Bartosz Krzowski

Background/Objectives: Hepatic steatosis and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) are cardiometabolic phenotypes relevant to atrial fibrillation (AF), but their prevalence and acute procedural relevance in pulsed field ablation (PFA) are poorly defined. We estimated the prevalence of hepato-renal index (HRI)-detected hepatic steatosis, assessed liver marker concordance, and explored acute procedural characteristics. Methods: In this single-centre prospective study, 99 consecutive eligible patients undergoing first-time PFA for AF underwent B-mode hepatic ultrasound. Hepatic steatosis was defined a priori as HRI ≥ 1.28, measured offline by an investigator blinded to clinical and procedural data. HRI-based MASLD-compatible phenotype, Hepatic Steatosis Index (HSI), BARD score, and Fibrosis-4 index were analysed as secondary liver markers. Results: HRI-detected hepatic steatosis was present in 62/99 patients (62.6%, 95% CI 52.8–71.5), and HRI-based MASLD-compatible phenotype in 55/99 (55.6%, 95% CI 45.7–65.0). Agreement between HRI and HSI was poor (Cohen’s κ = 0.01; prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted κ +0.06; positive agreement 62%). Acute pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in all patients. First-pass isolation was high in both groups (91.9% vs. 81.1%; p = 0.124). Most procedural metrics were similar. Fluoroscopy dose was modestly higher in patients with steatosis (median 226 vs. 207 mGy; p = 0.035), but this exploratory signal was inconsistent across sensitivity analyses. In-hospital complications were infrequent (4/99, 4.0%). Conclusions: In first-time PFA patients with feasible HRI assessment, hepatic steatosis was common, liver marker classifications showed limited patient-level agreement, and acute procedural conduct showed no consistent steatosis-specific signal. Long-term rhythm durability requires dedicated follow-up.

Association of Permanent Atrial Fibrillation with Mortality and Heart Failure Progression in Low Thromboembolic Risk Patients - Article abstract #951355

Background/Objectives: Hemorrhagic complications are among the most common adverse events of anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are known to be more effective than vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in preventing thromboembolism. The aim was to identify clinical factors associated with hemorrhagic events in AF patients treated with DOACs and to develop a simple, clinically applicable bleeding risk score. Methods: Data were derived from the multicenter CRAFT trial (NCT02987062). We conducted a retrospective analysis of hospital records of 1435 AF patients (median age: 67 years; 44.8% female) treated with dabigatran or rivaroxaban. The main study endpoints were the occurrence of a bleeding episode, thromboembolic episode, or all-cause death during a mean four-year follow-up (1531 [1062–2140] days). Results: The rates of bleeding episodes, thromboembolic episodes, and all-cause death were 17.4%, 13.5%, and 23.9%, respectively. Nine factors were identified as predictors of bleeding complications: male sex, history of major bleeding, history of cancer, COPD, CRT, rivaroxaban therapy, statin therapy, age, and absence of heart failure. Based on these, the CRAFT bleeding score was developed to predict the risk of hemorrhagic events in individual patients. Conclusions: The CRAFT bleeding score may be implemented in AF patients as an additional tool for evaluating DOACs safety prior to initiating anticoagulant therapy, and for guiding closer monitoring of high-risk individuals to minimize bleeding complications.

Background: Pharmacological cardioversion (PCV) is one of the therapeutic options within rhythm control strategies for atrial fibrillation (AF). Data on clinical determinants influencing its effectiveness and safety in real-world settings remain limited.Methods: This study is a sub-analysis of the multicenter Cardioversion with Intravenous Antazoline in Atrial Fibrillation II (CANT II) registry. The registry retrospectively included consecutive patients with recent-onset AF undergoing urgent PCV in six Polish centers between 2019 and 2020. We analyzed 931 patients stratified according to CHA₂DS₂-VASc score: Group I (0–1 points; n = 194), Group II (2–4 points; n = 580), and Group III (≥5 points; n = 157). The primary endpoint was successful restoration of sinus rhythm within 12 h, and the secondary endpoint was a composite of adverse events (death, syncope, bradycardia, hypotension).Results: The median age was 69 years, 48% were men, and the median CHA₂DS₂-VASc score was 3. Antazoline was used in 59% of patients, amiodarone in 53%, and propafenone in 19%. Sinus rhythm was restored in 69%, 70%, and 64% of patients in Groups I, II, and III, respectively (p = 0.45). The overall adverse event rate was low (2.1%) and did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.16). Antazoline was most effective in Group I, while propafenone showed higher efficacy in Group II.Conclusions: In this retrospective sub-analysis of the CANT II registry, success of pharmacological cardioversion of AF is not associated with number of comorbidities as assessed by the CHA2DS2VASc score. PCV remains a feasible and generally safe option in emergency and cardiology department practice.

