Marilena Di Napoli

Marilena Di Napoli

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Marilena Di Napoli has a total of 102 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Real-World Analysis of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated with Pembrolizumab Plus Axitinib: Evidence from the Campania Oncology Network

    by Marilena Di Napoli, Elisabetta Coppola, Carmine D’Aniello, Sarah Scagliarini, Carlo Buonerba, Andrea Muto, Luigi Formisano, Francesco Sabbatino, Davide Bosso, Sabrina Rossetti, et al.

    Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitor–tyrosine kinase inhibitor combinations represent a standard first-line option for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, patients enrolled in pivotal trials often differ from those treated in routine practice. We report real-world outcomes of pembrolizumab plus axitinib within the Campania Oncology Network. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study including consecutive treatment-naïve mRCC patients who received first-line pembrolizumab plus axitinib between January 2021 and November 2023 across eight regional centers. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR) and safety. Results: A total of 117 patients were included. IMDC risk was favorable in 19.6%, intermediate/poor in 65%, and unknown in 15.4%. Median age was 59 years, and 53.8% had ECOG performance status ≥ 1. Clear-cell histology accounted for 87.2% of cases; brain metastases were present in 36%. After a median follow-up of 12.8 months, median PFS was 15.1 months (95% CI 9.6–NR), and median OS was not reached. ORR was 27.3%, with a disease control rate of 79.5%; patients with non-clear-cell histology showed an ORR of 41.7%. Disease progression was the main cause of treatment discontinuation (49%), while adverse events (AEs) led to discontinuation in 6% of cases. Grade ≥3 AEs occurred in 14% of patients. Most toxicities were grade 1–2, including diarrhea (23.9%), asthenia (18%), hypothyroidism (12.8%), and hypertension (9.4%). Grade 1–2 AEs were significantly more frequent in females compared with males (57.6% vs. 35.7%, p = 0.05). Conclusions: In this consecutive regional cohort, pembrolizumab plus axitinib showed clinically relevant disease control, although ORR was lower than in pivotal trials. Performance status emerged as a key prognostic factor. Real-world data from oncology networks may support personalized first-line treatment decisions in mRCC.

  • Open Access

    The emerging role of PARP inhibitors in prostate cancer: A narrative review

    by Lorenzo Lobianco, Gabriele Calvanese, Debora D’aUsilio, Sabrina Rossetti, Sabrina Chiara Cecere, Jole Ventriglia, Carmela Pisano, Rosa Tambaro, Marilena Di Napoli, Anna Passarelli, et al.


  • Endometrial cancer in the elderly: Characteristics, prognostic and risk factors, and treatment options

    by Miriam Forte, Sabrina Chiara Cecere, Marilena Di Napoli, Jole Ventriglia, Rosa Tambaro, Sabrina Rossetti, Anna Passarelli, Chiara Casartelli, Martina Rauso, Gennaro Alberico, et al.


  • Open Access

    Analysis of Health-Related Quality of Life Reporting in Phase III RCTs of Advanced Genitourinary Tumors

    by Fabrizio Di Costanzo, Fabiana Napolitano, Fabio Salomone, Anna Rita Amato, Gennaro Alberico, Fortuna Migliaccio, Giovanna Pecoraro, Annachiara Marra, Felice Crocetto, Antonio Ruffo, et al.

    Background: As recommended in the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines, assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) should be a relevant endpoint in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) testing new anticancer therapies. However, previous publications by our group and others revealed a frequent underestimation and underreporting of HRQoL results in publication of RCTs in oncology. Herein, we systematically reviewed HRQoL reporting in RCTs testing new treatments in advanced prostate, kidney and urothelial cancers and published between 2010 and 2022. Methods: We searched PubMed RCTs testing novel therapies in genitourinary (GU) cancers and published in fifteen selected journals (Annals of Oncology, BMC Cancer, British Journal of Cancer, Cancer Discovery, Clinical Cancer Research, Clinical Genitourinary cancer, European Journal of Cancer, European Urology, European Urology Oncology, JAMA, JAMA Oncology, Journal of clinical Oncology, Lancet, Lancet Oncology and The New England Journal of Medicine). We excluded trials investigating exclusively best supportive care or behavioral intervention, as well as subgroup or post hoc analyses of previously published trials. For each RCT, we investigated whether HRQoL assessment was performed by protocol and if results were reported in the primary manuscript or in a secondary publication. Results: We found 85 eligible trials published between 2010 and 2022. Only 1/85 RCTs (1.2%) included HRQoL among primary endpoints. Of note, 25/85 (29.4%) RCTs did not include HRQoL among study endpoints. HRQoL results were non-disclosed in 56/85 (65.9%) primary publications. Only 18/85 (21.2%) publications fulfilled at least one item of the CONSORT-PRO checklist. Furthermore, 14/46 (30.4%) RCTs in prostate cancer, 12/25 (48%) in kidney cancer and 3/14 (21.4%) in urothelial cancer reported HRQoL data in primary publications. Next, HRQoL data were disclosed in primary manuscripts of 12/32 (37.5%), 5/13 (38.5%), 5/16 (31.3%) and 5/15 (33.3%) trials evaluating target therapies, chemotherapy, immunotherapy and new hormonal agents, respectively. Next, we found that HRQoL data were reported in 16/42 (38%) and in 13/43 (30.2%) positive and negative trials, respectively. Finally, the rate of RCTs reporting HRQoL results in primary or secondary publications was 55.3% (n = 47/85). Conclusions: Our analysis revealed a relevant underreporting of HRQoL in RCTs in advanced GU cancers. These results highlight the need to dedicate more attention to HRQoL in RCTs to fully assess the value of new anticancer treatments.


