Clemens W. G. M. Löwik
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Clemens W. G. M. Löwik has a total of 149 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Laura Mezzanotte
Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
24 shared publications - Dominic J. Robinson
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
17 shared publications - Henriette S. de Bruijn
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
17 shared publications - Ivo Que
Translational Nanobiomaterials and Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
17 shared publications - Roisin McMorrow
Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
17 shared publications - Pier Giorgio Mastroberardino
Department of Life, Health, and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
16 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Fig. 4 from Combination of Bremachlorin PDT and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Anti–PD-1 Shows Response in Murine Immunological T-cell–High and T-cell–Low PDAC Models
Supplementary Figure 4. Bremachlorin’s ex-vivo bio-distribution of non-homogenized organs. Ex-vivo bio-distribution of Bremachlorin from mice with T-cell high (magenta) and T-cell low (blue) tumors and their organs shown as µg of Bremachlorin/g, 6 and 24 hours after administration (n=4 per group).
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Fig. 4 from Combination of Bremachlorin PDT and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Anti–PD-1 Shows Response in Murine Immunological T-cell–High and T-cell–Low PDAC Models
Supplementary Figure 4. Bremachlorin’s ex-vivo bio-distribution of non-homogenized organs. Ex-vivo bio-distribution of Bremachlorin from mice with T-cell high (magenta) and T-cell low (blue) tumors and their organs shown as µg of Bremachlorin/g, 6 and 24 hours after administration (n=4 per group).
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Fig. 7 from Combination of Bremachlorin PDT and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Anti–PD-1 Shows Response in Murine Immunological T-cell–High and T-cell–Low PDAC Models
Supplementary Figure 7. Representative images at 20x magnification of immunofluorescence analysis of CD8+ cells of T-cell high 500% tumor tissue of PDT and anti-PD-1 treated side (left) and non-treated side (right) (A). Absolute number of CD8+ cells quantified in T-cell high (B). TS= treated side, NTS= non-treated side.
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Fig. 7 from Combination of Bremachlorin PDT and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Anti–PD-1 Shows Response in Murine Immunological T-cell–High and T-cell–Low PDAC Models
Supplementary Figure 7. Representative images at 20x magnification of immunofluorescence analysis of CD8+ cells of T-cell high 500% tumor tissue of PDT and anti-PD-1 treated side (left) and non-treated side (right) (A). Absolute number of CD8+ cells quantified in T-cell high (B). TS= treated side, NTS= non-treated side.
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Fig. 3 from Combination of Bremachlorin PDT and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Anti–PD-1 Shows Response in Murine Immunological T-cell–High and T-cell–Low PDAC Models
Supplementary Figure 3. Positive control X-ray. (A) Confocal 40x images of T-cell high (left hand side) and T-cell low (right hand side) KPC clones nucleus (DAPI) and yH2AX, 1 hour after X-ray radiation (+) or without (-). (B) Average yH2AX foci per nucleus in in T-cell high (magenta) and T-cell low (blue) KPC clones. All the statistics produced here were calculated using two-way ANOVA (analysis of variance) followed by the Tukey’s method for multiple mean comparison * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.005, **** p < 0.0001.
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Fig. 3 from Combination of Bremachlorin PDT and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Anti–PD-1 Shows Response in Murine Immunological T-cell–High and T-cell–Low PDAC Models
Supplementary Figure 3. Positive control X-ray. (A) Confocal 40x images of T-cell high (left hand side) and T-cell low (right hand side) KPC clones nucleus (DAPI) and yH2AX, 1 hour after X-ray radiation (+) or without (-). (B) Average yH2AX foci per nucleus in in T-cell high (magenta) and T-cell low (blue) KPC clones. All the statistics produced here were calculated using two-way ANOVA (analysis of variance) followed by the Tukey’s method for multiple mean comparison * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.005, **** p < 0.0001.
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Fig. 5 from Combination of Bremachlorin PDT and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Anti–PD-1 Shows Response in Murine Immunological T-cell–High and T-cell–Low PDAC Models
Supplementary Figure 5. Representative hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) images of whole tissue slice from T-cell high tumors from the different treatment groups, top row (left to right): control, anti-PD-1 alone, PDT alone TS and PDT alone NTS. Bottom row (left to right): PDT and anti-PD-1 TS, PDT and anti-PD-1 NTS and Bremachlorin control. TS= treated side, NTS= non-treated side.
