Sanne M. A. Jansen
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Sanne M. A. Jansen has a total of 8 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Daniel Martijn de Bruin
Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
1 shared publication - Leah S. Wilk
Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
1 shared publication - Mark Ivo van Berge Henegouwen
Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
1 shared publication - Maxime D. Slooter
Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Academic Medical Centre (AMC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
1 shared publication - Paul R. Bloemen
University of Amsterdam
1 shared publication - Richard Martin van Den Elzen
Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 10 August 2020
- Published by MDPI AG in Applied Sciences
- Vol. 10 (16) , 5522
Comparison of Optical Imaging Techniques to Quantitatively Assess the Perfusion of the Gastric Conduit during Oesophagectomy
In this study, four optical techniques—Optical Coherence Tomography, Sidestream Darkfield Microscopy, Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging, and Fluorescence Angiography (FA)—were compared on performing an intraoperative quantitative perfusion assessment of the gastric conduit during oesophagectomy. We hypothesised that the quantitative parameters show decreased perfusion towards the fundus in the gastric conduit and in patients with anastomotic leakage. In a prospective study in patients undergoing oesophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction, measurements were taken with all four optical techniques at four locations from the base towards the fundus in the gastric conduit (Loc1, Loc2, Loc3, Loc4). The primary outcome included 14 quantitative parameters and the anastomotic leakage rate. Imaging was performed in 22 patients during oesophagectomy. Ten out of 14 quantitative parameters significantly indicated a reduced perfusion towards the fundus of the gastric conduit. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 4/22 patients (18.4%). At Loc4, the FA quantitative values for “T1/2” and “mean slope” differed between patients with and without anastomotic leakage (p = 0.025 and p = 0.041, respectively). A quantitative perfusion assessment during oesophagectomy is feasible using optical imaging techniques, of which FA is the most promising for future research.
- 10 August 2020
- Published by MDPI AG in Applied Sciences
- Vol. 10 (16) , 5522
Open AccessComparison of Optical Imaging Techniques to Quantitatively Assess the Perfusion of the Gastric Conduit during Oesophagectomy
In this study, four optical techniques—Optical Coherence Tomography, Sidestream Darkfield Microscopy, Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging, and Fluorescence Angiography (FA)—were compared on performing an intraoperative quantitative perfusion assessment of the gastric conduit during oesophagectomy. We hypothesised that the quantitative parameters show decreased perfusion towards the fundus in the gastric conduit and in patients with anastomotic leakage. In a prospective study in patients undergoing oesophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction, measurements were taken with all four optical techniques at four locations from the base towards the fundus in the gastric conduit (Loc1, Loc2, Loc3, Loc4). The primary outcome included 14 quantitative parameters and the anastomotic leakage rate. Imaging was performed in 22 patients during oesophagectomy. Ten out of 14 quantitative parameters significantly indicated a reduced perfusion towards the fundus of the gastric conduit. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 4/22 patients (18.4%). At Loc4, the FA quantitative values for “T1/2” and “mean slope” differed between patients with and without anastomotic leakage (p = 0.025 and p = 0.041, respectively). A quantitative perfusion assessment during oesophagectomy is feasible using optical imaging techniques, of which FA is the most promising for future research.