Background: Ablation techniques have evolved greatly with advances in high-density 3D mapping systems over the last few years. Some patients develop atypical atrial flutter (AAFL) after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). The data regarding follow-up after AAFL ablation as well as predictors of arrhythmia recurrence are lacking. This analysis aims to report procedure success rates and establish predictors of long-term success. Methods and Results: This retrospective cohort study included 45 patients (median age: 69 years; 40% female) who qualified for their first AAFL after PVI. The procedures were performed with the use of conventional ablation-index-guided ThermoCool Smarttouch SF and QDOT MICRO catheters. Freedom from arrhythmia recurrence was used as a primary end point. After 52 weeks of follow-up, 60% of patients suffered from arrhythmia recurrence, but over 70% of the studied cohort reported symptom improvement. In multivariate analysis, class I antiarrhythmics prescription (HR = 0.24 [95% CI 0.06–0.94], p = 0.04) was associated with the lack of arrhythmia recurrence during the follow-up, while cardioversion during procedure was associated with increased risk of arrhythmia recurrence (HR = 7.05 [95% CI 2.09–23.72], p = 0.002). Conclusions: Long-term success of AAFL ablation procedures is not satisfactory despite improvement in symptoms. Class I antiarrhythmics prescription at the discharge contributes to higher chances of sinus rhythm maintenance, whereas cardioversion during the procedure is related to increased risk of arrhythmia recurrence.

MHealth solutions optimize cardiovascular risk factor control in coronary artery disease. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of mobile app AfterAMI on quality of life in patients after myocardial infarction. 100 participants were randomized (1:1 ratio) into groups: (1) with a rehabilitation program and access to afterAMI or (2) standard rehabilitation alone (control group, CG). 3 questionnaires (MacNew, DASS21 and EQ-5D-5L) were used at baseline, 1 month and 6 months after discharge. Median age was 61 years; 35% of patients were female. At 1 month follow up patients using AfterAMI had higher general quality of life scores both in MacNew [5.78 vs. 5.5 in CG, p = 0.037] and EQ-5D-5L [80 vs. 70 in CG, p = 0.007]. At 6 months, according to MacNew, the app group had significantly higher scores in emotional [6.09 vs. 5.45 in CG, p= 0.017] and physical [6.2 vs. 6 in CG, p = 0.027] aspects. The general MacNew quality of life score was also higher in the AfterAMI group [6.11 vs. 5.7 in CG, p = 0.015], but differences in EQ-5D-5L were not significant. There were no differences between groups in the DASS21 questionnaire. mHealth interventions may improve quality of care in secondary prevention, however further studies are warranted.

Cardiac rehabilitation after acute myocardial infarction is crucial and improves patients’ prognosis. It aims to optimize cardiovascular risk factors’ control. Providing additional support via mobile applications has been previously suggested. However, data from prospective, randomized trials evaluating digital solutions are scarce. In this study, we aimed to evaluate a mobile application—afterAMI—in the clinical setting and to investigate the impact of a digitally-supported model of care in comparison with standard rehabilitation. A total of 100 patients after myocardial infarction were enrolled. Patients were randomized into groups with either a rehabilitation program and access to afterAMI or standard rehabilitation alone. The primary endpoint was rehospitalizations and/or urgent outpatient visits after 6 months. Cardiovascular risk factors’ control was also analyzed. Median age was 61 years; 65% of the participants were male. This study failed to limit the number of primary endpoint events (8% with app vs. 27% without app; p = 0.064). However, patients in the interventional group had lower NT-proBNP levels (p = 0.0231) and better knowledge regarding cardiovascular disease risk factors (p = 0.0009), despite no differences at baseline. This study showcases how a telemedical tool can be used in the clinical setting.