René Laschak Pinto Gonçalves has a total of 4 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Metamodelling of the Correlations of Preform and Part Performance for Preform Optimisation in Sheet Moulding Compound Processing

    by Christian Hopmann, Jonas Neuhaus, Kai Fischer, Daniel Schneider, René Laschak Pinto Gonçalves

    In the design of parts consisting of long-fibre-reinforced Sheet Moulding Compounds (SMC), the potential for the optimisation of processing parameters and geometrical design is limited due to the high number of interdependent variables. One of the influences on fibre orientations and therefore mechanical part performance is the initial filling state of the compression moulding tool, which is defined by the geometry and positioning of the SMC preform. In the past, response surface methodology and linear regression analysis were successfully used for a simulation-based optimisation of rectangular preform size and position in regard to a part performance parameter. However, the computational demand of these increase exponentially with an increase in the number of design variables, such as in the case of more complex preform geometries. In this paper, these restrictions are addressed with a novel approach for metamodelling the correlation of preform and the resulting mechanical part performance. The approach is applied to predicting the maximum absolute deflection of a plate geometry under bending load. For metamodelling, multiple neural networks (NN) are trained on a dataset obtained by process and structural simulation. Based on the discretisation of the plate geometry used in these simulation procedures, the binary initial filling states (completely filled/empty) of each element are used as inputs of the NNs. Outputs of the NNs are combined by ensemble modelling to form the metamodel. The metamodel allows an accurate prediction of maximum deflection; subsequent validation of the metamodel shows differences in predicted and simulated maximum deflection ranging from 0.26% to 2.67%. Subsequently, the metamodel is evaluated using a mutation algorithm for finding a preform that reduces the maximum deflection.