vs. 0.4 BAU/mL, second dose 2174 vs. 98 BAU/mL, third dose 15,004 vs. 525 BAU/mL; N-Ab: first dose 0.05 vs. 0.02 µg/mL, second dose 3.48 vs. 0.38 µg/mL, third dose 19.8 vs. 0.89 µg/mL). mRNA vaccine recipients had a 6.2/22.2/28.6-fold higher S-Ab and 2.5/9.2/22.2-fold higher N-Ab response than inactivated virus vaccine recipients after the first/second/third inoculations, respectively. Mann–Whitney U analysis confirmed the significant difference in S-Ab and N-Ab titers between vaccination groups at each time point. Conclusions: The mRNA vaccines generated a more robust S-Ab and N-Ab response than the inactivated virus vaccine at all time points after the first, second, and third vaccinations.

Background: We evaluated the performance of the Abbott N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) assay against the Roche NT-proBNP immunoassay across two sites. Methods: Precision, linearity, and sensitivity studies were performed. A combined method of comparison and regression analysis was performed between the Roche and Abbott assays using samples from both sites (n = 494). To verify biotin interference, lyophilised biotin powder was reconstituted and spiked into serum samples at two medical decision levels (final concentration 500/4250 ng/mL) and compared to controls. NT-proBNP was also measured in anonymised leftover sera (n = 388) in a cardio-renal healthy population and stratified into three age bands—75 (n = 60). Results: Between-run precision (CV%) for NT-proBNP was 4.17/4.50 (139.5/142.0 pg/mL), 3.83/2.17 (521.6/506.3), and 4.60/2.51 (5053/4973), respectively. The assay was linear from 0.7–41,501 pg/mL. The limit of blank/quantitation was 1.2/7.9 pg/mL. The assay showed no interference from biotin up to 4250 ng/mL. Passing–Bablok regression analysis showed excellent agreement between the two assays (r = 0.999, 95% CI 0.999 to 0.999, p < 0.0001). The Roche assay had a slightly persistent, negative bias across different levels of NT-proBNP. ESC age cut-offs for diagnosing acute heart failure are applicable for the Abbott assay, with the median NT-proBNP of subjects < 50 years old at 43.0 pg/mL (range 4.9–456 pg/mL), 50–75 years old at 95.1 pg/mL (range 10.5–1079 pg/mL), and >75 years old at 173.1 pg/mL (range 23.2–1948 pg/mL). Conclusions: The Abbott Architect NT-proBNP assay has good performance that agrees with the manufacturer’s specifications. ESC/AHA recommended NT-proBNP age groups for acute heart failure diagnosis are applicable to this assay.

Background: We evaluated the post-booster (BNT162b2) antibody responses in Singapore. Methods: Participants (n = 43) were tested pre-booster and 20/30/60/90 days post-booster. Participants were boosted 120–240 days (mean 214 days) after their second dose and had no history or serologic evidence of prior COVID-19 infection; all participants had undetectable SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antibodies throughout the study. Total nucleocapsid and spike antibodies (S-Ab) were assessed on the Roche Elecsys e802 and neutralizing antibody (N-Ab) on the Snibe quantitative N-Ab assay. Results: Pre-booster median S-Ab/N-Ab titers were 829 BAU/mL/0.83 µg/mL; 2 participants were below manufacturer’s N-Ab cut-offs of 0.3 µg/mL (0.192 and 0.229). Both S-Ab and N-Ab titers peaked at 30 days post-booster (median S-Ab 25,220 BAU/mL and N-Ab 30.3 µg/mL) at 30–37× pre-booster median levels. These peak post-booster S-Ab/N-Ab titers were 11× (25,220 vs. 2235 BAU/mL) and 9× (30.3 vs. 3.52 µg/mL) higher than the previously reported peak post-second dose levels. Antibody titers declined to 12,315 BAU/mL (51% decrease) and 14.3 µg/mL (53% decrease) 90 days post-booster. Non-linear regression estimates for S-Ab/N-Ab half-lives were 44/58 days. At 180 days post-booster, S-Ab/N-Ab are estimated to be 2671 BAU/mL/4.83 µg/mL. Conclusions: Both S-Ab and N-Ab show a good response following post-booster vaccination, with half-lives that may provide a prolonged antibody response.

Background: Subjects with previous COVID-19 have augmented post-vaccination responses. However, the antibody response in COVID-naïve subjects from Southeast Asia is not well known. Methods: 77 COVID-naïve vaccinees were tested with a full antibody panel [spike antibodies (total (T-Ab), IgG, IgM) and neutralizing antibodies (N-Ab)] pre-vaccination, 10 days after dose 1, and 20/40/60/90/120/150/180 days after dose 2. Results: 10 days after dose 1, 67.6% (48/71)/69.0% (49/71) were T-Ab/IgG positive; only 15.5% (11/71)/14.1% (10/71) were N-Ab/IgM positive. While all (100%) subjects had brisk T-Ab, IgG and N-Ab antibody responses 20 days after complete vaccination, only 79.1% (53/67) were IgM positive. At 180 days (n = 8), T-Ab/IgG/N-Ab were still reactive (lowest T-Ab 186 U/mL, IgG 617 AU/mL, N-Ab 0.39 µg/mL), but IgM was negative in all samples. Spike antibody thresholds of T-Ab 74.1 U/mL (r = 0.95) and IgG 916 AU/mL (r = 0.95) corresponded to N-Ab reactivity (>0.3 µg/mL). Non-linear regression analysis showed that N-Ab would decrease to 0.3 µg/mL by 241 days, whereas T-Ab/IgG would need 470/163 days to reach titers of T-Ab/IgG associated with a N-Ab 0.3 µg/mL (76.4 U/mL and 916 AU/mL respectively). Conclusions: The antibody responses of T-Ab, IgG and N-Ab remain high and durable even at 180 days. N-Ab titers are expected to remain reactive up to 241 days post-vaccination.