Rajan Frcs (Plast) Uppal

Background: Aesthetic rhinoplasty is one of the most challenging procedures performed by aesthetic surgeons. Tip droop, especially on smiling, may not be noted by the surgeon postoperatively but can be concerning to patients. Our aim was to determine if the division of the depressor septi nasi or its combination with a columellar strut graft during rhinoplasty produce a measurable reduction in nasal tip droop on smiling. Methods: A retrospective casenote and photograph review was conducted on patients who had undergone aesthetic endonasal rhinoplasty, performed by a single surgeon between 2015 and 2019. In total, 29 patients had release of the depressor septi nasi muscle, whilst 11 had release of the muscle along with a strut graft. Lateral smiling photographs were taken postoperatively. Tip droop was measured as a variation of the nasolabial angle from rest to smiling using the Frankfurt line. Results: Photographs were taken at a mean of 14 months postoperatively. In the group who had muscle release only, a mean increase in nasolabial angle of 3.66 degrees was seen when smiling when compared with rest. In the group who had muscle release combined with strut graft, a mean increase of 2.27 degrees was seen. When using a columellar strut along with muscle release, tip droop on smiling was reduced. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that columellar strut grafting in combination with muscle release can alleviate drooping of the tip better than muscle division alone after rhinoplasty. The columellar strut graft provides tip stability and can therefore be used to enhance dynamic outcomes after rhinoplasty.

Background: The columella is an underrepresented part of rhinoplasty. The objective of this study was to assess the outcome of columella correction following rhinoplasty and to assess any differences in the open and endonasal approach.Methods: This is a retrospective study involving 65 rhinoplasty patients, who were divided into 2 groups depending on whether they had an open or endonasal approach. Fifteen patients underwent the open procedure, and 50 patients underwent the endonasal approach. Patients who underwent endonasal rhinoplasty were compared with open rhinoplasty patients in terms of their final outcome, with a focus on the columellar correction. The classification by Rohrich and Liu and Gunter’s distance between the nasal axis and columella were used to assess the correction.Results: The overall incidence of columellar correction was 90% in the endonasal group (45 of 50 patients) and 67% in the open approach group (10 of 15 patients); a comparison shows aPvalue of 0.043 (Pvalue of 0.036 (Pvalue of <0.001, suggesting a greater overall reduction using the endonasal approach. This may be related to differences in distribution of the deformities within the 2 groups.Conclusions: There is no standard way to correct the columella, but it is important to identify the deformity and the need to correct it. In our patients, we found comparable outcomes in achieving a satisfactory columella in the open and endonasal groups.