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Fig. 5 from Combination of Bremachlorin PDT and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Anti–PD-1 Shows Response in Murine Immunological T-cell–High and T-cell–Low PDAC Models
Supplementary Figure 5. Representative hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) images of whole tissue slice from T-cell high tumors from the different treatment groups, top row (left to right): control, anti-PD-1 alone, PDT alone TS and PDT alone NTS. Bottom row (left to right): PDT and anti-PD-1 TS, PDT and anti-PD-1 NTS and Bremachlorin control. TS= treated side, NTS= non-treated side.
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Fig. 6 from Combination of Bremachlorin PDT and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Anti–PD-1 Shows Response in Murine Immunological T-cell–High and T-cell–Low PDAC Models
Supplementary Figure 6. Representative hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) images of whole tissue slice from T-cell low tumors from the different treatment groups, top row (left to right): control, anti-PD-1 alone, PDT alone TS and PDT alone NTS. Bottom row (left to right): PDT and anti-PD-1 TS and PDT and anti-PD-1 NTS. TS= treated side, NTS= non-treated side.
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Fig. 6 from Combination of Bremachlorin PDT and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Anti–PD-1 Shows Response in Murine Immunological T-cell–High and T-cell–Low PDAC Models
Supplementary Figure 6. Representative hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) images of whole tissue slice from T-cell low tumors from the different treatment groups, top row (left to right): control, anti-PD-1 alone, PDT alone TS and PDT alone NTS. Bottom row (left to right): PDT and anti-PD-1 TS and PDT and anti-PD-1 NTS. TS= treated side, NTS= non-treated side.
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Fig. 2 from Combination of Bremachlorin PDT and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Anti–PD-1 Shows Response in Murine Immunological T-cell–High and T-cell–Low PDAC Models
Supplementary Figure 2. Pre-screening the photosensitizer in vitro PDT dose. PDT was performed at four different concentrations of Bremachlorin: 100, 10, 1 and 0.1 µM as well as a control (just media) at 20mW/cm2 at 0 (dark control), 5, 10, and 20 J/cm2 (biological replicate n=1) in T-cell high (top) and T-cell low (bottom). MTS assay was performed 24 hours after PDT. Dark Ctrl = dark control.
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Fig. 2 from Combination of Bremachlorin PDT and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Anti–PD-1 Shows Response in Murine Immunological T-cell–High and T-cell–Low PDAC Models
Supplementary Figure 2. Pre-screening the photosensitizer in vitro PDT dose. PDT was performed at four different concentrations of Bremachlorin: 100, 10, 1 and 0.1 µM as well as a control (just media) at 20mW/cm2 at 0 (dark control), 5, 10, and 20 J/cm2 (biological replicate n=1) in T-cell high (top) and T-cell low (bottom). MTS assay was performed 24 hours after PDT. Dark Ctrl = dark control.
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Fig. 1 from Combination of Bremachlorin PDT and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Anti–PD-1 Shows Response in Murine Immunological T-cell–High and T-cell–Low PDAC Models
Supplementary Figure 1. Confocal 40x images of control conditions: negative control - no Bremachlorin, no Mitotracker® Green (left hand side); 100 µM Bremachlorin alone and no Mitotracker® Green (middle), no Bremachlorin and MitoTracker® Green alone (right hand side). From top to bottom: Bremachlorin, MitoTracker® Green, composite of Bremachlorin and MitoTracker® Green and bright field in T-cell low clones.
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Fig. 1 from Combination of Bremachlorin PDT and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Anti–PD-1 Shows Response in Murine Immunological T-cell–High and T-cell–Low PDAC Models
Supplementary Figure 1. Confocal 40x images of control conditions: negative control - no Bremachlorin, no Mitotracker® Green (left hand side); 100 µM Bremachlorin alone and no Mitotracker® Green (middle), no Bremachlorin and MitoTracker® Green alone (right hand side). From top to bottom: Bremachlorin, MitoTracker® Green, composite of Bremachlorin and MitoTracker® Green and bright field in T-cell low clones.