  • Open Access

    Pembrolizumab Plus Axitinib for Metastatic Papillary and Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma: NEMESIA (Non Clear MEtaStatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Pembrolizumab Axitinib) Study, a Subgroup Analysis of I-RARE Observational Study (Meet-URO 23a)

    by Marco Stellato, Sebastiano Buti, Marco Maruzzo, Melissa Bersanelli, Francesco Pierantoni, Ugo De Giorgi, Marilena Di Napoli, Roberto Iacovelli, Maria Giuseppa Vitale, Paola Ermacora, et al.

    Non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) represents a heterogeneous histological group which is 20–25% of those with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Patients with nccRCC have limited therapeutic options due to their exclusion from phase III randomized trials. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effectiveness and tolerability of pembrolizumabaxitinib combination in chromophobe and papillary metastatic RCC (mRCC) patients enrolled in the I-RARE (Italian Registry on rAre genitor-uRinary nEoplasms) observational ongoing study (Meet-URO 23). Baseline characteristics, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicities were retrospectively and prospectively collected from nccRCC patients treated in 14 Italian referral centers adhering to the Meet-Uro group, from December 2020 to April 2022. Only patients with chromophobe and papillary histology were considered eligible for the present pre-specified analysis. There were 32 eligible patients who received pembrolizumab-axitinib as first-line treatment, of whom 13 (40%) had chromophobe histology and 19 (60%) were classified as papillary RCC. The DCR was 78.1% whereas ORR was 43.7% (11 patients achieved stable disease and 14 patients obtained partial response: 9/19 papillary, 5/13 chromophobe). Six patients (18.7%) were primary refractory. Median PFS was 10.8 months (95%CI 1.7–11.5). Eleven patients (34.3%) interrupted the full treatment due to immune-related adverse events (irAEs): G3 hepatitis (n = 5), G3 hypophisitis (n = 1), G3 diarrhea (n = 1), G3 pancreatitis (n = 1), G3 asthenia (n = 1). Twelve patients (37.5%) temporarily interrupted axitinib only due to persistent G2 hand-foot syndrome or G2 hypertension. Pembrolizumab-axitinib combination could be an active and feasible first-line treatment option for patients with papillary or chromophobe mRCC.


  • Open Access

    Nivolumab-ipilimumab in renal cell carcinoma metastatic to the bones: A case report.

    by Marilena Di Napoli, Carmela Pisano, Sergio Venanzio Setola, Sisto Perdonà, Florinda Feroce, Sandro Pignata

    In the last recent years, the introduction in the clinical setting of treatment combinations having immune checkpoint inhibitors as the backbone has dramatically improved the outcomes of patients suffering from advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Here we report the clinical course of a patient with a rapid and bulky bone recurrence of RCC after nephrectomy, experiencing long-term benefit from nivolumab-ipilimumab administered as first-line treatment.


  • Immunotherapy in cervix cancer

    by Laura Attademo, Valentina Tuninetti, Carmela Pisano, Sabrina Chiara Cecere, Marilena Di Napoli, Rosa Tambaro, Giorgio Valabrega, Lucia Musacchio, Sergio Venanzio Setola, Patrizia Piccirillo, et al.


  • Open Access

    Cytoreductive Surgery for Heavily Pre-Treated, Platinum-Resistant Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma: A Two-Center Retrospective Experience

    by Valentina Tuninetti, Marilena Di Napoli, Eleonora Ghisoni, Furio Maggiorotto, Manuela Robella, Giulia Scotto, Gaia Giannone, Margherita Turinetto, Dimitris Siatis, Riccardo Ponzone, et al.

    Few retrospective studies have shown a benefit in selected patients affected by heavily pre-treated, platinum-resistant ovarian carcinomas (PROCs) who have undergone cytoreduction at relapse. However, the role of tertiary and quaternary cytoreductive surgery is not fully defined. Our aim was to evaluate survival and surgical morbidity and mortality after maximal cytoreduction in this setting. We evaluated all consecutive patients undergoing cytoreduction for platinum-resistance over an 8-year period (2010–2018) in two different centers. Fifty patients (median age 52.5 years, range 34–75) were included; the median number of previous chemotherapy lines was three (range 1–7) and the median number of previous surgeries was one (range 1–4). Completeness of cytoreduction (CC = 0) was achieved in 22 patients (44%). Rates of major operative morbidity and 30-day mortality were 38% and 8%, respectively. Median follow-up was 35 months. The absence of tumor residual (CC = 0) was associated with a significantly better overall survival (OS) compared to the CC > 0 subgroup (median OS 32.9 months (95% CI 21.6–44.2) vs. 4.8 months (95% CI n.a.–9.8), hazard ratio (HR) 4.21 (95% CI 2.07–8.60), p < 0.001). Optimal cytoreduction is feasible and associated with promising OS in selected, heavily pre-treated PROCs. Further prospective studies are required to better define the role of surgery in platinum-resistant disease.