Tayyaba Khalid
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Tayyaba Khalid has a total of 10 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Aqsa Ahmed
Department of Botany, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
1 shared publication - Hafsa Khalid
Department of Computer Science, School of Systems and Technology, University of Management and Technology, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
1 shared publication - Kalsoom Fatima
Department of Computer Science, School of Systems and Technology, University of Management and Technology, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
1 shared publication - Khadija Khalid
Department of Electrical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Management and Technology, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
1 shared publication - Khalid Masood
Department of Computer Science, Lahore Garrison University, Lahore, Pakistan
1 shared publication - Mohammed A. Al Ghamdi
Umm Al-Qura University, Saudi Arabia
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 26 July 2020
- Published by MDPI AG in Diagnostics
- Vol. 10 (8) , 518
A Comparative Systematic Literature Review on Knee Bone Reports from MRI, X-Rays and CT Scans Using Deep Learning and Machine Learning Methodologies
The purpose of this research was to provide a “systematic literature review” of knee bone reports that are obtained by MRI, CT scans, and X-rays by using deep learning and machine learning techniques by comparing different approaches—to perform a comprehensive study on the deep learning and machine learning methodologies to diagnose knee bone diseases by detecting symptoms from X-ray, CT scan, and MRI images. This study will help those researchers who want to conduct research in the knee bone field. A comparative systematic literature review was conducted for the accomplishment of our work. A total of 32 papers were reviewed in this research. Six papers consist of X-rays of knee bone with deep learning methodologies, five papers cover the MRI of knee bone using deep learning approaches, and another five papers cover CT scans of knee bone with deep learning techniques. Another 16 papers cover the machine learning techniques for evaluating CT scans, X-rays, and MRIs of knee bone. This research compares the deep learning methodologies for CT scan, MRI, and X-ray reports on knee bone, comparing the accuracy of each technique, which can be used for future development. In the future, this research will be enhanced by comparing X-ray, CT-scan, and MRI reports of knee bone with information retrieval and big data techniques. The results show that deep learning techniques are best for X-ray, MRI, and CT scan images of the knee bone to diagnose diseases.
- 26 July 2020
- Published by MDPI AG in Diagnostics
- Vol. 10 (8) , 518
Open AccessA Comparative Systematic Literature Review on Knee Bone Reports from MRI, X-Rays and CT Scans Using Deep Learning and Machine Learning Methodologies
The purpose of this research was to provide a “systematic literature review” of knee bone reports that are obtained by MRI, CT scans, and X-rays by using deep learning and machine learning techniques by comparing different approaches—to perform a comprehensive study on the deep learning and machine learning methodologies to diagnose knee bone diseases by detecting symptoms from X-ray, CT scan, and MRI images. This study will help those researchers who want to conduct research in the knee bone field. A comparative systematic literature review was conducted for the accomplishment of our work. A total of 32 papers were reviewed in this research. Six papers consist of X-rays of knee bone with deep learning methodologies, five papers cover the MRI of knee bone using deep learning approaches, and another five papers cover CT scans of knee bone with deep learning techniques. Another 16 papers cover the machine learning techniques for evaluating CT scans, X-rays, and MRIs of knee bone. This research compares the deep learning methodologies for CT scan, MRI, and X-ray reports on knee bone, comparing the accuracy of each technique, which can be used for future development. In the future, this research will be enhanced by comparing X-ray, CT-scan, and MRI reports of knee bone with information retrieval and big data techniques. The results show that deep learning techniques are best for X-ray, MRI, and CT scan images of the knee bone to diagnose diseases.