- Open Access
- 2 April 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Data from Combination of Bremachlorin PDT and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Anti–PD-1 Shows Response in Murine Immunological T-cell–High and T-cell–Low PDAC Models
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most challenging types of cancer with little or no response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been shown to ablate tumors and induce an immune response. In our study, we investigated the effect of PDT using the photosensitizer Bremachlorin, in its ability to reduce tumor burden and immunologically sensitize T-cell–high and T-cell–low murine PDAC tumors to the ICIs that blocks PD-1 immune checkpoint. In addition, we monitored the effect on survival and investigated if there was a response in PDT-treated and non–PDT-treated distant tumors. Our results showed that Bremachlorin PDT induces direct tumor killing that increased survival in both “hot” T-cell–high and “cold” T-cell–low PDAC tumors and that it can make T-cell–high tumors more sensitive to ICIs blocking PD-1. We found that T-cell–high tumor-bearing mice had an overall greater response to therapy than did T-cell–low tumor-bearing mice. One mouse with T-cell–high tumors exhibited complete tumor regression in both the treated and nontreated distant tumor 90 days after treatment. These results indicate that combining ICIs with Bremachlorin PDT could be a promising therapeutic intervention for enhancing PDAC’s response to therapy.
- 2 April 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessData from Combination of Bremachlorin PDT and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Anti–PD-1 Shows Response in Murine Immunological T-cell–High and T-cell–Low PDAC Models
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most challenging types of cancer with little or no response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been shown to ablate tumors and induce an immune response. In our study, we investigated the effect of PDT using the photosensitizer Bremachlorin, in its ability to reduce tumor burden and immunologically sensitize T-cell–high and T-cell–low murine PDAC tumors to the ICIs that blocks PD-1 immune checkpoint. In addition, we monitored the effect on survival and investigated if there was a response in PDT-treated and non–PDT-treated distant tumors. Our results showed that Bremachlorin PDT induces direct tumor killing that increased survival in both “hot” T-cell–high and “cold” T-cell–low PDAC tumors and that it can make T-cell–high tumors more sensitive to ICIs blocking PD-1. We found that T-cell–high tumor-bearing mice had an overall greater response to therapy than did T-cell–low tumor-bearing mice. One mouse with T-cell–high tumors exhibited complete tumor regression in both the treated and nontreated distant tumor 90 days after treatment. These results indicate that combining ICIs with Bremachlorin PDT could be a promising therapeutic intervention for enhancing PDAC’s response to therapy.
- Open Access
- 2 April 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Fig. 7 from Combination of Bremachlorin PDT and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Anti–PD-1 Shows Response in Murine Immunological T-cell–High and T-cell–Low PDAC Models
Supplementary Figure 7. Representative images at 20x magnification of immunofluorescence analysis of CD8+ cells of T-cell high 500% tumor tissue of PDT and anti-PD-1 treated side (left) and non-treated side (right) (A). Absolute number of CD8+ cells quantified in T-cell high (B). TS= treated side, NTS= non-treated side.
- 2 April 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Fig. 7 from Combination of Bremachlorin PDT and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Anti–PD-1 Shows Response in Murine Immunological T-cell–High and T-cell–Low PDAC Models
Supplementary Figure 7. Representative images at 20x magnification of immunofluorescence analysis of CD8+ cells of T-cell high 500% tumor tissue of PDT and anti-PD-1 treated side (left) and non-treated side (right) (A). Absolute number of CD8+ cells quantified in T-cell high (B). TS= treated side, NTS= non-treated side.
- Open Access
- 2 April 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Fig. 2 from Combination of Bremachlorin PDT and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Anti–PD-1 Shows Response in Murine Immunological T-cell–High and T-cell–Low PDAC Models
Supplementary Figure 2. Pre-screening the photosensitizer in vitro PDT dose. PDT was performed at four different concentrations of Bremachlorin: 100, 10, 1 and 0.1 µM as well as a control (just media) at 20mW/cm2 at 0 (dark control), 5, 10, and 20 J/cm2 (biological replicate n=1) in T-cell high (top) and T-cell low (bottom). MTS assay was performed 24 hours after PDT. Dark Ctrl = dark control.
- 2 April 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Fig. 2 from Combination of Bremachlorin PDT and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Anti–PD-1 Shows Response in Murine Immunological T-cell–High and T-cell–Low PDAC Models
Supplementary Figure 2. Pre-screening the photosensitizer in vitro PDT dose. PDT was performed at four different concentrations of Bremachlorin: 100, 10, 1 and 0.1 µM as well as a control (just media) at 20mW/cm2 at 0 (dark control), 5, 10, and 20 J/cm2 (biological replicate n=1) in T-cell high (top) and T-cell low (bottom). MTS assay was performed 24 hours after PDT. Dark Ctrl = dark control.