Ramit Maoz-Segal

Background: Eosinophilia, defined as peripheral blood eosinophil counts > 0.5 K/μL, is associated with various clinical conditions, including allergic, infectious, and malignant diseases. Emerging evidence suggests that eosinophils may contribute to thrombo-inflammatory processes, but their association with thromboembolic events and mortality remains insufficiently characterized. This study aimed to evaluate whether eosinophilia is independently associated with increased risk of thromboembolic events and mortality in hospitalized patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using electronic medical records from Sheba Medical Center (2011–2020). Eosinophilia was classified as mild (0.5–1.5 K/μL) or hypereosinophilia (HE, >1.5 K/μL). Patients with eosinophilia were matched 1:1 to controls with normal eosinophil counts based on age, sex, and follow-up duration. Results: Among 93,320 patients (46,660 with eosinophilia and 46,660 controls), thromboembolic events occurred in 20.9% of eosinophilic patients vs. 9.8% of controls. Eosinophilia was independently associated with thrombosis (OR = 1.33; 95% CI, 1.28–1.38; p < 0.0001), with increased risk from counts ≥ 0.7 K/μL. Mortality was also higher among eosinophilic patients (HR = 1.17; 95% CI, 1.13–1.20; p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Eosinophilia is associated with increased thromboembolic and mortality risk, highlighting the importance of eosinophil monitoring in clinical practice.

Background: Late hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to the BNT162b2-vaccine have raised concerns regarding its safety, particularly as further immunizations are required. The yield of skin testing with the BNT162b2v is unclear, as well as the risk factors and outcomes of re-immunization after late HSRs. Objective: We studied a series of patients with late HSRs to BNT162b2v. Methods: Patients referred to the Sheba medical center from December 2020 to May 2021 with late HSRs to the first dose of BNT162b2 were included. HSRs were defined as late if they appeared or lasted >24 h after inoculation. We compared late HSRs to immediate HSRs that appeared within minutes–2 h after vaccination. Intradermal testing with PEG-containing medication and BNT162b2v was performed. Results: A total of 17 patients that presented with late HSRs (study group) were compared to 34 patients with immediate HSRs (control group). Delayed sensitivity to intradermal testing of the BNT162b2v was observed in 9/17 (53%) of the study group compared to 4/34 (12%) in the control group (p = 0.01). Former exposure to a dermal filler with hyaluronic acid was documented among 7/17 (41%) vs. 2/34 (6%) in the study and control groups, respectively, (p = 0.0038). All patients who presented with late HSRs were advised to receive subsequent doses of the BNT162b2v vaccine with or without concomitant medication, and all were re-immunized successfully. Conclusions: Late HSRs to BNT162b2v were linked with positive responses to intradermal testing with the vaccine and prior exposure to derma fillers with hyaluronic acid. This may elude to an immune mechanism triggered by former exposures. Although further studies are needed, late HSRs to the BNT162b2-vaccine did not prevent patients from receiving subsequent doses of the vaccines.

Purpose To study different mask types’ impact on a sinonasal quality of life. Methods For this observational cross-sectional study, a web-based survey was distributed via social media forums. We used the validated Hebrew version of the Sinonasal Outcome Test–22 followed by a questionnaire developed specifically for the present study, focusing on the time of the COVID-19 pandemic (Mask Sinonasal Outcome Test), and questions regarding general health issues. The participants’ mask-wearing routine was also studied. Results Seventy percent of 351 participants had experienced a change in their breathing during the time of the pandemic. The median total Sinonasal Outcome Test–22 score was 13, and 10% of the participants reported a significantly impaired quality of life. According to multivariate analyses, the only subject-related variables significantly associated with the reduced sinonasal quality of life were female gender, younger age, a background of chronic rhinitis and sinusitis, and the mask-wearing average daily duration. The mask sinonasal outcome test convergent validity was confirmed. Conclusion The majority of our survey’s responders, predominantly female and younger participants, reported reduced sinonasal quality of life in the COVID-19 pandemic period. It can be attributed to mask-wearing, especially for a prolonged time, irrespective of the existing mask type. These findings should encourage medical companies to produce more “airway-minded” personal protection equipment.

Summary: Primary immunodeficiency disorders (PID) are a group of heterogeneous disorders characterized by recurrent infections, autoimmunity, increased lymphoproliferative disorders and other malignancies. PID is classified into cellular or humoral disorders or a combination of both. We evaluated the clinical differences among adult patients with three variants of PID: common variable immunodeficiency (CVID), idiopathic CD4 lymphopenia (ICL) and combined immunodeficiency (CID). We retrospectively compared demographics, immunological characteristics, clinical presentations and outcomes of CVID, CID and ICL patients followed from 2012 to 2018. In our cohort, we identified 44 adult patients diagnosed with CVID (22), CID (11) and ICL (11). Malignancy was associated with CID, as seven of 11 patients in this group were diagnosed with malignancy compared to CVID (three of 22) or ICL (two of 11) (P = 0·002 and 0·03, respectively). Malignancies were also linked to male gender [odds ratio (OR) = 5, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1·12–22·18) P = 0·0342] and a low ratio of CD4/CD8 < 0·8 (OR = 5·1, 95% CI = 1·22–21·28, P = 0·025). Among CID and ICL, two of 11 patients died in each group, while no death was documented among CVID group (P = 0·04). Autoimmune manifestations did not differ between groups. Similarly, the rate of infections was similar between groups, although infectious agents vary. CID is associated with a high risk of malignancy compare to CVID or ICL. Among adults with PID, male gender, low CD4 and a CD4/CD8 ratio of < 0·8 may serve as risk factors of concomitant malignancy. Surveillance of lymphocyte subpopulations should be considered for all adults.